|
View Poll Results: kid holding a knife or a safety'd gun? | |||
unsheathed knife | 11 | 42.31% | |
gun with safety on | 9 | 34.62% | |
not sure | 6 | 23.08% | |
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
03-28-2011, 10:29 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
What would you rather a child pick up and hold?
Let's say around age 6.
A gun with the safety on or an unsheathed knife? I'd rather have the child with the safety'd gun. I have a feeling though that gun bias will push the results toward the knife. This isn't political, this is a life question, and a question about potential bias. This post isn't for or against anything. edit: woops, I meant to put this in either Life or General. Not tilted weaponry. Last edited by Zeraph; 03-28-2011 at 11:35 AM.. |
03-28-2011, 10:53 AM | #4 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
The gun with the safety mechanism is far safer than the knife which has no safety mechanism.
The knife here is inherently dangerous than the gun simply because it has an exposed sharp edge. ... That and I would rather be shot by a 9mm than stabbed by a 4" knife in the hands of an expert. I've stepped in the rubber knife ring with a knife guy and was absolutely destroyed in seconds. Last edited by Plan9; 03-28-2011 at 10:57 AM.. |
03-28-2011, 11:12 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
Future Bureaucrat
|
Other:
Plasma rifle in 40 watt range. Is the gun unloaded? Is the knife sharp? If so, how sharp? Does the gun have a DA/SA trigger with safety? Is it a 17lb rifle? Is it a pistol? How heavy is the trigger? Anyway, if you have children, you should probably safety up your firearms and lock them away in a safe, until they're old enough to understand what guns do and how to properly handle one (i.e. age 5 if you want).
__________________
Quote:
|
|
03-28-2011, 11:22 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
Pfft children can't handle the 40 watt range. Start em off with 10 watts.
The gun is obviously loaded or there wouldn't be much of a dilemma. The knife is very sharp. As for the gun, assume the average. I'm thinking of pistol. But I'm not stopping you from imagining a rifle (there I bet you just did right? And now again? OK I'll stop. One more time, RIFLE!) |
03-28-2011, 12:09 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Sunny South Florida
|
You say "child" so I'm gonna assume you mean one too young to grasp the full import of the situation.
I'd rather they held the unsheathed knife. It will teach them to be careful and instill respect for the tool / weapon. Handling a gun with the safety on shows them there's nothing to fear and they can pull the trigger with no danger to themselves or others... |
03-28-2011, 12:45 PM | #8 (permalink) |
follower of the child's crusade?
|
I guess its harder for a 6 year old to take the safety of a pistol and shoot himself or someone else than to badly cut himself with say a meat cleaver or chef's knife.
I wouldnt exactly be thrilled in either situation, but I would guess a gun is the lesser of two evils. That said, Ive never held a real pistol, so I dont know how hard the safety mechanism is to knock off.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being uncovered." The Gospel of Thomas |
03-28-2011, 12:58 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
There isn't an option for "neither". I'm the father of a 5-year old. He's barely allowed to use scissors. Any parent/guardian/caretaker that allows either to happen needs their own "timeout" to think about how they managed that. This is how kids get unnecessarily dead, and one of the reasons why there's a bias against guns in the US.
I'm assuming that you mean unsupervised, loaded, sharp, etc. So, yeah, it's an awful scenario as a parent.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
03-28-2011, 01:03 PM | #10 (permalink) |
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
|
I have a 3" partially serrated folding knife that I keep (kept) clipped in my back pocket. I was sitting on the couch, got up, and a few minutes later my 2-year-old asks me "Daddy, what's this thing?" I look over, and she's got it opened, held by the handle, and is curiously looking at the serrations on the blade.
I carry it in my front pocket now...I'd moved it to the back to avoid it being in the same pocket as my cell phone, but I'd rather have a scratch cell than a sliced daughter. I checked "pistol" because, even with the safety off, she doesn't have the finger strength to pull the trigger on any of the guns I have yet. She can't even use nerf guns that aren't specially modified for light pull! ...not that I would do such a thing. I mean. Hmm. Oh, and it's a good thing momma isn't on this forum, as she hasn't heard the knife story yet and never will from me.
