Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Artwork (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-artwork/)
-   -   Is this art? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-artwork/40925-art.html)

DonnChadh 01-09-2004 06:26 AM

Is this art?
 
This is art, right?

http://members.lycos.co.uk/d0nnchadh...our_blocks.jpg

admittedly, inspired by, and based off some of sadistikdreams' work in this thread: http://tfproject.org/tfp/showthread....threadid=37574

Now, what if I say that it was generated by a PHP script and is entirely random (within a range of 6 colours with 3 shades each)

Is it still art, or something else?

Script used to generate it is here: http://members.lycos.co.uk/d0nnchadh...our_blocks.php

And i'll apologise for the fact that it's on lycos and may be slow, it does make 100 small images after all. (More optimised versions may follow)

Edit: new version only makes one image, rather than 100

moonpie 01-09-2004 11:47 AM

yes it is. People argued that Andy Warhol's art wasn't real, it was just a soup can. But art is art, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

GoldenOuroboros 01-09-2004 06:20 PM

I'll agree with moonpie on this. There's some pieces of work I've seen that I wouldn't say are art.. but it is art to some people and to the artist.

Very Cool DonnChadh
:cool:

Ti6my 01-09-2004 08:09 PM

art doesn't have to be anything. It can be used to catch your eye or stir a reaction, like the guy(forgive me for forgetting)who signed his name to a toilet and displayed it in a museum. Art is creating.

yakimushi 01-10-2004 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ti6my
art doesn't have to be anything. It can be used to catch your eye or stir a reaction, like the guy(forgive me for forgetting)who signed his name to a toilet and displayed it in a museum. Art is creating.
Marcel Duchamp is the artist I think you're looking for :D And I believe the sculpture you're referring to is this one: http://www.sfmoma.org/collections/re...l_duchamp.html

As per the original question, yes its art. Its creative expression, through both the written code and the image it produces. Guess you get kind of a two-fer with this piece :D

DonnChadh 01-11-2004 03:44 AM

Thanks for your feedback

I've just finished another version which lets you select from the six palette colours and generate an image using only those colours.

http://members.lycos.co.uk/d0nnchadh...ur_blocks2.php

xim 01-14-2004 08:49 PM

I don't know. . . I would have a hard time calling a computer generated image 'Art'. I would definatly call the script itself a work of art. But since the actual images are just filtered products of some random (?) seed, there is no human imagination involved (past the initial creation of the filter (the script)). To me art is not just anything, but a creative creation created for the sake of creating, with labor and time. Now if he say wrapped a sculpture (even just a sphere) in these images or did something like that, adding creativity into them, it would unquestionably be art. On their own they are very similar to random numbers from a random number generator. Would every number be an artwork? I would say no, but the random number generator itself is.

The only real arguement that I can think of that would make the images art is that there seems to be something created in selecting which ones to display...the ones communicated... Just like each random number isnt art but If you creatively picked an amount of numbers and selected a font and positions for each of them on a canvas that would be art.

Call me crazy

Order_of_Monkey 01-16-2004 12:16 PM

Art is not something one can't really define its more like something you can feel

xim 01-17-2004 12:48 PM

I dont think saying that art is undefinable makes it any more profound. I believe that there is no meaning in anything besides what meaning we give it. But we CAN give things meaning. Thats art. This means that you can define art differently than me, in fact I dont believe in any objective definitions at all.

So, if you want to call random numbers art you are perfectly free to do so. But be forwarned: then you also have to call random puddles of water art. And if you want to open those floodgates, everything is art (from rust patterns on dumpsters to empty space), which to me seems to suck the meaning right out of the art that humans DO create.

I will continue to limit art to the things created out of human conciousness (maybe a photo of a rust pattern or empty space that someone has decided to 'present' in some way).

sadistikdreams 01-17-2004 07:39 PM

I think it's a parody.
Mine's the original, than you recolored it.
It's the same thing that Weird Al does to songs.

I think it's an honor to be parodied.

bermuDa 01-18-2004 06:51 PM

art is what you get out of it, but I usually equate the value of art with the effort and thought put into it. For that reason I'd say the image is art because of the effort put into the script, but what exactly is the meaning of it? Thought doesn't equal effort, and vice versa. Whenever I see "art" I ask myself "what is the artist trying to say with this piece?"

Although, it wouldn't look too bad blown up to 5'x5' and hung on the wall...

mr_mcrafe 01-19-2004 02:33 AM

I'd call it art. Art is an expression, something that creates thought. This PHP script is art, along with what it creates.

DonnChadh 01-21-2004 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sadistikdreams
I think it's a parody.
Mine's the original, than you recolored it.
It's the same thing that Weird Al does to songs.

I think it's an honor to be parodied.

I hadn't considered it that way.

Ha, just had one of those 'what if' moments thinking about what ppl have been saying, particularly about the script as art, and ended up visualising the script in a frame hung up in some posh gallery like the Tate with all these classics around it.

xim 01-23-2004 12:41 AM

Heh this could be quite a lively debate.

TheShadow 01-23-2004 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by moonpie
yes it is. People argued that Andy Warhol's art wasn't real, it was just a soup can. But art is art, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I think that... Halx [Not sure here] was talking about art having to have effort and thought put into it. Simply plastering an image in multicolor doesn't require that much thought or innovation. Neither do Andy Warhol's soup cans. Those didn't have any innovation in them, and in my opinion, are not art. They're just paintings of soup cans.

[Small Digression] Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but it seems that what the public believes is what matters. Sure, there may an objective truth to everything, but if we don't agree that it is correct, then it doesn't matter.

xim 01-27-2004 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shadowz
Sure, there may an objective truth to everything, but if we don't agree that it is correct, then it doesn't matter. [/B]
Thats why there isn't an objective reality, its only what we have agreed is true.

Pick up Robert Anton Wilson's book "Reality Is What You Can Get Away With"


And my opinion is that Andy Warhauls soup cans are art strictly because he decided to 'present' them for whatever reason. Just like a still life of a banana is art. (but the can and the banana themselves aren't). I guess put simply I believe that if there is an artist, there is art. In the case of the script, DonnChadh is the artist. But there could be thousands of random images created daily by that script everyday without him even knowing about it. He makes no decision to create. So who is the artist? The script? No matter what you think about what art is, PHP scripts are not creative. They don't come up with anything new or innovative and they are not artists.

So I guess what this all comes down to is: Does Art need an Artist?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360