Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Entertainment (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/)
-   -   300 - the movie (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/109424-300-movie.html)

SecretMethod70 03-10-2007 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Until someone digs up some expose about how this movie was supposed to be a slick political thriller with undertones of personal faith and ultimately a love story...

I'm looking forward to seeing this movie. It should be very visually entertaining. That said, I have to point out that "drawing a line in the sand for democracy" is a part of the summary description and, well, Sparta is anything but a good example of democratic ideals, let alone Sparta as seen in 300 :p

ratbastid 03-11-2007 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jth
I was worried all the slo-mo would piss me off but I really thought it was perfect. I like how it seemed like watching a live graphic novel instead of a movie based on one.

Yes. Most of the "slo mo" battle moments are literal visual quotes from the graphic novel.

Cynthetiq 03-11-2007 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Changed it for you :p

Oh, and I have another word for those complaining about the realism: No.

Seriously, I feel like I shouldn't have to defend a movie that was adapted from a glorified, highly stylized COMIC BOOK. Apparently people didn't get that part. Besides, aren't we all a bit tired of real bad blood makeup? The 2D blood splatters are way cool in light of what could be some corny blood sprays. The exaggeration is what some people call "style" ... and style is usually accepted in something those same people call "art."

So we didn't like the unrealistic creatures and characters? Spoiler: Well let's not forget that this story was told as an account from someone who was personally picked by the King for his storytelling ability. How do you think he's going to describe elephants, rhinos and other foreign things (people who look different?) that he'd never seen before?

I know everyone's allowed to think what they want, but that doesn't mean they aren't being short-sighted for thinking it. Until someone digs up some expose about how this movie was supposed to be a slick political thriller with undertones of personal faith and ultimately a love story... please don't complain about the lack thereof. If you just paid $11 dollars thinking it was gonna be any more than what it was, you need to think more before spending your next buck.

:)

Of course, if you don't like it for what it really IS, then.. ok. Fine.

(Oh, and a little sub note... I know none of this criticism has taken place in this thread... I was just so taken aback by the opinions I've seen posted on the internet by viewers and critics. Don't you wish some people would just shut up and be entertained?)

I don't recall where I saw it... but someone was saying something about 300 having a political vibe.

quick google search gave me:
Quote:

When a Feb. 22 report on Wired.com carried a brief mention of the question about Mr. Bush’s proper parallel in the film, Web commentators in the United States began to lock on its supposed political vibe. Yet attempts by both the left and the right to appropriate the lessons of Thermopylae clearly predated the movie.

Mr. Bush has been compared to Xerxes at least since his “axis of evil” speech in the wake of 9/11, for instance, while the Spartan cry “Molon labe,” or “Come and take them,” has long been a rallying call for supporters of the right to bear arms.

Halx 03-11-2007 07:58 AM

Yeah, its inevitable that people are going to make some connection between the movie and today's situation. That doesn't mean the director and writer ever meant it to be so.

ratbastid 03-11-2007 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Yeah, its inevitable that people are going to make some connection between the movie and today's situation. That doesn't mean the director and writer ever meant it to be so.

Okay, but it's naive to release that film at the current time in history and not expect it to have resonances with the current situation. Especially the Gorgo-before-the-council speech, I was having a hard time not hearing that as right-wing posturing.

Cynthetiq 03-11-2007 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid
Okay, but it's naive to release that film at the current time in history and not expect it to have resonances with the current situation. Especially the Gorgo-before-the-council speech, I was having a hard time not hearing that as right-wing posturing.

All films, books, art, all mediums reflect current situations in some capacity. Always. People just aren't smart enough to see the parallels on the surface, how long did it take people to realize the Star Trek Cold War similarities? I know that I was too young to understand it in the 70s, but in the 80s it became apparent to me.

Halx 03-11-2007 08:24 AM

Maybe my brain was turned off, but I didn't draw that connection. Hell, the Spartans can be seen as both "Iraqi insurgents" and "The Bush Administration" if you want to really break it down. On one front, they are holding off a horde of enemies, unrelenting on their own turf, and on the other front they are begging for reinforcements.

Destrox 03-11-2007 08:45 AM

Whatever happened to going to movies, enjoying the fact that it was made for entertainment and not getting all political?

Its a 2 hour block where you are given the option to get away from real world issues and just relax your brain.

Maveric 03-11-2007 10:01 AM

Gerard Butler talks about the costumes of "300" and training for his role as King Leonidas in the movie "300" in this interview video from the 2006 Comic Con.

http://movies.about.com/library/weekly/bl300butler1.htm

-Mav

Astrocloud 03-11-2007 10:24 AM

Comparing ancient Spartans to anything in modern society other than the Nazis is quite pointless. The reason that the Nazis work well for a comparison is because they modelled parts of their military training on the Spartan society. (Not to mention the outright persecution/destruction of the Helites/Jews).

