Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2011, 10:27 AM   #81 (permalink)
Addict
 
Shadowex3's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
"Just look at them, you can feel it" doesn't hold a lot of water.
And what kind of argument am I supposed to use in support of their having one of the basic aspects of human emotional spectrum? You want me to find a betazoid? The argument "They don't really feel, not like we do" holds even less water.

Quote:
First let me suggest, if you do not have children of your own STOP!
So not having the judgment to properly use contraction magically gives anyone that has a kid the sound judgment on whether or not it's alright to habitually abuse children and call it "discipline"? I don't need to be an F1 driver to tell you that driving into the walls is a bad idea, or that you shouldn't put gasoline in a diesel engine, or try to shift from your highest gear straight into your lowest without changing RPMs, and so on.


Quote:
Now if that game plan entails a swat to the butt or a tap of the hand to get the child's undivided attention, so that you can correct the behavior.
I've mentioned the pro-violence tendency to redefine things as is convenient in #64 already, this is just another example of that. Coming into a discussion of beltings, whippings, smackings, slappings, and other forms of corporal punishment and trying to make everyone arguing against it look unreasonable by redefining "corporal punishment" as something that can barely be qualified as physical force is just disengenuous.

This isn't a "continuum", there's a very clear line between what the ever-referenced Reasonable Person would consider to be corporal punishment or not. Swatting a kids hand away from something immediately dangerous in a manner which is specifically done to move the hand rather than cause pain, or their clothed butt in a way designed to cause noise rather than a physical strike when they're about to run into the street, is absolutely different from the calculated brutality of deliberately striking them in a manner which is calculated to cause maximum pain with minimum legal liability.

Trying to compare the two is like coming into a police brutality thread and trying to use cracked ribs from CPR to justify going Rodney King on someone.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hectonkhyres
I'm imagining crazed dwarves doing profoundly weird things. Urist McNutcase has developed a compulsion to jam anything colored blue up his anus, or alternately other peoples anuses
Shadowex3 is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 10:28 AM   #82 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Yeaaah, assumption and fuck-ups are my job.
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 11:05 AM   #83 (permalink)
Insane
 
RogueGypsy's Avatar
 
Location: The Great NorthWet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plan9 View Post
This. And that moderation thing. In a big sandwich.

I'm tired of the "I'm a parent, that makes me special" crap.

Congratulations on Biology 101. You figured out the penis/vagina.

Reproduction doesn't give you the civilian equiv of a Ranger tab.
Nor does sitting around the barracks watching Rangers train, make you an Instructor for Ranger School. Hey, I've watched every Rambo movie ever made and Navy SEALS, let me tell you how to do your job.???? Being a parent doesn't make you special, it gives you experience. Who would you rather learn from, someone who's been there or me? The guy who watched Rambo and now thinks he's a pro.


I'm also tired of the "kids are different/special" philosophy.

Kids are like expensive pets that can learn to do more expensive tricks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
You're presuming that my post was a direct and enclosed response to yours. It was only one of many factors.

Don't assume too much.
There were only two posts between your posts, mine and Hector. His was a response to another post, so yes, it appeared to be directed at my post.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowex3 View Post
And what kind of argument am I supposed to use in support of their having one of the basic aspects of human emotional spectrum? You want me to find a betazoid? The argument "They don't really feel, not like we do" holds even less water.



So not having the judgment to properly use contraction What does that even mean? magically gives anyone that has a kid the sound judgment on whether or not it's alright to habitually abuse children and call it "discipline"? I don't need to be an F1 driver to tell you that driving into the walls is a bad idea, or that you shouldn't put gasoline in a diesel engine, or try to shift from your highest gear straight into your lowest without changing RPMs, and so on.

The last sentence makes very little sense. RPMs and so on? It's your speed you need to be concerned about when down shifting, not RPMs. Yet another stellar example of someone pretending to know what they're talking about and spewing shit.




I've mentioned the pro-violence tendency to redefine things as is convenient in #64 already, this is just another example of that. Coming into a discussion of beltings, whippings, smackings, slappings, and other forms of corporal punishment and trying to make everyone arguing against it look unreasonable by redefining "corporal punishment" as something that can barely be qualified as physical force is just disengenuous.

Reread your post #64, there is no 'definition' of the conversation. Just your rambling about why your opinion is nonsense. Aside from that, the OP asks if parents have the right to 'smack' or discipline their own kids. Until you quoted me, I was not responding to you. There is nothing disingenuous about my post, it is my opinion from experience. And although you may like to steer the conversation into an area you have strong feelings about for your convenience, this string is about discipline, not abuse.

