Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   US Army unveils new combat uniform (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/60002-us-army-unveils-new-combat-uniform.html)

BigGov 06-23-2004 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bermuDa
I guess they didn't adopt the ultra effective computer generated camoflauge:

http://www.marcorsyscom.usmc.mil/sit...ity/index.html

the new style looks like they faded the normal camo... and the beret looks..........

yeah.

Umm...Bermuda, if you look closer you can see they did adopt the camo developed by the Marine's, they just changed the colors.

I don't know, the more I think about it, the more it sounds like a good idea. The velcro will be covered in combat, and likely won't be a major difference compared to the old uniforms.

Sparhawk 06-26-2004 10:26 AM

You won't take my polished black boots, unless you rip them off my cold dead feet.

MikeyChalupa 09-20-2004 03:10 PM

The Navy just announced two new uniforms are coming out late this year/early next year: A Navy Working Uniform to replace the Coveralls and Utilities, and a new year-round Service uniform to replace seasonal Summer White and Winter Blue unfiorms.

I truly hope they don't suck.

-Mikey

Y2KDREAD 09-20-2004 09:30 PM

like everyone else is saying, those patches look really shotty.

omega2K4 09-20-2004 09:45 PM

Looks like faded pyjamas to me.

Menoman 09-20-2004 09:57 PM

uhhh of course!!


Green is like so yesterday man, this is designer ok guy?!

irateplatypus 09-20-2004 09:58 PM

lol, i was wondering if anyone was going to bring up the air force's new BDUs. i think more than anything else the AF brass wanted it to look different. i guess they accomplished that... but i'd rather stick to the green/brown/blackish stuff. i hear the new one doesn't need ironing. there is always a silver lining.

Stare At The Sun 09-20-2004 10:43 PM

They need to hire Hugo Boss to design the uniforms.

That statement actually does have merit, if you know your history. :)

Mephisto2 09-20-2004 11:10 PM

I can't believe some people are complaining about the noise velcro would make.

For goodness sake, don't you think the days of GI-Joe, Nazi-fighting, comic-book, sneaky sneaky, cloak and dagger fantasy missions is over?

These guys will be fighting in a very very loud environment.

I'm quite sure the Special Ops guys will probably have a different uniform.


Sheesh...


Mr Mephisto

Gortexfogg 09-21-2004 11:31 AM

I know it looks like crap, but I believe them when they say it's made to function better than previous uniforms. I'm not a soldier, but if I was, I'd want the uniform that worked best, not the one that looked best. Also, why settle for 80% effectiveness in terms of the camo? If I was a soldier, I'd like the best camo for a certain environment. If buying more uniforms meant saving my life, I'm all for it.

feelgood 09-21-2004 11:43 AM

How exactly do you test new uniform that has different style of camo on it?

Do they just send out tester with the new uniform and have somebody play "Spot the baddies"?

The velcro is actually a good idea. For whatever reason, the solider can get out of it quickly than using the buttons. There are times when I played paintball and couldn't get it to unbutton.

Seaver 09-21-2004 05:24 PM

Quote:

How exactly do you test new uniform that has different style of camo on it?

Do they just send out tester with the new uniform and have somebody play "Spot the baddies"?
Pretty close to it actually. The field tests are you have a bunch of sniper-trained people in different field environments, and you give them different designs of cammies. The ones that time after time get the closest before being spotted are the better cammies (lots of diff. people to take into account skills in hiding).

Before that though the civilians the Marines contracted made a computer program that looks for outlines of various things (trees/buildings/people). The digi-cammies were found to be the hardest to detect the outline of, and ANY person who knows about camoflage knows the intention is to break up the outline.

Fallow 09-23-2004 06:34 PM

The comments made regarding Velcro and zippers are spot on. Noise may not be a major issue, but servicability in the field certainly is. Buttons are easy to sew back on. Not so with velcro and zippers.

Patches? Too many patches to begin with, let alone stuck on with velcro. Name, rank, and the words "US ARMY" are sufficient. Save all the bells and whistles for the dress uniforms where they belong.

