Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-06-2003, 10:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Cannabis 'could kill thousands'

From the BBC:


There is controversy over the health effects of cannabis
Regular cannabis use may be as dangerous as smoking in the long term, claims a UK drug expert.

Professor John Henry, a toxicologist at Imperial College London, says he fears that deaths attributable to cannabis could soar.

There are currently an estimated 3.2 million people in the Britain who smoke cannabis regularly, compared with 13 million tobacco smokers.

Smoking tobacco is believed to cause approximately 120,000 "excess deaths" a year through heart disease, lung cancers and other illnesses.

However, there is no firm evidence of the long-term risks of smoking cannabis.

Studies are clouded by the fact that many cannabis users also smoke tobacco, and it is hard to conduct large-scale studies of individuals who admit using illegal drugs.

The government intends to "downgrade" cannabis from a class "B" to a class "C" drug.

This means that while possession of small quantities of cannabis remains illegal, it is not an "arrestable" offence unless there are aggravating factors, such as use of cannabis near children.

'Scaremongering'

However, Professor Henry, in an editorial for the British Medical Journal, said that if, as many scientists suspected, regular cannabis smoking was as dangerous as tobacco smoking in the long term, the annual death toll from using the drug could be substantial.

He wrote: "It may be argued that the extrapolation from small numbers of individual studies to potential large scale effects amounts to scaremongering.

"For example, one could calculate that if cigarettes cause an annual excess of 120,000 deaths among 13 million smokers, the corresponding figure for deaths among 3.2 million cannabis smokers would be 30,000, assuming equality of effect.

"Even if the number of deaths attributable to cannabis turned out to be a fraction of that figure, smoking cannabis would still be a major public health hazard."

Uncertain future

However, there are various reasons why the likely future death toll caused by cannabis smoking is uncertain, not least the lack of large scale studies investigating this.

It is not yet clear whether the high number of younger people who smoke cannabis regularly will continue the habit into middle and later life.

If not, then their risk of premature death would theoretically be greatly reduced, just as a smoker can radically reduce his or her risk of lung cancer by giving up before middle age.

However, some studies suggest that even though cannabis use involves fewer "cigarettes", users tend to draw more heavily on them, increasing the potential damage from each "joint".

Professor Henry said that both cannabis and tobacco released approximately 4,000 chemicals when burned - most of them identical.
..............

No one could smoke this junk more than I used to.
I stopped totally and will never touch it again.
IMO it is a tar-filled, skanky, noxious, unfiltered smoke
that has to kill your lungs worse than any other.

Comments?
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 10:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
 
*Nikki*'s Avatar
 
Location: Charleston, SC
I think if you consume it on a regular basis then just like everything else done excessively it is not good for you. I think more effort needs to be put into the research of other things that cannot currently be prevented.

Don't smoke a lot of pot and you won't die. Cancer gives you no choice. Appples and oranges yes. Priorities people!!
*Nikki* is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 10:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
"could kill thousands"

I agree with the guy who said if it was killing thousands - we'd know it.

I don't think I look at studies the same way I used to years ago. Now, I feel that for every study saying use butter you can find one saying use margarine, etc. All from credible sources.

Anything used habitually is probably being put into your system in excess and probably ain't good for you. If you know you like to smoke a little pot, you should be aware of any consequences.
gov135 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 10:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
It's true that cannabis smoke has more toxic junk than tobacco smoke, but most people who use it don't smoke it on a regular basis like they would cigarettes. I myself only smoke it about once a month if that. It's been said that a joint is equivalent to 10 cigarettes or so, but who smoke a whole joint by themselves?... most of the time one would only take a few puffs off one. A water bong reduces the amont of tar in the weed smoke also. Also, there are ways to get high without smoking it, namely eating it or utilizing a vaproizer. That way you get all the THC and none of the toxic crap you would get from burning it. I see this cannibis is more dangerous than tobacco as a moot point. I want to see studies of long term effects of THC itself, not the other chemicals in the smoke.
Spungfoo is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 11:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: MI
Quote:
However, there is no firm evidence of the long-term risks of smoking cannabis.
yep, that's what i thought
TaLoN is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 11:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
Watcher
 
billege's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
I never said that mari-ja-wana was <i>good</i> for anyone. I think if anyone is thinking that sucking a burning plant into the lungs for the purpose of chemically altering the brain is going to be healthy, they're nuts. I don't know of any weed smokers that deny smoking, either kind, is bad for the lungs. I also don't know any of them that care to worry about that particular thought.