This isn't a "continuum", there's a very clear line between what the ever-referenced Reasonable Person would consider to be corporal punishment or not. Swatting a kids hand away from something immediately dangerous in a manner which is specifically done to move the hand rather than cause pain, or their clothed butt in a way designed to cause noise rather than a physical strike when they're about to run into the street, is absolutely different from the calculated brutality of deliberately striking them in a manner which is calculated to cause maximum pain with minimum legal liability.

Yet another example of "I don't know what I'm talking about, so I'll just repeat it until someone listens. If you smack a child's butt, when he/she's about to run into traffic, enjoy the funeral. The first reaction is going to be to get away from you, which will lead directly into traffic if that's the way he/she's facing. Nice.

Trying to compare the two is like coming into a police brutality thread and trying to use cracked ribs from CPR to justify going Rodney King on someone.

Then why are you making the comparison, I didn't. And what does cracked ribs from CPR have to do with the police abusing authority to beat down a drunk asshole?
Yeah, I think if I had the whole world to look to for advise, you're the first person I'd call. What's your number?


..
__________________
Methods, application and intensity of application vary by the individual. All legal wavers must be signed before 'treatment' begins. Self 'Medicating' is not recommend. However, if necessary, it is best to have an 'assistant' or 'soft landing zone' nearby. Any and all legal issues resulting from improperly applied techniques should be forwarded to: Dewy, Cheatum & Howe, Intercourse, PA 17534. Attn: Anonymous.

Last edited by RogueGypsy; 06-09-2011 at 11:27 AM..
RogueGypsy is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 03:55 PM   #84 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Nice to see we're getting some of our angst out.

It is typically a mistake to assume you know about something when you've never actually done it.

Like assuming you can rap because, you know, they're just talking.

Becoming a parent doesn't make a person any smarter. It does make a person a parent. There are things about being a parent that nonparents can't know. The previous statement should not make you feel bad, if it does, you should take a few breaths and try and figure out why it hurts your feelings when someone points out that you can't accumulate comprehensive knowledge about being a ______ if you've never actually been a _______.

That being said, I don't think that nonparent's opinions on child rearing should be automatically discounted. They should only be discounted if they're ridiculous.
filtherton is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 04:30 PM   #85 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Wow. Some people are very passionate about hitting their kids.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke

Last edited by Charlatan; 06-09-2011 at 04:32 PM..
Charlatan is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 05:28 PM   #86 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I think this commercial that Irish broadcasters won't play should go here.


I didn't get hit that many times. I deserved one because I was running behind my sister with a knife. But, I don't remember anything before age 4, and I don't think it is good for the kid if they get smacked at that age or younger. There are alternatives.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 05:53 PM   #87 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan View Post
Wow. Some people are very passionate about hitting their kids.
Some people don't like to be told that they're child abusers just because someone else doesn't like the method of reasonable, effective and non-abusive discipline that they've chosen.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 11:06 PM   #88 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
I think I have been very clear. I don't see it as abuse.

I see it as potentially abusive and open to overuse. I think smacking your kid is retrograde and unnecessary.

There are other, ways to disciple kids that do not involve giving the a whack. That are more effective.

Using violence as a form of discipline is a lazy cop out.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 01:44 PM   #89 (permalink)
Insane
 
RogueGypsy's Avatar
 
Location: The Great NorthWet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan View Post
Wow. Some people are very passionate about hitting their kids.

Whoa, easy there Chief, in my case the passion is for the right, not the act. In 14yrs I have never found it necessary to exercise that right. But if I do find it necessary, I will exercise my right.

Then again, I don't reward every breath they take either. So they aren't disrespectful little shits that think everyone owes them the world.


--------------------------

I look at this as the lesser of two evils. I do not condone abuse in any way, physical, verbal or mental. But I do wholeheartedly condone giving your child the tools they need to succeed. One of those tools is discipline.

By taking away the right of a parent to discipline their child, you are telling the parent they are not responsible for their child's behavior. If you take away one tool used in discipline, then you better replace it with something equally effective. So if someone is too lazy, to take the time to talk to their children, explain why what they did is wrong and follow through with a punishment, instead resorting to a slap. If you take away that slap, you better be willing to teach that parent an alternate means of discipline.

Kids aren't stupid and they are devious as can be. They will use everything they can think of, to manipulate you, to get their way. Remove discipline from the equation and you get GeeDubbya Bush and nobody wants/needs that. They don't see a parent talking to them instead of hitting them, they see, that they got to do what they wanted and got away with it.

