Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   No f**king way... (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/51818-no-f-king-way.html)

Mephisto2 04-08-2004 02:02 PM

No f**king way...
 
Subject is a pun.

Quote:

Coming soon: The smut-free DVD


Just as long as it goes no further
American cinephiles will soon be able to enjoy their movies without sex, violence, swearing - indeed, without any of the interesting bits.

Wal-Mart, the country's mightiest retailer, is preparing to ship a $79 DVD player that automatically strips out potentially offensive content.

The gadget, made by French-owned RCA, aims to tap into mounting concern in the US about media standards.

But the self-censoring technology has run into protests from Hollywood.

No sex, please

The RCA player is the first to incorporate the screening technology of Clearplay, a Salt Lake City-based company.

Many firms provide bowdlerised versions - not always legally - of Hollywood films, but Clearplay operates at a higher level of sophistication.

Clearplay scans movies for dodgy content, and then programs that data into its system.

Subscribers can then watch standard copies of the 500-or-so films on its list, with the assurance that they will automatically skip over mute anything that children or the squeamish may not like.

Until now, Clearplay has only run through a PC.

The naked truth

The launch of the new player, which RCA says was at Wal-Mart's urging, could hardly be better timed.

Ever since the singer Janet Jackson bared a breast during the SuperBowl, US regulators have been highly jumpy about what goes out over the airwaves.

"Increasingly it seems the media is not playing close to the line, but is outright leaping past the line and in fact daring the audience and daring the government to do anything about it," Michael Powell, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, told a media seminar last month.

"Some of the transcripts I have been forced to read reveal content that is pure trash, plain and simple."

The FCC has fought shy of tougher state regulation, but has handed out some unprecedented indecency fines in recent months.

The same, but different

But Clearplay and its rivals face a challenge from the other direction.

A Hollywood consortium, including some of Tinseltown's top directors, has sued Clearplay and others, arguing that they are abusing the films' artistic integrity.

By producing - without permission - altered versions of intellectual property, censors are effectively pirating directors' and studios' work, the lawsuit argues.

Clearplay hopes to escape through a loophole: instead of making new versions of films, it argues, its technology is simply another way of playing the existing movie - no more an abuse than a viewer fast-forwarding a tape in his own home.

The case is pending, but RCA has decided to press ahead regardless.


REF: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3611969.stm

Personally, as this is self selected censorship, I have absolutely no problem with it.

Thoughts?

kutulu 04-08-2004 02:07 PM

It doesn't bother me any, although the filtering should be able to be stopped if the owner wishes to stop it.

Does it surprise anyone that the software comes from a SLC-based company?

yournamehere 04-08-2004 02:11 PM

If I want to see the sex and violence, that's my business.
If others don't - that's their business.
Carry on.

Oh - and clever title :)

rockzilla 04-08-2004 02:17 PM

Like you said Mr. Mephisto, since this is self-imposed censorship, I don't think it's a big deal.
I wouldn't buy one, but I don't think they're trying to target the nudity, violence and profanity-loving demographic.

animosity 04-08-2004 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kutulu
Does it surprise anyone that the software comes from a SLC-based company?
my thoughts excatly.

people should use this if they feel the need... but i do see film companies point... id file a lawsuit.

its fine if people want to censor what they view.... but they start censoring my shit and they will have hell to pay.

*edit* if you dont want to see sex and violence dont watch rated R movies!

moonstrucksoul 04-08-2004 02:23 PM

self edited out of new information. :)


can anyone name a movie that would be as good as the original if it was censored like that? i can't.

Mephisto2 04-08-2004 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by moonstrucksoul

can anyone name a movie that would be as good as the original if it was censored like that? i can't.


How about ones with gratuitous sex and violence?

I think that's the whole point.

I don't see any reason to make a bid deal about this. It's a hell of a lot better than actually censoring the original content.


