Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2005, 02:20 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
meembo's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
I remember people talking about this twenty-five years ago (now, that's dating yourself!). An article in USAToday says it's like trying to stop an elephant by throwing a ping-pong ball at it. Hurricanes cover tens of thousands of square miles, and the heat energy released by a hurricane absolutely dwarfs our most powerful explosives, thousands of times over. A bomb detonation would just render the storm radioactive as well.
__________________
less I say, smarter I am

Last edited by meembo; 09-07-2005 at 12:41 PM..
meembo is offline  
Old 09-06-2005, 02:24 PM   #42 (permalink)
Junkie
 
nukeu666's Avatar
 
Location: India
bombing a tornado would be feasible coz its smaller...few feet to a dozen feet wide at the eye...tho you would have to be able to predict where one would be making a touchdown
a hurricane eye is miles wide...only a nuke would do the job...but then better hurricane then a nuke...usually
__________________
Why did the Comp. Engineer get X-mas and Halloween mixed up?
Because Oct(31) == Dec(25)
nukeu666 is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 07:28 AM   #43 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by THGL
I don't think anyone's mentioned this yet, but do we really want to stop a hurricane after it's been formed? What I mean is that everything on this planet happens for a reason and why should we destroy something that Mother Nature thought was necessary. Yes, hurricanes are destructive; yes, people die; yes, it costs us millions or billions to rebuild, but that's all part of living on a dynamic planet.

All that energy has to go somewhere. If we start destroying hurricanes maybe the activity in Tornado Alley will increase tenfold. Or maybe the intensity and duration of thunderstorms in North America will increase.

Our time and money is better spent on making sure buildings/levies/etc. can withstand the next Cat. 5 hurricane that blows by.
If that energy is dissipated into turbulent flow rather than an organized system, it will collapse on itself with a net increase in entropy.

I've been reading Chaos by James Gleick, and I've been pondering the effect of chains of massive fuel-air bombs on hurricanes. Instead of hitting the eye, I took into consideration that there are many warm and cold areas within a hurricane, and that air spirals in toward the eye. If we were to disrupt several lines of air into the eye, I think that htere's a potential not to destroy the hurricane, but to divert it by throwing it off-balance. The basic idea is that sustaining turbulent flow in a confined but unbounded area requires much more energy than sustaining ordered flow.

It's all working out in my head, but there's probably something I'm missing.
MSD is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 08:06 AM   #44 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
It's all working out in my head, but there's probably something I'm missing.
You are missing the jillion fuel air bombs required to significantly change the system. You need a lot of energy, more than you realise.

Your idea of disrupting the energy lines of the system has merit but it would probably be better to start earlier and in a different way. I was thinking of something along the lines of massive reflective oil slicks to lessen the heating of ocean water in certain areas during certain building cycles, which could significantly decrease the strength of a potential storm if not prevent some completely.
Phage is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:36 PM   #45 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phage
You are missing the jillion fuel air bombs required to significantly change the system. You need a lot of energy, more than you realise.

Your idea of disrupting the energy lines of the system has merit but it would probably be better to start earlier and in a different way. I was thinking of something along the lines of massive reflective oil slicks to lessen the heating of ocean water in certain areas during certain building cycles, which could significantly decrease the strength of a potential storm if not prevent some completely.
I was thinking about minor alterations of its course as it starts up, before it's a full-force storm. I was considering doing this to a tropical depression when it was still a manageable size. It would still take a lot of energy (as far as I know, fuel-air results in the most concussive force short of anyhting nuclear) but the cost of disrupting a storm could be less than the potential loss of life and property.
MSD is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:53 PM   #46 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
...It would still take a lot of energy (as far as I know, fuel-air results in the most concussive force short of anyhting nuclear) but...
Concussive force is useless, remember we are talking about air formations here. Creating pressure waves is not going to do anything (except perhaps squeeze some moisture from the air temporarily). After you have set off your bombs the air is still going to be about in the same place as before.
Phage is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 04:52 PM   #47 (permalink)
Invisible
 
yournamehere's Avatar
 
Location: tentative, at best
I believe that, under the rules of the present administration, the only logical reason to bomb a hurricane would be if we were attacked by an earthquake.
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors:
"If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too."
It won't hurt your fashion sense, either.
yournamehere is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 05:58 PM   #48 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Ok so now our misguided scientist is using fuel air bombs, we can still do the movie!

