01-04-2006, 09:45 AM | #1 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
News Reports 12 Miners Survive - They Got it Wrong.
Last night I went to bed after listening to television news reports of a miracle in West Virginia. No matter which of the 24-hour news channels I turned to, there was grandstanding. Rita Cosby on MSNBC kept talking about her mascara smearing because she was in tears. Geraldo Rivera on Fox News could be heard screaming out to the family members in joy about how great the news was, chasing down people to get their immediate, joyous reactions. Other nameless reporters spent hours in typical fashion waxing poetic and miraculous about small-town cohesiveness and the spirit of America, etc.
Here was the early story: http://www.nbc5.com/news/5832803/detail.html Quote:
Quote:
What angers me the most about this was watching the genuine joy on the faces of the family members after being led in what could be described as a revival by the visiting television reporters only to be informed later that all but one of the miners did not survive. Many of these families were told that the miners survived by overzealous reporters anxious to get tear-filled interviews. They wasted no time having their "Miracle in the Mountain State" graphics with snazzy sound-effects greeting us after each commercial break. Watching Fox News earlier, one of the flock of reporters stated that now was not the time to place blame on why the miners were reported alive. Will the media ever take responsibility for blunders like this? I don't know how much time I've spent watching television news reporters backpedal on stories they've been reporting wrong all along.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
||
01-04-2006, 09:55 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
i'm not excusing it.. but I've spent enough time around newspapers to know that deadlines have to be met... (press deadlines that is - when you might have 5 newspapers using the same presses you have a specific window to get your paper printed )you blow a deadline you hemorrage cash pretty quickly and that cash is difficult to recover from...
At the witching hour -- the newspapers had the story - the miners were reported to be alive... From all accounts i've read-- the fact that they were all alive was given when the vital signs were still be taken - three hours later it came back that they were all dead.. I don't beleive that the media can be blamed for that three hour communication breakdown. The media can be blamed for jumping the gun.. the news - both printed and broadcast are all about getting the story first... you get the story last -- well ratings go down, circulation drops... and money is lost --
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
01-04-2006, 10:02 AM | #3 (permalink) |
<3 TFP
Location: 17TLH2445607250
|
I prefer accurate news to quick news. Frankly, despite the need for the know in this Information Age, I can handle waiting up to, say... 24 hours for news that doesn't directly concern me if it means hearing it correctly. I guess I'm in the minority. *sigh*
|
01-04-2006, 10:03 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
Regarding the print media: I have a bit more sympathy for them since they do have a deadline to meet before printing, so for them to get it wrong is a bit more understandable.
My main focus is on the live television news reports that went on for hours without any confirmation whatsoever that the miners had survived. I switched between CNN, MSNBC, and Fox and not one of those channels spoke with any officials during their hours of reporting. What's worse is that Fox News JUST ran a promo that went "As brave rescuers work around the clock to rescue the trapped miners in the Sago Mine, stay with Fox News for live coverage of the rescue efforts. Fox News!"
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
01-04-2006, 10:05 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A
|
I don't know anything about the news industry, and I don't think I'd be very good in it because I'd rather be late and right than early and so wrong, as is the case here.
I too went to bed with a smile on my face thinking that they had found 12 out of the 13 alive, even though I felt saddened for the one man's family and friends. Then before I left for work my husband told me that he had been watching the news and saw that they had it wrong. My heart just fell. I can't even begin to imagine how the families and friends there must feel. My thoughts go out to all of them.
__________________
"Whoever wrote this episode should die!" |
01-04-2006, 10:07 AM | #6 (permalink) |
You had me at hello
Location: DC/Coastal VA
|
The credo we always worked under was not "get it first", but "get it right, first".
In this case, it was the recovery team relaying information back that was heard by a family member who then started cell phoning everybody. I hate it when mainstream media reacts like this, but I'm not surprised, given the confusing situation. If you want to hand out some blame, give it to the mining comapny. Within 20 minutes of the news spreading, they knew the story was different, but they sat on it for three hours.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet |
01-04-2006, 10:09 AM | #7 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
did th e officials make themselves available to the press? How forthcoming were they with information? I'd imagine not very - given all the citations that this mine has - they'd want to do all they could to put this in the very best possible light... If the media isn't given anything to work with - then is faced with 24 hour coverage... they have to do something -- heaven forbid they have dead air.. the advertisers wouldn't like that... the media -- as we know - is all about the almighty dollar..
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
|
01-04-2006, 10:19 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
From what I heard, the media received the information directly from the president of the mining company. I don't think you can blame the media on this... they just reported what they were told by the official sources.