Mr Mephisto

Cynthetiq 04-08-2004 02:36 PM

at least it's not REISSUING the content like they were doing in Utah.

that is copyright infringment, but this allows for people to, do as they please for themselves.

kutulu 04-08-2004 02:43 PM

Quote:

By producing - without permission - altered versions of intellectual property, censors are effectively pirating directors' and studios' work, the lawsuit argues.

Clearplay hopes to escape through a loophole: instead of making new versions of films, it argues, its technology is simply another way of playing the existing movie - no more an abuse than a viewer fast-forwarding a tape in his own home.
They are not altering the movie in any way. If you play it in a normal DVD player it will not exclude anything. It's just the MPAA trying to jump on the opportunity to make a buck.

Hollywood has been castrated enough lately, this is a way for them to make what they want and avoid some consumer complaints.

Quote:

Originally posted by Cynthetiq
at least it's not REISSUING the content like they were doing in Utah.

that is copyright infringment, but this allows for people to, do as they please for themselves.

What are you referring to in Utah?

Cynthetiq 04-08-2004 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kutulu
They are not altering the movie in any way. If you play it in a normal DVD player it will not exclude anything. It's just the MPAA trying to jump on the opportunity to make a buck.

Hollywood has been castrated enough lately, this is a way for them to make what they want and avoid some consumer complaints.



What are you referring to in Utah?

http://www.cleanflicks.com/
Quote:

Welcome to CleanFlicks.com

As your premier source for edited DVDs and Videos, we have over 500 titles available to buy online. If you would rather rent edited movies, look for an authorized dealer near you or visit Rentals Section to rent online!
here's where they run afoul with the MPAA
We only edit movies on our list.
Quote:

Ordering options A and B
A) Send us your VHS/DVD movie to be edited. We edit it and ship it to you.

Edit a VHS movie for $14.00 plus shipping.
Edit a DVD movie for $18.50 plus shipping.

B) We buy the VHS/DVD movie for you, edit it, and ship it to you.
Buy and edit a VHS movie for $26.95 plus shipping.
Buy and edit a DVD movie for $36.95 plus shipping.
an interesting dissection of the CleanFlicks vs. Hollywood

http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/mod...rticle&sid=360

mingusfingers 04-08-2004 02:53 PM

Hey, I see no problem there. Not that I'd buy it. Ever.

MooseMan3000 04-08-2004 02:59 PM

Wait. Was that by any chance posted on April 1?


Because that's fucking retarded, if you don't mind me saying.

Cynthetiq 04-08-2004 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MooseMan3000
Because that's fucking retarded, if you don't mind me saying.
why?

If you want to ALLOW yourself to see porn and gratuitous violence then why should someone else allow themselves to NOT see that stuff?

your intolerance is equal to theirs if you can't at least admit that they have the right to do what they need to ensure that they don't expose themselves to such things.

slimpi66y 04-08-2004 03:06 PM

Re: No f**king way...
 
couple years ago, car manufacturer say they will eliminate the lighters in cars in support of whatever bullshit they can think of (just an excuse to cut features out), well that one folded quick

this dvd thing, I don't know man, I can the swearing should be cut out, I don't enjoy hearing it even when my wife says "i want to suck your fucking cock" (okay I actually like that one)

my point is, sex is a component in life that shouldn't be censored, but the swearing, educated people can express themselves without swearing too much...so I want my kids to know that

World's King 04-08-2004 03:06 PM

*takes off all his clothes and grabs his crotch*


I gotcha sex and violence right here!

Nafter 04-08-2004 03:19 PM

As long as it doesnt effect my film watching in any way im fine with it. Hopefully they dont sell too well, else it might be percieved that people want these blander, less interesting films (versions of films) and future films will be made blander to suit.

These things will only destroy a good film though, i doubt they will be used to censor dawn of the dead type horror films or anything of the sort, as they would become unwatchable, but to more take out the one or two graphic scenes in a otherwise "safe" film. Trouble is more graphic scenes in films like this are usually put in for a good reason, to illustrate a point, a highlight of the film etc. People with this device will really be missing out. ah well, its thier loss.

