![]() |
Teen Killed over Ipod/Steve Jobs Calls family to offer condolences
Teen Killed Over Ipod
Quote:
Jobs calls family of stabbing victim Quote:
Classy move by Jobs, and completely suprising... How many CEOs out there would actually call the family of someone who was killed over one of their products? Sneakers and a Cellphone were also stolen.. wonder if the CEO of Nike would make the call or Adidas? nice to see some humanness in the world |
I was just looking for this article mal :D :D you must be psychic or sumfin.
It was a great move by Jobs and I really think Jobs was sincere in what he said. It'd be nice to see more CEO's taking an active role in the public eye. |
Quote:
|
Personally, I think Jobs should have just stayed out of it.
If I was a memeber of that family I would seriously question the motives of his call to console 'us.' Is he doing it to cover Apple's ass (the company that cares) or is he doing it just to make himself feel better about his and his company's tangenteal involvment in a murder. By no means am I suggesting that Jobs should be held responsible, clearly that responsiblitity falls to the street punks. I just don't feel that his call to the family would help. Plus I can't get over this niggling suspicion that it's not entirely compassion motivated. |
This doesn't surprise me about Jobs at all. When I buy a brand for some reason other than (or in addition to) price value, it's because of things like this. I feel good knowing that my laptop business went to a company headed by a guy like that.
It's unfortunate that somebody had to die, but I can't say I didn't see something like this coming for a while. When I first got my ipod, I used my old headphones for a while because I didn't want to advertise to muggers that I was carrying expensive equipment. When they broke and I started using the distinctive white earbuds, I couldn't help but think of that John Ruskin saying whenever I went out with it: "Every increased possession loads us with a new weariness." It's the damn truth. Poor kid. |
Quote:
As for Jobs, i'm not sure of my opinion on that. Half of my mind reasonably and rightfully questions the motive... the other says, "why do you have to shit on a man's supposed good intentions, you cynical fuck?" So i'm a little divided. |
Here's the way I see it-- Even if Jobs was just saving face for the company or his intentions weren't correct; at least the father of the kid got some solice out of the act. That alone makes it a good thing
|
One more final thought...
If my son or daughter were killed the last thing I would want is for it to turn into a media circus, and getting a phone call from a 'celebrity' in condolence and then having that phone call reported by the media is a good way for that to start. Now this becomes "The iPod Murder" and it will be in the news for weeks and every good memeory about your lost son is trampled by the crush of reporters reducing him to nothing more than his death. I fear his life would be forgotten |
I think it was probably sincere.
I mean, the cynic in me immediately went the "cover your ass" route, but then the logical side (a side I don't use too often...:) ) asked what exactly would he need to cover his ass about? I've read a lot of interviews, seen a lot of clips on Jobs over the years and he seems very...genuine, for lack of a better word. I think this was probably on the up and up. Jobs didn't comment on the call and the boy's father seems to have been the one to mention it in the first place. Personally, I can't imagine someone being killed over a high dollar trinket that I made. A trinket that I'm the public face for. Sorry to hear about the kid. Getting stabbed to death over an Ipod is pretty fucking pathetic. At the very least, the whole affair reminded us that while the world may have a bunch of ignorant, emotionally stunted shitheads, it's also full of genuinely nice people. |
I agree with Guthmund - What does he have to cover his ass about? He didn't get the kid killed, his product didn't malfunction and explode. I think most people don't give enough credit to CEO's for being humans, too. People with children, families, and emotions.
I'll give Jobs the credit for being a good guy and doing a nice thing for the family. |
i honestly think it's a good gesture on the part of jobs to call teh family and offer his condolences. I mean, Ford/firestone killed many with the rollover problems and not once did you hear of a ceo offering anything. Kids were often killed for their nikes and not once did you hear of a ceo personally calling the people to offer condelences.