Now if they had heard it from someone who heard it form someone... that would be a different story.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
01-04-2006, 11:10 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Comedian
Location: Use the search button
|
Will the spread of misinformation overshadow the fact that 12 people lost their lives in an industrial accident?
Why do we allow the story to spin like this? 12 people died, because the energy industry does not put enough emphasis on worker safety. I don't give a fuck if the media got the story wrong at the start. I want answers from the CEO on his workplace safety standards, and how this industrial accident could have been prevented, and how it could be prevented in the future. I don't want to hear "It is a dangeous job, they knew the risks..."
__________________
3.141592654 Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis. |
01-04-2006, 11:13 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
How could that possibly be normal?
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:24 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
Trust me. Those figures are very normal. Right...no. Normal...most definately.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
01-04-2006, 11:24 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
BigBen,
You make a strong point. Where I was going with this was the devastation to the families after hearing that the miners had been found alive only to be told 3 hours later that they in fact did not survive. For me, that's a huge story because these families had waited and waited and waited for any news at all. Finally, they hear that 12 of the 13 people survived. Then, 3 hours later, the rug is pulled out from under them. In order for this to have an impact for me, I focus on the media reports and how the families will now have to cope with what happened. I didn't intend to ignore the fact that 12 people died due to apparent safety violations because I feel that is a different story that will be told in time. For this thread, I wanted to focus on how the media shapes our perceptions and their responsibility to check their stories. Charlatan, The more I watch this story unfold, the more I'm learning. Apparently, someone phoned into the church and told someone there that the miners had been found alive. The church began to ring the bells, and the media then ran with it. The media didn't wait for any confirmation. I remember watching split screens for 2 hours last night. One screen showed celebrations and interviews with families and news reporters giving their commentary. The other screen showed an empty press conference room.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
01-04-2006, 11:31 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
I'll have to take your word on it as the only news I've had was a radio report this morning. I'm sure the story has developed over time... and it doesn't surprise me that Cable News jumps the gun in the race to be first.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
01-04-2006, 11:39 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
01-04-2006, 11:44 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Comedian
Location: Use the search button
|
Quote:
True Story: I was woken by banging at the door; Ben wake up. What is it? Guy was in a car accident. Is he okay? Nope. He's gone... (Shock, horror, sickness) The whole barracks is dying. (Guy walks into the room) What are you guys fucking moaning about? (Shock, disbelief, wave of relief) WE THOUGHT YOU WERE DEAD!!! And yes, we hunted down the source of misinformation and sorted it out. We were so glad Guy was alive. Having it go the other way would be unbelievable.
__________________
3.141592654 Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis. |
|
01-04-2006, 11:47 AM | #16 (permalink) |
Comedian
Location: Use the search button
|
Someone decided that the world needed 24 hours of news every day. Then, not being able to find that much, newsstations are pressed into these tactics out of necessity.
All one must do is to withstand an interview and then watch it on TV in its edited form to truly understand the effect the media has on the public. I have been noted to reply "No Comment" more than once. At least they can't fuck that up.
__________________
3.141592654 Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis. |
01-04-2006, 11:57 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Insane
|
The only thing that can be reasoned from this is that the media is sick mother fuckers. And the people that caused the miscommunication to the families are worthless, sick mother fuckers.
Piss on their deadline and their ratings. Another example of the fucking media exploiting people and screwing up while doing it. Wanted to add, has anyone noticed how quite a few of the news channels dropped this story fairly quickly after it was evident they were part of the fuck up. And other news stations keep blaming other people or saying how we just need to focus on the people that died and not the mistake. Maybe the mining company did mess up but they didn't force fox news to broadcast this shit. Fuckers need to take some damn responsibility and stop being such pathetic assholes. Last edited by Justsomeguy; 01-04-2006 at 12:02 PM.. |
01-04-2006, 12:09 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Hahahaha, man that sucks for their families!
__________________
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/ |
01-04-2006, 12:29 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
01-04-2006, 12:45 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Whats sad is that without having seen any of this I can see how Heraldo would have covered it in my minds eye.
God I can't stand him.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
01-04-2006, 01:40 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Fade out
Location: in love
|
Quote:
as to the OP... they are trying to be sensational... and sometimes people want good news, even if it's not true, chances are their source is the same that said there was WMD's in Iraq..... I hope that this will highlight the lack of safety in many workplaces... I hope a lawsuit will come of this and shed further light on the corporations taking human life for granted one too many times, someone has to be responsible for those deaths.... sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life! Looking for a great pet?! Click Here! "I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself" |
|
01-04-2006, 01:52 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:06 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Idolator
Location: Vol Country
|
Yeah this is definitely tragic.
