Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Goldfish Go Blind in Round Bowls, Let's Ban 'Em (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/96635-goldfish-go-blind-round-bowls-lets-ban-em.html)

maleficent 10-25-2005 11:33 AM

Goldfish Go Blind in Round Bowls, Let's Ban 'Em
 
Rome bans 'cruel' goldfish bowls

Quote:

ROME, Italy (Reuters) -- The city of Rome has banned goldfish bowls, which animal rights activists say are cruel, and has made regular dog-walks mandatory in the Italian capital, the town's council said on Tuesday.

The classic spherical fish bowls are banned under a new by-law which also stops fish or other animals being given away as fairground prizes. It comes after a national law was passed to allow jail sentences for people who abandon cats or dogs.

"It's good to do whatever we can for our animals who in exchange for a little love fill our existence with their attention," said Monica Cirinna, the councilor behind the by-law.

"The civilization of a city can also be measured by this," she told Rome daily Il Messaggero.

The newspaper reported that round bowls caused fish to go blind. No one at Rome council was available to confirm this was why they were banned. Many fish experts say round bowls provide insufficient oxygen for fish.

In July 2004, parliament passed a law setting big fines and jail terms for people who abandon pets and since then local governments have added their own animal welfare rules many of which will be difficult to police.

The northern city of Turin passed a law in April to fine pet owners up to 500 euros ($597.7) if they do not walk their dogs at least three times a day.

The new Rome by-law requires owners to regularly exercise their dogs, and bans them from docking their pets' tails for aesthetic reasons.

It also provides legal recognition for cat lovers who provide food for the colonies of strays which live everywhere from the city's ancient Roman ruins to modern office car parks.

Animal rights groups estimate that around 150,000 pet dogs and 200,000 cats are abandoned in Italy every year.
I had to double check to make sure that this wasn't Rome, New York...

Walking a dog three times a day? It's good business for dog walkers but what about people who have jobs...

I'm all for the ethical treatment of animals, but this seems a bit ridiculous to legislate it.

The wise ass in me wants to see a goldfish be given an eye test, or glasses for when it can't see. I'd imagine when I had my pirhana I'd have been arrested for feeding them goldfish... but really it was only the ones who wanted to die...

BigBen 10-25-2005 11:47 AM

Hey, I love animals; let me preface what I am about to say with that...

How would they enforce this? House-to-house searches? No, Ben, you have it all wrong... neighbours are supposed to turn each other in! Oh, great, just one more thing to make me feel alienated from my community.

If you come to my door and claim that I am not walking my dog enough, I will respond with an inappropriate amount of rage, followed by the words "Prove It."

To think that people have enough time in their lives to worry about the welfare of a 10 cent fish. No, even worse, about their fucking eyesight.

I know I am going to eventually edit this post, but man am I feeling jaded and cynical right now. Fucking politicians annoy me sometimes. Please worry about the big things first. That is what society is paying you for.

raeanna74 10-25-2005 11:57 AM

Ok it's good for a person to walk their pets thrice daily but what if the person happens to get sick one day? They let him out on his leash in the back yard for 10 minutes while he goes to throw chucks again. So if the dog poops and the guy bring him back in without sufficient 'exercise' they're going to fine or arrest this guy? Besides - how much is a 'regular dog-walk' 5 minutes, 10 minutes? How're they gonna even know? What if they say it has to be 10 minutes, I gotta go to the bathroom at 9 minutes and bring my dog in?

This is a little invasive and controlling for them to make laws like this? Not taking your dog for a sufficiently long walk 3 times a day is a far cry from chaining him in the back yard, day and night, rain or snow, and letting him sleep in a tiny wooden box and even worse - not feeding him daily.

I can't imagine the logistics and time spent trying to enforce this. I doubt this will last long. The money spent to enforce this will cost too much too quickly for politicians to stick by it for long.

And the goldfish thing? What reliable source is gonna stand by that one? How obsurd! If a gold fish isn't getting sufficient oxygen, you know what happens? They die - end of story.

maleficent 10-25-2005 12:00 PM

Quote:

Animal rights groups estimate that around 150,000 pet dogs and 200,000 cats are abandoned in Italy every year.
That's a lot of animals, I have no idea what that number would be in other cities, but if they are trying to 'protect the animals' and 'let's think about the animals' wouldn't liscensing them and proof of spaying or neutering part of the license be more effective?

maleficent 10-25-2005 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raeanna74
And the goldfish thing? What reliable source is gonna stand by that one? How obsurd! If a gold fish isn't getting sufficient oxygen, you know what happens? They die - end of story.

And then they get flushed.. a lovely burial at sea... maybe the authorities would need to be called and an autopsy on the fishie would beed to be performed... :D

politicophile 10-25-2005 12:05 PM

When I see examples like this one, I think about how socialist Europe is becoming overly willing to legislate the daily affairs of its citizens. This is clearly a law that is overly invasive, disrespectful to the good judgment of pet owners, and not based on the actual physical needs of animals.