Digital camo? Cool, but as they admitted, one size does not fit all, nor does one pattern fit all backgrounds. None of the current camo patterns is perfect, but at least they admitt that the world does not have one homogenous backdrop. The Corps, at least has two different patterns.

Everything else? <shrug, yawn, so what>. They still haven't fixed the worst problem with the uniforms---the material they're made of. Cotton, polyester, or poly/cotton sucks as a uniform material. Cotton is a sponge (minor problem in hot weather, major problem in cold weather), polyester melts and sticks to skin when exposed to heat and/or flame (both are occupational hazards), and poly/cotton gets it all.

mosha 09-25-2004 05:19 AM

I know the Navy is planning a similar change. They are currently testing a blue digital camo.

Cobalt_60 09-25-2004 06:04 AM

I've worn the old green camo bdu's while in the Army. I liked them. The where very comfortable. I don't understand what they mean by saving money by not taking a uniform to the cleaners or shining boots. Taking your bdu's to the cleaners was your choice. Usually everyone ironed and starched their own stuff. Shining boots only cost the few bucks for a can of Kiwi and the brush which was nothing. Now if you paid someone to shine your boots hey that was up to you again. I don't like the idea of zippers myself. A zipper can snag and get caught. And velcro has a tendency to pick up all kinds of fuzz and junk. Low crawling through brush you'd end up with all kinds of things stuck to you. I always liked the large green buttons on the old bdu's. If one ripped off it was easy to pick up new ones and sew them on yourself. Saving money by using velcro on patches is weird. The only time you spent money on the sewing was when you first picked up the uniform and then you only changed your unit patch when you went to a new duty station. Usually they would sew the unit patch on for free. $88 dollars per uniform? Does that mean per top and bottom or for the whole set? Bdu tops and bottoms cost around $30 and up for each. If the new uniforms are $88 per top and $88 per bottom thats very expensive. I don't know what a moisture wicking t-shirt means, but I'm pretty sure its more expensive than the plain brown t-shirts I was issued. The rank is put at the same spot as where we wore our rank on our Gortex jackets. And the collar looks uncomfortable as hell. I'm glad I got out before they made everyone wear berets. I liked the old softcap.

combatmedicjen 09-25-2004 08:19 AM

I am so NOT excited to about the new uniforms. :mad: I love my BDU's!! I do not want to go to some stupid blueish velcro outfit... gah! The only thing I'm really excited for are the new shine-free boots. I HATE shining boots.

I do not understand the advantage of these new outfits. If they say you're saving money by not taking them to the cleaners... I've NEVER EVER taken mine to the cleaners. It's called spray starch and a fucking iron. And if you're in Iraq or in the field, you don't press your uniform, anyway. You're lucky if you get to clean it! They also say the patches are easy to change because they're attached with hideous velcro... What am I, four? You change patches infrequently, anyway. People can go years and years without having to change a single thing on their uniform. The velcro is just ridiculous! Do they have velcro boots, too? :confused:

I do not know a single person who is actually excited for these... in fact, if you read the Army Times, people are generally pretty divided between, "Eh, it's alright, I geuss," to, "That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen!"

Oh, well. It's not like I have a choice in this, anyway. At least the boots will be nice. :|

VitaminH 09-25-2004 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
Hmmm what an invention. . .quiet velcro

I going to get to work immediately


According to Garden State you can make your fortune on that stuff.

tehblaed 09-25-2004 10:30 PM

^^^^My thoughts exactly.

xepherys 09-26-2004 08:09 AM

As usual, I'll butt in with my two cents because some of the comments here aren't quite true to this situation.

"Lowest Bidder" is true for who manufactures items used by the military, but does not usually have anything to do with design. The military designs a lot of it's items (including these uniforms) without regard to cost. Cost comes later (and it's always cheap).

"Comfort" is a major issue with uniforms, and the new ACUs are supposed to be MUCH more comfortable. Yes, they're ugly, yes velcro sucks, but they are supposed to be a ton more comfortable.