For one thing: a Spatan would be appalled by the inclusion of Women (and the exclusion of homosexuals) from our modern military.

That's just one thing. I encourage everyone to learn more about the Spartans and their militaristic society.

Ch'i 03-11-2007 10:35 AM

Quote:

Mr. Bush has been compared to Xerxes at least since his “axis of evil” speech in the wake of 9/11, for instance, while the Spartan cry “Molon labe,” or “Come and take them,” has long been a rallying call for supporters of the right to bear arms.
Morons!

LoganSnake 03-11-2007 03:27 PM

I went to see it yesterday and I must say it was really good. The effects and visuals were amazing and the action scenes kicked large amounts of ass. It's a good action movie, but that's it. I would like it even more if it had a slightly more involving story. Yeah, shoot me.

I liked Sin City better though. I've seen that movie five times by now. I don't think I can watch 300 more than two or three. I'm going to see it again with my family (my grandpa will go nuts for the battle scenes) next week.

blahblah454 03-11-2007 04:11 PM

I thought the movie was simply amazing. I went with my girlfriend and my brother and we all agreed that it was one of the best movies that we had seen in a long time.

Ch'i 03-11-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
I went to see it yesterday and I must say it was really good. The effects and visuals were amazing and the action scenes kicked large amounts of ass. It's a good action movie, but that's it. I would like it even more if it had a slightly more involving story. Yeah, shoot me.

Bang.

spindles 03-11-2007 09:55 PM

its times like this I wish Oz wasn't so far behind - this doesn't open here until April 9, so I've got a few weeks to wait to see it. Bloody small economies :(

Xell101 03-12-2007 03:50 AM

I feel like a crazy person but I think the movie had too much story and character development. I mean, they really nailed the concept of it as being an embellishment of the narrator but damnit, the tale is about a suicide mission by 300 one dimensional men. The queen and some jerkass were superfluous to the main draw of the film, which was a boat load of glorious hyperstylized violence. Also, I don't know if the film was pro-bush or anti-bush, all I know is it had a strong anti-xerxes agenda. Anything beyond this and I can only reason people are making things up.

JustJess 03-12-2007 05:18 AM

I dunno - our theater was filled with people who cheered when SPOILER:Spoiler: the queen killed that mofo in council. It was involving enough... but not too much, for me. The action was freakin' awesome, honest to gods - I loved the style, the effects, the blood - not even that gory, really... And crap on a stick - the Spartans were a joy to behold in the battle - just gloriously beautifully hot. Yep. Mrowl.

LoganSnake 03-12-2007 05:42 AM

I thought this review from aintitcool.com was pretty...informative about the movie.

Quote:

I just saw a movie that’ll give your eyes boners, make your balls scream and make you poop DVD copies of THE TRANSPORTER. It’s called 300. I don’t know what the title has to do with the movie, but they could’ve called it KITTENS MAKING CANDLES and it’d still rule.

It’s about these 300 Greek dudes who stomp the sugar-coated **** out of like a million other dudes. I have a feeling that a lot of high school sports coaches are going to show this film to their teams before they play. Also, gay dudes and divorced women are going to use screen captures for computer wallpaper.

The movie takes place about a million years ago, and it’s sort of like a prequel to SIN CITY. Except way less guns and cars but twice as much skull splitting. If you watch this movie and go into a Taco Bell, and say to the cashier, “I need some extra sauce packets” guess what? You’re getting twenty sauce packets because your face will punch him in the brain.

I can’t spoil the plot because THANK GOD THERE ISN’T ONE. Just ass kicking that kicks ass that, while said ass is getting kicked, is kicking yet more ass that’s hitting someone’s balls with a hammer made of ice but the ice is frozen whiskey.

TWO COOL THINGS ABOUT THE MOVIE AND ONE THING I DIDN’T LIKE:

COOL THING ONE:
HEAVY METAL DURING BATTLE SCENES

Who gives a **** if the music isn’t historically correct? LORD OF THE RINGS could’ve used some Journey. This movie has that chu-CHUNG kind of metal that you hear in your head when your shift supervisor at Wetzel’s Pretzel is telling you that you’ll have to stay for clean up and you wish you had a sock filled with quarters in your hand.

COOL THING TWO:
FOES, MINI-BOSSES AND A BIG BOSS

Basically, the Greek dudes are fighting these Persian dudes, but the director, who must have a dick made of three machine guns, does it all like a video game. The Greeks fight every death metal video from the last ten years. There’s wave after wave of giants, freaks, ninjas, mutants, wizards, and a hunchback who looks like he’s got Rosie O’Donnell on his back.

