03-16-2004, 06:23 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Reading
I'm pretty bored at the moment and I've been thinking, what are some benifits of reading? What's the difference between like reading a book and watching tv or listening to an audio book?
__________________
smoking weed everyday keeps the doctor away |
03-16-2004, 06:30 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Illinois
|
I've never listened to audio books, but reading is a lot more detailed in some ways than watching T.V. You get the chance to really get in the character's mind and how they're thinking. Events seem to happen both slower and faster at the same time. It's also good just to sit down and relax with a good book.
|
03-16-2004, 06:50 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Holy Knight of The Alliance
Location: Stormwind, The Eastern Kingdoms, Azeroth
|
Ain't that the damn truth. The incredible imagery and depth that most books have just make it more enjoyable than watching TV.
__________________
What do you say to one last showdown? - Ocelot, Metal Gear Solid 3 The password is "Who are the Patriots?" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo." "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo." Gotcha. - The Colonel and Snake, Metal Gear Solid 3 |
03-16-2004, 08:15 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Comment or else!!
Location: Home sweet home
|
What Milkman said.
Also, one importantadvantage reading have over movies, tv is that reading will not disapoint the reader. Movies and tv tend to kill the reader's imagination. I've been disapointed many a times when I go see a movie thats based on a book. Only to be pissed that its not as good as I'd imagined it to be.
__________________
Him: Ok, I have to ask, what do you believe? Me: Shit happens. |
03-16-2004, 09:01 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Lincoln
|
The best thing about reading is your imagination is allowed to go nuts. You can picture things the way you like them a lot better than somebody in a TV studio can. Also, another benefit is that reading a book is a lot more accessable, you can take them just about anywhere.
|
03-16-2004, 10:51 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: Orange County, California
|
Not only that but when you reflect on a book you read, you imagine the images that came from your imagination and not what some director thought you should see. Movies are great, however, they cannot hold a candle to a good book.
|
03-17-2004, 12:53 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Delicious
|
For me, I read mainly because there's a huge supply of books in the genres that I like. Your imigination is the limit - Things are more grand, more beautiful, or more terrifying than something that can ever be portrayed in movies. Movies are a quick fix, and books are something that can keep you thinking about them for a very long time after you've finished them.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry |
03-20-2004, 09:45 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Femme Fatale
Location: Elysium
|
reading allows you to recognize words/letters quickly which will make you be able to read faster
it'll also improve your spelling
__________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip. |
03-20-2004, 10:07 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
Television and films are passive media, you sit and consume them and have no active agency in its creation.
Books are an active medium, in order to engage in a book fully you muct actively complete the text with your own imaginative abilities. Add to this the fact that almost all television and much of film today are all about selling you products. This is much less that case when it comes to books.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
03-20-2004, 10:23 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Minion of the scaléd ones
Location: Northeast Jesusland
|
Frankly, I like reading because it's quiet. I can listen to music and read at the same time, and I can also read and abosrb the rare moments of peace and quiet I get in a house with two daughters. (Pronounce like laughter and you'll get the picture.)
Also, movies (with a few notable exceptions) are 2 or 3 hours long. A good book can last me days (at least a whole day). If every bit of a good book were put in a movie, the movie would be at least 6 hours long. Further, books can impart information that just doesn't make good film. I have nothing to say about audio books.
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
03-22-2004, 05:43 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Reading leaves more to the imagination....I dont think you are up for quite as much dissapointment as you potentially are with movies/tv.
__________________
"Is it so small a thing to have enjoyed the sun, to have lived long in the spring, to have loved, to have thought, to have done." -Matthew Arnold |
03-22-2004, 07:42 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Guest
|
Also, with reading, you're open to so many more interpretations... not only does it exercise your imagination, but it makes you think at the same time...
Nothing is better than a good book.. nothing can give you the same emotions, because a movie or an audio tape is already filled with someone else's interpretation. Given the choice... always pick reading... (plus, its easily transportable. Great for the bus/ bus stop for us poor university students) |
03-22-2004, 08:51 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Japan
|
Not to mention that books are the best medium for those who are deaf. For the blind; braille. I'm as big of a fan of technology as the next guy, but nothing beats reading for your entertainment needs!
__________________
all work and no play make Date something something |
03-29-2004, 05:59 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: The Tip of the Boot
|
If I watch something on TV, I get what the creator of the show has pre-packaged the way they want me to see it. If I read a book, I am able to exercise my imagination, and that to me is infinitely more valuable.
__________________
Louisiana: We're Not ALL Drunken Cajun Wackos, But That's Our Tourism Campaign |
04-02-2004, 05:56 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: Princeton, NJ
|
Plus books have no commercials.
Seriously, this is one of my biggest gripes with TV. A study by Harvard Sociologist Juliet Schor found that every hour of TV you watch per week, on average, increases the amount of money you spend by $208 a year, controling for income and a bunch of other factors. So someone who watches an average of 14 hours a week (2 a day) spends $2912 more a year then someone with the same income who watched no TV. It deadens your mind and then indoctrinates you into our national religion of commercialism. |
Tags |
reading |
|
|