I tend to side with Big Ben on this one insomuch that I think the devastating loss here should be the real story over the media's incompetence. However, I realized that that is not the purpose of this thread. What can I say? The media is the media, they never cease to amaze, but what's really sad is that I've heard that the media could become the primary factor in shaping children's sociopolitical beliefs within fifteen or twenty years, eclipsing even their parents. God help us all.
__________________
"We each have a star, all we have to do is find it. Once you do, everyone who sees it will be blinded." - Earl Simmons |
01-04-2006, 02:10 PM | #26 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
As far as outrageously expensive goes, that's up for debate. I assume they are making profit, correct? The investors may have to settle for the 50' yacht instead of the 55' yacht so that the peons who make their money can be safe. My heart breaks for them. |
|
01-04-2006, 02:28 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Another thing, safety (and environmental) regulations aren't just about "buy this expensive thing" a lot of accident prevention is proper trtaining and work practices. It is "do it exactly like this every time" People are lazy and they get a false sense of security after doing a task 1000 times so they cut corners.
One of the things that the mine was cited for last year was failure to properly dilute dust, which can lead to explosions. That is a work practice and the blame falls primarily on the workers that shortcut and the managers that facilitate it. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/02/min....ap/index.html Quote:
I put the other part in italics because that pissed me off. It was shoddy reporting to claim that their injury rate was 3x the average but then reveal that they only had 8 injuries in 2004. |
|
01-04-2006, 03:03 PM | #28 (permalink) |
Registered User
Location: Right Here
|
I hate watching the idiot reporters saying things like, "At this point we don't know how the fire started or if anyone was inside, or what is inside the building" over and over for the whole five minute interruption of the regularly scheduled program. I can't help but think "You interupted what I was doing to tell me that you don't know anything?"
I would love to see some news anchor come on and say, "You may have noticed that many other channels were having a feeding frenzy trying to beat each other to the bite. We on the other hand were busy being responsible and were gathering correct information. Now that the facts are known, here is the story...." It's interesting though that in both nature and the media, during the frenzy the sharks rarely bite each other. |
01-04-2006, 04:48 PM | #30 (permalink) | |
Still fighting it.
|
People are so quick to jump down the throats of reporters. Hey, get this: They were just doing their jobs.
Edit: Quote:
Just think about how the chain, the cycle, works. If people would stop rampantly buying shit, stop giving their money to the corporations that are paying for this shit in the first place, just for once get off their asses and do something other than consume every media fad that comes along (I'm looking at you, must-watch hyped to the gills bite-size premiering-this-week don't-miss-it everyone's-talking-about-it TV drama), every hour of glaze-eyed TV joy they can get, then maybe these rolling news channels wouldn't have the draw for monolithic companies' advertisements and therefore, wouldn't have the resources and power - or indeed, the need - to report so competitively and so quickly, and thus to get it wrong so often. Is that worth thinking about? Maybe we're the ones fucking ourselves? Am I off-base? It just gets my goat when all the news media are doing is feeding our need - our desire - to be salaciously and voyeuristically entertained, then we round on them, just for doing what's asked of them. We need to make our minds up about how our world ought to work, I think. Never mind, what's on TV? Last edited by flamingdog; 01-04-2006 at 04:58 PM.. |
|
01-04-2006, 04:54 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
If by "without any confirmation whatsoever" you mean "gee only a representative of the company told everyone the miners were alive and the news reported what he said since that was the best info they had to go on, and it's pretty understandable that the reporters weren't exactly able to go down in the mine and check the men for themselves" then I suppose I agree with you. |
|
01-04-2006, 05:28 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
I don't want to get into a pissing contest with you because I respect your opinion a lot, but here is somewhere where we have to disagree. From what I've seen, here is how it went down: One of the rescuers radioed up that they had found the miners. The person who received this message then called the Baptist church where the families had congregated with the message that they were all alive. The church then began ringing their bells. The television news reporters went with this. Remember, the mining company made no statement whatsoever for 3 hours. The reports we were hearing on the television news came from church bells ringing after someone called someone reporting what they heard from someone else. The reports we were seeing were based solely on the church bells ringing and the family members celebrating. Regardless of what journalists would like us to believe, they reported rumors as fact. Not once during this reporting did any media outlet that I watched report that what they heard was unconfirmed. This is what I meant by "without any confirmation whatsoever."
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
|
01-04-2006, 06:00 PM | #33 (permalink) |
Tone.
|
I dunno. When the governor of the state saying it's true, a congresswoman saying it's true (on air) and relatives who got calls from mine officials saying it's true, that's pretty good confirmation. Unfortunately, all those sources were wrong, but as soon as *that* information came to light the media did their job and reported that as well.
