Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   More Proof of "Pussification of America" (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/86598-more-proof-pussification-america.html)

jorgelito 04-04-2005 12:40 AM

More Proof of "Pussification of America"
 
Here's some more proof of MojoPeiPei's coined phrase, "Pussification of America".

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...us/no_more_red

I am stronlgy opposed to this type of "coddling". I believe we are sending the kids the wrong message and making them soft. The parent's need to parent and support the teachers. I am surprised that anyone would still want to be a teacher after all the sh*t we out them through.

This type of thinking is similar to banning dodge ball, changing the rules of competition so "everyone's a winner" etc. Now I am not advocating abuse or "boot camp" but c'mon, a little reality and common sense please.

We need to bring personal responsibility and accountablility back.

Cut the kids more slack or hell no, discipline and work ethic?

Your thoughts?

john_713 04-04-2005 12:45 AM

That is just insane! Surely you have to ask why the teachers chose to use red in the first place....it stands out and makes the errors clear. I personallally used to do all my work in black or blue. It wouldn't be easy to distinguish between my work and the teacher's corrections if they were the same colour. If the work is wrong then it's wrong! There is no point in trying to disguise that fact by doing it in a different colour.

jorgelito 04-04-2005 01:06 AM

I personally like to see my "A's" in bold red at the top.

Glory's Sun 04-04-2005 05:18 AM

for those of you who don't want to click the link::

Quote:

Red Falls Out of Favor As Teacher's Choice

Sun Apr 3, 5:09 PM ET

Add to My Yahoo! U.S. National - AP

By BEN FELLER, AP Education Writer

WASHINGTON - Of all the things that can make a person see red, school principal Gail Karwoski was not expecting parents to get huffy about, well, seeing red. At Daniels Farm Elementary School in Trumbull, Conn., Karwoski's teachers grade papers by giving examples of better answers for those students who make mistakes. But that approach meant the kids often found their work covered in red, the color that teachers long have used to grade work.

Parents objected. Red writing, they said, was "stressful." The principal said teachers were just giving constructive advice and the color of ink used to convey that message should not matter. But some parents could not let it go.

So the school put red on the blacklist. Blue and other colors are in.

"It's not an argument we want to have at this point because what we need is the parents' understanding," Karwoski said. "The color of the message should not be the issue."

In many other schools, it's black and white when it comes to red. The color has become so symbolic of negativity that some principals and teachers will not touch it.

"You could hold up a paper that says 'Great work!' and it won't even matter if it's written in red," said Joseph Foriska, principal of Thaddeus Stevens Elementary in Pittsburgh.

He has instructed his teachers to grade with colors featuring more "pleasant-feeling tones" so that their instructional messages do not come across as derogatory or demeaning.

"The color is everything," said Foriska, an educator for 31 years.

At Public School 188 in Manhattan, 25-year-old teacher Justin Kazmark grades with purple, which has emerged as a new color of choice for many educators, pen manufacturers confirm.

"My generation was brought up on right or wrong with no in between, and red was always in your face," Kazmark said. "It's abrasive to me. Purple is just a little bit more gentle. Part of my job is to be attuned to what kids respond to, and red is not one of those colors."

Three top pen and marker manufacturers — Bic, Pilot Pen and Sanford, which produces Papermate and Sharpie — are making more purple pens in response to rising sales. School leaders and teachers are largely driving that demand, company representatives say.

"They're trying to be positive and reinforcing rather than being harsh," said Robert Silberman, Pilot Pen's vice president of marketing. "Teachers are taking that to heart."

The disillusionment with red is part of broader shift in grading, said Vanessa Powell, a fifth-grade teacher at Snowshoe Elementary School in Wasilla, Alaska.

"It's taken a turn from 'Here's what you need to improve on' to 'Here's what you've done right,'" Powell said. "It's not that we're not pointing out mistakes, it's just that the method in which it's delivered is more positive."

Her students, she said, probably would tune out red because they are so used to it. So she grades with whatever color — turquoise blue, hot pink, lime green — appeals to them.

That is a sound approach, said Leatrice Eiseman, a color specialist with a background in psychology who has written several books on the ties between colors and communication.

"The human eye is notoriously fickle and is always searching for something new to look at it," she said. "If you use a color that has long been used in a traditional way, you can lose people's attention, especially if they have a history of a lot of red marks on their papers."



Purple may be rising in popularity, Eiseman said, because teachers know it is a mix of blue and red. As she put it: "You still have that element of the danger aspect — the red — but it's kind of subtle, subliminal. It's in the color, rather than being in your face."

In Charles County, Md., reading and writing specialist Janet Jones helps other teachers lead their lessons. The students at Berry Elementary School in Waldorf, Md., use colored pencils to edit each other's papers. By the time teachers get to grading, Jones said, the color they use isn't that important.

"I don't think changing to purple or green will make a huge difference if the teaching doesn't go along with it," Jones said. "If you're just looking at avoiding the color red, the students might not be as frightened, but they won't be better writers."

--My mom is a teacher and she uses red to correct papers. I guess it makes more sense to use red to correct since it stands out better and is easier to see the corrections right away. I think the last statement is the most important though; it doesn't matter what color the paper is graded in, it matters about the quality of teaching.

frogza 04-04-2005 05:26 AM

Give me a break! Do these people not have anything else to worry about? I'd gladly donate some of my problems to help them.

04-04-2005 06:01 AM

I really don't care what colour teachers mark their students grades in. What amazes me is that someone went to the length of writing an article about this. It must have been a quiet week in the office.

martinguerre 04-04-2005 06:38 AM

anyone ever stop to think that using the word pussy as an insult may not be the most enlightened way of dealing with something you disagree with?

Mojo_PeiPei 04-04-2005 07:11 AM

Saying that this is lending to the pussification of America is just what we need. I'm not about coddling people, especially when they are being soft ass mamby pamby pussies. It's about conveying a point, why would I not call a spade a spade? I might offend them, therefore I shouldn't? That only furthers my point that America is become a bunch of pussy ass bitches, we don't need to always need to act all "enlightened", I would rather take this sucker out of the park and not beat around the Bush. Forget my harsh words but to curb this disease on America people need to realize how retarded they are acting.