I further think that if weed was commercially grown and processed there would be far more control over what is in it. Perhaps even there would be a reduction in the "badness" of its smoke through farming / processing designed to do just that. Filtered weed anyone?

The drug marinol is pure, synthetic THC. I belive it has been developed to help shoot down medical marijay, and put the profits in the pockets of drug companies. Either way, the high from marinol is supposed to be the same, but it's free of all that smoking badness. It'd be an interesting experiment if the tablet was as available as the plant. Who would still smoke and who would take the cleaner pill to get high?
I just don't know too many health nuts that use mind altering substances, other than caffinee.
__________________
I can sum up the clash of religion in one sentence:
"My Invisible Friend is better than your Invisible Friend."
billege is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 12:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Delicious
 
Reese's Avatar
 
I think more people are killed by walking into a cannabis patch and getting shot than anyone who actually smokes it. I don't think its any more harmful than alcohol. Yes it probally has more tar and other junk than 3-4 cigarettes but when you smoke 20 cigs a day and maybe 4 joints a week its still not as bad. Weed is still illegal the same reason Moonshine is illegal, Its too hard to tax it. You think it'd be illegal if the government made billions a year off of it? hah

Of course, thats just my opinion. I could be wrong.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry
Reese is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 12:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Grey Britain
Re: Cannabis 'could kill thousands'

Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
From the BBC:

Professor John Henry, a toxicologist at Imperial College London, says he fears that deaths attributable to cannabis could soar.

However, Professor Henry, in an editorial for the British Medical Journal, said that if, as many scientists suspected, regular cannabis smoking was as dangerous as tobacco smoking in the long term, the annual death toll from using the drug could be substantial.

He wrote: "It may be argued that the extrapolation from small numbers of individual studies to potential large scale effects amounts to scaremongering.

"For example, one could calculate that if cigarettes cause an annual excess of 120,000 deaths among 13 million smokers, the corresponding figure for deaths among 3.2 million cannabis smokers would be 30,000, assuming equality of effect.

"Even if the number of deaths attributable to cannabis turned out to be a fraction of that figure, smoking cannabis would still be a major public health hazard."


Professor Henry said that both cannabis and tobacco released approximately 4,000 chemicals when burned - most of them identical.
..............

Comments?
Dammit! I never said any of that! I swear!
__________________
"No one was behaving from very Buddhist motives. Then, thought Pigsy, he was hardly a Buddha, nor was he a monkey. Presently, he was a pig spirit changed into a little girl pretending to be a little boy to be offered to a water monster. It was all very simple to a pig spirit."
John Henry is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
well i dunno anyone that died from it yet and i know plenty that smoke it. (i did for 10 years & my Dad still does).
Ciall is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
pow!
 
clavus's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal
Do this:

Hold a Geiger counter up to a pack of cigarettes. Scary huh?

Now tell me that smoking pot is anywhere near as dangerous as inhaling radioactive tar.

