Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2003, 09:41 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: 1 mile from Ground Zero
Correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the RIAA saying that you can own a CD without any problems but you can't put it in a file sharing program and allowing others to download it from you? I guess this means that they are not allowing you the right to have your CD backed up on any folders on your computer they deam unacceptable. This has to be against the law somehow.

I can just see the RIAA saying to the nice pawns, "You can back up your CD but don't be naughty and put it in a folder we don't want you to." Ludicrious!!

Glad
__________________
I'm "Glad I Ate Her" because the payback was worth it!!
Glad-I-Ate-Her is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 12:35 AM   #42 (permalink)
Tilted
 
down with RIAA
Bumm is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 01:13 AM   #43 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I think Kazaa Lite has an option to prevent other users from being able to look at your shared files. You can still share them though.
rainheart is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 07:51 AM   #44 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
You don't remove a problem by targeting the least of the offenders
Please understand that I'm no friend of the RIAA. This message should not be construed as defending them or supporting their tactics.

I think that they are specifically *not* going after only the largest infringers in order to generate as much fear as possible...I mean, it certainly seems a more frightening prospect to me that *anyone* could be sued regardless of how many files were being shared. It seems to me they are trying to build a "you are never safe" mindset in the population.
Spanky Johnson is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 09:26 AM   #45 (permalink)
undead
 
Location: nihilistic freedom
Quote:
Originally posted by Phaenx
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboa...728091125.html


Buy one of these.

And that would accomplish what, exactly? Yes it would keep unauthorized users out of your harddrive, but it does nothing to prevent the RIAA from cataloging your shared files. Why not just disable file sharing and spare yourself a hardware upgrade?
nothingx is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 10:26 AM   #46 (permalink)
The Northern Ward
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Quote:
Originally posted by moelester
And that would accomplish what, exactly? Yes it would keep unauthorized users out of your harddrive, but it does nothing to prevent the RIAA from cataloging your shared files. Why not just disable file sharing and spare yourself a hardware upgrade?
Can't win a lawsuit with no evidence.
__________________
"I went shopping last night at like 1am. The place was empty and this old woman just making polite conversation said to me, 'where is everyone??' I replied, 'In bed, same place you and I should be!' Took me ten minutes to figure out why she gave me a dirty look." --Some guy
Phaenx is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 11:39 AM   #47 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
Lawsuits cost a bunch of money and time, and you can't get money out of people that don't have it. This is a scare tactic plain and simple. They are hoping to shut it down just due to fear. There is absolutely no way they can justify this financially.
skysooner is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 11:41 AM   #48 (permalink)
Follower of Ner'Zhul
 
RelaX's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
I'm in the Netherlands and using KaZaA Lite... to quote from some 80ies or 90ies song (MC Hammer? I don't remember, I just remember it sucked)

"Can't touch me!"

__________________
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents.
- Nathaniel Borenstein
RelaX is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 11:49 AM   #49 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Location: Location: Location:
when did it become about money and not the music? thats what really bothers me about this whole thing... bands that freak out about file-sharing because they're not getting all their damn money... chris carabba from dashboard confessional said "i don't care how people get my music.. because, its about the music. not the money... if my music can reach more people because of file-sharing then so be it."

that, my friends, is a true artist, someone concerned about the fans, and the music that he is making.. not the fucking money.
__________________
I dare you to forget the marks you left across my neck from those nights when we were both found at our best. Now I could make this obvious, and you..you could deny me all in one breath. You could shrug me off your shoulders. Just forget me.. it's that simple.
nostalgic1 is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 09:10 PM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: 1 mile from Ground Zero
There will be a definite backlash against the music industry. I think the RIAA mis-calculated the ire of the consumers. Time will tell.

Glad
__________________
I'm "Glad I Ate Her" because the payback was worth it!!
Glad-I-Ate-Her is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 09:24 PM   #51 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
They can't financially afford to go through with this. Most of it is just a scare tactic. They realize if they go after someone, there will be a class action suit filed on behalf of the people they are going after and legal fees will eat them alive. I don't condone stealing, but when a corporation controls all channels of distribution (think albums and books) and they charge ridiculous amounts of money for their product, people are going to react. The RIAA needs to get a clue and figure out how to keep up with the times rather than trying to drag us back into the Stone Age.
skysooner is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 09:32 PM   #52 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Castro Valley
My plan for stopping myself from Dl music is fairly simple:
Get my friends CD book, which he said I could borrow
Delete all of the music on my computer (with a few exceptions)
Back up all of his CDs on my hard drive

I still violate the laws, but I cant get caught as easy.
Fifteen Short is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 02:44 PM   #53 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I don't know if this is possible, buy if you but a tape and it sucks, can't you sue the artist and the label for putting out an inferior product?

And this whole downloading thing is bullshit. Would somebody buy a car without test driving it? How about a house? Would somebody but a house without checking it out first? Most people check out Doctors, Dentists, Schools, Colleges, church etc. Before going or joining them. Should it be illegal to test drive a car? Or inspect a house? Do you have to buy them first before you can see if you want it? Downloading is the same, everybody want to make sure they don't throw away their hard earn money.

I hope that made sense.
Psivage is offline  
Old 08-18-2003, 06:26 PM   #54 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: 1 mile from Ground Zero
Quote:
Originally posted by Fifteen Short
My plan for stopping myself from Dl music is fairly simple:
Get my friends CD book, which he said I could borrow
Delete all of the music on my computer (with a few exceptions)
Back up all of his CDs on my hard drive

I still violate the laws, but I cant get caught as easy.
Interesting strategy. But after awhile, your friend would want you to buy the music so he could download it to his computer.