So let's see, we have schools abandoning honor rolls because the morons feel bad about themselves because they are not on it, you have teachers putting four chairs for three people in musical chairs, and now we are banning the color red as it has become "symbolic of negativity". These are probably the parents that don't let their kids play with toy guns, or play cowboys and indians because it's politically incorrect.

04-04-2005 07:17 AM

Your harsh words make you sound stupid and ignorant (please excuse my harsh words)

"We" are not banning anything. A bunch of teachers decided to change their stationary, and someone thought they'd write (a rather boring) article about it.

asaris 04-04-2005 07:19 AM

In defense of not using red ink, I learned in my pedagogy course that studies have been done (what haven't studies been done on?) that have seemed to indicate that using red is less effective as a teaching tool than using some other color. So it's not just being touchy-feely, there are reasons why teachers might not use red to grade papers/tests. Unfortunately, I don't have a link to the studies.

Mojo_PeiPei 04-04-2005 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zen_tom
Your harsh words make you sound stupid and ignorant (please excuse my harsh words)

"We" are not banning anything. A bunch of teachers decided to change their stationary, and someone thought they'd write (a rather boring) article about it.

How do they make me sound stupid and ignorant? If people are acting like morons, why should they not be told as such? Because it's offensive? They are offending me with their sheer stupidity, maybe not so much in this case, Asaris made a legit point about the color red. My harsh words might make me sound like an asshole, they do not however make me sound ignorant.

04-04-2005 07:32 AM

You can tell someone they are acting foolishly without using the word pussy, moron and asshole. Resorting to words like these make you sound ignorant.

(I'm sure you're not - in fact I know you often make well informed responses that show intelligence and compassion - it's just difficult to take them as seriously if they use anatomical swear-words.)

Mojo_PeiPei 04-04-2005 07:39 AM

Haha, my name and compassion in the same sentence, I think that's a first here, thanks man, that made my day.

At any rate I can see what you are saying, but the bottom line is I'm not calling people pussies per say, I'm saying there is a disease sweeping this country, said disease is the pussification of America.

biznatch 04-04-2005 08:34 AM

yes indeed. One of the problems of the american system of education is the teachers all seem to wanna be your friends.. "aw, sweetie, you got a D..that's not bad. Its a lot better than an F!! And F is for Fantastic!" ok exagerrating, but I have witnessed a lot of this positive bullshit. everybody is special to them...they just can't accept that some students aren't as good as others...its biological, some people just have it easier in school than others.
Now, if they go as far as saying that red is too negative, then I'm losing hope.
I don't think it has to do with America in general.. just some parts of society, the same that always want to be politically correct(when you can't always stay politically correct).

THGL 04-04-2005 08:37 AM

That makes me so mad, I'm seeing... purple?

Willravel 04-04-2005 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THGL
That makes me so mad, I'm seeing... purple?

:lol: :lol: :lol: Nice!

This is an unfortunate example of why people should have to be licensed to have kids. These people are morons. Shades of Kyle's mom on South Park.

Ace_O_Spades 04-04-2005 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Shades of Kyle's mom on South Park.

that woman makes me so angry... for a cartoon character.

Pretty much exemplifies everything that I think is wrong with people.

But as for the red ink on papers, I couldn't really care less because the message is there. Writing corrections in red ink or blue ink won't chance the fact the kid might not be as smart as another kid. It is of utmost importance for the teachers to convey that the corrections are not a put-down of the kid's work, and that they should be free to approach the teacher to discuss the corrections.

HAL3000 04-04-2005 10:04 AM

Not sure what to even say here. We could talk this to death... basic point is that we've lost sight of the forest for the trees. Sad really, because our kids are paying the price.

streak_56 04-04-2005 10:10 AM

So... since grading in red meant that it was stressful for me.... I could sue the government for putting me into an umcomfortable position. Oh wait... that would just make me as stupid as them. This is just idiotic. As was said before, its not the colour of the pen that counts, its the quality of the teaching. Needless to say... red= crappy grade isn't a big issue. I had one paper in College that was all marked up in red, but I got an A- on the paper. Its just people taking things way out of proportion.

kutulu 04-04-2005 10:21 AM

This really isn't something to get worked up about.

RE: Dodgeball

Even though I enjoyed that it is a cruel game. There is no need for the PE teacher to provide a forum for cruelty.

Bacchanal 04-04-2005 10:59 AM

What I don't get more than anything is that if red has been used for so long, because it does stand out so much, are these parents saying that they didn't receive the best education they could've, or that they were enraged as children because of the red ink?

This makes no sense to me at all.

Halx 04-04-2005 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinguerre
anyone ever stop to think that using the word pussy as an insult may not be the most enlightened way of dealing with something you disagree with?

I really hope that was a joke. If it is, I commend you on your subtle yet brilliant line.

If it wasn't, your statement is a prime example of why everyone in this thread is so up in arms about this supremely pussified notion.

Mojo_PeiPei 04-04-2005 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
I really hope that was a joke. If it is, I commend you on your subtle yet brilliant line.

If it wasn't, your statement is a prime example of why everyone in this thread is so up in arms about this supremely pussified notion.

And the truth shall set you free. Jordan fades back "swoosh", that's the ball game!

martinguerre 04-04-2005 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
I really hope that was a joke. If it is, I commend you on your subtle yet brilliant line.

If it wasn't, your statement is a prime example of why everyone in this thread is so up in arms about this supremely pussified notion.

Not a joke at all. And I don't give a flying fuck about pen colors, to be quite honest. Nor do i see why anyone else is. Gendered language does concern me.

http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=44729

Halx 04-04-2005 01:48 PM

Just so I'm clear on this... are you a pussy yourself and thus take offense with the term 'pussy' being applied to things you disagree with?

They're words. WORDS! That's only about 10% of communication, right? The words shouldn't matter. The meaning behind them should. In this case, the term "Pussification of America" means that we're all approaching life with oven mits on and it's ruining our culture.

