Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2009, 07:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Alberta parents can pull kids from lessons about sex, religion, or sexual orientation

Quote:
Alberta passes law allowing parents to pull kids out of class
Written notice required when sex, sexual orientation, religion are covered
Last Updated: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 | 5:26 AM ET
CBC News

Alberta legislators passed legislation early Tuesday that will give parents the option of pulling their children out of class when lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation are being taught.

The Alberta legislature held a seven-hour debate on Bill 44 Monday night before it passed third and final reading about 1:30 a.m. MT (3:30 a.m. ET) Tuesday.

A clause in the bill, which is an amendment to the province's human rights legislation, requires that school boards give parents written notice when controversial topics are going to be covered in the curriculum. Parents can then ask for their child to be excluded from the discussion.

There will be no restrictions placed on casual classroom discussions that might arise about the topics.

The parental rights clause is included in a bill intended to enshrine gay rights in Alberta's human rights code.

But the buried clause had drawn objections from teachers, schools boards and human rights groups, who argued Bill 44 makes it possible for parents to file human rights complaints against teachers and school districts, creating a chill with regard to what is taught in the classroom.

Critics had argued the clause should be scrapped and the issue should be dealt with under the Schools Act rather than being enshrined as a human right.

A small group of gay rights activists held a rally outside the legislature in Edmonton to oppose the bill on Monday.

The government has said the effects of the legislation on the education system will be minimal and is meant to allow parents to be more involved in their children's schooling.

Attention must now shift to making sure the legislation is implemented in the best possible way for teachers and schools, said Alberta School Boards Association President Heather Welwood.

"We want to nail down exactly what's required for notification — when it's required, exactly on what topics it's required, how often, and we'll be seeking our own legal advice … on that," Welwood said.

Frank Bruseker, president of the Alberta Teachers' Association, said he's advised the group's lawyers to prepare to defend any teachers who are brought before the human rights tribunal.

"We'll need to review curricula right across all subjects and all grades to see where there might be a minefield, if you will, that a teacher might step in and suddenly find themselves in deep trouble," Bruseker said.
Alberta passes law allowing parents to pull kids out of class

Ironically, a bill meant to enshrine gay rights has included a clause forcing educators to notify parents when their children's curriculum includes such controversial topics including sex, religion, and sexual orientation.

The problem here is that now teachers need to be careful when planning their lessons. They aren't held from holding casual conversations when they come up, but if any aspect of a lesson is interpreted as controversial, the teacher could land themselves into trouble.

Furthermore, this basically creates an opting-out for kids whose parents don't want them to learn about relevant social issues related to sex and sexual orientation. Teachers will need to use the permission-form format for teaching these topics, which I think makes it all too easy to yank kids out of it. Religion has a much longer history of problems in the education system, so to me the sexual orientation bit stands out to me.
  • Do you feel this law is fair?
  • Should parents have this much power in determining what lessons their kids get in the public school system?
  • Do you feel the public school system should teach formal lessons on sex, religion, and sexual orientation? Why or why not?
  • Is this a case of an advance or regression in human rights issues?
I think this is a regression, personally. It gives parents the power to essentially shelter their children from education about important matters. Sex is real; homosexuality is real. There is a certain age when children should start learning about these matters formally. Children aren't as ignorant as some may believe. They have curiosity; they have questions; they have misconceptions that need to be cleared. This is what education is for.

The religion thing...I don't know. There are problems in that religion is a complex issue when it comes to followers of different faiths, and then you have non-believers. I don't see much room for religion in a public school system, unless it was a kind of survey course to learn about world religions and their role/influence in society.

What do you think overall?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 06-02-2009 at 07:13 AM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 07:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Eat your vegetables
 
genuinegirly's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Arabidopsis-ville
I find this a frustrating turn of events. What could better be accomplished through a parent speaking with their teacher has turned into an institutionalized mess that creates more red tape for our over-burdened teachers. Were this to be considered a matter to be dealt with strictly between a parent and the teachers, the concerned parent would be able to explain their perspective as they request their child to not participate in certain matters.

This hardly seems a productive way for Alberta to deal with a few parents. It takes the power away from the individual - both the parent and the teacher. It invites humiliation for the student whose parent refuses to fill out the form.

I certainly hope that this policy doesn't bleed over into the states.
__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq

"violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy
genuinegirly is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
Halanna's Avatar
 
Location: Over the rainbow . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru;2644480
  • Do you feel this law is fair?
  • Should parents have this much power in determining what lessons their kids get in the public school system?
  • Do you feel the public school system should teach formal lessons on sex, religion, and sexual orientation? Why or why not?
  • Is this a case of an advance or regression in human rights issues?
I think some aspects of it are fair and some are not.