I'm not saying it's not tragic, but the media did its job in this situation. Unfortunately, the mining company (yes, the mining company) initially got the wrong information out, and then failed to retract that information for 2 and a half hours after they knew it was suspect. |
01-04-2006, 06:23 PM | #35 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
|
01-04-2006, 06:38 PM | #36 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
flamingdog, I wasn't intentionally ignoring your post, I just got caught up with what Shakran said. Sorry about that. I think you make a good point, but at the same time, I believe that we're only as knowledgable as the media allows us to be. When I use media in this context, I'm referring to all media - print, radio, television, entertainment, etc. It's impossible for those who wish to be informed to inform themselves of all events that may affect them. We rely on the media to do that. We expect that the information we entrust them to will be accurate and truthful. What I've found in some reading that I've done is that media outlets often use other media outlets as sources of their own information. This pretty much explains how they got this story wrong. A lot of times, the thinking is that if one source is reporting it, then they must have checked their facts and the information is accurate. We are not informed that their sources are simply another media outlet whose information may or may not be correct. Then, once a story is repeated enough by numerous outlets, it suddenly becomes "fact." There is a book I would suggest reading that deals with this kind of lazy journalism. It's titled Don't Believe It. I understand that the reporters on tv are in a studio reading information that their given, so the blame really shouldn't fall on them, but the reporters in the field (I'm looking at you, Geraldo) are the ones who need to be held responsible. Once that falls down, I'm guessing the blame falls on the producers of news shows who rush information on the air before confirming it's veracity. Granted, if we didn't watch as much television as we do, then there would be less need to please advertisers and ratings whores. However, I still don't believe that our fascination with television excuses reporting erroneous information under the guise of "scooping" a story.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses |
|
01-04-2006, 06:48 PM | #37 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
Hehe. Calm down. We're slow, but we're-a-gettin' to it I think you're mostly wrong, but not for the reasons you probably think. And the core of your ideas is correct. This is gonna be tough to explain all this - people have written very large books on it and I'm gonna try to compress it into a post that won't use all of TFP's bandwidth Yes, the public wants stories about sex, crime, and scandal (not real scandal, such as congressmen funneling billions of dollars into a pork barrel project run by one of their campaign contributors, but idiotic scandal, like the president fooling around with an intern). They want reality shows. They want Fear Factor. But they WOULDN'T want this stuff if the media hadn't given it to them in the first place. 10 years ago did you ever say "Shit dude, I wish there was a show on TV where they made people eat bugs for money?" Now, if you go up to a GOOD journalist, he's not gonna want to give you all that crap. But the owners of his newsroom, generally a large corporation, want to get as many advertising dollars with as little expenditure as possible. Sex, crime, and fluffscandal are easy and cheap to cover. Got a murder? Send one photographer and maybe a reporter and call it a night. Sex? That's easy too. Political scandal involving illegal funneling of money? Gee that'll take time and research and maybe FOIA lawsuits, and gosh that's just too much money to spend. So in the first part I object to the characterization of journalists that has happened in this thread. Saying WE deliver crap like you said we do is rather like saying it's the garbage man's fault that the dump stinks. Now people aren't gonna stop rampantly buying shit unless we convert to true communism, which isn't gonna happen. Journalists aren't gonna stop being forced to do what their owning corporations want until we give the journalists a place to go (constitutionally mandated large public endowment for the news media that CANNOT be touched and who's employees the government has NO control over) where they are not forced to work for a corporation. Again, blaming the journalists for the situation the megacorporations and the government (by allowing megacorporations to become media empires in the first place) has gotten us into is completely disingenuous. And where you're largely wrong is in your vitriolic comments about the american public. The public ate Edward R Murrow's stuff up. They loved it. Harvest of Shame was a hugely successful documentary. His reports on McCarthy brought that SOB down. The public WANTED that. But even back then his idiot corporation (which at that time was ONLY cbs, not CBS/Viacom/etc) thought the public REALLY wanted interviews with stars, so he was forced to do that crap in order to get permission to do the real journalism. And it's only gone downhill from there. In other words, if the damn media wouldn't feed you guys bullshit like "what's J-Lo doing?" then you wouldn't consume it. Where you and I differ is that I feel the public would THEN consume REAL news, if we gave it to them. The BBC is a good example. Americans are no dumber than the Brits. We don't even drive on the wrong side of the road Yet the brits consume the HELL out of the BBC, and are on the whole much more informed about what's going on in their country, and the world, because of it. I think Americans would be the same way, if only they were given the chance. |
|
01-04-2006, 06:53 PM | #38 (permalink) |
Still fighting it.
|
Sorry JJ, Shakran, everyone - having a really rough day here, didn't mean to lash out at you.