Halx 04-08-2004 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Original King
*takes off all his clothes and grabs his crotch*


I gotcha sex and violence right here!

awesome

kutulu 04-08-2004 03:33 PM

I can see why cleanflicks is being sued. They should be. The MPAA should sue them for every penny that they made.

The self censoring DVD player is totally different since it leaves the original copy completely intact.

moonstrucksoul 04-08-2004 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr Mephisto
How about ones with gratuitous sex and violence?

I think that's the whole point.

I don't see any reason to make a bid deal about this. It's a hell of a lot better than actually censoring the original content.


Mr Mephisto


name one that would still be good.

paddyjoe 04-08-2004 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Original King
*takes off all his clothes and grabs his crotch*


I gotcha sex and violence right here!

Watching this would be a damn sight better than some of the crap Hollywood is feeding us!



Hey, no disrespect intended, King.

Mephisto2 04-08-2004 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by moonstrucksoul
name one that would still be good.
I tend not to watch movies with gratuitous sex and violence, so I can't.

But, as has been said already, if you CHOOSE not to watch edited movies, then that's fine. You can even say they would be no good. Conversely, concerned parents could also CHOOSE not to watch unedited versions. They may think your taste in movies is "no good".

Different strokes my friend, different strokes...


Mr Mephisto

yournamehere 04-08-2004 07:17 PM

A couple more thoughts on this now that I've had a few hours to think on it:

1. I do have a problem with this - it's basically censoring your movie according to someone else's standards. We all have our own idea of what's acceptable and what's not - but the words and/or actions are cut depending on someone else's interpretation of what's obscene or violent - not our own. But since I'll never buy one of these DVD players, it's really not a concern.

2. It could be a good thing in that if I ever found myself with nothing to do for 5 minutes, I could watch <i>Pulp Fiction</i> :)

Nefir 04-08-2004 07:21 PM

As long as people have a choice, I have no beef with such self-censoring products... However, there is a dark side to any invention.

What may begin innocently enough can evolve into something truly dangerous to freedom of speech and expression.

&lt;Tin Foil Hat&gt;
It will happen like this: More and more self-censoring devices will enter the market. Eventually people will become so accustomed to them, that censor chips will be a given in any product.

The next step would be to introduce a more avanced version of the self-censoring DVD - one where you cannot control what is censored. It will censor things by itself, so that a truly caring parent will not have to worry about messing with complicated controls.

More and more of these automatically-censoring devices will enter consumers' hands - they will be more affordable, and have special online features not available in "dirty" devices. Soon it will be impossible to get a hold of one that lets you view media the way it was meant to be viewed - but of course by then the media itself will have adapted, and censored out everything that can be censored before it even reaches your DVD!
&lt;/Tin Foil Hat&gt;

Whew.

Prince 04-08-2004 07:49 PM

I've no problem with such crazy inventions.

I wouldn't buy one, nor would I sit through a movie that got the "good bits" skipped over automatically.

Really, though, what's next? Bleep out the cuss words, or cut them out of the movie as well?

Pulp Fiction might lose some of its appeal, that's for sure.

MooseMan3000 04-08-2004 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cynthetiq
why?

If you want to ALLOW yourself to see porn and gratuitous violence then why should someone else allow themselves to NOT see that stuff?

your intolerance is equal to theirs if you can't at least admit that they have the right to do what they need to ensure that they don't expose themselves to such things.

Eh, I made myself unclear. I believe they have the RIGHT to do anything they want regarding their movies. The self censoring DVD player is essentially a more sophisticated version of the Fast Forward button.

That doesn't change the fact that I think anyone who uses one is a complete tool. Nothing personal, but I believe that there are much better ways to raise your kids than showing them adult movies with all the "naughty bits" taken out. Like reading to them. Oh, and if you're doing it because YOU don't want to see it... just rent a different movie, eh? Why would you get something you don't want to watch?

That is all.

moonstrucksoul 04-08-2004 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr Mephisto
I tend not to watch movies with gratuitous sex and violence, so I can't.

Different strokes my friend, different strokes...


