01-29-2005, 07:17 AM | #41 (permalink) | ||
Mjollnir Incarnate
Location: Lost in thought
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-29-2005, 07:46 AM | #42 (permalink) |
Ravenous
Location: Right Behind You
|
Actually Slavakion you're right, now that they showed it being worn backwards on TV, more kids probably will wear it like that. Nice, the media tries to cause a stir amongst parents and ends up causing a new fashon statement.
I agree even if you take out the dress which is being worn backwards, the others are still too revealing. I'm not saying that I think kids should be wearing nun's habits, but cover up something, my god.
__________________
Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as Gods. Cats have never forgotten this. |
01-29-2005, 11:58 AM | #43 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
Now, in response to the dresses... I opted not to go to prom when I was in high school. And if I HAD gone, there is no way in hell that I would have worn those dresses. However, I did go to a couple of semi-formal dances, and I saw several girls in two-piece dresses: a bikini top and a long skirt. Completely inappropriate, IMO.
__________________
~Alex~ You've come far, and though you're far from the end, you don't mind where you are, 'cause you know where you've been. |
|
01-30-2005, 01:16 PM | #44 (permalink) |
young and in bloom
Location: under the bodhi tree.... *bling*
|
i like the blue one, i wore something like it to one of my proms....
__________________
"Woke up this morning with a blue moon in my eye" ~A3 "woke up this morning" "Don't compromise yourself, you're all you've got." -Janis Joplin |
01-30-2005, 01:31 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Upright
|
I saw that on the Today show. I can't imagine anyone from my high school wearing that to Prom! No way... most girls are too insecure about their bodies for that... and maybe where I'm from, we are more traditional, as well. Interesting, though...
__________________
For your sake I hope heaven and hell
are really there but I wouldn't hold my breath Modest Mouse |
01-30-2005, 11:29 PM | #46 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
I don't know, I'd have to say I haven't heard of many teenage pregnancies. To say that "It's not as uncommon as you think" is true, but in the same respect it's not as common as it's being blown out of proportion to be. Pregnant teens are a minority, and some are truely bad apples. My previous school had a student body of 1700 and I never heard of a teenage pregnancy, and on top of that my new school also has a student body of roughly 1700 and so far no such stories, still. Of course that begs the question "are you in the know?", and at least for my previous school I most definately was.
Quote:
In my previous post I think I conveyed the wrong idea that teenage sex doesn't occur at 13, or give or take a couple of years. It does, but for a small minority. Of course this is all relevant to my experience- I think it does have a lot to do with socio-economic status. My peers in high school are from families who are either right above the poverty line (30/40k a year families) to families with better incomes (say 90k a year families, that's a hard thing to point out because you can't go up to them and ask them what their incomes are haha). I would hypothesize it would be worse in the bad neighbourhoods. But to address the topic posters questions which I should've just done in my first post: Would you wear such a dress back when you went to the prom? No, being a guy and all. Is there a trend towards teens dressing trashier? Yes, imo almost completely due to bad influences by the media combined with horrible parenting (i.e. letting children be exposed to those bad influences). Are stores appropriate in asking for a "permission slip" before selling one of these dresses to a teenager? Stores as a business are seeking to make money and don't care. The exception would be the store owners who as individuals refuse the teenager's business which, at least here is percectly legal to do. So to answer wether they would be appropriate in asking for a permission slip, I'd have to say that it's just a way to make it seem like they care... |
|
01-31-2005, 04:38 PM | #47 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: IOWA
|
If parents are actually letting their kids wear these dresses then they shouldn't be surprised that they may be sexually active. Why else wear such a revealing dress, than to look as good as you possibly can for your man or kid-date. Parents aren't doing their job if their daughters are wearing these sex-object dresses!!
