Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Entertainment (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/)
-   -   Original Star Wars vs. Star Wars SE (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/51456-original-star-wars-vs-star-wars-se.html)

PredeconInferno 04-05-2004 01:40 PM

Original Star Wars vs. Star Wars SE
 
I don't know about this one.

I got into an argument with one of my friends on which was better, and he seems to COMPLETELY believe the originals were better.

He couldn't offer even an ounce of logical argument as to why he felt that way, he just did.

So I'd like to hear it from someone here, what are your opinions? and why please?

Kadath 04-05-2004 01:46 PM

Because Han shot first. He is a dirty motherfucker, and I hate that Lucas changed it to make him the good guy. The scene with Jabba in A New Hope was not overly strong, and didn't add much to the movie. The new dance number in Return of the Jedi was appallingly bad.

I don't actually care much for myself, but I hate that the new generation will not have even the option to see the original.

Cynthetiq 04-05-2004 02:08 PM

right... Han being the scoundrel that he's supposed to be, that's reason enough.

it was the ORIGINAL vision and not a rewrite or additional stuff because he finally had more money and more time.

If everyone got to redo stuff then we'd always have things that were work in progress.

Speed_Gibson 04-05-2004 02:25 PM

Quote:

Because Han shot first. He is a dirty motherfucker, and I hate that Lucas changed it to make him the good guy.
Never have seen the full 'Butchered Edition' release but that small change ruined the entire thing (what I saw of it) for me.

Ace_O_Spades 04-05-2004 02:46 PM

personally i felt the added special effects took away from the imagination and immersiveness it left to the viewer by physically being able to show anything

i think the originals are better

FaderMonkey 04-05-2004 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ace_O_Spades
personally i felt the added special effects took away from the imagination and immersiveness it left to the viewer by physically being able to show anything

i think the originals are better

I agree. There is something to be said about the artistic quality of a film when your abilities are limited. Now that Lucas can pretty much do whatever he wants visually, the films have lost something.

bparker805 04-05-2004 03:21 PM

I guess i might be in the minority here. But if its Star Wars, chances are I'm going to like it even if it sucks. I like the Special Edition because it gave me more to watch/look at. I really dont care if Lucas changes things. It's his story and he can do what he wants with it. And with that, I will climb back into my bomb shelter...

shakran 04-05-2004 03:56 PM

what if Shakespeare came back today and decided to rewrite Romeo and Juliet?

do you think that "hey hunk, ditch your dad and old lady and let's get hitched" sounds better than "wherefore art thou Romeo?"

Kinda the same thing with star wars. If you have a classic, and you fuck with it, it's just not a classic anymore.

SecretMethod70 04-05-2004 04:09 PM

You know, I'm impartial on most parts of this debate, but I definitely think Han should have been left shooting first and that the ending of Return of the Jedi sucked with the new music, etc.

I don't mind the changes so much as the fact people won't get the option of which they'd like to own on DVD.

Redjake 04-05-2004 04:51 PM

I don't mind the "Han shoots first" thing. What I do mind is how the graphics (in my opinion) weren't quite good enough to add them into a really old movie (i.e. ROTJ scene with singers at Jabba's palace). The graphics were ok then, now they just plain suck and seem out of place.

gnort 04-05-2004 04:59 PM

Im not a fan of the CGI just thrown into a movie that rocked without it. Bring back the little models of ships flying around.

[goes to watch original Star Wars sans CGI]

Lebell 04-05-2004 05:48 PM

Han.

Shot.

First.



Period.


(Damn you, George!)

phukraut 04-05-2004 06:26 PM

i'm not sure what version SE is supposed to be.. but if it's the one with all the added scenes and new effects and so on i have to agree that the original is better. the scene with jabba just didn't seem to fit (i mean, jabba leaves his cushy lair to talk to han personally, and then swallows a simple lie? was this scene really crucial?), and the other one near the end where the x-wing pilots chat before the run on the death star just seemed pointless and boring. i almost fell asleep at one point before luke sold his wheels.

the original was compact and streamlined, and the effects still stand up today thanks to great model-work.

PredeconInferno 04-05-2004 06:37 PM

SE is the "Special Edition"

Kinda like you can get a car that's "SE" Only those are usually better... the consensus here is that this "SE" sucks

Batman976 04-05-2004 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by phukraut
the scene with jabba just didn't seem to fit (i mean, jabba leaves his cushy lair to talk to han personally, and then swallows a simple lie? was this scene really crucial?)
Not to mention he just let Han walk all over him (literally). I thought Jabba was supposed to be a powerful, feared creature. You don't get that way without demanding some respect.

Stare At The Sun 04-05-2004 07:00 PM

I wish they would have just made the film look better, by taking out all the grain. Other than that, the dance number in ROTJ was horrid. and yes HAN SHOT FIRST.