Mr Mephisto

a teaspoon of sugar makes the medicine go down, eh ?:)

Skettios 04-08-2004 08:53 PM

This is great.

Nobody is going to buy this. Hopefully Walmart has a ton of money locked into this venture.

Mephisto2 04-08-2004 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by moonstrucksoul
a teaspoon of sugar makes the medicine go down, eh ?:)
Actually one occurred to me whilst I was washing up (don't ask...).

How about Caligula?

A movie with lots of great actors and what was apparently a good script, that the director added porn to after most of the shooting was complete.

Mr Mephisto

Cynthetiq 04-09-2004 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Skettios
This is great.

Nobody is going to buy this. Hopefully Walmart has a ton of money locked into this venture.

did you see how many stores CleanFlicks has? If they only sell to 1% of America, it still will make money.

Reese 04-09-2004 03:58 AM

We have a bad word filter on my little sisters' tv. It's not that bad, it does stop them from hear about 90% of the language. I wouldn't even bother watching a movie like requim for a dream though, Probably every war movie would be ruined too. As long as its not forced, I'm fine with it.

raeanna74 04-09-2004 06:52 AM

I wonder if it will remove any profanity? My mother scorns watching ANYTHING that has one word of profanity and misses out on a lot of good movies. There are a few I think she would enjoy watching but because she's so extremely sensitive she refuses. This might open up that door for her. Cool stuff.

Kaos 04-09-2004 07:29 AM

Quote:

The launch of the new player, which RCA says was at Wal-Mart's urging
Isn't anyone else concerned that Walmart is trying to be everyone's moral concience?

Cynthetiq 04-09-2004 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaos
Isn't anyone else concerned that Walmart is trying to be everyone's moral concience?
no surprise

walmart does lots of market research and then asks manufacturers to make products based on that research.

ladyadmin 04-09-2004 08:13 AM

In a family setting, I think they are just attempting to provide consumers with products that will aide in the blocking of profanity and nudity that younger children shouldn't have to view yet until they are older or at the discretion of their parents.

I can view both sides of the fence. I get sick and tired of watching movies/TV ads/TV shows that always revolve around sexual situations and where every other word is a swear word. If I want sex, I'll rent a porn movie! If I want swearing, I'll go hang out at the docks with some sailors.

I don't agree with censorship but I do agree with the providing of the equipment to block it out if necessary when there are small children involved.

erion 04-09-2004 08:18 AM

There's a reason that Wal-Mart was born out what they call America's Heartland.

It's because the Brain isn't there.

It never ceases to amaze me how these "religious right" sheep are willing to hand over control of their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms just to be over the inconvenience of a few dirty words or pictures.

moonstrucksoul 04-09-2004 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr Mephisto
Actually one occurred to me whilst I was washing up (don't ask...).

How about Caligula?

A movie with lots of great actors and what was apparently a good script, that the director added porn to after most of the shooting was complete.

Mr Mephisto


i have wanted to see that movie since i was a kid and i learned that it was full of sex, LOL. i suppose that you could still cut alot out of it and still get the point across that Ceasar had some sexual issues. but as a filmmaker now , you might have to plan ahead on individual censorship, and elude to physical acts with verbal dialogue, so people could still understand what was happening without the sex scenes. seems like it would take some of the fun out of filmmaking.

Holo 04-09-2004 09:59 AM

Like I said in Hal's thread, technology is giving us options to see what we don't want our kids to see, and gives the "right" less ammo to take away the freedoms of adults.

analog 04-09-2004 10:59 AM

I want to vomit uncontrollably for an hour.

I want to cry for humanity.

No rant is long enough, mean enough, or could fully support or come close to representing my feelings of disgust, DISAPPOINTMENT, and nausea over this developement.

This is simply filthy.

I have to yell.

AMERICA: Raise your kids properly and we won't have these problems.