And you're still hung up on WORDS!

lindseylatch 04-04-2005 01:51 PM

mwahahahah! How about we teach our kids to READ the comments, instead of reacting to a color...I mean, if it says "GOOD JOB!" in red, I'd be excited. If it says "PIECE OF SHIT!" in green, I'd be upset.
I don't go into a deep depression just cause there's some red ink on the page. Fuck, I have a little more basis for my self-worth than how many comments a teacher put on my paper I cranked out the night before it was due.
I can see why the school gave in though. they don't give a flying fuck what colors the teachers use, and if it makes the parents happy, it's no sweat off their back.

All these parents are just afraid the teachers are commies...that's the real reason they don't like red. McArthy-ism is back!!!!!
Didn't mean to Bogart your term there Martin, I just think "flying fuck" sounds nice...

ironman 04-04-2005 02:15 PM

This kind of stuff is making mediocrity the rule of thumb in our society. It won't be long till some loser allegues that top level athletes makes him feel lesser so rankings should be prohibited.

ironman 04-04-2005 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinguerre
Not a joke at all. And I don't give a flying fuck about pen colors, to be quite honest. Nor do i see why anyone else is. Gendered language does concern me.

To me "pussy" means coward, it doesn't matter if you're a boy or a girl, black or white, green or purple. Taking offense on simple things like this is exactly what makes us loose focus on what really matters.

martinguerre 04-04-2005 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Just so I'm clear on this... are you a pussy yourself and thus take offense with the term 'pussy' being applied to things you disagree with?

They're words. WORDS! That's only about 10% of communication, right? The words shouldn't matter. The meaning behind them should. In this case, the term "Pussification of America" means that we're all approaching life with oven mits on and it's ruining our culture.

And you're still hung up on WORDS!

No. I don't use the word pussy to identify myself.

In this case, words are really all we have. There is some graphical communication that might take place by avatar, but essentially the TFP is a word driven communication system. As such, words are important.

I said what i did because it's a gendered insult. It assumes that weakness, coddling, and immaturity are somehow related to women, and women's sexuality. I don't think that's accurate. And i think it sends the wrong message to the women of this community.

I'm not particularly outraged at this, but i don't approve of it either. I've put my two cents in, and that's all i wanted to do.

Halx 04-04-2005 02:40 PM

Martin, just how we all know "gay" didn't start out meaning "homosexual" nor was it ever used negatively - "pussy" didn't start out associated with females. I've always been an advocate of the notion that if you cannot take words in their correct context, then you're probably not worth the breath it takes to explain their meaning.

With that said, getting bent over a word reminds me of a happlessly irreverent quote from Full Metal Jacket. "If I'm gonna get my balls blown off for a word, my word is poontang."

It shines light on the weight that is given to words, as if the word by itself is power. In relation to the quote, take "Freedom" for an example. The mere mention of it is sure to get any redneck NRA local militia member to puff out his chest.

You've gotta be smarter than that. You've gotta be more fluid and free-thinking than that. Being affected by a single word is submitting to the will of whoever would speak it. In my mind, that's too much power to give ANYONE over me.

People who are affected by words and words alone are the weak-minded hyper-reactive nitwits that we're trying to save our culture from.

Sage 04-04-2005 03:16 PM

Yay for saving the culture from weak-minderd hyper-reactive nitwits!

However, I think that you need to think up something more constructive than pussy to insult someone... like weak-minded hyper reactive nitwit! Point for Hal!

Anyway, you know what? If you suck at school, you need to have some constructive criticisim towards what you did wrong. I agree with the satement that said "if PIECE OF SHIT was written in green, I'd be upset" I do think that the color red causes a reaction in some people when they see it, so if you were going to be progressive in your teaching methods (and I'm all for progressing away from this NCLB crap) then grading in another color (I like the purple) might be a good idea. However, I think that grades on the top of the paper should be in red! That's your grade, it's what you earned, if it's good you should see it and react strongly to it, and if it's really bad, then you should be jarred into wanting to do better.

I'm all for the abandoning of this "oh, let's not hurt poor Johnnie's feelings cause he can't read" in favor for "OK, Jonnie, you're going to have to go to this different classroom because our previous methods of teaching you how to read were inadequate." I was always getting into trouble in class when I was young because the class progressed at the pace of the slowest kid, and I got bored really, really fast. I think that might have to do with some of the ADD that gets thrown around nowadays.

Down with the ineffectual bourgeoise public school system! Who gives a damn about the pen color when kids can't read!!

martinguerre 04-04-2005 03:20 PM

start out meaning and are now associated with are two different things. frankly, i don't know the etymological roots of the word pussy. but i don't think it's relevant. the word currently carries that meaning. faggot can mean match or cigarette, but that doesn't mean it's a commonly accepted part of civilized discourse.

again, i think you're overestimating my reaction here. i'm not in a position to tell you or anyone else on this board not to use a word. what i am communicating is that i do not respect your decision to use that word. now, if that makes me a hyper reactive nitwit, i'm sorry to hear that. but, really...i think this is as simple a matter of your choice to say something, and my choice to disagree.

Sweetpea 04-04-2005 03:57 PM

(I think the title could have been different. I think that jorgelito choose it to be a reactive title to gain attention)

What is NOT being recognized in this thread is that the teachers are trying their best (in this case, by not using the red color) to overcome the fact that kids are not getting the validation/love/support they need in their home environment. Kids have become reactive in the education environment because most no longer have the stability they need in their homes.
It's not the red color that is stressing the kids, but the sheer fact that American society has made competition the only means by which people in our society, children or not, can get validation . . . people in our society are seen as successful only if they are winners, or somehow clawed their way to the 'top.'
What the teachers should be asking themselves is really WHY these kids are reacting to the 'stressful' color of red. It really does appear, as usual, that a Band-Aid is being placed on a larger issue.
As to Americans being 'pussies' or raising their children to be as such . . . last i checked, sentiments of being American in our world community is that we are cocky, arrogant and righteous . . .