Edit: By the way, I'm not levelling this at the American public exclusively. I'm an inclusive misanthropic fuck. I hate everyone equally. I think I should clarify, since my previous post was a bit of a rant: No, I'm not saying our fascination with television excuses it, because I think the whole debacle is a complete mess. There is no excuse for any of this, none at all. But on the flipside, looking at the reality of it, you can hardly blame the people on the ground doing what's expected of them, because it's just the way the world works. When you're in business, you go where the money is, right? The media exists primarily (and nowadays, increasingly exclusively) to skewer you to your seat with news, entertainment, music, whatever, long enough so that you'll get to the advertisements, and so the network gets its payday. That's how the business works. Currently, the ratings are with the networks that give you what you want. In the case of news, it's getting there first, getting the juiciest stuff before anyone else. In this case, that would be tears of joy from families who've just been informed that their relatives, thought dead, are okay. That's the killer angle. That's what everyone wants to see. As sad as you or I might find it, that's the meat of the story. Joe Blow will hear that the mine failed however many safety inspections and go 'that's a damn shame', but he'll sit down and watch agog if there's some homely soccer mom bawling her guts out live on air because she just heard her son got exploded to death. That's what gets the asses on the seats, and the viewing figures through the roof. Because it's compelling, it's real, it's genuine human drama. And it's where the money is. If we (as a people) didn't buy into this shit, it wouldn't exist. It's a self-propelling phenomenon. The same argument exists for every other form of advertisment-funded, or commercial media. Why do you think Reality TV is such a hot property nowadays? People sit down to swallow it like baby birds, and it's cheap as chips to make. That's why TV is in such a dire state. That's why things like Harry Potter movies and books are hyped to the ceiling (which in my opinion explains a large proportion of their popularity, especially among adults - although that's just my axe to grind. ). Basically, what I'm saying is, it only exists because we let it. It's fucked up, yes, but it's who we are. Last edited by flamingdog; 01-04-2006 at 08:55 PM.. |
01-04-2006, 07:09 PM | #39 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
We can say that about anything though. Democracy, New York, the Ice Capades. They only exist because we let them. There's nothing inherently wrong with reality shows or stupid entertainment. It's when crap like that is ALL that's available that things go awry. And reality shows are particularly bad. Ever notice what happened with Big Brother? That show TANKED in the ratings, yet they brought it back. Why? It wasn't much of a risk. All the actors were free. It was shot by untrained tape apes (sorry, they're not photographers ) on cameras that cost a tiny fraction of what a real show's cameras cost - basically, even if the ratings SUCK, as long as they get some, cheap, advertising on it they've paid for the show and then some. So that's where your premise might get derailed. With the exception of the heavy hitters - survivor, the apprentice, etc, reality shows aren't necessarilly mega-hits, but they're so cheap that they don't need to be, so even if the public for the most part stops watching, they'll still survive. |
|
01-04-2006, 07:14 PM | #40 (permalink) | ||
Still fighting it.
|
Quote:
Then again: Quote:
On the other hand, the BBC, because it's funded by the TV licence (called a 'tax' by some) that people all over the world are frequently shocked and appalled to hear about, has to justify its existence. If it doesn't pull in the viewers, its 'public service' remit is questioned by the government, and that funding could be pulled. In recent years, we've seen the BBC launching what amount to commercial sattelite channels, aping the reality and talent show formats so beloved of the commercial networks, and basically dumbing itself down (I hate that phrase) until it barely resembles anything remotely intellectual. It's been forced into competition, and in order to stay afloat, it's basically had to lobotomise itself. It's what people seem to want. It provides its highbrow content on a digital channel called BBC4 now, which used to get ridiculed for the pitifully low numbers of people tuning in, while its flagship soap opera, EastEnders (an unremittingly grim piece of television) draws in millions, and airs something like four episodes a week, and a two hour omnibus repeat on Sundays. Now, it might be entertaining, but if there's a show on TV that does a better job of exploiting sheer human suffering for entertainment, I'm not sure what it is. See, at least with a network like PBS, people choose whether to pay for it or not. The BBC, you get no choice. Everyone who has a TV pays. They have to walk a very slender tightrope, and when it comes to giving people what they want, they pretty much exclusively plump for the lowbrow. At least, that much is true for BBC1, the flagship terrestrial channel. Last edited by flamingdog; 01-04-2006 at 07:15 PM.. Reason: I fucked that up somehow. |
||
Tags |
miners, news, reports, survive, wrong |
|
|