Xell101 04-09-2004 11:47 AM

One more step to self censoring electronics, one more step to viewing television and movies as I'd like to.

kutulu 04-09-2004 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Xell101
One more step to self censoring electronics, one more step to viewing television and movies as I'd like to.
I don't think this could carry over to television. My idea of self censoring is cutting out what is offensive to certain people. Therefore, the censored version is going to be shorter than the original version. Commercial breaks and schedules would get all fucked up unless they just had something like a black screen during visually offensive scenes and overdubs over language.

The only drawback I see here is if it becomes maditory for products to include this software. The TV has the V-chip which is included in all new TVs. Whether or not you want it you have to pay for it. That is fucked.

TM875 04-09-2004 03:45 PM

Personally, I'd want to toss a porno DVD in it and see what happens...it might just self destruct.

heyal256 04-09-2004 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TM875
Personally, I'd want to toss a porno DVD in it and see what happens...it might just self destruct.
This is a great way to test the technology to see if it works... and damn funny too :)

twilightfoix 04-10-2004 02:00 PM

yeah ok. this censorship thing has just hit a whole new level. people just need to get over this kind of shit and let people watch what they wanna watch.

Cynthetiq 05-03-2005 09:03 AM

followup article from Forbes.com


Quote:

My Family, My Movie
Stephane Fitch, 04.29.05, 10:00 AM ET

You tinker with the recipes in Bon Appetit and add ice cubes to your white wine. You prefer the shuffle mode on your iPod and you skip the boring parts of The Tonight Show with your TiVo. Now, thanks to the U.S. Congress, maybe you can skip the boring parts of movies, too.

No, this wasn't really what legislators intended. The Family Movie Act of 2005, signed by President George W. Bush on Wednesday, was aimed at folks who use software to cut out four-letter words, nudity and graphic violence from movies they rent or buy for home viewing.

But the law may also loosen Hollywood's tight control over its products. It passes some of the control over how movies are edited to you and, hypothetically, a mini-industry of movie remix artists.

U.S. copyright law makes it illegal to sell edited versions of Hollywood films. But the Family Movie Act says if you use software to "mak[e] imperceptible changes to...limited portions of audio or video content of a motion picture...from an authorized copy of the motion picture," you're OK. Just don't create a "fixed copy of the altered version."

The law came about in part due to the efforts of William Aho and his tiny Salt Lake City software company called ClearPlay. For years, Aho had scratched his head and wondered why Hollywood refused to release on DVD versions of its most popular movies that would be slightly altered to appeal more to squeamish parents. Sensing an opportunity, he founded ClearPlay (see "Monster In A Box").

Aho's software, when installed onto a DVD player, makes the player mute or skip ahead when something objectionable happens in a movie. (The software isn't smart enough to recognize curse words or violence; Aho employs teams of editors who watch movies, find the objectionable bits and program a movie-specific filter to excise the bad stuff frame by frame.) Aho successfully lobbied to create the Family Movie Act after billionaire director Steven Spielberg, Robert Redford, Steven Soderbergh, 13 other famed Hollywood directors and eight large studios sued ClearPlay in U.S. District Court in Denver, claiming its software violated copyright laws. The new law is a direct blow to them.

But could it also seed a new industry? Annual DVD sales are around $16 billion. It's easy to envision a side business in DVD filters. Since it's now OK for ClearPlay to create filters that make Spider-Man 2--produced by Sony (nyse: SNE - news - people )--less violent, it's also legal for bowdlerizers to create filters that would serve other purposes. Somebody, for example, needs to create a filter that would excise all the stupidity about Gaelic poetry in Million Dollar Baby, from Time Warner's (nyse: TWX - news - people ) Warner Bros. studio. Another hot-selling filter would be one that mutes out all the ruinous voice-over in Wonder Boys.

There's a proven market for these kinds of edits; witness what happened to George Lucas' Star Wars: Episode I--The Phantom Menace. In 2001, an alternative version of Lucas' unloved sequel, called Episode 1.1--The Phantom Edit, created a sensation among fans of the 1970s original. Created by a fan, the edited version cut 20 minutes from the film. The excisions all but deleted a dopey character (Jar Jar Binks) and got rid of several other annoyances, like Anakin Skywalker's shouts of "Yahoo!" and "Whoopee!" during the movie's pod-racing sequence.