While I think parents should have knowledge about what is going on and what is being taught to their child during the day, on sex education it should be mandatory. It can be argued that sex education is really public health education and STD's, contraceptives and necessary information that children need to have. Back when I was in school, we had the whole sex ed complete with slide projections of the location of the organs, ovaries and whatnot and the cheesy little film about how a sperm fertilizes an egg and this is what leads to pregnancy etc. That information is important too. While kids are more mature and with the internet they know a lot more, some of them are suprisingly naive. Mandatory, no parental choice, sex ed gets my vote.

Sexual orientation I can't say because I don't know what is being taught. Is it lessons on tolerance or how to explore your inner lesbian kind of thing. That's a tough one because kids can be so cruel to one another. I can just envision the teacher telling the class that it's ok for a man to love a man or a women to love a women and having some bright bulb in the class turn to some poor unspecting kid that's rumored to be gay and saying "Yea, you can ask Mark all about that, he loooves other men"

Religion is easy. Religion has no place in a publicly funded classroom, ever. The only acceptable time is in the purely historical context while studying that topic.
Halanna is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 10:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
The kids whose parents would pull them out of classes dealing with sex are the ones who need that education the most. Viewing sex as a negative thing or something that shouldn't be discussed is a detriment to our society and those who feel that way are harming others by legislating their beliefs into modern states.
MSD is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 10:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halanna View Post
Sexual orientation I can't say because I don't know what is being taught. Is it lessons on tolerance or how to explore your inner lesbian kind of thing.
It's usually a definition of what homosexuality/bisexuality/transsexuality is, with lessons on tolerance, and an emphasis on creating a safe space in schools. Most teachers are incredibly uncomfortable with the topic as they don't want to offend anyone, one way or the other, so it gets briefly covered. I highly doubt any teacher who considers themselves to be a professional would even think about teaching a course on exploring your inner lesbian. We don't even do that in women studies at the university level.

Personally, I think this is problematic. It's one more hoop teachers have to jump through in order to convey important information to students. And I agree with MSD--typically the people pulling their kids out of class are the ones with kids who need the information the most. I don't have any statistics to back this statement up, but I've seen enough anecdotal evidence to wonder if teens with Christian conservatives for parents really do get knocked up more often than those with liberal let's-talk-about-sex-openly parents.

And I think religion is okay so long as it's as Baraka suggested--in a survey course where all the major world religions get covered, or in a history course where it must be talked about. Religion is another one of those issues where schools are so desperate not to offend anyone.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:44 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Jozrael's Avatar
 
I kinda /sign everything Halanna said, with the exception that I think that so long as it's a tolerance-building lesson on orientation, that should be mandatory. I can't quite envision a 'inner-lesbian' lesson, lol.
Jozrael is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
I remember in grade school, parents had to give permission for children to sit through sex ed. In my classes, I would say about 90% of kids were allowed to attend the class.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 01:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Here
 
World's King's Avatar
 
Location: Denver City Denver
How else is a kid supposed to grow up to a rapist and serial killer if you don't suppress their sexuality?
__________________
heavy is the head that wears the crown
World's King is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 01:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
I think the law should be amended to not only require attendance in schools until 16, but also that they receive comprehensive sex education before they're allowed to drop out. They're the ones who need it most.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 06-03-2009, 03:59 AM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Halanna's Avatar
 
Location: Over the rainbow . .
When I made the "inner lesbian" comment, while it was tongue-in-cheek, what I was thinking was this:

Is the teacher standing there saying, "If you are a boy(girl) and you feel sexually attracted to a boy(girl), that's ok! It's perfectly natural, you shouldn't feel that you are doing something wrong. Explore your feeling and don't let anyone tell you different."

Something along those lines.

Maybe these lessons should be moved out of the classroom and be held at a local hospital or other medical facility as a field trip, albeit mandatory. Have doctors and nurses present the material instead of teachers. This would help coat the topics in a more medical veil instead of an instructional one from the classroom. Doctors inherently feel comfortable with these topics anyway.
Halanna is offline  
Old 06-03-2009, 08:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
biznatch's Avatar
 
Location: France
Hell, let the parents decide if they don't want their kid exposed to homosexuality, sex in general, and religion.
The kids will learn the basics from their classmates, the parents will feel like they've done the right thing, and there's always the internet for your kid to get himself some education. You know they'll end up there sooner or later.
__________________
Check it out: The Open Source/Freeware/Gratis Software Thread
biznatch is offline  
Old 06-03-2009, 12:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
That's a fine live-and-let-live policy, biznatch, except when it comes to the affect of inadequate sex education on the society as a whole. It has a nation-wide affect beyond individual behavior regarding their sexuality.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
 

Tags
alberta, kids, lessons, orientation, parents, pull, religion, sex, sexual


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:04 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360