Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Economics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2009, 06:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Efficiency or inefficiency, which is better?

Is the capitalistic economy better off with inefficiency?

For example, when computers were new they took people with lots of education to program them and they didn't do very much. Now people can download an open source program and have it do far more than what computers in the past could do. It used to cost companies lots of money, and they had to hire lots of people. Now, most users are getting smart enough to take care of their own computer and once a network is setup it doesn't require much oversight. It is much cheaper for companies, but there aren't as many jobs as there used to be. I would argue that the first option is better for a capitalistic economy.

Even saving gas or electricity is hurting the gas/power company and they will lay off the workers before any bonuses are cut.

Making cars last 20-40 years is easily possible (use stainless steel screws, aluminum, carbon fiber, LED lights, and plastic), but it kills car companies, dealerships, and mechanics. Car companies that can't sell any more cars because their previous customers still have their cars and are happy with them won't give any more money for the same product if they don't need to. Consumers need to be as efficient with their money as they can be. They aren't always efficient and the capitalist economy benefits from this. I am at a place in my life where I don't need to buy anything new to put in my house, I only need to buy replacements if something breaks (which isn't very often).

In a socialist or communist countries, efficiency is key. And it is what is missing from the failed or bad communist economies. If the USSR had computers, robotics, GPS, internet, electric cars, autonomous public transport, renewable power systems/nuclear power, touchscreens (ATM like), they could have a workforce of 30% providing all the services that they would want or need. It's just like how we now have 2% of our workforce as farmers, yet they provide all of the food 1% is military and they provide all of our defense forces. In a capitalistic economy, the rest would need to find a new job. In the 'ideal' and 'peaceful' communist/socialist economies 'the state' (small workforce that is compensated with better goods, land, and services) would provide what people would need. They would be able to do what ever they wanted to do after that. They would need to promote innovation with rewards of some sort that might not always be money.

At least that is my take on it, do you think it is wrong?

What would you think a high-tech, small efficient government, socialist state would look like?

Was the stimulus package government manufactured inefficiency? Are regulations, rules, and laws all inefficiencies that help the economy (as long as they don't kill the market for that product), but hurt the owners and stockholders?

Last edited by ASU2003; 06-23-2009 at 06:19 PM..
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 02:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
Delicious
 
Reese's Avatar
 
I think the more efficient we become, the closer we have to move toward socialism or communism to survive. I'd be very interested to see a High tech socialist society. I don't mean a modern day socialist state. Our world is not high tech yet. I'm talking about 95% of jobs being obsolete while the other 5% have George Jetson-esque jobs of pushing a button for an hour a week. Honestly, I think it'd be boring as shit.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry
Reese is offline  
Old 06-26-2009, 10:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
loquitur's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
efficiency is a companion of productivity: the more a person can do in less time, the more economically valuable that person is and the more pay s/he will command in the market. So in the business world, efficiency is best for everyone - the boss gets a return on investment, the employee gets raised and might even decide to purchase more leisure time. So economic efficiency promotes individual choice by making people more productive and thus more valuable and empowered.

Outside the business world I have some seriously conflicting feelings. An efficient government will in many ways be very good at limiting liberty. How efficient do you want your traffic cops to be? Your parking enforcement agents? The IRS? Some creakiness in its joints sure helps make life livable. On the other hand, wasted resources appears to be a chronic plague in government, and I can't think of many arguments in favor of it.
loquitur is offline  
Old 06-26-2009, 10:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
IdeoFunk's Avatar
 
Location: to
This is quite the conundrum isn't it. I've always felt that, as a society, we should always be pushing for the most efficient allocation of resources. I think that we should be using ground tires in our asphalt, that our cars should actually be built to last, and that the economy in general should expect people to spend their money in a lot more rational and cautious way. Sure such sweeping changes would also bring with them some serious challenges, but at least it'd all be in the name of progress. And what does this really say about us as a society to be apprehensive of progress? Like c'mon, hurry up already and bring on the hover cars... I'm getting impatient.
IdeoFunk is offline  
 

Tags
efficiency, inefficiency

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360