Planes & Nuclear power stations (4.1MB) - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

DEI37 · 10-21-2004, 05:06 PM

Want to fly in to one? Here's about what'll happen:

<embed src="http://vid2.stileproject.com/ec0f048c4154781b82b0a7bba12c5e97/smak4.wmv"></embed>

Edit: Here's the link...the embed doesn't seem to function right now.

http://vid2.stileproject.com/ec0f048...5e97/smak4.wmv

Ramega · 10-21-2004, 06:46 PM

Crazy. Though in all liklihood if that were to happen it would be a 7-series airliner and not a fighter jet.

MSD · 10-21-2004, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramega

Crazy. Though in all liklihood if that were to happen it would be a 7-series airliner and not a fighter jet.

One of those would be a lot less compact and a lot more flexible. With the exception of the engines, most of it would probably just crumple and absorb the impact.

bermuDa · 10-21-2004, 08:12 PM

that would suck to be on the plane when it hit the wall, but not for long.

tropple · 10-22-2004, 12:18 AM

Well, maybe if using airliners for kamikaze attacks had been fashionable when the average reactor designer learned his trade, then it would have been constructed deep underground.

Then you'd only need to worry about the mole people.

telekinetic · 10-22-2004, 12:25 AM

Aww, I thought this was going to be a post about the NB-36H, the plane with the onboard nuclear reactor

bermuDa · 10-22-2004, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tropple

Well, maybe if using airliners for kamikaze attacks had been fashionable when the average reactor designer learned his trade, then it would have been constructed deep underground.

Then you'd only need to worry about the mole people.

or ground water contamination...

tropple · 10-22-2004, 09:11 AM

Nope. We don't need to worry about that. It's been fully accomplished by the generation before mine.

denim · 10-22-2004, 09:53 AM

I can't view that document yet, but I asked this one when I was working at a nuke in Texas. It was a consideration during design, as were many other scenarios.

10-21-2004, 05:06 PM	#1 (permalink)
DEI37 Go faster! Location: Wisconsin	Planes & Nuclear power stations (4.1MB) Want to fly in to one? Here's about what'll happen: <embed src="http://vid2.stileproject.com/ec0f048c4154781b82b0a7bba12c5e97/smak4.wmv"></embed> Edit: Here's the link...the embed doesn't seem to function right now. http://vid2.stileproject.com/ec0f048...5e97/smak4.wmv __________________ Generally speaking, if you were to get what you really deserve, you might be unpleasantly surprised. Last edited by DEI37; 10-22-2004 at 02:54 PM..

10-21-2004, 08:12 PM	#4 (permalink)
bermuDa don't ignore this--> Location: CA	that would suck to be on the plane when it hit the wall, but not for long. __________________ I am the very model of a moderator gentleman.

10-22-2004, 12:18 AM	#5 (permalink)
tropple Junkie	Well, maybe if using airliners for kamikaze attacks had been fashionable when the average reactor designer learned his trade, then it would have been constructed deep underground. Then you'd only need to worry about the mole people. __________________ +++++++++++Boom!

10-22-2004, 12:25 AM	#6 (permalink)
telekinetic zomgomgomgomgomgomg Location: Fauxenix, Azerona	Aww, I thought this was going to be a post about the NB-36H, the plane with the onboard nuclear reactor __________________ twisted no more

10-22-2004, 09:11 AM	#8 (permalink)
tropple Junkie	Nope. We don't need to worry about that. It's been fully accomplished by the generation before mine. __________________ +++++++++++Boom!

10-21-2004, 06:46 PM	#2 (permalink)
Ramega Crazy	Crazy. Though in all liklihood if that were to happen it would be a 7-series airliner and not a fighter jet.

10-22-2004, 09:53 AM	#9 (permalink)
denim Banned Location: Massachusetts, USA	I can't view that document yet, but I asked this one when I was working at a nuke in Texas. It was a consideration during design, as were many other scenarios.