Sweetpea :)

Halx 04-04-2005 04:39 PM

Martin, from there, it's a simple matter of being whiney enough to try to make people change. It all starts with being affected, as you are.

meembo 04-04-2005 04:40 PM

This is a thread about how we see things others care about as ridiculous. Is anyone's mind changed after reading this thread? Mine isn't, and isn't likely to be any time soon either. My son in 5th grade is about to have the big "Human Development" (read: SEX) talk in class, and it's difficult for me to accept how many other parents have such serious and heartfelt problems with the words "penis" and "vagina".

Are they pussies? Do they suffer from disease? Investigation and education is the way to build bridges to understanding between any two ideas, not ridicule.

I know people my age ashamed of papers they received as children with red ink on them -- the red was never good news. I think the color is a ridiculous fixation as well, but it's the meaning to others (i.e., failure) that carries all of the meaning that is misunderstood, not the color red (which is a temporary and unfortunate stand-in for real dialogue about the real problem).

Who here hasn't experienced a dozen of these disagreements in the last year?

liquidlight 04-04-2005 04:41 PM

Once again, a group of inept parents that are incapable of communicating with or parenting their children are blaming a completely innocuous inanimate object in an effort to make themselves feel better at their utter failure in raising their children.

Would this be an issue if their kids weren't flunking out of school because the parents were too busy trying to blame someone else for their screwups to help these children with their homework? You know this wasn't coming from the parents of the kids that brought home A's, this is from the people that their kids brought home papers where at least every other question was wrong.

I went through school, if I got a wrong answer it got marked that way, heaven forbid I get off my ass and study so that I didn't get the wrong answer, though studying may not be an option in modern society, these kids have completely full schedules what with their rigid dosing regimens, their ridiculous therapy sessions, and their sensitivity awareness classes, who has time for silly things like homework and studying?!

meembo 04-04-2005 04:41 PM

I agree that "pussy" is a simple-minded insult destined to make you more misunderstood thatn understood.

filtherton 04-04-2005 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Martin, just how we all know "gay" didn't start out meaning "homosexual" nor was it ever used negatively - "pussy" didn't start out associated with females. I've always been an advocate of the notion that if you cannot take words in their correct context, then you're probably not worth the breath it takes to explain their meaning.

With that said, getting bent over a word reminds me of a happlessly irreverent quote from Full Metal Jacket. "If I'm gonna get my balls blown off for a word, my word is poontang."

It shines light on the weight that is given to words, as if the word by itself is power. In relation to the quote, take "Freedom" for an example. The mere mention of it is sure to get any redneck NRA local militia member to puff out his chest.

You've gotta be smarter than that. You've gotta be more fluid and free-thinking than that. Being affected by a single word is submitting to the will of whoever would speak it. In my mind, that's too much power to give ANYONE over me.

People who are affected by words and words alone are the weak-minded hyper-reactive nitwits that we're trying to save our culture from.

Words and how they are interpreted play a vital role in how one'e message is percieved, obviously. I think it stands to reason that when one is attempting to persuade another on a certain matter, one should use words that don't offend the audience. I don't really get offended by words that other people use. I do try and pay more attention to the words i use because generally words like pussy, bitch, faggot, nigger, etc convey more about the person using them than they do about any particular message.

The idea that anything is "just a word" seems to me to be a tad naive. A gun is not just a "lump of metal". That being said, choosing to get offended by someone else's inability to communicate without alluding to gender stereotypes seems rather bush league to me.

HAL3000 04-04-2005 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
Martin, just how we all know "gay" didn't start out meaning "homosexual" nor was it ever used negatively - "pussy" didn't start out associated with females. I've always been an advocate of the notion that if you cannot take words in their correct context, then you're probably not worth the breath it takes to explain their meaning.

With that said, getting bent over a word reminds me of a happlessly irreverent quote from Full Metal Jacket. "If I'm gonna get my balls blown off for a word, my word is poontang."

It shines light on the weight that is given to words, as if the word by itself is power. In relation to the quote, take "Freedom" for an example. The mere mention of it is sure to get any redneck NRA local militia member to puff out his chest.

You've gotta be smarter than that. You've gotta be more fluid and free-thinking than that. Being affected by a single word is submitting to the will of whoever would speak it. In my mind, that's too much power to give ANYONE over me.

People who are affected by words and words alone are the weak-minded hyper-reactive nitwits that we're trying to save our culture from.

Quote:

Originally Posted by filtherton
Words and how they are interpreted play a vital role in how one'e message is percieved, obviously. I think it stands to reason that when one is attempting to persuade another on a certain matter, one should use words that don't offend the audience. I don't really get offended by words that other people use. I do try and pay more attention to the words i use because generally words like pussy, bitch, faggot, nigger, etc convey more about the person using them than they do about any particular message.

The idea that anything is "just a word" seems to me to be a tad naive. A gun is not just a "lump of metal". That being said, choosing to get offended by someone else's inability to communicate without alluding to gender stereotypes seems rather bush league to me.


Halx, while I agree with you whole heartedly in theory, filtheron has made an excellent point. A word is just a word after all... but the complexities of human communication are not quite that simple. :)

Mojo_PeiPei 04-04-2005 05:51 PM

Nobody is being called a pussy, the point is society and the world in general is becoming pussified.

jorgelito 04-04-2005 06:02 PM

SweetPea, you are partially correct.

I chose to use the phrase "Pussification of America" to:
1. Acknowledge MojoPeiPei's coining of it in another thread
2. Continuation of a dialogue originally titled "Wussification of America" (do a search)
3. Reinvigorate the discussion of said "coddling, 'p*ssification, political-correctness-gone-wild, etc" in a constructive manner.

Cheap theatrics aside, I actually did not intend for the thread to deteriorate into an argument over semantics. My original intention was to discuss the problems as I framed it in terms of: personal responsibility, accountability, parenting, common sense, and the balance between sensitivity and "reality (so-called toughening up). Perhaps I erred in judgement.

I do not think Martin is "wrong" nor do I think he "overreacted". I feel he has pointed out a valid point and regardless of "just words", we should be better than that and create better discourse (myself includeed of course).

