Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Entertainment (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/)
-   -   Explain American censorship rationally (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/127749-explain-american-censorship-rationally.html)

highthief 11-22-2007 07:15 PM

Explain American censorship rationally
 
OK, so last night I watched Dodgeball (the Ben Stiller/Vince Vaughn movie) on a Canadian station - probably CITY TV. I had never seen the movie before and found it funny, especially at the end when the little blond girl's girlfriend blows into town after the tournament and they kiss on screen, leading to a lesbian/bisexual joke.

Tonight, the same movie was on FOX so I watched again as I missed the first part and the wife had not seen it at all. Throughout the movie, many jokes are made of a sexual nature, and the team is depicted in full S&M get up (a joke is even made about submissives). At the end of the film, I am expecting the two girls to kiss - they have shown other kisses already in the film - but they cut that out. They still make a les/bi joke but don't show the actual kiss.

So, basically - WTF? That is such a weird thing to censor - especially as there have been plenty of lesbian kisses on screen in prime time on US network. Is it a FOX thing? Or a more general American thing?

ratbastid 11-22-2007 07:30 PM

Fox has no problem pushing the edge of what's allowable. And same-sex intimacy is absolutely not allowable on the US airwaves. They'd have the standards board all over them in a heartbeat.

Explain that rationally? When violence, murder, and dead bodies are perfectly acceptable? I can't--it's not rational.

Mister Coaster 11-22-2007 07:32 PM

The religious right wing politicians, period. They "know what's bad for your soul" and therefore won't expose it to the US public. Everyone knows lesbianism is the path to Satan, come on.

But, yeah. There is no rational explanition.

Charlatan 11-22-2007 07:38 PM

Wow. I knew that there was self-censorship occurring but I didn't think something of this nature would constitute something censurable.

That said, a lot more would be censored from the film if it were to air here.

Plan9 11-22-2007 08:17 PM

America: Decapitation is cool to show a 14 year old yet boobies are a no-no.

Go figure.

Baraka_Guru 11-22-2007 09:25 PM

Explain American censorship rationally.

The American Puritan Restoration is already underway.

spectre 11-23-2007 12:32 AM

I tend to rant about this topic pretty often, but I'll keep it short. Basically, in the early days of television there wasn't much choice (only a couple channels) so the government put someone in charge of regulating what should be allowed on the air. The man that they chose was very puritanical. To give you some idea of how puritanical, just look at shows like "Mary Kay and Johnny" and "I Love Lucy" which broke barriers which now seem ridiculous and idiotic. One barrier that they broke was having a married couple sharing a bed. Yup, you read that right, up until that point, married couples were shown sleeping in separate beds because if they shared a bed, then that meant that they had sex, and that kind of smut wasn't suitable for television. :rolleyes: Another barrier that they broke was having a pregnant Lucy on the show. The executives were extremely uncomfortable having a pregnant woman on the air and finally allowed it after Lucy and Desi consulted priests and rabbis who said they didn't find it morally objectionable. Despite this, they were never allowed to say she was "pregnant," only that she was "expecting."

They've slowly lightened up and allowed more realistic content, but despite all of the advances over the years, the rules are still very uptight.

Charlatan 11-23-2007 12:42 AM

I thought Carol and Mike Brady were the first TV couple to appear in the same bed.

highthief 11-23-2007 03:24 AM

But what is so weird to me is there is a ton of sexual innnuendo in the show, and lesbianism/homosexuality is referenced - they just don't want to show a same-sex kiss (although that barrier was broken ages ago both on primetime and daytime television).

Anyway, I don't go in for comedies much but I thought Dodgeball was worth a few chuckles.

Halx 11-23-2007 03:31 AM

My first reaction is to say, "No, I wont rationalize it. I don't even agree with it." However the networks have to a) fit the movie into a length suitable for television advertisements and b) make the movie suitable for young children to watch. Suitable is defined in a very puritanical sense. This is because the wrong people are in charge.

spectre 11-23-2007 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
I thought Carol and Mike Brady were the first TV couple to appear in the same bed.

Nope. Even Lucy and Ricky shared a bed in "I Love Lucy" long before Carol and Mike Brady. :)

Psycho Dad 11-23-2007 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spectre
Nope. Even Lucy and Ricky shared a bed in "I Love Lucy" long before Carol and Mike Brady. :)

I thought it was Bob and Emily Newhart. I remember Lucy and Ricky having twin beds.

And I'd apologize for the off topic but there is no way to rationally explain why we need protection from seeing two people of the same sex sharing a kiss on TV.

Plan9 11-23-2007 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad
...rationally explain why we need protection from seeing two people of the same sex sharing a kiss on TV.

DISCLAIMER: Just as long as it isn't two dumpy dudes with handlebar mustaches tonguing it out.

...

I can't handle that.

Psycho Dad 11-23-2007 09:50 AM

I'd rather see two fat men in wife beaters and boxer shorts kissing than the continued stereotype that gay men hang out in bars dressed like Judas Priest fan club rejects.

Even television shows that aren't subject to censorship do that. Look what The Sopranos did with Vito.

Plan9 11-23-2007 10:03 AM

/joke

...

I like the laugh track associated with interracial relationships on TV, myself.

"But she's just... so... black."

...

Well, I'm going to watch Predator on TV... nothing in that movie to censor if you live in America!

spectre 11-23-2007 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad
I thought it was Bob and Emily Newhart. I remember Lucy and Ricky having twin beds.

They did have twin beds. I'm pretty sure that they eventually switched to a single bed though.

Just to try to end the thread jack, here's the snopes article about it: http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/marykay.asp

Telluride 11-23-2007 02:51 PM

Censorship sometimes makes no sense. I've seen things on TV where words like "bitch" and "ass" were allowed, but "god" in the phrase "god damn it" was bleeped out.

Mith 11-23-2007 09:08 PM

No rational explanation for it. Rich Steves goes through Europe. He visits some incredibly well-known art exhibits. Unfortunately, here in the United States portrayal of the human form in its natural state is "dirty". This is particularly frustrating for the producers and Rick, these are things that everyone should be able to see. Ah well, 'tis the nature of the beast.

Plan9 11-23-2007 09:10 PM

Didn't Ashcroft demand some statue's bare breast be covered with a sheet during a conference or something? Talk about prude. Lady Justice's teet was too much for him to handle before he went back to his Girls Gone Wild collection.

Sion 11-25-2007 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psycho Dad
I'd rather see two fat men in wife beaters and boxer shorts kissing than the continued stereotype that gay men hang out in bars dressed like Judas Priest fan club rejects.

Even television shows that aren't subject to censorship do that. Look what The Sopranos did with Vito.


just a couple facts that you may or may not be aware of:

1. Rob Halford is gay.
2. There are lots of gay men who do the leather thing. There are bars/clubs where that is the norm for the clientele.

so, while it's a stereotype to suggest that ALL gay men are like that, its is true that some portion are.

Psycho Dad 11-25-2007 02:50 PM

Rob Halford is gay? The hell you say!

MSD 11-25-2007 03:39 PM

There is no rational reason to believe that it is right for anyone other than a parent raising a child to decide what others should and should not be exposed to.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360