I'll still by the SE though...

Fremen 04-05-2004 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Stare At The Sun
I wish they would have just made the film look better, by taking out all the grain.
Yeah. :)
And I'm glad they got rid of all those black boxes around the ships in space.

guthmund 04-05-2004 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Batman976
Not to mention he just let Han walk all over him (literally). I thought Jabba was supposed to be a powerful, feared creature. You don't get that way without demanding some respect.
The "hanger" Jabba was such a pussy. Making stupid faces, shrugging and the dialogue?!? Jabba was supposed to be a bad-ass not a used car salesman.

Cleaning it up was fine. Adding extra shit to show off your superior CGI skills isn't.

RedCometChar 04-05-2004 10:41 PM

I prefer the SEs for the visual cleanup, though I admit many of the added visual effects are unnecessary- and I don't mean just Han's "gunfight". I mean things like a pointless shot of a Dewback walking through a scene, or that Jawa's whatchamacallit thing rearing up on its hind legs.

The SE of A New Hope did have some small stuff missing that probably shouldn't have been in the final cut anyway- like the guy in the werewolf mask, or Vader using the Force to fetch a wineglass (how's he supposed to drink it?).

Bobaphat 04-05-2004 10:47 PM

I didn't like the CGI at all. IT wasn't that great for one (jabba looked terrible) and it was just plain out of place. It looked wrong.

Lasereth 04-06-2004 05:13 AM

There's a general rule to follow when doing CGI in movies: how good will it look years down the road?

James Cameron used a ton of CGI in Terminator 2 because he knew it would look good ten years later. Guess what? It still does.

The Star Wars SE graphics are already incredible shit. It was a bad idea. CGI was NOT developed enough to do what they wanted, and now it looks like an episode of a Saturday Morning cartoon.

Episode 1 did this well...it still has superb graphics (better than Episode 2 in most parts). It all depends on what you're trying to do with what you have. If the technology isn't advanced enough to make it look real years from now, then don't fucking do it! So many movies have made this mistake (Terminator 3!!!).

-Lasereth

Kostya 04-06-2004 08:23 AM

Despite my penchant for DVD's, the fact that Lucas has flat out refused to release the original cuts means I will have to purchase worn out copies on VHS from some back alley record exchange. Still better than CGI shit. I've never seen the Greedo shooting first thing, mainly because I don't want to have to burn my TV to cleanse it afterwards, not to mention the rage, the overwhelming urge to kill that accompanies such a heresy.

m0rpheus 04-06-2004 09:45 AM

Greedo doesnt shoot. Not first, not ever.

Reasons
1) The shot looked horrible, he's sitting 2 feet from Han and misses. Was he aiming at a fly on the wall? Did he train at the Stormtrooper acadamy???

2) It ruins the character development Han has through the movies. In the real SW he starts as a dirty bastard who does what he needs to survive (IE blowing the crap out of Greedo) then over the course of the series becomes a hero. But in the Shit Edition he only shoots because Greedo did, making it an easy case of the hero defending himself.

The only SE I didnt mind was Empire, mainly because it was the one that Lucas didnt really fuck with (only adding in a few scenes of things like the Falcon flying to Cloud City which were really just tacked in so he'd have a "Special Edition")

punx1325 04-06-2004 04:33 PM

I guess I am one of those minorities too, I liked the few CGI touches. Yes, the dance scene was bad and Han did shoot first, but it didn't ruin the movie. If you are going to bitch about the smallest detail, then I don't want to know what you have to say about Jar Jar.

Sparhawk 04-06-2004 04:54 PM

I'm not so much of a purist as to say "Han shot first, that makes this crap," but what bothers me is how lame the scene looks. I mean, it just LOOKED fake. That and the ROTJ dance annoy me. I guess I'm one of the few, however, who thought the ending music to ROTJ was an improvement.

It's a wash IMO, and I'm still buying it :)

Redjake 04-06-2004 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sparhawk
I'm not so much of a purist as to say "Han shot first, that makes this crap," but what bothers me is how lame the scene looks. I mean, it just LOOKED fake.
same here, I totally agree. it was done badly in the graphics department.

Cynthetiq 04-06-2004 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kostya
Despite my penchant for DVD's, the fact that Lucas has flat out refused to release the original cuts means I will have to purchase worn out copies on VHS from some back alley record exchange. Still better than CGI shit. I've never seen the Greedo shooting first thing, mainly because I don't want to have to burn my TV to cleanse it afterwards, not to mention the rage, the overwhelming urge to kill that accompanies such a heresy.
or the LaserDisc box set :)

dy156 04-07-2004 06:56 AM

The greedo and Jabba scenes were bad enough, but the addition of another song in Jabba's palace? What was this? a musical??!!