Not that pot is good for you. Smoking anything is dangerous. Burn ANYTHING in our atmoshere and you get NOX compounds.
__________________
Ass, gas or grass. Nobody rides for free.
clavus is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: MI
the problem with marinol is that while it may fuck you up, it is not the same high as marijuana. There are many perscription drugs that can give you that "drugged up" effect
TaLoN is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:32 PM   #12 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Cali
I just saw a commercial about this teen that is pregnant and at the end, it says something about pot being the reason for her pregnancy...so now pot makes you pregnant...neat.
__________________
What would Jesus do.......for a Klondike bar
Rant is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
Crazy
 
i think its pretty obvious that any type of smoke you inhale isnt going to be good for you. i would figure marijuana isnt good for you but most people, including myself and some of my friends, dont smoke it as much as people smoke tobacco products so it may not affect you as much. plus lots of people quit when they get out of high school/college because it could really mess up your chance of getting a good job in todays world if yo uwere to get caught or if you failed a drug test.
Emotion is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Emotion,
sounds like a plan.
Good to hear some realism.
Yes, I'd suggest you do that because it's a smart way to go.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Quote:
The drug marinol is pure, synthetic THC. I belive it has been developed to help shoot down medical marijay, and put the profits in the pockets of drug companies. Either way, the high from marinol is supposed to be the same, but it's free of all that smoking badness. It'd be an interesting experiment if the tablet was as available as the plant. Who would still smoke and who would take the cleaner pill to get high?
I just don't know too many health nuts that use mind altering substances, other than caffinee.
Dronabinol (Marinol) is ineffective for cancer patients. Why waste time creating and testing a new drug instead of using marijuana? Cancer patients will vomit out Marinol, but can't puke up weed. Also, marijuana might be more effective since it contains other cannabinoids and obviously has different effects than Marinol.

I would take the pill if it actually got you high.

Also remember that THC has anti-cancer properties and there has never been a conclusively linked case of marijuana and cancer.
butthead is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:51 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by *Nikki*
Cancer gives you no choice.
Sorry, but I have to disagree with that. There are several drugs that work exceptionally well during chemotherapy when administered properly. When given over proper intervals, Zophran, Benadryll, Reglan, and Atavan can be (most times) enough to stop even the worst nausea.
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:54 PM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
there is too much inconclusive evidence cited for me to believe that this isn't just another scare tactic. plus smoking grass in a vaporiser is much safer than any other way of doing it, bongs included.
impirius7 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 03:46 PM   #18 (permalink)
Loser
 
Moderation is key just like everything else.I know one guy who has missed only 2 days in 25 years of smoking pot.Once was for his uncles funeral and the other time he was in jail cuz he got busted,..well with pot.This guy can't remember a conversation he's had 5 minutes ago.Another guy I knew would criticize me cuz I'm a weekend puffer.He was an avid runner and dropped dead of a heart attack at age 34. Is smoking bad? I don't know but I eat plenty of fruits and vegetables.Are they bad for you yet?
gibber71 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 05:08 PM   #19 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Room Nineteen
There is that commercial out now saying that one joint contains as much tar as 4 cigarettes. Also, smoking pot is like smoking without a filter which, i think, is probably very bad for your lungs. And in tribes where smoking pot is a regular activity, there is a problem where the smoker's lungs become deformed (we learned that in anthropology class).
little limey is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 05:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Registered User
 
sixate's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
Weed is a major factor in todays messed up society. I'll never do it or support the use of it. I don't need a test to know that smoking weed is bad for my lungs and will fry my brain.
sixate is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 05:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
Upright
 
I smoke weed daily as do many of my friends, and i know no one who has died from it. Aynway, you can get high other ways than smoking pot, like eating it. Oh, and the you can solve the tar problem by buying a vaporizer, With these you can get nice, big, clean hits.


-NuKE (ssjtwizta)
NuKE is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 05:54 PM   #22 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Indiana
We can argue all day about the merits and relative risks associated with this or that substance. (Would alcohal really be our legal drug of choice if we considered all the known factors?)

When I was younger we were taught all sorts of bad things would happen if we used drugs. Most of it was overblown hogwash. This sound like just another supposed bit of evidence to bolster the arguments of the anti drug crowd.