Glad
__________________
I'm "Glad I Ate Her" because the payback was worth it!!
Glad-I-Ate-Her is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 07:56 AM   #55 (permalink)
Vyk
Insane
 
Location: Dayton, Ohio
I think the RIAA has a right to protect its properties but this is not the way to go about it. I'm looking forward to seeing this bite them in the tush
__________________
"Courage of the heart is very rare"
Vyk is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 10:10 AM   #56 (permalink)
Fucking Hostile
 
tinfoil's Avatar
 
Location: Springford, ON, Canada
This HAS started to bite them in the ass. Universities and ISPs are fighting this in the courts. The court itself is starting to lash against the RIAA as well as more and more of the government representatives.

It seems the tide of subpoenas is slowing, so perhaps the RIAA has had a lucid moment.

Ha!
__________________
Get off your fuckin cross. We need the fuckin space to nail the next fool martyr.
tinfoil is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:35 PM   #57 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Michigan
I'm wondering who a sobpeona is for in the office. We caught wind that someone is being served an sobpeona and a good friend of mine who is also a co-worker has a ton of mp3s, so he thought it might be him.

But, my impression of this is they are going after the people who have 120 gigs online with filesharing programs. My friend downloads it for himself and sometimes I go thru it and listen to some when at work.

Just makes you wonder when you hear about sobpoenas all over the place and then find out someone is gonna be served one in your company that conisists of 15 people
__________________
Patterns have a habit of repeating themselves.
asshopo is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:37 PM   #58 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally posted by tinfoil
This HAS started to bite them in the ass. Universities and ISPs are fighting this in the courts. The court itself is starting to lash against the RIAA as well as more and more of the government representatives.

It seems the tide of subpoenas is slowing, so perhaps the RIAA has had a lucid moment.

Ha!
Heh, because they are being so agressive, I've decided I will never buy another cd or movie for that matter. I bought a DVD writer over the weekend and I won't ever buy anything from the RIAA or MPAA.

Might sound childish, but they are getting to be too much like big brother. CDs/DVDs that expire after x amount of time once they hit oxygen? Heh, thats alot of thought into something that is simple, lower the prices and people won't steal it.
asshopo is offline  
Old 08-20-2003, 04:41 AM   #59 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: france
I've spent waay too much money on cd's over the years. For example, I bought Led Zep's entire back catalogue during the 80's. Some cd's got scratched. You told me they were indestructable! I took care of them!
Then along comes a big box set. Remastered! All my favourite songs, but better! That's about $100 in your money. So I've got the set, then they release all the albums again, but...Remastered! Right, so all the money I spent the first time was wasted, 'Remasters' the box set is now redundant, as I can now hear the albums as they were meant to be heard in both order and sound...If I spend another -ooh- $250.
I've been ripped off until I'm sick, and poor. The fact remains that I will always continue to buy the music I like on cd, because the sound is everything to me, and MP3's (and my reasonable PC setup) are nothing like as good.

To sum up: fuck them.
castex is offline  
Old 08-25-2003, 06:34 PM   #60 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: 1 mile from Ground Zero
It will be interesting to see what will come out of all of this when the dust settles. I'm sure its not going to be pretty.

Glad
__________________
I'm "Glad I Ate Her" because the payback was worth it!!
Glad-I-Ate-Her is offline  
Old 08-25-2003, 11:30 PM   #61 (permalink)
Go Ninja, Go Ninja Go!!
 
Location: IN, USA
Here's my tidbit. They say they are doing this cause people are ripping off the Artists.. So of all this money they are sueing for.. how much of it is going to go to the artists? I mean if none of it goes to the artists... aren't they being just as greedy as the ones they are sueing?

I love that twist
__________________
RoboBlaster:
Welcome to the club! Not that I'm in the club. And there really isn'a a club in the first place. But if there was a club and if I was in it, I would definitely welcome you to it.
GakFace is offline  
Old 08-26-2003, 12:26 AM   #62 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Diego
Quote:
Originally posted by crfpilot
Those money hungry fuckers are just hurting the artists. I know I would hear a song on KROQ from a band that I have never heard of before, download a few of thier songs and if I liked them I would go buy the cd. But now fuck that!! I ain't gonna buy any more cd's with the exception of old punk bands that existed long before these lawsuits. If most people are like me, cd sales will go down even more. I don't think that p2p programs are responsible for the loss of cd sales anyway, how bout cause they cost too fucking much!!! $20 for a cd?? c'mon how much of that $20 does the artist get anyway 1 or 2 dollars.


Fuck the RIAA!!!
I couldn't have said it better. My question is though, there has to be a loophole. What exactly are people being sued for is it for having the songs or for sharing the songs. If its for having the songs, you could just go out and buy every song/cd until you legally owned it. And just keep them in their package and return them after the lawsuit was over with. I don't know my laws the best, but isn't this searching without a warrant? And so all their evidence would be meaningless?
__________________
If something seems too good to be true, then it probably is....
punx1325 is offline  
Old 08-26-2003, 11:58 AM   #63 (permalink)
Banned
 
The recording industry is alienating their own customers
skippy is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:40 PM   #64 (permalink)
Psycho
 
With all the lawsuit and such, about people suing manufactures of guns because their weapons was used in a killing or such, why don't the RIAA go after the computer companies who computers are being used to download "illegal" music? My guess is because the computer companies has the money to fight. So they don't want to start a fight they can lose.
Psivage is offline  
 

Tags
anger, filesharers, prompt, remorse, subpoenas


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360