|
02-02-2005, 02:13 AM | #48 (permalink) | ||||||
Insane
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
and i wasn't saying that all teenagers are having sex, but that it is definetly happening. and when i talked with a few dozen girls (under age 16) in my average sized community who were not only sexually active but had a significant number of partners, it left an impression. Quote:
Quote:
they don't discuss sexual activity for those under the age of 15. but as of 2002, 30% of girls 15-17 are sexually active (which was down from 38% in 1995), compared to 31% of boys (down from 43% in '95). the numbers increase for teens 18-19 with girls at 69% (up from 68% in 1995) and boys at 64% (down from 75% in '95). so a little more than twice as many teens are sexually active at 18-19 compared to 15-19. i may be a little older than you but the '95 stats are a better reflection of what it was like when i was in school. to state numbers for teens below 15 would be a guess, unless you have more time than i do and wanna find some stats at any rate, 15 is still pretty young and 3 out of 10 isn't what i personally would consider a small minority. also, as i recall from my own teen years, oral wasn't really sex (and neither was anal for that matter). the older i got though, the more likely such behavior was accepted as sexual activity. afaik, no official data exists on any activity other than vaginal intercourse. depending on how a person chooses to view "sexual activity" the stats offered by the nchs could be way off. Quote:
*edit* found this link http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/3229800.html that deals with the subject of oral sex among teens. apparently, there is no accurate statistical data. Last edited by bad jane; 02-02-2005 at 03:57 AM.. |
||||||
02-02-2005, 02:56 AM | #49 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Louisiana
|
In 1988, '89, and '90, which are the three years I attended proms at my school (my boyfriend's senior, and my junior and my senior, and not counting the proms I attended with friends at other schools) I wore black cocktail dresses to each one. At the time, I had a hard time convincing the school administration to allow me to attend in the dresses I chose, since in the late '80s, short tight black adult dresses were not the prom attire of choice. My mom went to bat for me, and I got to wear them. Admittedly, they didn't show as much flesh as those dresses.... the most revealing of them was similar to #8 of the dresses in question.... but it was bias cut at the neckline and the hemline, with the fringe.
I also already had the reputation to go with the dresses, too.... *shrugs* I don't know what I'd do if my own (hypothetical) daughter wanted to wear one, but I'd like to think I wouldn't be a hypocrite. Meh, good thing I don't have (or ever will have) kids, I guess. *grins*
__________________
“When facism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” ~Sinclair Lewis |
02-05-2005, 06:53 AM | #50 (permalink) |
Tilted
|
I really don't think a store should need a permission slip for the person. If the dress is inappropriate, they will find out 1 of two ways. Their parents will make them take it back, or they won't be allowed to attend prom. If they pass these little tests, then apparently its appropriate. Personally i wish more girls at my school would wear this stuff but they don't cuz my principles a dick head
|
02-05-2005, 11:01 AM | #51 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: La Mirada, Ca
|
I remember at my prom, which was some time ago, dresses like that were not allowed. My daughter will definetly not be wearing anything like that when her prom comes around. Thank God she is only 9 months old right now, and I don't have to worry about stuff like this for some time. The fact that girls today seem to want to grow up so fast does concern me. The girls in middle school and high school today look and act nothing like the girls that I went to school with. Whatever happened to enjoying your childhood and acting like a child?
|
08-21-2010, 03:18 AM | #53 (permalink) | |
Eat your vegetables
Super Moderator
Location: Arabidopsis-ville
|
Here are a few more to add to this old thread...
Somehow, posing with your mother makes this ok. Look at all that gold. I think they're actually trying to sell this one... And to show that it's not just a trend from the past, here's a story from March in the New York Post. Prom dresses going risqu this year - NYPOST.com Quote:
__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq "violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy |
|
08-23-2010, 12:37 PM | #56 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Houston, Texas
|
In the article genuinegirly posted, it says the principal doesn't let girls in if they wear an exposing dress. I'm sure most schools are like that, mine is, so they can buy the dress all the want, but they won't get into the prom with it.
__________________
Our revenge will be the laughter of our children.
Give me convenience or give me death! |
08-23-2010, 02:50 PM | #58 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
Damn, this thread is deader than Vincent Price.
There's a difference between having sex (something most of us did in high school) and looking like a really garish prostitute. I'm all for the first one and the second one is fine when it isn't related to a school function. That and I don't see anybody here attempting to legislate Victoria decorum. Last edited by Plan9; 08-23-2010 at 02:53 PM.. |
08-23-2010, 03:35 PM | #59 (permalink) |
comfortably numb...
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
|
#57 tripped someone's trigger...
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done." - Robert S. McNamara ----------------------------------------- "We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches... We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles." - Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message" ----------------------------------------- never wrestle with a pig. you both get dirty; the pig likes it. |
08-23-2010, 04:00 PM | #60 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: Houston, Texas
|
Quote:
And willravel, that "me gusta" picture had me crying.
__________________
Our revenge will be the laughter of our children.
Give me convenience or give me death! |
|
Tags |
prom, wear, whatd |
|
|