If you teach your kids they can have anything and do anything they want without any recourse, they will fail in life. Life just doesn't play by those rules and it hits a lot harder than any parent can, life plays for keeps. Life will kill you.

There was a post a couple of years ago about hiring people to work for you. I talked about how I always look for retired seniors citizens when I need help these days because the kids are useless. They would show up when they wanted, put in a pathetic day of work, then ask for a raise. When they didn't get what they wanted, they just quit showing up. No notice, no phone call, just didn't show up or return calls. It was pitiful. They wanted a reward just for being there. I wonder who taught them that? It wasn't isolated either, it was literally 9/10 kids I hired. The one exception was the son of a Dairy farmer who'd been working since he was 6 or 7, helping around the farm. Who do you think is going to do better in life? No, I don't think everyone should start working at 6yo. I think that by working at that young age, he learned discipline and a work ethic that is commendable.

I don't think any real parent holds malice toward their children, but I think a lot of people, not just parents, fail to see the long term effects they're having on children. The current generation graduating college is the scariest shit I've seen in my lifetime. If you think the country is fucked up now, wait 20 years. Think the government is out of control with taxes, non-taxes, corporate lobbying, war, national debt, etc..... What do you think is going to happen when these self entitled little shits hold the keys to the kingdom? That kid who was rewarded just for showing up. The one that got a 5 minute time out for doing exactly what he was told not to do. The child that was taught all his/her life that it's better to just do it and ask forgiveness later. The child who has never had to earn anything and has never paid the consequences of his/her actions?

Fuck, just look at what's happening right now with our economy; the bank bailouts, Wall street, Supreme Court judges, unapproved wars, trillions of dollars of debt and none of those responsible will ever be held accountable for their actions. Just like undisciplined children and we as citizens, bad parents.

Once again, I'm not condoning abuse, just discipline that is effective. The idea that a slap teaches violence as a solution is non-sense as well, beating your kids may teach that, but not a slap to get their attention. Like it or not, we are born violent. Don't believe me? Try watching a few toddlers trying to play with the same toy. In your first year, you haven't had time to learn violence and in all likely hood have never even seen it. But it's a Battle Royale when more than one child decides they want to play with that same toy. Eye gouging, kicking, hitting no holds barred brawls. Hitting is probably one of the most corrected behaviors and likely the reason some one decided it must come from the parents actions, because it is so common. It's common, because it's already there at birth.

We are effectively training morality out of society with these actions.

And somehow people are equating reasonable, necessary, discipline, with abuse???? Equating a hand or butt slap as violence??? Does that make all physical contact violence? I believe the pendulum has swung way too far to the side and these actions are doing far more harm than they were intended to prevent. Parents going to prison and kids in foster care because some tiny minded ass lick witnessed a hand slap and called the police?? What the fuck is wrong with people?

I have a friend. Here mom is a psychotic bitch. My friend decided she would not let her daughter spend anymore unsupervised time with grandma when she found her 8yo daughter in the bathtub with her 65yo mother. What the fuck is a 65yo woman doing bathing with an 8yo??? So grandma calls social services and tells them her daughter is a drunk and she's abusing her granddaughter. In 7 years I've seen her have 3 drinks, not a drunk. Social services shows up at her house, does an inspection, finds 1 old dusty half empty bottle of wine, and takes her child!!?? They then place the child with grandma. 6 weeks later on a surprise inspection, the social worker finds grandma and granddaughter naked in a kiddie pool in the back yard after there was no answer to the front door. Good job social services. At least she got her daughter back the next day. But after 6 weeks of who knows what. Yes, it could have been totally innocent. No one thinks it was and the child was in therapy for reasons unknown to me for 3 years after that. This is the kind of shit that happens when you give control to an uninterested outside party. This is what happens when you try to enforce your beliefs on others. Yes, some children are saved from abuse. However an innocent group is also sucked into the whirlwind of the self righteous cleansing of society and in the process more harm than good is done.


Moderation people, moderation.
__________________
Methods, application and intensity of application vary by the individual. All legal wavers must be signed before 'treatment' begins. Self 'Medicating' is not recommend. However, if necessary, it is best to have an 'assistant' or 'soft landing zone' nearby. Any and all legal issues resulting from improperly applied techniques should be forwarded to: Dewy, Cheatum & Howe, Intercourse, PA 17534. Attn: Anonymous.