Where is the compelling state interest in banning goldfish bowls? Why the hell are we even assuming that goldfish have rights that the government should defend? Unless I'm missing something here, it's still legal in Rome to kill a fish, chop it up, and eat it. If that's legal, then what does it matter that round goldfish bowls supposedly cause the fish to go blind?

I'm being driven towards libertarianism on a daily basis, it seems...

denim 10-25-2005 12:43 PM

If they manage to enforce the dog walking rule, I expect they'll have a lot of dogs put down as a result.

Willravel 10-25-2005 01:33 PM

What are Rome's laws about children? Are you required to peel your 12 year old away from his PS2 3 times a day and run him? Have they banned children from watching TV, as it can have a negetive effect on eyesight over a long period of time? Perhaps it is time to check our priorities.

serlindsipity 10-25-2005 01:40 PM

i really really want to see the scientific study on goldfish going blind in Round Bowls. Lack of Oxygen? Change the damn water!

cyrnel 10-25-2005 02:04 PM

The eyesight thing made me smile. Which came first: Bug-eyed goldfish or goldfish bowls? :)

Still, those things do mess with optics. We must look pretty crazy to the fishes.

The new laws aren't economical but they fit with our broader understanding of non-human life. Conflicts with our ancient assumptions and behavior are unavoidable. If we can't treat all people equally, where do the critters fit? And what qualities makes a life-form worthy vs. dinner?

I watched a science special a few months ago that touched on veterinarians. They mentioned how in the 80's working on birds was weird but now mainstream. They now treat pet fish, where 10yrs ago that was also weird. What's next?

Then again, 25yrs ago I never would have believed tool-making crows, or chimps & gorillas who speak sign-language. It makes you think.

BigBen 10-25-2005 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maleficent
And then they get flushed.. a lovely burial at sea... maybe the authorities would need to be called and an autopsy on the fishie would beed to be performed... :D

Coroner: My GOD MAN!! This fish was completely blind at the time of death... who owned this little goldie?!?

Police Detective: Our files say that the fish matches the description of one that belongs to a "BigBen". We've had problems with this piece of shit before. He takes his dog for 7.548 minute walks when it drops to -25c, instead of the regulated 10 minutes. Do you think the blindness was caused by a round fishbowl, doc?

Coroner: I hope not. Let me run some more tests. Go pick this BigBen up, and if he gives you the slightest trouble...

Detective: I know, doc, I know. Two shots to the chest, one to the head. I can't believe that people raise their kids to become like this. I think I am going to be sick.

feelgood 10-25-2005 02:50 PM

Quote:

Animal rights groups estimate that around 150,000 pet dogs and 200,000 cats are abandoned in Italy every year.
I find that number hard to believe, at this rate...cat and dogs are gonna out-number humans living in Rome.

jorgelito 10-25-2005 03:22 PM

Ahem - We missed the obvious: Who might enforce this you say?

Wait for it....

*cue superhero music*

Ace Ventura, Pet Detective!!!!! Of course!

I love the idea of little prescription eyeglasses for the goldfish (Thanks Mal for the hilarious visual, I haven't stopped laughing yet!)

Ben, you do realize that Dr. Dolittle will be very busy performing "petopsies" in the morgue eh?

stevie667 10-25-2005 03:37 PM

Damn right, goldfish bowls (your bog standard ones) suck, and giving away fish at a fair is just cruel to begin with.

Go rome!

Grasshopper Green 10-25-2005 03:46 PM

Hmmm...my goldfish has lived in a circular bowl his entire life (2 years!) and he freaks out and begins a frantic fishie dance whenever me or my husband walk into the room. Unless he has ESP, then I'm guessing he can SEE us. I guess I should go ask him eh....

jujueye 10-25-2005 04:00 PM

I was thinking about the whole round bowl oxygen thing, and it begins to make sense. Compare a square fish tank to a bowl, both containing a gallon of water, then examine the top surface of the water which is exposed to outside air. The square tank obviously would have more surface area available for oxidation compared to the top of the spherical bowl. Otherwise, maybe the Italians are taking in a bit too much Chianti...(if I were a fish, I would want to swim in wine for sure

I tried to find a picture of a goldfish wearing glasses, but none were available. This is the closest I could find. She looks rather goldfishy.

http://us.inmagine.com/img/designpic.../dp1766264.jpg

cyrnel 10-25-2005 04:21 PM

Or...

http://img487.imageshack.us/img487/2...inbowl12gw.jpg

Manuel Hong 10-25-2005 07:47 PM

bwaaahaaa haaaaa haaaaa haaaa!!!!!! that photoshop is priceless!