I also agree with Hal(x) in that we need to be "tougher" and let that sh*t slide or roll off our backs etc (as I intrepreted what he was saying).

It is true, that MojoPeiPei often uses "colorful" speech in his debates. He is straight-shooter and at the very least, honest and up front. However, one can still make a compelling argument without coarse language or insulting diatribes, in my opinion. We are all here to discuss and words are our medium.

Looking at the "Rules of TFP, I have to remind myself of the "golden rule": to treat everyone with respect and dignity regardless of agreements and disagreements and maintain a level of civility in discourse. We should all review the "rules" from time to time. [smiley face]

So, any teachers here on TFP want to weigh in on yet another "inane rule" (in my opinion) further cleaving parent-teacher relations?

How do things like this eventually affect our kids? What will they do when they get rejected from colleges, jobs etc? Are we setting them up for a huge nasty rude-awakening?

Aladdin Sane 04-04-2005 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinguerre
Gendered language does concern me.

I think this kind of concern is pussified.

Psycho Dad 04-04-2005 06:19 PM

If I thought for a minute that some of the long lines I've stood in at parent teacher conferences were due to the fucking color of ink, I'd be going on a damn rampage.

Carno 04-04-2005 06:39 PM

Hahaha, this shit makes me laugh.. Kids are going to get more and more coddled, and then when they get out in the real world, they are going to be completely helpless. They won't have any tools to deal with anything. How can you expect a kid to learn and to grow without adverse conditions? Tomorrow's adults are going to be a fucked up bunch of helpless babies, unable to cope with the realities of life.

What's also funny is that the same people who are pissed about this are the same people who push for the pussification if people in other ways.

In many ways, I am glad that I am going to be joining the Marine Corps, so I will not have to deal with this bullshit. I'd rather call stupid people stupid, cowardly people cowards, etc. I am too direct for the bleeding pussies that inhabit the United States.

flstf 04-04-2005 07:51 PM

Some of my best learning experiences in school were the result of papers I turned in that were bled all over by the teacher. When I screwed up and didn't study, the sight of that blood red writing all over my paper was visible to me before it was passed half way back the row to me. Also there is a very good feeling when you aced the paper and that big bright red A was circled at the top.

I assume we are talking about grade school kids here, high school kids are too old to get excited by this stuff aren't they.

Willravel 04-04-2005 08:05 PM

This will weed out the weaker kids. The smarter kids will take power and eventually we will have the Morlocks and Eloi. And all they had to do was let the red ink slide.

F-18_Driver 04-04-2005 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx
They're words. WORDS! That's only about 10% of communication, right? The words shouldn't matter. The meaning behind them should. In this case, the term "Pussification of America" means that we're all approaching life with oven mits on and it's ruining our culture.

And you're still hung up on WORDS!

That explains it! I wondered who was the reincarnation of Frank Zappa. :)

(That's a compliment.)

If you haven't seen this, it's something of a classic. It's also 21 minutes long, so I'll understand if there are those who don't want to view the whole thing.

Zappa on Crossfire

Zeraph 04-04-2005 11:08 PM

I don't think it's that big of a deal. It's hard to tell what long term psychological effects it can have (same thing with using some words like the above argument over pussification.)

I don't see why people get upset over this, why not err on the side of caution? If red colors don't mean anything what's the big deal in changing it?

roachboy 04-05-2005 05:59 AM

i do not use red pen when marking up papers because i do not like using a red pen when i mark up papers. so maybe i am complicit in this process of encouraging students to think for themselves by reducing the pointless flourishes that are about nothing but authority in and for itself, which would be part of what i assume you mean, mojo, with your term


"pussification"


were i you, mojo, i would be more concerned about the very macho educational trajectory that enabled you to imagine "the pussification of america" means anything.
it sounds like the kind of phrase that would pop into your mind during your fourth or fifth week of 24/7 limbaugh.

are you advocating anything here, really?
an education that inculcates servility, that respects authority, no matter how bankrupt, because it is authority?
an education that persuades students that a cretin with a gun is more free than someone who can think for themselves?

martinguerre 04-05-2005 06:14 AM

jorgelito...i tip my hat to you, good sir. enjoy the rest of your thread. :)

Mojo_PeiPei 04-05-2005 08:05 AM

Yeah, I'm adovcating something here, I want people to wake up and grow some stones. Kids don't need this coddling or else they'll turn into whiney little bitches. Everyone is a winner, so let's do away with honor rolls, because those that didn't make it feel left out. Let's play musical chairs with enough chairs so no ones ego is bruised. National no name calling week? Is this shit serious? Again it doesn't relate so much to this particular instance of markers and color. My issue is that everyone seems to be fostering the idea that everyone is equal, when the reality is that we are not all equal.

Here is an article, talking about how Nashville did away with honor rolls and hanging up work in hallways. They also went after pep rallies and spelling bees.

Quote:

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - The school honor roll, a time-honored system for rewarding A-students, has become an apparent source of embarrassment for some underachievers.

As a result, all Nashville schools have stopped posting honor rolls, and some are also considering a ban on hanging good work in the hallways - all at the advice of school lawyers.

After a few parents complained their children might be ridiculed for not making the list, Nashville school system lawyers warned that state privacy laws forbid releasing any academic information, good or bad, without permission.

Some schools have since put a stop to academic pep rallies. Others think they may have to cancel spelling bees. And now schools across the state may follow Nashville's lead.

The change has upset many parents who want their children recognized for hard work.

''This is as backward as it gets,'' said Miriam Mimms, who has a son at Meigs Magnet School and helps run the Parent Teacher Association. ''There has to be a way to come back from the rigidity.''

The problem appears unique to Tennessee, since most states follow federal student privacy guidelines, which allow the release of such things as honor rolls, U.S. Department of Education officials said.

''It's the first time I've heard of schools doing that,'' said department spokesman Jim Bradshaw.

But Nashville school lawyers based their decision last month on a state privacy law dating back to the 1970s--a law that's not always followed because no one challenged the honor roll status quo.

