BARE-BUTT BRITNEY BURNED UP
 

http://www.nypost.com/gossip/41068.htm


BARE-BUTT BRITNEY BURNED UP

October 10, 2003 -- WHILE men the world over drooled over the latest cover of Esquire, which featured Britney Spears mimicking a famed 1966 Angie Dickinson photo, Spears herself was livid. Sources say the singer - who appears in less and less clothing with each successive magazine cover - was "humiliated" by her bottom-baring pose, which had her standing sideways in a skin-tight sweater and white stilettos. The photo was shot by James White for Esquire's "70 Years of Women We Love" issue. "Britney thinks the pictures are too naked and is really angry at Esquire," a magazine insider said. "But really, is she out of her mind? I mean, her brother was at the shoot. Exploited? Is she crazy? Look at the photos she has done for everyone else. The Rolling Stone cover was practically naked, too - but she wasn't exploited by them?" Relations between Esquire and Spears have been frosty ever since editor David Granger thought he had an exclusive on the pop tart - and then she posed for other magazines without telling him. A rep for Spears declined comment.

It's a real pretty picture, there on the cover.

Worth a bit of extra publicity/controversy.

...sounds like a publicist's idea.

um....if she had a problem with being that naked in a picture....why did she pose for it? :confused: :rolleyes:

Yeah right she really is livid - she is doing anything for publicity and this is just another stunt. I'm waiting until she does Playboy, and then complains about the pictures.

I'm gonna have to agree... I think it was just a ploy by the publicist to get more people to look at the picture... (as I look at the lifesize picture of Britney in my dorm room).... But yes, she is a very beautiful girl and I don't necessarily think the cover was in bad taste

Livid like a fox. I bet she's sewing a new sweater out of old 100 dollar bills right now.

Britney who? Yawwwn

Didn't she use to "sing" or something?

lol, pop tart :lol:

she only has herself to blame. she wanted to transition from pop star to sex symbol. now that she's got what she wanted she's gonna whine about a pg-13 magazine cover? i've already wasted enough time on this bitch. PEACE!

Britney (and Jessica Simpson) for that matter are the most overrated girls around. Cute (yes), beautiful (hell no). I saw tons better looking girls at the OU-Texas game yesterday.

I was thinking the same thing. It's not like it's a paparazzi shot. :confused:

Uh-huh. Pose suggestively, then shore up what's left of your public innocence by claiming outrage. Whatever keeps those albums selling to the widest demographic, right?

I give her a year before we see her topless with nothing covered up. It will be even quicker if her next album flops.

Give her a year before we see her in porn films getting fucked from every position..She's headed in that direction..The cover of Rolling Stone, Esquire etc..etc..and prior to is all a set up for a porn career.

Like you guys have said, I'm sure she was real outraged when Esquire forced her to drop her knickers and smile at the camera.

Please, spare me.....:)

this women has a weird schizophrenia.

half of her wants to be this pure virginal idol
the other half is a very sexual sluttish figure.

I don't respect this at all.
Choose what you want to be, and follow through with it.
You can't have it both ways.

Once you decide, I'll respect that,
but otherwise you just look like a manipulator and a flake.

She chose to pose for this magazine, give me a break.

Nope that's been done by Darryl Hannah. Britney will have come up something more original. :lol:

She looks good. She should just go the extra mile *whispers 'playboy'*

while i don't respect her in the slightest i would still fuck her.

that last post doesn't really make me look very good i guess i mean she's pretty but i don't like her views and tactics.

Remember, she is a large retail monster. There is nothing she does without accountability. She can't even buy a multi-thousand dollar purse without acknowledgement. Don't kid yourself, she knows what she's doing.

Jdoe

buttney never 'sang'...
that voice is a computer generated emulation made specificly to intice younf gullible minds

Yup..She looks all burned up to me..More like a bitch in-heat.

From the Esquire photo shoot:

http://a820.g.akamai.net/7/820/822/1...ritney01_g.jpg

http://a820.g.akamai.net/7/820/822/1...ritney02_g.jpg

http://a820.g.akamai.net/7/820/822/1...ritney03_g.jpg

EXACTLY. If she didn't want to possibly have that photo anywhere, muchless the cover, why the hell did she allow it to be taken?

They show you the pictures before they publisize them. And some even ask your opinion on them. No fuckin way she didn't know she looked like that in the pictures. She's fuckin full a shit stupidest fuckin complaint I've ever heard.

Asta!!

i like how her butt looks in it

Her ass would have looked nicer if I was balls deep in it.

she should've not posed if it was going to be that big of a deal to her

This person drives me nuts. It's like the girl at the party that wants to get laid, so she finds some guy, has sex with him, and later, when people are laughing at her for it, she calls it date rape.

She wants everyone to like her, for being sweet and innocent and always hounded by fame. Bull.

I might like her if she wasn't such a hypocrite. But she is, and that is a trait that I don't tolerate in a person.

I think it was summed up best in the Rolling Stone interview, when asked about her cocaine and sluttiness. She denied everything so much that it made it sound a little like lies. I think the line in the story was "Dost thou lady protest too much?"

In a couple of years, after playboy and a couple of adult videos, her boobs will start to sag and you will see her in line for welfare because million dollar purses don't do much if you have no money to put in them.

You know, it all started going downhill when Justin dumped her. Maybe he knew something that none of us did. *washed up*

i'll give everyone a dollar if i never see another BS thread on General Discussion again.

ill give every a rupee also if there r no more BS,aguilera,(u get the idea) threads here

ill give a rupee for every mariah carey thread started :p [my 1st and only role model]

She is clinging to any publicity she can get beacuse her 15 minutes were up about two years ago. She should just do the Playboy thing while she can really cash in on those looks (the only thing she has) and be finished.

The sooner the better.

Here's the cover...

http://a820.g.akamai.net/7/820/822/1...03/2003_11.jpg

Y'know, who really knows what goes on in the mind of celebrities? They're people like you and me, they just have bigger bank accounts and have a whole lot more people looking at them a whole lot more frequently.

Maybe she says what she says to deflect too many people from calling her a tramp, and maybe she does it because she is, in retrospect, regretting the shoot. People do things they sometimes feel bad about later.

You never know.

She posed... Why is she complaining? Beyond that tho, did anyone else notice that it stated that her BROTHER was there? How fucking gross is that?

How is that gross? It's not like he's never seen her naked before...

if she does a Barely Legal spread for Hustler i gotta agree with gak :D

I think you're safe, Z :)

I still want my dollar.

Nimbletoe: I don't know about you, but if my sister's were ever to go on a shoot like that, I sure wouldn't be compelled to go. "Oh my sister is going to strip! LETS GO!"... I don't think so.