|
View Poll Results: Would you rather be deaf or blind? | |||
Deaf | 100 | 81.30% | |
Blind | 23 | 18.70% | |
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
01-13-2005, 12:48 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Sauce Puppet
|
I hate these, because I feel if I pick one, I'll probably end up losing the other due to kharma, luck, whatever you want to call it.
But I would rather lose hearing, I'm a very visual person. But I like having full use of both, and hope I can keep it that way for quite some time. |
01-13-2005, 08:08 PM | #45 (permalink) | |
Drifting
Administrator
Location: Windy City
|
Quote:
Well, I drive when I have my hearing aid in, but I pretty much ignore my passengers at times because I need my eyes COMPLETELY on the road to make up for what I don't catch in hearing. If you can hear a police/fire/ambulance siren early enough to move the hell out of the way, you should be ok.
__________________
Calling from deep in the heart, from where the eyes can't see and the ears can't hear, from where the mountain trails end and only love can go... ~~~ Three Rivers Hare Krishna |
|
01-13-2005, 08:34 PM | #46 (permalink) |
Tilted
|
Losing your sight means losing a lot of freedom. You can still function fine if you're deaf you just wouldn't be able to communicate as easily anymore. Be blind would require an entirely new lifestyle. The technology for hearing loss is a lot further ahead than optical technology.
|
01-14-2005, 09:07 AM | #47 (permalink) | |
Lost!!
Location: Kingston, Ontario
|
Quote:
|
|
01-14-2005, 02:19 PM | #51 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Quote:
__________________
ominous adj. Menacing; threatening. Of or being an omen, especially an evil one. |
|
01-15-2005, 11:25 AM | #53 (permalink) | ||
Lost!!
Location: Kingston, Ontario
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-15-2005, 11:38 AM | #54 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Music is extremely important to me and it would be a huge loss, but I could still function almost normally being deaf.
If I was blind, I couldn't drive or read regular books or work effectively on a computer, which would strike to my livelihood.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
01-15-2005, 11:51 AM | #55 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: West Coast, USA
|
As much as it would be a far greater handicap to be blind, I can honestly say that I've seen very few things that brought forth enough emotion to make me cry. But I have heard many, many things that have caused that level of emotion. So I believe that I would live a more limited life full of more peak experiences if I were blind.
|
01-15-2005, 11:55 AM | #56 (permalink) |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Other people's noise is probably high on my list of things that drive me the craziest, but I aslo can't stand silence, even if it's just a white noise around me, I would go more insane than I already can be. To not hear the first birds of spring, or to hear the ocean... the sense of hearing would be tough to give up.
Then again, to never see another sunset, a lightning storm, sunrise, watching the waves hit the shore, watching a fire in the fireplace, the colors the leaves turn in fall, a snowfall, couldn't give up that either. Tough decision... Guess I'd go with giving up hearing, and find something else to keep me sane
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
01-15-2005, 12:17 PM | #58 (permalink) |
Registered User
Location: Texas
|
both would certainly suck, but i would rather be blind than deaf. there are too many sounds in the world that i would miss. i think that it would be easier to figure out what something looks like through their noises than it would be it figure out what they sound like through their sight.
|
01-15-2005, 11:26 PM | #60 (permalink) | |
Upright
Location: Permanently in Stanford, ca, but in the moment in Campus at UCLA
|
Quote:
|
|
01-19-2005, 04:38 AM | #61 (permalink) |
Tilted
|
I was a professional musician for 11 years and love music but still think I would rather be deaf than blind. I really think being blind would be much more limiting - although I'd sure hate not being able to hear music. Still, it didn't stop Beethoven producing some of his greatest work - genius.
|
Tags |
blind, deaf |
|
|