Laws to protect animals are great to bring issueslike pet abandonment to the public's conciousness. Some people are bad pet owners and may get some sort of nudge when there are regulations...I can't imagine most infractions being noticed...

Anyone who abandons a pet should be punished. Heartily.

stevie667 10-26-2005 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medusa99
Hmmm...my goldfish has lived in a circular bowl his entire life (2 years!) and he freaks out and begins a frantic fishie dance whenever me or my husband walk into the room. Unless he has ESP, then I'm guessing he can SEE us. I guess I should go ask him eh....

I don't believe the going blind crud, thats bs of the highest order, but the fact that he freaks out everytime you walk in the room is of some concern. :hmm:

dlish 10-26-2005 05:35 AM

has anyone realised that most golfish in bowls are always alone.

which brings me to my next point...with who else will the goldfish find sexual gratification except with its own fins?!?!?!

yes masturbation makes you go blind...

now...wheres my guide dog....

Blaise 10-26-2005 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jujueye
Compare a square fish tank to a bowl, both containing a gallon of water, then examine the top surface of the water which is exposed to outside air. The square tank obviously would have more surface area available for oxidation compared to the top of the spherical bowl.

That's right- the amount of water in contact with the air is much too small, especially for goldfish who are coldwater fish (these require more water anyway as less oxygen can be held in cool water) and produce lots of ammonia that builds up in the water. Kept in proper tanks they tend to live much longer- 20-40 years is perfectly normal.

I don't think it should be a crime as people buy bowls out of ignorance or cheapness rather than deliberate animal abuse, but I do think they should perhaps stop the things being manufactured in the first place. Then if people want a fish hopefully the only option at most shops will be a small tank instead. It's not as if they're ridiculously expensive, but when the average person who knows nothing about fish has a choice between a cheap tank and a cheap bowl, they'll often pick the bowl if they're being sold as apparantly acceptable pet housing.

maleficent 10-26-2005 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blaise
but I do think they should perhaps stop the things being manufactured in the first place..

They are banning them... which is less severe than making it a crime....

However, (and I really do like animals) in the grand scheme of things, the eyesight of a disposable pet should only be on some politicians radar if they've solved every other problem plaguing their city.

Suave 10-26-2005 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBen
To think that people have enough time in their lives to worry about the welfare of a 10 cent fish. No, even worse, about their fucking eyesight.

The point of being compassionate towards animals specifically avoids the price you've paid for one. A 10 cent goldfish's life and well-being is worth no more than a ten thousand dollar horse's. If you are going to get a pet, you should invest the time and effort in seeing that it lives as healthy and good a life as you can provide.

IamtheSuffering 10-26-2005 01:14 PM

I am completley against animal cruelty, but this seems to go to far. The goldfish bowl thing I can agree with, but having a FINE for not walking a dog? I agree they need to be outdoors and they need a bit of freedom, but giving a fine for just not walking them seems ludacris. Most people don't have the time OR effort to take a dog out 3 times a day...I have 2 dogs and I rarely get a chance to get them out that often anymore...

Grasshopper Green 10-26-2005 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevie667
I don't believe the going blind crud, thats bs of the highest order, but the fact that he freaks out everytime you walk in the room is of some concern. :hmm:

I have always chalked it up to us getting close = food. Then again, I don't have fish ESP ;)

Atropos4 10-26-2005 05:17 PM

Why can't the people with the goldfish bowls just buy a bubbler? I had one in mine and they cost, what, two dollars?

The dog walking law is ridiculous. I wouldn't be able to do that, and I can't afford a pet sitter.

shakran 10-26-2005 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamtheSuffering
I am completley against animal cruelty, but this seems to go to far. The goldfish bowl thing I can agree with, but having a FINE for not walking a dog? I agree they need to be outdoors and they need a bit of freedom, but giving a fine for just not walking them seems ludacris. Most people don't have the time OR effort to take a dog out 3 times a day...I have 2 dogs and I rarely get a chance to get them out that often anymore...


I think the point of the law is, if you don't have the time, don't get the pet. Far too many people get a dog even though everyone in the house works long hours and the dog ends up in a cage for 10-14 hours per day. How would you like to spend your whole life not being allowed out of your house but one or two times per day for a few minutes at a time?

It's not cruel to the dog in the sense that you're not beating him or starving him, but it isn't the best life for the animal either.

If you can't take a dog out 3 times a day then you need to rearrange your priorities. Hell, that's once in the morning, once when you get home, and once before bed. Why is that so hard? I think the real statement is "I don't WANT to take the dog out 3 times a day" which is fine, but if you feel that way, then you shouldn't have a dog.

stevie667 10-27-2005 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medusa99
I have always chalked it up to us getting close = food. Then again, I don't have fish ESP ;)

lol, good point, i thought you meant it more in the sense of a minor psyciatric breakdown :p


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360