There is a down side to drug use and that why I don't use drugs exept the occasional drink. However, I think it is an individual's own desicsion to make.
rs8001 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 06:06 PM   #23 (permalink)
Tilted
 
The age old argument.......bah.

aside from that....I am curious to see how the US will react to that vs. the reaction to Canada.
__________________
Read the date
on the outside of my cocoon.
It specifies my release...
but im running out of room.
termnl is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 06:17 PM   #24 (permalink)
King Knave
 
QuasiMojo's Avatar
 
Location: Lancaster
To much of ANY good thing......
__________________
AzAbOv ZoBeLoE
QuasiMojo is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 07:29 PM   #25 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Canada
I think this theory would have been noted. Even though Canada is going ahead with decriminalizing marijuana here. I think its crap. Even though I dont smoke the stuff.
__________________
Vaseline in a sock does not a Bill Cosby make
BudTheSpud is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 07:33 PM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicagoland
One word: Brownies.

There's no doubt that the act of smoking is not good for people. Therefore hemp should be consumed (eaten). I have a good chili recipe, as well as one for soup.
Double D is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 08:00 PM   #27 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: lost
It sounds to me like nobody really knows what the long-term effects are. We hear about studies that suggest that smoking marijuana can be hazardous to your health, and we hear just as many stories from people who used marijuana for years and have had no bad side effects. I don't think there is any way to end this argument--there are always skeptics who will deny research as "lies from the government" and there are always lurking variables in even the best planned experiments.

My personal opinion? Anything that screws with your mind like that can't be good. I just stay away from all drugs, with the exception of caffeine.
__________________
I'd rather be climbing...

I approach college much like a recovering alcoholic--one day at a time...



phoenix1002 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 08:07 PM   #28 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
Big surprise that we see the word scaremonger in there.

This latest round of Anti-Drug propaganda is getting a little ridiculous.

"Buying drugs supports terrorists" uh-huh
"Smoke Marijuana, get pregnant/raped/sodomized." uh-huh
"Smoking Marijuana is just as dangerous as good ol' regular smoking" Well, no shit. I smoke my fern hanging in the window, chances are it isn't good for me. And the term "just as dangerous" leaves me a little empty....so marijuana is "just as dangerous" as smoking tobacco, yet I can purchase 20 death sticks in box form for handful of dollars....

I just wish the Government would say: Okay, look, were all adults here....you understand the risks involved....go out knock yourselves out. Smoke everything....
It's time for you to start acting like an adult and taking responsibility for your actions, were tired of babysitting
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 08:18 PM   #29 (permalink)
Minion of the scaléd ones
 
Tophat665's Avatar
 
Location: Northeast Jesusland
Everybody dies of something. While I respect people's choice to not indulge in recreational drug use, I am dismayed by the number of such people who believe that their choice is the only right one for everyone.

I am not going to argue the potential medical benefits or the alleged societal detriments of marijuana use. I'm not even going to defend the next point I make. Consider, though, what is wrong with recreational drug use (particularly of the non-addiciting variety), that is not a direct effect of it being illegal? I submit that there is nothing.
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
Tophat665 is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 09:31 PM   #30 (permalink)
Upright
 
Alcohol and Tobacco kill more people than every illegal drug combined times 30.

Caffeine hurts your body more than Marijuana.
w|red is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 10:21 PM   #31 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Tigerland
I thought it said "CANNIBALS could kill thousands". Damn.
Easytiger is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 10:23 PM   #32 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Easytiger
I thought it said "CANNIBALS could kill thousands". Damn.
heh so did I, you are not alone!
redrum is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 04:29 AM   #33 (permalink)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
 
*Nikki*'s Avatar
 
Location: Charleston, SC
Quote:
Originally posted by spectre
Sorry, but I have to disagree with that. There are several drugs that work exceptionally well during chemotherapy when administered properly. When given over proper intervals, Zophran, Benadryll, Reglan, and Atavan can be (most times) enough to stop even the worst nausea.

