12-21-2008, 09:46 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Broken Arrow
Location: US
|
Martial law? O RLY?
Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out "Crowd Control" | Rights and Liberties | AlterNet Amy Goodman reported that an Army spokesperson confirmed that they will have access to lethal and non lethal crowd control technologies and tanks. Tanks and soldiers moving on American soil. I think this is an "if" situation, but still. WTF. That's fucked up. Is anyone not in a position of power for this sort of action? If so, do you understand that they will be policing you too, when you go to the store, work, take your kids to school? They will be at the school too, holding guns over your kids. That's just the beginning of sweeping changes that can occur under martial law. Thoughts?
__________________
We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -Winston Churchill |
12-21-2008, 10:03 AM | #2 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
I really don't know at this point. My initial reaction is that this is merely fear-mongering. But after a bit of thought, this also looks like the beginnings of the kind of paranoia one would expect coming from a military-industrial complex once it's lost sight of the conventional altogether.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
12-21-2008, 10:46 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Broken Arrow
Location: US
|
Yeah I agree it is fear mongering. I'm not trying to be a part of that, this is more of an awareness post, just like Sherman was making people aware of what he heard. I'm not the reactionary type, I prefer to just hang back and let the piss-and-vinegar types get shot at, but the fact that this topic even comes up does concern me.
__________________
We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -Winston Churchill |
12-25-2008, 05:59 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Master Thief. Master Criminal. Masturbator.
Location: Windiwana
|
rex 84?!
shit! run! FEMA Coffins are here for a reason, ARGHH!!!!!
__________________
First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the communists and I did not speak out because I was not a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist Then they came for me And there was no one left to speak out for me. -Pastor Martin Niemoller |
12-26-2008, 10:39 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
question, when is it NOT fear mongering? Is it too late then?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
12-26-2008, 11:13 AM | #7 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
WOLVERINES!
... No, seriously. The US has had this plan on the drawing board for a while. Here's one perspective: Defense Review: Anti-Terrorism Shmanti-Terrorism! |
12-26-2008, 12:33 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
so the contention is that in the event of a major armed assault by terrorists in the US, our police will be ineffective and we must use military forces?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
12-27-2008, 08:00 AM | #9 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
Yeah! With an impossible war going on at two like-shit-for-breakfast locations across the globe, it's hard for The Man (TM) to Keep-A-Brother-Down (TM) when he doesn't have any Jack-Booted Thugs (TM) with which to do it. These hot-hot Bush wars are so awesome you have to pass freakin' legislation to get troops home these days.
I was always under the impression that the national guard was designed for "domestic security" stuff. After touring both of our illustrious prime GWOT locations in the last couple years and seeing flabby guard people everywhere when I arrived... I've determined that national guard has a "inter" prefix attached to it somewhere in invisible ink. Last edited by Plan9; 12-27-2008 at 08:07 AM.. |
12-27-2008, 09:43 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
the decision to start using the national guard as a way to avoid instituting the draft for the various colonial adventures undertaken by reactionary administrations these days is yet another gift that keeps on giving from the reagan period. there are a bunch of others as well, like building a legal apparatus around fema that enables martial law to be imposed in principle...good ole ronny, spokesmodel of the counter-revolution. what an asshat.
i will say that the clip above does not particularly alarm me simply because the bush people are in such a politically weak position now that i don't see a scenario, short of maybe taking a page from the playbook of the algerian fln and staging an attack that could be blamed on the Other, that would allow for such an action without entailing a wholesale collapse of whatever legitimacy remains, not just domestically but internationally. we are stumbling through a rickety time: few houses grown rickety implode with quite the dramatic flair of an imperial house. besides, where'd the "domestic disturbances" come from? the host of rural men who've bought guns in the last month?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
12-29-2008, 02:26 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Wehret Den Anfängen!
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
For sufficiently major definitions of major, yes? The police are not a military, and training the police in military tactics results in them treating parts of the country like occupied territory. (Note that the police are already militarized to a decent extent -- isn't the 'special' part of SWAT basically 'military'?)
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest. |
01-07-2009, 11:52 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Spring, Texas
|
Quote:
Some people also freak out a bit more than necessary when the word "martial law" is spoken. Martial law was enacted in Florida and recently in Houston, Texas durring many of the hurricanes there due to massive loss of power, which affected the local law enforcement from doing their jobs since there was no power to run the switchboards. The military have huge mobile communication systems obviously, and are self contained and self powered. You didn't see the National Guard running around Houston or Florida waving their guns around and freaking people out. Personally we WELCOMED them. I felt much safer. Now in the case of the OP, yea, martial law country wide does not sit well, but don't everyone think that martial law eneacted any time is a bad thing.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison |
|
Tags |
law, martial, rly |
|
|