Would I have been happy if Dom DeLuise from HISTORY OF THE WORLD, PART I had shown up? Maybe, but this movie more than makes up for that glaring oversight.

NOT SO GOOD THING:
DUDE NUDITY (“DUDE-ITY”)

These are Greek times, when there were a lot of naked women around. And there are some naked women in this film, but almost every naked woman scene has a muscular dude giving the screen an ass picnic. Dude-ity is something directors put in their movies so people will think they’re serious, I guess, and not just throwing in naked hotties.

Any directors reading this – IT’S OKAY TO JUST THROW IN NAKED HOTTIES.

Can’t someone make a movie about naked Amazons and call it PAUSE BUTTON?

My final analysis is 300 the most ass-ruling movie I’ve seen this year, and will probably be the King of 2007 unless someone makes a movie where a pair of sentient boobs fights a werewolf.

Destrox 03-12-2007 05:51 AM

Hah I love it, that review is great.

fresnelly 03-12-2007 05:56 AM

Ah yes, now I remember why I don't bother with aintitcool.com anymore. :rolleyes:

LoganSnake 03-12-2007 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fresnelly
Ah yes, now I remember why I don't bother with aintitcool.com anymore. :rolleyes:

You don't like something about the review?

Kadath 03-12-2007 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoganSnake
You don't like something about the review?

It's aggressively stupid?

fresnelly 03-12-2007 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kadath
It's aggressively stupid?

Bingo. It's a funny read and all, but it's a prime example of why I don't get my reviews there anymore. I just can't relate. I don't demand that movies provide me with an orgiastic sensory rush like most of the posters there.

Call me a stick in the mud, but I won't be seeing 300 because I'm too jaded to sit through a balletic war movie.

LoganSnake 03-12-2007 10:50 AM

Sense of humor deficiency?

If you take that review seriously, you probably need as much help as those who came into 300 and expected Shindler's List story.

It's just a guy who is really excited about and loved the movie.

The only place for movie reviews is rottentomatoes.com

SecretMethod70 03-12-2007 02:10 PM

http://cad-comic.com/comics/20070312.jpg

Lasereth 03-12-2007 02:15 PM

Ha ha ha ha ha I haven't even seen the movie and I laughed out loud at that comic.

LoganSnake 03-12-2007 03:49 PM

Great comic. I follow every Ctrl+Alt+Del update.

Halx 03-12-2007 04:04 PM

I think I have a good sense of humor and that aint it cool review was absolutely moronic.

So first we have a twit with a thesaurus assualting us with words even Hunter S Thompson wouldn't use, then we have a dipshit with as much charisma as a jagged shard of glass trying to get us all riled up by making the movie sound worse than a Steven Seagal flick.

Who wants to post the next "great" review?

cadre 03-12-2007 05:18 PM

I didn't read any reviews before seeing this movie because I figured that they'd be either really against it or really for it, which doesn't make for a good review. Apparently I was right but I found the aintitcool.com review to be amusing (though maybe not a good review techinically).

Anywho, I'm with JustJess. As a female, I loved the movie. As a war-type movie person, I also loved it. I think it's worth seeing at least once even if you don't think you'll like it because it has alot to offer. It looks like it did stick to the comic pretty well, especially in alot of the scenes. It looks like they took it directly from the drawings (which adds to the style very nicely).

I watched it and didn't have any thoughts of the current political situation, my boyfriend thought it was slightly homoerotic but that's about it. Let's remember that the comic is from the late 90's so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's not supposed to be political. I think it's in the same realm as Troy and Gladiator as far as story goes (Gladiator was better though) but it's also got this great eyecatching style that is just awesome.

edit: This link shows screenshots side by side with the original comic. It shows what I was saying about the scenes being taken directly from the comic. http://www.solaceincinema.com/2006/1...en-comparison/

NoSoup 03-12-2007 06:42 PM

I just got back from it, and I thought it was phenomonal....

We learn several things throughout this movie:

1) You cannot have too much slow motion battling
2) Watching 300 nearly naked dudes lounging around is totally fine, as long as you know that they are about to dispatch 10,000 of the enemy
3) Spartans are hiliarious - "We will fight in the Shade"
4) In addition to not showing pain, fear, or surrendering, they have also given up all laws of physics. Throwing a spear accurately at 1/2 mile isn't even really a feat.

Willravel 03-12-2007 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoSoup
1) You cannot have too much slow motion battling

Damn straight. That's in the Bible AND the Constitution. Look it up.

serlindsipity 03-12-2007 07:55 PM

Im agreeing with NoSoup and willravel, the movement and timing produced greate imagery.