"Target patches" are not likely to be an issue. The Army already makes various color schemes for ALL patches. Subdued green (for BDUs), Sand color (for desert cammies), white (for arctic wear), et cetera. I don't see why a color of patches would not be created for wear on these uniforms. They'd be stupid not to (even I don't think they're that lame).

"Blue Camo for AF"... Who cares? As far as I can tell, they DO only work in the air... or on ships far out to sea... or on the ground a thousand miles or more away from combat. This is perhaps not true for about 0.03% of the air force. *shrug* That'd be like the Navy wanting green camo to blend into the woods... wtf?!

The velcro is an appearance thing. I think it's dumb, but it's not my design.

The "tried and true" BDUs are not so much as maybe you'd think. They've only been around since the 80's. We've fought in two wars in them. Don't you think WWII uniforms would've been more "tried and true" from that perspective? Oddly enough, this most recent war, and the complaints the Army received from combat units is WHY the uniform is being changes. Currently, pockets are inaccessible with the military's body armor. Buttons on chest pockets and upper chest dig into you while wearing body armor. So, you can be safe OR comfortable. With the new design you can be both. Seems like a fair deal to me.

bermuDa - The computer generated "digital camo" is exactly what the pattern is. If I can find better pictures, I'll link them. It's an almost identical pattern to the USMC with a few minor changes and different colors (no black, most importantly, as black is not a color found almost at all in nature). It's not "faded" but uses lighter colors... Still effective in brush and woodlands, but also more effective in the desert. The main issue is that the USMC still has two styles of uniform. The ACU's will be the ONLY combat uniform for the Army. It will serve in all environments. Hence a slight color mod.

As Parched_son said, that's where rank has been for a long time (just not on the BDU's). The only issue is color. If they don't make rank/patches with appropriate colors, they'll be screwed.

The idea can't really be rejected by the soldiers anymore. The uniforms are already being made, and the first units will start to get them in 3-4 months. They were already tested by at least one elite Army unit over in Iraq, and they HELPED to design the uniform, gave input and molded what it became. Concerns about patches falling or ripping off have been looked into and apparently aren't an issue.


The end result... I can't say I'm a fan of the new uniform for a lot of reasons. Wrinkle-free sounds great, but taking pride and care in the uniform is part of our tradition. Shine-free boots... same thing. I guess we'll just have to see when I put one on. Even if I hate it, I'll have to learn to love it...

Drider_it 09-26-2004 11:02 AM

http://world.guns.ru/assault/as61-e.htm

there is the xma

on the the velcro issue.. depends on how they stand up to sand.. and stuff.. every get crap on velcro and it wont stick anymore?

and they do look a bit .. i dont know goose stepish.

Greazy 12-02-2004 09:56 AM

THe Navy is taking the Air Force's bad idea and making it their own.


http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_navy_101804,00.html

Meanwhile the Air Force realized their colors are fugly and have decided to use the new Army colors, with the tiger-stripe pattern

12-02-2004 10:33 AM

did that picture bring to mind M. Bison's costume in the Street Fighter movie? because if they have those magnetic boots, sign me up for killing some people for being different from me.

newMaster 12-03-2004 08:26 PM

Buttons are still alot more practical, if they get stuck, you can always rip em off and sew it back on. Zippers are noisy and they do get stuck... No ripping off this time. Heard there are even instant buttons now they u just puncture into your shirt... As for the velcro... Still think its too noisy and that it gets ripped off easily. I mean, I don't think you will be changing your name or allegiance any time soon, right? Also, if noise is not an issue, why camo in the 1st place? Its to avoid enemy detection!! Even if you are not special forces, staying under cover is still important for survival.. If not, might as well wear a bight red shirt with the words "Suck on this!". Combat rations should have potato chips too. :P

On another note... Why barets? I know its to differenciate different units, but doesn't that make it easier for the enemy to know who you are too?

Conclamo Ludus 12-03-2004 09:35 PM

Those Air Force uniforms are hilarious.
Are you supposed to blend in with the sky? I don't get it.

Lockjaw 12-04-2004 12:25 AM

Glad I'm not the only one that thought the new unis looked Brit/Euro.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360