__________________
twisted no more |
03-28-2011, 01:06 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: Nova
|
The gun scenario is obviously less immediately dangerous, but it's horrible to think about the things that children do with objects, especially younger children who are 12 to 18 months old. Most things go immediately into the mouth and the safety could get switched if the child focused on picking at the switch or pounding the gun on the floor, which some children seem to delight in doing with objects. Either scenario is a nightmare, basically.
|
03-29-2011, 06:54 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
I started learning the correct/safe use of firearms at the age of 3.5 years (with a .22 rifle), and carried my own folding pocketknife everywhere I went by the time I was 6. I wasn't allowed to take my .22 out by myself until I was 6 or 7 years old; before that my Mom was alwaya with me. I started learning handguns and shotguns at 10 or so. Any safety violation, any at all, ended shooting for the day. It isn't hard to gun-proof a kid if it's done properly. For instance, I was never allowed toy guns growing up, because it might inculcate bad habits/thought processes. Likewise, I was first taught correct handling of firearms with an unloaded rifle under strict supervision, then taught to shoot off a bench under equally stringent conditions. Only after I had consistently demonstrated that I not only could but would handle a.gun or knife safely was I allowed unsupervised acess to it.
__________________
"I personally think that America's interests would be well served if after or at the time these clowns begin their revolting little hate crime the local police come in and cart them off on some trumped up charges or other. It is necessary in my opinion that America makes an example of them to the world." --Strange Famous, advocating the use of falsified charges in order to shut people up. Last edited by The_Dunedan; 03-29-2011 at 06:58 PM.. |
03-29-2011, 07:17 PM | #14 (permalink) |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
The only time I was ever beat as a kid was when I chased my sister through the kitchen with a knife. That didn't happen again...
I didn't grow up with guns, but I would think a safety wouldn't prevent a 6 year old from firing it accidentally. Neither option is good, but I would rather have a 6 year old come after me with a knife than a gun. |
03-29-2011, 07:22 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
This question is really dumb, because the first thing I'd do as soon as I saw a child holding either would be to instinctually lunge and take it from them. I'm not sure it would matter which I "rather" they picked up, as I'd react the same way to a child holding them.
I arbitrarily picked knife because I think the understanding of sharpness is learned before the understanding of projectiles. Those extra milliseconds help me take it from the child harmlessly.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
03-30-2011, 02:37 AM | #16 (permalink) |
Done freeloading here
Location: on my ass :) - Norway
|
I would go for the knife. My kids love to help in the kitchen so they have good knowledge about handling sharp knives. This friday my 5 year old sliced the potatoes with a fairly sharp knife.
A gun on the other hand would freak me out - even with the safety on and the magasine removed. We're not used to handling guns, and I assume any gun is loaded with safety off on the rare instances I handle one.
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be. |
03-30-2011, 10:35 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: The Cosmos
|
Well this is a theoretical situation in which a child has his first experience with knife or gun. The only difference being that the gun has a safety(s) on and the knife is unsheathed. Obviously unsupervised.
Even if you don't have guns I've seen guns shot and held by 8 year olds. (which isn't specifically bad so long as the have proper instruction). |
03-30-2011, 10:38 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Europe
|
Quote:
__________________
Life is...
|
|
04-06-2011, 04:39 AM | #21 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: San Huevos, USA
|
I'm going with the knife, because my own daughter (who's 5) has been heavily supervised with knife use in cutting her own food at the dinner table. She knows she can get hurt with an edge, so she's careful.
On a related note, she's handled some replica blank-firing guns of mine (also under heavy supervision) and her comment on how heavy they are made me think about the possibility of how easy it would be for her to drop one of them... ...which brings me to a final point: as far as I see it, both are dangerous but if a child manages to disengage the safety and drop the gun (or worse, pull the trigger "to shoot the bad guys") there is no controlling the damage. Just my two cents' worth.
__________________
How's your mom, Ed? |
04-06-2011, 12:04 PM | #22 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: The Aluminum Womb
|
knife 10 times out of 10
a little kid might see a gun as some sort of contraption with no idea as to what it does whereas there seems to be something instinctual saying: "be careful with sharp shit"
__________________
Does Marcellus Wallace have the appearance of a female canine? Then for what reason did you attempt to copulate with him as if he were a female canine? Last edited by EventHorizon; 04-06-2011 at 02:16 PM.. |
04-06-2011, 12:42 PM | #24 (permalink) |
People in masks cannot be trusted
Location: NYC
|
To me the question is about which one would i call children protective services on you faster.