School officials are developing permission slips to give parents of the Nashville district's 69,000 students the option of having their children's work recognized. They hope to get clearance before the next grading cycle--in about six weeks at some schools.

Until then, school principals are left trying to figure out what they can and can't do.

Sandy Johnson, chief instructional officer for the Nashville schools, says the restrictions go ''far beyond the honor role.''

''It's for anything having to do with grades and attendance or anything normally reserved just for the student or parent,'' she said.

Getting parents to sign permission slips won't help protect students from being left out, but at least it will comply with the law, school officials said.

Christy Ballard, general counsel for the state Education Department, said she's ''getting a lot of calls'' since the Nashville decision, and will recommend that all Tennessee public schools get honor roll permission slips from parents.

In Knoxville, school district spokesman Russ Oaks said they do not think posting good information about a student violates state law. He said they put such information in the same category as sports statistics.

But some school systems already get parents to sign a release before student information is made public. Others think it might be a good idea to get rid of the honor roll altogether, as Principal Steven Baum did at Julia Green Elementary in Nashville.

''The rationale was, if there are some children that always make it and others that always don't make it, there is a very subtle message that was sent,'' he said. ''I also understand right to privacy is the legal issue for the new century.''

Baum thinks spelling bees and other publicly graded events are leftovers from the days of ranking and sorting students.

''I discourage competitive games at school,'' he said. ''They just don't fit my world view of what a school should be.''

Parents at most schools, though, have been close to outrage over the new rule.

''So far, what we've heard parents say is 'This is crazy; spend your time doing other things,' '' said Teresa Dennis, principal at Percy Priest Elementary School. ''It does seem really silly.''

A similar issue over student privacy went to the U.S. Supreme Court two years ago, when some parents objected to students grading each other's work. The court sided with tradition in that case, ruling the long-standing practice of teachers asking students to swap papers and grade them in class does not violate federal privacy law.

''It's not always clear what falls into (the privacy laws),'' says Naomi E. Gittins, an attorney with the National School Boards Association. ''Schools often take a more cautious route.''
This is pure backwards insanity. Also RB maybe you could fire back to me in laymans terms for me what you are asking, me in my simplistic underachieving burned out glory can't really make out what you are trying to tell and or ask me.

OFKU0 04-05-2005 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by filtherton

The idea that anything is "just a word" seems to me to be a tad naive.

And taking from your words, I'll add "a tad naive" is an understatement.

If a word was just a word, anyone could say anything with no fear of repercussion. That simply isn't reality. Even on this board, if one uses the wrong 'words,' they will get banned. So a word really isn't just a word afterall.

As for the teachers who don't want to use red ink, I say good for them. Teaching is difficult enough and any resource to make the learning experience for everyone involved easier is a positive step.

How that makes kid's "pussys" I really don't know. But being a teacher, and having taught young kids, I don't see the connection. I don't use red ink either. There is enough pressure on young kids by their peers to be cool, macho, not a wimp etc,...that actually permeates the opposte of "pussification". Call it machofication or bullyfication.

To call a teaching method that creates a positive notion out of a potentially negative circumstance (a poor grade) "pussification" shows an ignorance towards a profession that some know little about. Hopefully those entrenched with notions of a society being pussified won't become teachers, or better yet, parents.

Cynthetiq 04-05-2005 08:19 AM

emabarassment for some underachievers????? what about the pride of the achievers? doesn't that have value?

presonally the words are just words, but America spends way too much time worrying about making someone uncomfortable.

Carno 04-05-2005 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OFKU0
If a word was just a word, anyone could say anything with no fear of repercussion. That simply isn't reality. Even on this board, if one uses the wrong 'words,' they will get banned. So a word really isn't just a word afterall.

Yeah no shit, right? If I were use the word 'fatass' a lot, I would be insta-banned.

Glory's Sun 04-05-2005 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carn

In many ways, I am glad that I am going to be joining the Marine Corps, so I will not have to deal with this bullshit. I'd rather call stupid people stupid, cowardly people cowards, etc. I am too direct for the bleeding pussies that inhabit the United States.


so how does joining the Marines make you not have to deal with this shit? After all you'd be the one protecting all the "bleeding pussies".

04-05-2005 09:49 AM

Words define how you come across to the rest of the world. You can choose which words to use and which words to avoid. Normally, using swear, curse and anatomical words in place of more descriptive words is an easy way to convey an image of ignorance and stupidity. In very rare cases do people get away with it. Many people think they can get away with it and don't.

However, someone who's getting upset at how gentle and delicate America is becoming, is probably not going to care about being percieved by people like me as being ignorant. :rolleyes: ;)

jorgelito 04-05-2005 09:54 AM

It's not that "red ink" makes kids "pussies", rather, the issue that I was trying to address (and I assume Mojo too) is the reaction or overeaction to seemingly simple everyday events.

For example, to over simplify, the school and parents are concerned that the color red will hurt the kid's self esteem etc, etc. Or, that having honor rolls will do the same. It is the "everybody's a winner" culture that is misleading and (in my opinion) detrimental to kid;s development.

That is why I asked teacher's to weigh in. It seems to me that it gets harder and harder for teachers to well, teach these days because of new restrictions, and changing pedagogy. By over-coddling and aiding-and-abetting the delusion of "we're all winners", are we not setting up the kids for some major harsh reality check down the road?

The color of the pen really wasn't the point, I was trying to address the motivation behind it and its potential effects.

In the "wussification threads" (do a search), someone mentioned how their 1st grader was playing musical chairs at school, but to avoid hurt feelings, they didn't take away a chair. That way, everyone would have a chair! Seemingly innocuous, but lays the foundation for stunted growth. What's next, no scoring or records allowed in school sports?

I believe, the lesson we learn is "rising above adversity".

For example: My paper is returned to me with a sea of red ink. With a score of "C-", the teacher is merciless in pointing out my grammar errors, poor structure, sideways logic, and lack of support for the argument. Do I hold my head in my hands and cry? Well, maybe I shed some tears, but more importantly, I talk to the teacher, make my corrections and do better next time. Not, "oh no, look at all the red ink, my self-esteem os lowered now".