Last edited by RogueGypsy; 06-10-2011 at 02:34 PM..
RogueGypsy is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 07:46 PM   #90 (permalink)
Addict
 
Shadowex3's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
So not having the judgment to properly use contraction
Quote:
What does that even mean? magically gives anyone that has a kid the sound judgment on whether or not it's alright to habitually abuse children and call it "discipline"? I don't need to be an F1 driver to tell you that driving into the walls is a bad idea, or that you shouldn't put gasoline in a diesel engine, or try to shift from your highest gear straight into your lowest without changing RPMs, and so on.

The last sentence makes very little sense. RPMs and so on? It's your speed you need to be concerned about when down shifting, not RPMs. Yet another stellar example of someone pretending to know what they're talking about and spewing shit.
I typoed contraception and it was autocorrected to contraction. That it was a typo is pretty obvious from the context of the discussion and the fact that "contraction" doesn't remotely make sense. Was it necessary to make such a large multicolored deal out of that?

Also utterly unrelated but since it IS a safety issue: learn some more about transmissions before you blow one up. Engine RPMs transmitted through the gears of the transmission apply torque to the wheels which gets you moving. It may be strongly correlated with vehicle speed, but RPMs and speed are NOT automatically equivalent.


Quote:
I've mentioned the pro-violence tendency to redefine things as is convenient in #64 already, this is just another example of that. Coming into a discussion of beltings, whippings, smackings, slappings, and other forms of corporal punishment and trying to make everyone arguing against it look unreasonable by redefining "corporal punishment" as something that can barely be qualified as physical force is just disengenuous.

Reread your post #64, there is no 'definition' of the conversation. Just your rambling about why your opinion is nonsense. Aside from that, the OP asks if parents have the right to 'smack' or discipline their own kids. Until you quoted me, I was not responding to you. There is nothing disingenuous about my post, it is my opinion from experience. And although you may like to steer the conversation into an area you have strong feelings about for your convenience, this string is about discipline, not abuse.
You are indeed being disengenuous (inbetween insults) and here's why: First you try and redefine "corporal punishment" to be something everyone in the thread agrees barely qualifies as physical force let alone "smacking" as has been discussed for a page and a half at least.

Now you're trying to redefine the OP's post to something else for YOUR convenience. The OP clearly asks whether we would/do smack our children, where we draw the line between discipline and abuse, how violence affects the child and long term affects on personality and behavior, and our thoughts on the UN (ie govt) involvement in the whole debate as you can clearly see right here:


Spoiler:
Quote:
So does the UN convention for the Rights of the Child apply here? Is smacking considered child abuse and should parents be held accountible for the way they discipline their children?

Would you/Do you smack your kids? where do you draw the line between discipline and abuse?

as a parent of a toddler who's going to start acting up soon, ive been thinking about this topic a lot. Does smacking affect the child, and if so, what long term affect does it have on a childs behaviour, and ultimately their personalities?

i have to say that im undecided on this debate as yet, but i think parents can and have a right to be firm with their kids and discipline them without smacking them. The problem here is that the UN convention refers to the physical and mental abuse of kids. Are parents hands tied? should we just ignore the UN?

what are your thoughts?



Quote:
This isn't a "continuum", there's a very clear line between what the ever-referenced Reasonable Person would consider to be corporal punishment or not. Swatting a kids hand away from something immediately dangerous in a manner which is specifically done to move the hand rather than cause pain, or their clothed butt in a way designed to cause noise rather than a physical strike when they're about to run into the street, is absolutely different from the calculated brutality of deliberately striking them in a manner which is calculated to cause maximum pain with minimum legal liability.

Yet another example of "I don't know what I'm talking about, so I'll just repeat it until someone listens. If you smack a child's butt, when he/she's about to run into traffic, enjoy the funeral. The first reaction is going to be to get away from you, which will lead directly into traffic if that's the way he/she's facing. Nice.
No, that's not every child's first reaction starting with the fact that I myself am still here as are at least five other toddlers I've ridden the bus with in the last month alone.

Quote:
Trying to compare the two is like coming into a police brutality thread and trying to use cracked ribs from CPR to justify going Rodney King on someone.

Then why are you making the comparison, I didn't. And what does cracked ribs from CPR have to do with the police abusing authority to beat down a drunk asshole?
It's called a metaphor.


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hectonkhyres
I'm imagining crazed dwarves doing profoundly weird things. Urist McNutcase has developed a compulsion to jam anything colored blue up his anus, or alternately other peoples anuses
Shadowex3 is offline  
Old 06-12-2011, 03:16 AM   #91 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Gypsy... my tongue was rather firmly in cheek.

That said, I stand by my comments. Discipline is essential. Discipline need not come from hitting your kid. There are other, more effective, methods. Hitting your kids is lazy and shows a lack of imagination.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
 

Tags
debate, smacking


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360