Answer, I would call in either case.
__________________
Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me. |
04-06-2011, 02:36 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: The Aluminum Womb
|
i just think that accidents involving little kids with knives are usually less lethal than with guns. yeah they might end up with a cut on the arm or leg but it beats a hole through the body any day
__________________
Does Marcellus Wallace have the appearance of a female canine? Then for what reason did you attempt to copulate with him as if he were a female canine? |
04-06-2011, 03:22 PM | #26 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Looks like some people have trouble with the hypothetical question. There are two options, either they have the loaded gun with the safety or they have the knife. You pick one, then justify it. Jeez.
This is a classic question of lower risk, greater consequence vs. higher risk, lesser consequence. The gun represents a lower risk because the safety is on, but if fired represents greater consequences. The knife is unsheathed, meaning there's a higher risk, but the consequences are less than the gun. I'd probably say the gun simply because the safety isn't always obvious (to someone unfamiliar with a gun), and doesn't strike me as being as interesting a lever as the trigger. Still, in a nonspecific hypothetical situation of low risk/greater consequence vs. high risk/lower consequence, I'd usually choose the latter. Interesting thread, Zeraph. |
04-06-2011, 04:10 PM | #27 (permalink) |
Invisible
Location: tentative, at best
|
The knife.
The gun represents the worst case scenario. I would rather my child face a greater chance of a non-lethal wound than even a minuscule chance of a lethal one. Besides - children are naturally curious; the safety would be off in a very short time. Kids are always thinking, "Hmmmmm . . . what's this thing do?"
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors: "If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too." It won't hurt your fashion sense, either. |
04-10-2011, 12:38 AM | #28 (permalink) | ||
Crazy
Location: Yonder
|
One is no more or less dangerous than the other. Both are tools capable of inflicting great harm. When I was 6 years old, there would have been absolutely nothing dangerous about handing me a knife or a gun in any condition. I was also taught how to safely use power tools at around that age.
Quote:
Quote:
No kidding. What determines the lethality of the wound, or any wound at all for that matter? |
||
04-10-2011, 01:30 AM | #29 (permalink) |
Currently sour but formerly Dlishs
Super Moderator
Location: Australia/UAE
|
for me its called risk management
knife=high risk of small injuries, low risk of large injuries gun=high risk of small injuries, high risk of large injuries i'd choose neither. but if i had to i'd choose a knife because of the lower risk of major injuries or death. kids need strength to cause significant major damage with a knife. a 6 year old can fire a gun without a lot of strength and in the case of a gun the child doesnt control the speed of the projectile. the question is, at what age is it ok to start introducing these sort of weapons to your child? i dont see why a 6 year old needs to be carrying a knife or gun around at 6 unless it was for educational purposes. even then, id probably start them off whith videos rather than the real thing.
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay? - Filthy |
04-10-2011, 01:02 PM | #30 (permalink) |
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
Location: Southern England
|
If forced to pick one, I'd say knife (and voted such). The way I look at it, a knife can't kill someone by accidentally being discharged through the drywall.
Also, a knife can certainly do horrific damage, but it starts to hurt as soon as it breaks the skin (most of the time), and so pressure is removed, or the knife is dropped. A kid COULD work out how to switch off the safety, or even do it by random fidling, and if the trigger is pulled the bullet doesn't go slower simply because the shooter was not intending to kill.
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air, And deep beneath the rolling waves, In labyrinths of Coral Caves, The Echo of a distant time Comes willowing across the sand; And everthing is Green and Submarine ╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝ |
04-10-2011, 01:13 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
Invisible
Location: tentative, at best
|
Quote:
Severing an artery or puncturing the brain or vital organ would be next to impossible for a 6-year old to do accidentally; it could be done quite easily with a bullet.
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors: "If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too." It won't hurt your fashion sense, either. |
|
04-10-2011, 01:18 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: The Aluminum Womb
|
Quote:
can you imagine some statistician asking a parent "so on a scale of 1-10, how lethal did you think the wound was when your child shot himself in the leg?" dammit YKH, you beat me to it. but thats exactly what i was trying to say. +1 for brevity
__________________
Does Marcellus Wallace have the appearance of a female canine? Then for what reason did you attempt to copulate with him as if he were a female canine? |
|
Tags |
child, hold, pick |
|
|