In the same way that we own our successes, we also own our failures. Personal responsibility, accountability can be instilled at an early age. It is the trend of blaming others or (hypersensitivity) that I am concerned with.

MartinGuerre, thank you for your kind remarks. ;)

Carno 04-05-2005 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guccilvr
so how does joining the Marines make you not have to deal with this shit? After all you'd be the one protecting all the "bleeding pussies".

Because not many people in the Marines are bleeding pussies.

If I worked out in the civilian world, I would have to deal with whiny bitches every day of my life. In the military, I would have to deal with much less of that.

I'm not saying that military people know everything or are right about everything, just that I would rather hear nationalism and patriotic bullshit than bleeding heart hippy bullshit.

filtherton 04-05-2005 10:07 AM

I see a lot of people making bold proclamations about future generations of weaklings we are currently going to curse ourselves with. What i want to see is if there is any basis for this perspective. So teachers don't use red pens? And? Do any of you honestly think that the color of the ink plays any kind of fundamental role in the education a child recieves? Do any of you honestly think that the honor roll plays a huge part in the education of the average child? If so, maybe i should start a thread concerning the "baseless-speculationification" of america.

Carno 04-05-2005 10:14 AM

I don't think it's any single act that people think is making kids into weaklings, but more the mindset that kids should be coddled and protected from every single little tiny thing that may make them the least bit uncomfortable.

jorgelito 04-05-2005 10:21 AM

Yes, yes that's it. Thank you Carn, I guess I went the long-winded way about it. I don't think anyone bothers to read my posts anyhow, LOL.

ShaniFaye 04-05-2005 10:21 AM

I honestly think I live on the wrong planet.....for this to even be an issue is ridiculous.....

pussification is right

Glory's Sun 04-05-2005 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carn
Because not many people in the Marines are bleeding pussies.

If I worked out in the civilian world, I would have to deal with whiny bitches every day of my life. In the military, I would have to deal with much less of that.

I'm not saying that military people know everything or are right about everything, just that I would rather hear nationalism and patriotic bullshit than bleeding heart hippy bullshit.


I have a friend who is a corpman. I've known plenty of Marines and my dad is a retired vet. I've never heard more bitching about things than military people. Anyway, I guess this is off topic so I'll leave it at that

jorgelito 04-05-2005 10:29 AM

Wait, Shanifaye, which issue are you referring to? (I think I got caught in the middle of a few different conversations here).

ShaniFaye 04-05-2005 10:31 AM

I was referring to the parents getting pissed off about the use of the red pens...lol I ignored all the posts that didnt refer to that specific thing....sorry for the confusion

filtherton 04-05-2005 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carn
I don't think it's any single act that people think is making kids into weaklings, but more the mindset that kids should be coddled and protected from every single little tiny thing that may make them the least bit uncomfortable.

Do you really think that it is a problem on a massive scale? If you don't have kids why does it matter? If you do have kids, why does it matter if other parents want to "pussify" their children?

I agree that children shouldn't be coddled. I don't think that evidence of the occasional isolated incident that may or may not actually have coddling effect on the children involved amounts to evidence of large scale coddling. I bet that for every instance of "coddling" there is at least one instance of some kid getting the crap kicked out of him/her.

Perhaps all you parents out there who fear the pussification of america could do all your countrymen a favor and beat the hell out of your child. Depussify him/her. If everyone does their part, we'll have nothing to fear.

Carno 04-05-2005 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guccilvr
I have a friend who is a corpman. I've known plenty of Marines and my dad is a retired vet. I've never heard more bitching about things than military people. Anyway, I guess this is off topic so I'll leave it at that

I never said military people don't bitch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by filtherton
Do you really think that it is a problem on a massive scale? If you don't have kids why does it matter? If you do have kids, why does it matter if other parents want to "pussify" their children?

I agree that children shouldn't be coddled. I don't think that evidence of the occasional isolated incident that may or may not actually have coddling effect on the children involved amounts to evidence of large scale coddling. I bet that for every instance of "coddling" there is at least one instance of some kid getting the crap kicked out of him/her.

Perhaps all you parents out there who fear the pussification of america could do all your countrymen a favor and beat the hell out of your child. Depussify him/her. If everyone does their part, we'll have nothing to fear.

I am not around kids a lot nor do I care to be, because I don't particularly like kids, so I'm not qualified to say whether they are being pussified or not. I was merely attempting to clarify what was being said.

I do however find it extremely annoying and stupid when people think that red ink should be banned from school papers because it lowers a kid's self esteem. In all the time that I have been in school, I have never known anyone who's self esteem was lowered because they did shitty on a paper and the teacher wrote in red.

Cynthetiq 04-05-2005 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carn
I do however find it extremely annoying and stupid when people think that red ink should be banned from school papers because it lowers a kid's self esteem. In all the time that I have been in school, I have never known anyone who's self esteem was lowered because they did shitty on a paper and the teacher wrote in red.

I don't see the correllation either.

The kids self esteem was lowered by the poor marks they received for the effort they put forth, not by the color of the pen.

biznatch 04-05-2005 11:29 AM

My papers have always been graded in red as a kid. It never shocked me.. I never cared. What would be important would be whats written on the goddamn paper.
Whether you write in blue, black, green, or even pink (to "pussify" kids even more...juuuust kidding) the fact is that you shouldn't waste time worrying what color the writing is in, but how you can make the kids progress. Maybe teachers should meet and discuss more of cognitive science, or the content of their classes. I don't think this is a case of pussification, just retardification.

filtherton 04-05-2005 12:52 PM

I think the problem the parents had in the article was that they felt that red was a more "stressful" color. It's a value judgement. Everyone makes value judgements every day. Furthermore, it is relatively meaningless by any kind of measure. The parents decided that they didn't want the teachers to use red anymore. Big fucking deal. That's just one more of the many arbitrary rules that make up every day of our existence. It may be stupid, but it's their decision to make, apparently, and all of you would be hard-pressed to demonstrate any kind of ill effects of a red ink ban.

