![]() |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Your faith in information
How do you feel about the information and news you read and receive from the internet? Do you 100% believe in everything you read? Do you think everything is fake and/or a lie? Do you take everything with a grain of salt? Something more to add on to this?
I'll put my opinion after I hear some of yours. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
comfortably numb...
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
|
i try to feel the blood, bones, and flesh before i believe...
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done." - Robert S. McNamara ----------------------------------------- "We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches... We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles." - Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message" ----------------------------------------- never wrestle with a pig. you both get dirty; the pig likes it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Kramerica
|
Unfortunately, I'm easily swayed by a well-written article. I'm well aware that I'm reading a biased / false account of a story when it's written by Joe Internet, but I often let my curiosity get the best of me. Plus, the Internet's take on things is usually funnier and more interesting than broadcast media. A nice blend of humor and a little bit of truth is enough to convince me... I'm a simple man.
__________________
"Nitwit! Oddment! Blubber! Tweak!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
data > information > knowledge > wisdom The further down the chain, the easier it is manipulated. The media consists mostly of information, so we need to tread carefully, because you never know what data it is based upon. Websites and news should not be your only sources of learning.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
I don't believe in things. If the scientific method can be applied and is not, I don't accept the results. Beyond what is scientifically provable, I demand hard evidence. I assume that people disseminating information are trying to deceive me unless they can back up their claims.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Life's short, gotta hurry...
Location: land of pit vipers
|
I don't accept what I read as the truth. I think that everything I read is subject to being slanted in some way. So, I read and I read and I read....and then I think about it. Often for too long. I make my own decisions/interpretations based on different opinions and what I know to be factual information. It is rare that I am satisfied with a final truth of any sort. I just keepa thinkin' about it. This leads to a good deal of stress, since no one and no website or information source can really be trusted.
__________________
Quiet, mild-mannered souls might just turn out to be roaring lions of two-fisted cool. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I don't believe anyone is going to admit that they "100% believe in everything they read." No one wants to believe they are entirely gullible or that the wool has been pulled over their eyes. Just like 80% of people believing they're in the top 10%, most people who are being tricked or mislead are likely very unaware of it.
That only leaves "with a grain of salt" and perpetual cynic. I'm going to with perpetual cynic, unless it matches my worldview and is written with correct grammar and usage. I'd be a damn liar if I said I subjected things I agreed with to the same scrutiny as the things I disagreed with. I can usually find evidence that something I disagree with false within minutes, and often take the opportunity. I could probably find evidence that something I agree with is false too, but it's the less likely and less-used option, for sure.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
I take everything with a grain of salt. Even offline, I take information in books and newspapers with a grain of salt just because I've read two biographical books about the same person and they stated completely opposite things occurring in the same period of time. Also, the media tends to be biased... and very stupid. They seem to be the last to know anything that happens online. What I read/see COULD be true... but it really doesn't matter to me unless it affects me personally.
I only completely believe what I read is official/fact if I read it on a government website. Not saying if they say "Our city is the best!" I'm going to believe it.. but if they say they have $suchandsuch and they are going to use it for suchandsuch, then I'll believe them on that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: Singapore/Malaysia
|
I dare say I generally start off each of my internet travels with a HUGEASS jar of salt which I replenish on a daily basis. I also make sure my intellectual functions are running normally and at an optimal level as I regularly douse them with copious amounts of incredulity. They make the believing process more reliable, so to speak.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
The key is to read more from different sources. The larger your sample size, the more likely you are to spot inconsistencies and bias.
I find that much of actual journalism is a pretty straightforward reporting of facts (x did something to y). I find that a lot of what people are talking about when they speak of journalistic bias is actually commentary. Commentary by its very nature is biased.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) |
Insane
|
Critical thinking must be applied to all information coming in. I think about who is relaying this information, what the source is, what the other side could be. It is the best thing I learned in school.
__________________
"Mommy, the presidents are squishing me!" "Using the pull out method of contraceptive is like saying I won't use a seat belt, I'll just jump out of the car before it hits that tree." Sara |
![]() |
Tags |
faith, information |
|
|