The one song I remember was taken out and replaced. The old ewok song was pretty hokey, but it makes me sad that kids won't ever get to hear

"Rub-Dub, edub be Chub-Chub, edub be wo be waddley-do be dob be waa duuu waaahhh!"

I'll still probably buy it.

FaderMonkey 04-07-2004 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kostya
Despite my penchant for DVD's, the fact that Lucas has flat out refused to release the original cuts means I will have to purchase worn out copies on VHS from some back alley record exchange. Still better than CGI shit. I've never seen the Greedo shooting first thing, mainly because I don't want to have to burn my TV to cleanse it afterwards, not to mention the rage, the overwhelming urge to kill that accompanies such a heresy.
Quote:

Originally posted by Cynthetiq
or the LaserDisc box set :)
Yeah, go for the laserdiscs. That's what I did. I didn't have a laserdisc player, so I got one pretty cheap on eBay.

shakran 04-07-2004 08:08 AM

Greedo shooting first doesn't even make sense. He's sitting 1 foot away from Han with a weapon that's even more impossible to dodge than a bullet, and he doesn't HIT Han when he shoots first?

Charlatan 04-07-2004 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by shakran
what if Shakespeare came back today and decided to rewrite Romeo and Juliet?

do you think that "hey hunk, ditch your dad and old lady and let's get hitched" sounds better than "wherefore art thou Romeo?"

Kinda the same thing with star wars. If you have a classic, and you fuck with it, it's just not a classic anymore.

I can't believe you just compared George Lucas to Shakespeare... :crazy:

Kadath 04-07-2004 09:38 AM

The comparison was more "Star Wars to Romeo and Juliet", but the point is still valid. Maybe "if Coppola redid the Godfather trilogy" would be a better analogy.

Cynthetiq 04-07-2004 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kadath
The comparison was more "Star Wars to Romeo and Juliet", but the point is still valid. Maybe "if Coppola redid the Godfather trilogy" would be a better analogy.
Coppola did get bitten by the bug, Apocalypse Now: Redux.

shakran 04-07-2004 01:58 PM

Actually, you both missed the point. The point was, tampering with the classics rarely makes the classic better.

Kadath 04-07-2004 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by shakran
Actually, you both missed the point. The point was, tampering with the classics rarely makes the classic better.
Yeah, I think putting the works of Shakespeare on the same plane as Star Wars is what spurred the debate. I'll agree they're both classics, but the term clearly has degrees.

Bonesaw 04-07-2004 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FaderMonkey
Yeah, go for the laserdiscs. That's what I did. I didn't have a laserdisc player, so I got one pretty cheap on eBay.
Yuppers....and I watch the originals with my 3 year old son all the time and he's never seen the SE versions.

Fire 04-07-2004 09:25 PM

ya know- the SE should have been my clue that lucas was headed down the shittube- fuck, Howard the duck, SE, EP 1, Ep 2, I grew up with the OT, and am constantly shocked by how much george has let me down........

Cynthetiq 04-07-2004 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fire
ya know- the SE should have been my clue that lucas was headed down the shittube- fuck, Howard the duck, SE, EP 1, Ep 2, I grew up with the OT, and am constantly shocked by how much george has let me down........
really?

did you forget that he was part of Indiana Jones franchise and also Willow?

Derwood 04-08-2004 06:20 AM

I'll try to paraphrase what I said in the Box Set thread:

Lucas has fallen in love with his own innovations. He is now all style and no substance. I think that Peter Jackson proved that a filmmaker can create a lush, fantastic epic film without 650 effects shots and 100% digital backgrounds. In fact, Jackson used many techniques that Lucas was using in the 70's and 80's (filming miniatures, using matte compositing, etc.)

What made the original films great WASN'T the special effects or the battle scenes or what have you. It was the story. It was the characters. What the new films lack is just that. There is no rogue (Han), there is no smart ass (Leia). Everyone is very straight forward and cold.

Somewhere Lucas was led astray and thinks that SW fans want dazzle instead of substance. We don't want 3 prequels that are about politics and government (which they plots really are when you look at them). We could give a shit about trade federations and the galactic senate. What the original films had (and what LOTR had, which made them great) was a clear and present danger that had to be eliminated by the underdog. The prequels have no such things.

I'll wrap up this rant by saying that in all my life, I never thought I'd say that there were films that were better than the SW trilogy, but I'm starting to leave them behind.

Kostya 04-08-2004 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kadath
Maybe "if Coppola redid the Godfather trilogy" would be a better analogy.
Or maybe the thought of that just makes me want to DIE. Except if he improved Godfather Part III, by unmaking it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360