This was taken out of context. I meant that we need to be concentrating on finding a cure for things such as this, not the effect that pot has on ones health.
*Nikki* is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 04:39 AM   #34 (permalink)
Transfer Agent
 
troit's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally posted by billege
The drug marinol is pure, synthetic THC. I belive it has been developed to help shoot down medical marijay, and put the profits in the pockets of drug companies. Either way, the high from marinol is supposed to be the same, but it's free of all that smoking badness. It'd be an interesting experiment if the tablet was as available as the plant. Who would still smoke and who would take the cleaner pill to get high?
Very interesting Billege. I've got friends that smoke this crap everyday. It literally is like a cup of coffee to one guy. I don't know how but it actually energizes him...That being said -- I will pose the pill vs. bowl/bong question to him and get his take on it... Look back here for the edit of this post.
__________________
I've yet to dephile myself...
troit is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 06:05 AM   #35 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by *Nikki*
This was taken out of context. I meant that we need to be concentrating on finding a cure for things such as this, not the effect that pot has on ones health.
Sorry, I misunderstood.
__________________
"Fuck these chains
No goddamn slave
I will be different"
~ Machine Head
spectre is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 06:52 AM   #36 (permalink)
Everything's better with bacon
 
SaltPork's Avatar
 
Location: In your local grocer's freezer.
Oh my God, people. How can it be healthy to breathe hot smoke into your lungs?!?!?! The drug issue aside, breathing hot smoke into your lungs is not healthy, this cannot be argued. People die mostly from SMOKE inhalation when there is a fire, not from being burned. So how can smoking anything be good for you??
__________________
It was like that when I got here....I swear.
SaltPork is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 07:30 AM   #37 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicagoland
Wrkime, I don't think most of us are saying that smoking anything is healthful. What appears to be true however, is that for a very long time, humans have altered their consciousness with various sustances. Even children do something that can make the head spin- twirling around repeatedly until dizzy- then collapsing in laughter. I submit that it is normal to occasionally alter one's reality. I think adults can make this choice, as long as it is an informed one.
Double D is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 09:10 PM   #38 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Quote:
How can it be healthy to breathe hot smoke into your lungs?!?!?!
I'm not going to bother searching the rest of the threard, but please cite exactly what lead you to believe someone believed inhaling smoke is *HEALTHY*.

Quote:
The drug issue aside, breathing hot smoke into your lungs is not healthy, this cannot be argued. People die mostly from SMOKE inhalation when there is a fire, not from being burned. So how can smoking anything be good for you??
One thing you may like to ask yourself is how ANYTHING can be 100% good in all ways (absolutely). I'm also willing to bet that many fatalities related to smoke inhalation might also have a great deal to do with insufficient oxygen, something controlled inhalation like smoking a joint or a pipe doesn't feature.

Smoke inhalation isn't good, but it's not exactly life-threatening either.
butthead is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 09:19 PM   #39 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: MI
Quote:
Originally posted by little limey
There is that commercial out now saying that one joint contains as much tar as 4 cigarettes. Also, smoking pot is like smoking without a filter which, i think, is probably very bad for your lungs. And in tribes where smoking pot is a regular activity, there is a problem where the smoker's lungs become deformed (we learned that in anthropology class).

the government likes to lie

weed has 1/3 the tar (you smoke bud not leaves like tobacco), and it is not cancer causing tar

smoking pot is much less harmful than tobacco because you are smoking much less and you are not smoking the thousands of chemicals added by tobacco companies.
TaLoN is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 09:50 PM   #40 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Quote:
weed has 1/3 the tar (you smoke bud not leaves like tobacco), and it is not cancer causing tar
Could you please back this up with some sources?

Quote:
smoking pot is much less harmful than tobacco because you are smoking much less and you are not smoking the thousands of chemicals added by tobacco companies.
Let us not forget about the significant and well-documented anti-cancer properties of THC and its medical uses (keeping in mind tobacco has none)!
butthead is offline  
 

Tags
cannabis, kill, thousands

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360