I think it's a good thing and may not be totally magnanimous, but it is definitely something i wish others would do. |
According to this, the fact that Jobs made the call was only released to the media by the father after the event. That suggests that Jobs' intentions were sincere.
|
Are there any legal implications? For example, if Nike or Ford CEOs apologized, could they then be held liable? I've always wondered about that.
|
Whatever Jobs's intentions were it's a better thing to have made that call than to have not made that call. He sent his sympathies, he didn't take responsibility for the kids death and there's absolutely no way apple would be liable for the kids death.
|
true..forgot about that.
I don't think jobs apologized in that way, just that he mainly offered condolences. but no, i don't think there arelegal implications for jobs apologizing, otherwise, every owner of any company making anythign luxurious would be held liable. |
I don't see any evidence that Jobs or Apple tried to make this call public. It seems a classy response to a shitty situation.
|
in assessing job's motives...i think it's best to remember that he's a pretty impulsive person. i wouldn't suspect that much more calculation went in to this than the intitial reaction that he thought it was the right thing to do.
|
I got an email from a high-school kid. He went through my charity's leadership camp the previous Summer. He wrote to thank us. Because of the camp, he felt he had the skills to organize the memorial service for his friends who were gunned down earlier in the week. I cried like a baby when I read his email.
My point is that the things we do affect people far removed from us. When we discover the heavy implications, sometimes it can be overwhelming. Mr. Nobel started a peace prize when his invention (dynamite) was weaponized. I bet Steve felt guilt and sadness that his invention cost a father his son. |
Quote:
Well said. I find it sad sometimes that if someone reacts to a nasty situation people immediately suspect them and wonder "why" they are doing it. Perhaps the man was just truly sorry for the loss of the boy. Otherwise...I find it repulsive that we live in such a materialistic world that a young man would be killed over something as meaningless as an electronic device. There is no respect for our fellow man any longer and lives are as disposable as diapers now. All these guys will get is a slap on the wrist while some Mother has lost part of her life and her heart...forever. It makes me shake my head. Kudos to Job for his actions. May the other two kids that did this crime rot in hell. |
Don't judge Steve Jobs as if he is an average guy. He's much more than that.
For example: http://news-service.stanford.edu/new...bs-061505.html |
I have always heard and read good things about Jobs so I think it's just the way he is.
As for saving face..... I don't see how. The product didn't really cause the death, it was the fact some greedy fucks wanted it from the rightful owner and killed him for it. It's much like 10 years ago when kids were killing kids for their Nikes or whatever shoes were hot. It's in no way the company's fault, so I don't see how Jobs is saving any face (maybe bad publicity but I don't even really see that.) As for the phone call being public, perhaps it wasn't meant to be, but JObs' people called the paper for the boy's home # and who knows if the father didn't approve to let it be known. I cannot see this being a publicity stunt in anyway, Jobs doesn't need it and can make other "public" moves. Maybe I'm naive but I truly think this was a class act by a class act man. Sorry Flat I had to post the link, some people choose not to link move and this speech by Jobs is important and shows his true (or rather what I believe is his true) character. LINK ABOVE IN Flat's post: Quote:
|
I've got to believe the call was sincere. If so, I think it was a classy thing to do. If Jobs didn't leak the story it was OK and especially if it helped the parents.
|
I suspect that incidents like this aren't really about whatever piece of property was stolen. Ten years ago it was designer sneakers and athletic jackets, Gameboys. People steal small, valuable electronics, sure, but when it comes down to murder, I think there's something else going on. It's as much about exerting dominance. I think that even if the boy who was killed hadn't had an Ipod, he'd still have been a target, but his attackers would have found some other excuse to harrass him. Teenage boys manage to kill each other over turf or respect; they don't need expensive items for that, though they probably do act as a stimulant.
|
Hello pan6467
Since my FIDO days I'm reluctant to post long messages esp. when a link will do. Guess I over do it. We should all be as lucky as Mr. Jobs :-) |
Quote:
|
I'm sure Gates wouldn't do this.
It's stuff like this that makes me glad to be a Apple user. Shit, I'm even wearing my apple shirt today, totally didn't notice that. |
Man, everybody got right off the foot assuming because Mr. Job is the head of Apple and got lots of money has to be saving face for the company.
The humane element isn't completely gone these days you know? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project