Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-17-2004, 10:19 AM   #41 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
So lurkette, you come from the "ends" camp. I'm all about the "means" as it seems most people here are. As to your threadjack, I think the subsidizing of oil is incredibly stupid. You have to realise though, that the government action affecting transportation was put in place to allow people to continue their preferred course of action in that area, hence no one (aside from some environmentalists and so forth) complained. The action that would increase the cost of "fatty food" (how they would define parameters for this would be interesting) would be limiting the preferred course of action of many people, and therefore gives more reason to complain.
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato
Suave is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 12:20 PM   #42 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkette
Incidentally, (threadjack coming up here) I don't hear anybody bitching about the government interfering in personal consumption behavior by subsidizing the hell out of agriculture and oil so we can have cheap oranges in December and gas that costs less than milk so we can drive huge cars instead of funding public transportation. If you don't object to government action that affects one set of behaviors (public transportation issues), why do you object to it when it affects another set (public health)?
Well, I'm not bitching (your word) but I am against a lot of government subsidies in general. It didn't come up on this thread until now.

Do you really want polititians to attempt to determine what is healthy or not and tax what they consider unhealthy behavior? What is considered a good diet seems to change every few years. Diet and weight loss books are often on the best sellers list and they often don't agree. I can't even remember what the latest fad is between high carb and low carb. A few years ago weren't we supposed to avoid red meat?

I am wary of what the current polititians might consider unhealthy behavior to tax. I don't think they should make us all pay more for fatty foods when many of us have no problems maintaining our weight. In my opinion I think one of the problems with some folks gaining so much weight is because they diet and loose but their bodies go into fat storing mode and they gain it all back and more. If it isn't McDonalds they will get the extra calories from other foods anyway.

Mostly I am just against the polititians getting too much involved in our personal lives. I fear that it is a slippery slope and they won't just stop with McDonalds.
flstf is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 01:32 PM   #43 (permalink)
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
Do you really want polititians to attempt to determine what is healthy or not and tax what they consider unhealthy behavior?
No, but because I don't think it will achieve the desired end result, not because I object to government involvement per se. Sin taxes generally don't work. I just think it's ironic that many people who are objecting to the government taxing something to decrease its consumption don't seem to have a problem with benefiting from the government's subsidizing something to increase its consumption. /nitpick.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 02:14 PM   #44 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Good points Lurkette.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 08:33 PM   #45 (permalink)
Junk
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by funkeodor
And since so many boomers are overweight from living a lifestyle in which they believed "If what I'm doing only hurts me and no one else then what does it matter!" The economy will be strained by many over weight people in the coming few years. If someone wants to be 5'5'' and 600 pounds and believe that it is their business and and doesn't affect anyone else is first of all completely self centered and two, lacks any thought of foresight. Since gargantuan (you know, I've always liked that word, gargantuan, but it's so rare that I get a chance to use it) people are more likely to get clogged arteries and have several heart attacks. Before so many medical breakthroughs these people generally died at much younger ages for their own stupidity. However in more recent years these people of numerous rolls of fat have become a burden to society due to the fact that often enough the people that are fat are mid to low income people who can not afford health care and the society pays their costs. With the number of people retiring and more and more people depending on social security and medicare since they were far to dimwitted and once again, lacked foresight, to plan their own retirement they let society take the burden for them. This makes the gov't tax people more since there are more people collecting 'benefits' and less people working. Which brings up the real question that I wonder. Since the dollar is relatively weak right now, and taxing people more and more takes the money out of people's hands and more often than not is squandered away which means the gov't needs more money. Ultimately this money is put back into the hands of the enormous fatsos that are the problem to begin with. In turn this seems likely to be a situation in which inflation could become out of hand and (while in turn erasing the national defecit), could create another 'great depression' in which once again we're all in poverty! The best option I see is the elimination of fat people all across this country. every should have to take a BMI test and if they have more than 30% fat, shoot em. Or, better yet, have them fight national games to the death! They could reenact older battles. We could have our president, or perhaps we could call all of our presidents in the future the High Caesar (or High C for short)(He would also have to be a porn star and would always shout "OH YEAH! DRINK SOME OF HIGH C!"), then they decide if they live or not with the traditional thumbs up (good) or thumbs down (die fatso!). The tv ratings would be huge across the world. The people in the middle east would be happy for seeing americans die, and in doing so they would stop their wars since we would be fighting it for them! with this they would watch the battles and be enthralled with the ads in which would support the U.S. economy. The EU would be happy again because they could once again sell their manufactured goods at a lower price than the americans and wouldn't have to compete directly with us. Kim Jong Il would also be happy to see americans die and thus stand down in the nuclear arms race since his destruction of americans is already being replicated. This would put us on a far better track to get our economy on track. Screw going to mars, instead, lets stop the future great depression from happening and instead just concentrate on killing all the fat people. The world would obviously be a better place for it! I once heard that the best way to end a piece is with a quote because it shows humility and that others may know more than yourself. So as the great and wise Homer Simpson, "Oh come on Marge, the only reason we don't move out of this dunghill is because of my court ordered ankle bracelet"
Ha ha. Good one. Now that's funny.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 08:52 PM   #46 (permalink)
Rawr!
 
skier's Avatar
 
Location: Edmontania
What about an incentive to be fit? Everyone fit enough to complete a basic fitness test every year (allowing for those who have some medical problems) gets a refund, or a tax break.
__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim
skier is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 11:16 PM   #47 (permalink)
Upright
 
ah damn it! I just got High C in my Eye!!!!!
funkeodor is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 11:39 PM   #48 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
The governor here in Washington State has just introduced sin taxes for beer, wine, and liquor. I'm interested to see how this plays out and whether or not Oregon does the same to try and assuage its budget woes.

Personally, even if the cost of beer goes up thirty cents in tax I'm still going to buy it. So I don't think a sin tax necessarily discourages anyone from quitting the behavior that is damaging, but rather just raises funds for government.

Really, these taxes do little to treat the cause of the problem and they don't really address the symptoms either. No one is saying that this money will be earmarked for obesity treatment or disabled people or alcoholics or whatever. Money for these taxes is going to end up, nine times out of ten, in the state's general fund and go for things like roads, schools, etc--things we all use. Perhaps some of the funds generated by such taxes SHOULD be earmarked to education aimed at encouraging healthy eating habits or providing subsidies for organizations who do so. Perhaps some of the funds SHOULD be used in public schools to overhaul how we encourage children to participate in physical activity and eat nutritiously.

I don't mind taxes, but this is getting ridiculous. If the government could prove to me that they would put these dollars to efficient use and use some of them towards the education of the populace in healthy eating and exercise habits or supporting people in healthy eating and exercise habits, then perhaps I would support them.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
 

Tags
fat, tax


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360