Lucas went from amused to horrified. And the edit-happy fan--no doubt worried about getting sued--later apologized. If the Family Movie Act had been in force then, he could have been rolling in dough instead.

Aho admits the law "doesn't discriminate" about what kind of filters you would create. "As long as it was purely subtractive, the law supports it," he says. He believes the market for family-type filters is around $100 million, "but I don't think there's much of a market for filters [that aren't] family-friendly."

Asked if he'd consider licensing his software to other companies or individuals looking to create filters like these that they could sell for home use, Aho says no. "There are some noncontroversial-type, good-for-society-type applications we'd consider," he says. ClearPlay has discussed licensing its software for classroom use, he says.

But that doesn't mean companies looking to license software or hardware that would allow for movie remixes couldn't do so elsewhere--especially since there's some question about who, exactly, holds the patent on DVD-filtering software. A Boca Raton, Fla., company called Nissim is now suing ClearPlay over patent infringement in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Aho says the claim is unfounded. But RCA, the Thomson (nyse: TMS - news - people ) unit that had created a ClearPlay DVD player that was being sold in Wal-Mart Stores (nyse: WMT - news - people ), has ceased manufacturing the player.

The directors and the studios that declined to release family-friendly versions of their films before Aho founded ClearPlay and Congress stepped in with the Family Movie Act are also busy: kicking themselves.

rockogre 05-04-2005 09:15 AM

Well, I for one think that we should just prepare to give up and bow down before our Wal-Mart overseerers.

It's just an evil, woman hating, slave driving, cult I tell you.

Now, back to the movie.

Zeraph 05-04-2005 11:42 AM

I'm still very much against this and censorship of any kind....here's a thought, if you don't want to see sex/violence/whatever don't watch it!

Here's a very simple, if unrealistic, example of why I don't like it. Say I'm an artist and I produce this sentence: "Killing is not good" but there is a censorship device that edits out negative words, so now the sentence is changed to "Killing is good". That is not my message, and to play it as if is were is cheating me, my work is presented as a lie, and I don't care if they know it's being censored that's not what I created it for.

You may still be thinking, its self censorship, what they do doesn't hurt me so who cares? But where does it stop? Should we start playing and censoring schindler's list in school and TV? Suddenly we have a generation of kids growing up that doesn't think nazi's are a big deal (not that this example is perfect, but I'm sure it can be applied to other examples you can think of, even if they arn't as big a deal) creating the possibility that it could happen again, or more of a possibility. Are books next? DL something on your computer to automatically edit online books? May not be a big deal now, but what happeens if books switch nearly completely to digital?

I suggest reading Fahrenheit 451, especially his essay at the end about censorship (may only be in certain prints, not sure).

Cynthetiq 05-04-2005 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeraph
I'm still very much against this and censorship of any kind....here's a thought, if you don't want to see sex/violence/whatever don't watch it!

Here's a very simple, if unrealistic, example of why I don't like it. Say I'm an artist and I produce this sentence: "Killing is not good" but there is a censorship device that edits out negative words, so now the sentence is changed to "Killing is good". That is not my message, and to play it as if is were is cheating me, my work is presented as a lie, and I don't care if they know it's being censored that's not what I created it for.

You may still be thinking, its self censorship, what they do doesn't hurt me so who cares? But where does it stop? Should we start playing and censoring schindler's list in school and TV? Suddenly we have a generation of kids growing up that doesn't think nazi's are a big deal (not that this example is perfect, but I'm sure it can be applied to other examples you can think of, even if they arn't as big a deal) creating the possibility that it could happen again, or more of a possibility. Are books next? DL something on your computer to automatically edit online books? May not be a big deal now, but what happeens if books switch nearly completely to digital?

I suggest reading Fahrenheit 451, especially his essay at the end about censorship (may only be in certain prints, not sure).

intersting, when I'd meet them I'd know they were Epsilon Semi-Morons because they would have never seen it in a book or movie.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360