Good Job Frank Miller and crew

Val_1 03-13-2007 09:20 AM

I did not like 300. I'm a sci fi/action film/history/comic lover. I would have thought it was right up my alley. But, as it is, I think it's worthy of an MST3K treatment.

It wasn't entirely bad. A lot of the battle scenes were good; very good, in fact. But so many parts of the movie were so laughably bad that it really killed the enjoyment. The highly stylized look of the movie worked both for it and against it in areas.

I really wouldn't recommend it to anyone. The overwhelmingly positive response to this film is just baffling me.

Willravel 03-13-2007 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Val_1
I did not like 300. I'm a sci fi/action film/history/comic lover. I would have thought it was right up my alley. But, as it is, I think it's worthy of an MST3K treatment.

It wasn't entirely bad. A lot of the battle scenes were good; very good, in fact. But so many parts of the movie were so laughably bad that it really killed the enjoyment. The highly stylized look of the movie worked both for it and against it in areas.

I really wouldn't recommend it to anyone. The overwhelmingly positive response to this film is just baffling me.

This sentiment reminds me of how I felt about 'A History of Violence". Apparently, everyone but me and my little bro absolutely loved the movie. I thought it was one of the worst pieces of film I've ever seen. I'm still confused as to how people enjoy it. To each their own, I suppose.

YaWhateva 03-13-2007 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoSoup
3) Spartans are hiliarious - "We will fight in the Shade"

I think that was actually a quote from Dienekes. "So much the better, we shall fight in the shade." It's even the Greek 20th Armored Division's motto. A lot of the quotes from the movie are from what is thought to be actual quotes people said at that time. Even on Leonidas' Monument, there is a thing that says, "Come and take them."

Also, I loved this movie so much! I loved the Battle of Thermopylae as a kid. The one thing I didnt like though was Spoiler: the large monster/executioner with the giant blade hands Besides that, the movie was fantastic.

Frosstbyte 03-13-2007 12:34 PM

I really really really wanted to love this movie like I loved Sin City.

I didn't and couldn't. The images of battle were beautiful, really beautiful and the oracle's dance was incredibly effective and powerful. The depiction of the Persian excess-Xerxes' moving temple, for example-were breathtaking.

The rest of the movie was blah. The entire "meanwhile in New Jersey" storyline back in Sparta was both terrible and completely pointless, to say nothing of being nothing even in the remote general vicinity of historically accurate. Also, for all the lofty talk of the phalanx, as far as I could tell they used it for all of five minutes. And then they didn't use it and were slaughtered. Now, I realize that watching 1 or 2 guys run around alone slaughtering hoards of bad guys is probably for the average viewer much more interesting than watching a phalanx work. However, the entire reason this battle is so famous is because of the fact that they used the damn thing to the full extent of its lethal potential. The movie paid modest lip service to that fact, but didn't show me all I wanted to see.

I enjoyed it, I'm glad I saw it, my fiance and I will probably own it, but it's not going on my favorites list.

cadre 03-13-2007 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YaWhateva
The one thing I didnt like though was Spoiler: the large monster/executioner with the giant blade hands Besides that, the movie was fantastic.

Oh yeah, I agree with you. That just bugged me.

n0nsensical 03-13-2007 11:12 PM

This movie is Hollywood schlock of the worst kind, just terrible. No plot at all, its just like killing, sex, killing killing, sex, sex, killing. This would have been just as effective as a 20 minute short except not nearly as tedious and boring. The writing was awful, horribly clichéd and predictable, and the whole thing was ridiculously over dramatic. It ripped off several movies that were actually good, like Gladiator, Crouching Tiger, Hero, even The Matrix and Lord of the Rings, except they forgot to copy any of the good parts and were left with all the crap. I would have had more fun burning a 10 dollar bill or reading a thousand page history about the Greek-Persian wars. This is the film equivalent of the brainless button-mashing violent videogame with pretty graphics. Movies like this are why I don't go to movies.

Destrox 03-14-2007 04:00 AM

Damn... you do know this movie was not meant to be a history piece, that it was written to be an exact book-movie transition from a COMIC BOOK.

These things never were meant to be taken that serious.

Comic books, just like movies, in general (excluding educational films) are merely made for entertainment.

I'd suggest for you to re-watch it after brushing that chip off your shoulder, but it seems firmly in place.

NoSoup 03-14-2007 04:13 AM

Agreed - I don't think the film was supposed to pay homage to any historical facts at all, it was simply the movie version of the comic book.

To be fair, though, I certianly didn't expect to see any historically accurate scenes when I went to see the movie - just very pretty CG and a ton of slow motion fights. I got what I paid for :D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360