(Odds are messing with something like a hurricane is BAD)
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-07-2005, 06:20 PM   #49 (permalink)
Adequate
 
cyrnel's Avatar
 
Location: In my angry-dome.
News events of the past couple days have convinced me our best weapon to minimize hurricane damage and fatalities would be to drop a 10MP/B bomb (MP/B=Million Politician/Bureaucrat) in the hurricane eye, ideally while it's still at sea. Of course, being unable to locate 10 million of the asses should in no way prevent us from making a best effort attempt.
__________________
There are a vast number of people who are uninformed and heavily propagandized, but fundamentally decent. The propaganda that inundates them is effective when unchallenged, but much of it goes only skin deep. If they can be brought to raise questions and apply their decent instincts and basic intelligence, many people quickly escape the confines of the doctrinal system and are willing to do something to help others who are really suffering and oppressed." -Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, p. 195
cyrnel is offline  
Old 09-12-2005, 10:16 AM   #50 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Since there doesn't seem to be much of an overlap between Slashdot and TFP, here's a link to Scientific American: Controlling Hurricanes from last year. I'm too tired to figure out the conclusions, I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader.
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 09-12-2005, 10:19 AM   #51 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by yournamehere
I believe that, under the rules of the present administration, the only logical reason to bomb a hurricane would be if we were attacked by an earthquake.
There was some made for television disaster movie on last year - i think with dana delaney as the beautiful, brilliant, and misunderstood scientist, where there was an earthquake threatning to destroy the west coast (in fact, it took out the space needle) A well placed nuclear weapon stopped the earthquake before it got any worse...

/me hates insomnia they play the worst movies at 3am
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 08:00 AM   #52 (permalink)
Junkie
 
meembo's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
I saw this in the paper today (The Hartford Courant). I found it online, but I can't find a link that works without a membership.



Hurricanes Defy Attempts At Control

Scientists Say Storms Too Powerful To Divert
September 23, 2005
By JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA, Associated Press

It sounds like a great idea: Let's just blast hurricanes like Rita and Katrina out of the sky before they hurt more people. Or, at least weaken the storms and steer them away from cities.

Atmospheric scientists say it's wishful thinking that we could destroy or even influence something as huge and powerful as a hurricane.

They abandoned such a quest years ago after more than two decades of inconclusive government-sponsored research.

Private companies have conducted tests on a much smaller scale, but have made little progress despite initially claiming to erase storm clouds from the atmosphere.

"It would be like trying to move a car with a pea shooter," said hydrometeorologist Matthew Kelsch of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder. "The amount of energy involved in a hurricane is far greater than anything we're going to impart to it."

The federal government's hurricane modification program was called Project Stormfury. The idea was raised during the Eisenhower administration after several major storms hit the East Coast in the mid-1950s, killing 749 people and causing billions in damage.

But it wasn't until 1961 that initial tests were conducted on Hurricane Esther with a Navy plane releasing silver iodide crystals. Some reports indicate winds were reduced by 10 percent to 30 percent.

During Stormfury, scientists also seeded hurricanes in 1963, 1969 and 1971 over the open Atlantic Ocean far from land.

Researchers dropped silver iodide, a substance that serves as an effective ice nuclei, into clouds just outside of the hurricane's eyewall. The idea was that a new ring of clouds would form around the artificial ice nuclei. The new clouds were supposed to change rain patterns and form a new eyewall that would collapse the old one. The re-formed hurricane would spin more slowly and be less dangerous.

Sometimes, the experiments appeared to work. Hurricane Debbie in 1969 was seeded twice over four days by several aircraft. Researchers noted that its intensity waxed and waned by up to 30 percent.

For cloud seeding to be successful, clouds must contain sufficient supercooled water that is still liquid even though it is below 32 degrees Fahrenheit.

Raindrops form when the artificial nuclei and the supercooled water combine.

But scientists also learned that hurricanes contain less supercooled water than other storm clouds, so seeding was unreliable. And, hurricanes grow and dissipate all on their own, even forming new walls of clouds called "concentric eyewall circles."

This made it impossible to determine whether storm reductions were the result of human intervention. Project Stormfury was abandoned in the 1980s after spending hundreds of millions of dollars.

Other storm modification methods that have been suggested include cooling the tropical ocean with icebergs and spreading particles or films over the ocean surface to inhibit storms from evaporating heat from the sea.

Occasionally, somebody suggests detonating a nuclear weapon to shatter a storm.

Researchers say hurricanes would dwarf such measures. For example, Hurricane Rita measures about 400 miles across.

According to the center for atmospheric research, the heat energy released by a hurricane equals 50 to 200 trillion watts or about the same amount of energy released by exploding a 10-megaton nuclear bomb every 20 minutes.
__________________
less I say, smarter I am
meembo is offline  
 

Tags
bomb, hurricane


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360