It seems ironic to me that a great many people in this thread are going out of their way to get offended by people whom they believe are going out of their way to get offended. In the nomenclature of the thread starter, you are all a bunch of pussies.

Lebell 04-05-2005 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
This will weed out the weaker kids. The smarter kids will take power and eventually we will have the Morlocks and Eloi. And all they had to do was let the red ink slide.

I personally welcome our new Morlock masters :D

04-05-2005 12:59 PM

filtherton - perfect post :)

Cadwiz 04-05-2005 02:03 PM

I think it's really sad that parent's only reaction to their kid being a moron is "don't use red ink on Johnny's paper". I personally couldn't care less what color is used. Befor long, purple will be associated with warping young minds, and will be discarded in favor of pink.

I do forsee a time when they don't even grade papers anymore. Just give the whole class a gold star and a big group hug. That should get them ready for real life.

gal 04-05-2005 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jorgelito
... but c'mon, a little reality and common sense please. ...

My understanding of the american society is that there is no such thing as common sense. I'm not saying Americans are stupid, just that there appear to be no common sense. I'm referring to all the warning labels you see on everything (like "CONTENTS FLAMMABLE!" on lighters) and also all the lawsuits (ref. Stella awards) it is seems that there really is no common sense as defined by the law. I think this is a problem in schools as well, who are more conserned with being PC than teaching (and enforcing) common sense.

filtherton 04-05-2005 08:34 PM

The idea of common sense only exists to help people who think they have it feel superior to anyone who may not share their perspective or knowledge on certain subjects.

Until you can find one thing that every human agrees upon, there is no such thing as common sense in any kind of meaningful way.

Mojo_PeiPei 04-05-2005 09:23 PM

I disagree Filth, there is such a thing as common sense. Saying there isn't, subscribing to some "great philosophical" "everything is a matter of perspective" is just for lack of a better word, retarded.

filtherton 04-06-2005 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei
I disagree Filth, there is such a thing as common sense. Saying there isn't, subscribing to some "great philosophical" "everything is a matter of perspective" is just for lack of a better word, retarded.

Nope, you're wrong. Tell me one thing that all humans have in common in terms of perspective and perception, without it you can't have anything in common in terms of sense. Maybe you could define common sense for me, not as a concept, but as it is in practice.

All you need is a job where you deal with many different people on a regular basis. What may seem like common sense to you may be completely foreign to someone else, whereas what may seem like common sense to someone else may be completely foreign to you.

"Common sense" is a meaningless term for people who can't understand that their own perspective isn't universal.

gal 04-06-2005 08:27 AM

Common sense to me is what a majority people in a geographical or social group percieve as sensible. I'd say 90% of the americans I've met share my perception of sensibility, but that is of course a biased group. I think part of the the problem in US with regard to loony lawsuits is that the US is a diverse nation where it's harder to define common sense. Also the deeply founded american idea of personal independence and freedom inherently recognizes that others may have very different personal beliefs.

Anyway, it's pretty easy to mention examples of common sense within a group of people. For instance for the western world:
  • Don't jump in front of moving cars
  • Eating 10 BigMacs a day is unhealthy
  • Don't use the hair dryer in the bath tub
  • An 8-ball is not a pregnancy test
  • For sun lotion to work, you have to apply it to the skin
  • Loud farting at dinner parties is considered rude

filtherton 04-06-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gal
Common sense to me is what a majority people in a geographical or social group percieve as sensible. I'd say 90% of the americans I've met share my perception of sensibility, but that is of course a biased group. I think part of the the problem in US with regard to loony lawsuits is that the US is a diverse nation where it's harder to define common sense. Also the deeply founded american idea of personal independence and freedom inherently recognizes that others may have very different personal beliefs.

Anyway, it's pretty easy to mention examples of common sense within a group of people. For instance for the western world:
  • Don't jump in front of moving cars
  • Eating 10 BigMacs a day is unhealthy
  • Don't use the hair dryer in the bath tub
  • An 8-ball is not a pregnancy test
  • For sun lotion to work, you have to apply it to the skin
  • Loud farting at dinner parties is considered rude

I see what you're saying. I guess my point is that lacking common sense only means that someone doesn't share the perspective of the majority. This is often not a bad thing. I don't think having common sense is inherently valuable. There are a great many things which the majority has absolutely no clue about. If you asked the average person what the most common sense way to find a solution to a seperable first order differential equation most would just look at you like you were speaking french. What is common sense to someone taking a diff eq class is not common sense to the average american, just as what might be common sense to a bunch of parents in washington might not be common sense to a bunch of random strangers on the internet.

flstf 04-06-2005 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by filtherton
The idea of common sense only exists to help people who think they have it feel superior to anyone who may not share their perspective or knowledge on certain subjects.

Yeah, I'm not exactly sure what common sense is but when I was an adolescent my father assured me I didn't have any. :)

lordkos 04-06-2005 10:19 PM

Thats just absurd to throw a hissy fit over what color they use to grade their kids with =/

jaco 04-07-2005 07:02 PM

Just a quick aside, the term "pussification of america" has been used by morning talk show hosts "Walton and Johnson" for a number of years. they play in texas and louisiana. and yes, this is a joke once again presented by people with nothing better to do with their lives but bitch and moan about unimportant issues such as the color of ink.

filtherton 04-07-2005 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaco
Just a quick aside, the term "pussification of america" has been used by morning talk show hosts "Walton and Johnson" for a number of years. they play in texas and louisiana. and yes, this is a joke once again presented by people with nothing better to do with their lives but bitch and moan about unimportant issues such as the color of ink.

For the benefit of people who have nothing better to do than bitch and moan about the bitching and moaning of other people.

Xell101 04-10-2005 05:52 PM

Small people with small minds are everywhere. The problem isn't that they are, it's that they're ceded and catered to; even more so that they're enabled to arbitrarily decide what shall be what simply by widdling away the opposition until they attain their mediocre and generally conspicuously, yet unexpectably (Hio!), deleterious victories.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360