Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2008, 11:59 PM   #41 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
What more do you need?
Perhaps you noticed I said that female sexual assault of an *adult male* was virtually unknown. There are a small number of sexual assaults committed by women against children. These women are in my judgment suffering from gender confusion - ie they are biologically women but emtionally are male. (the opposite case would become a cross dresser or even have a sex change)

Simply violence and cruelty are not part of the female character. There are very few violent crimes committed by women, and sexual assault is one of the most violent crimes of all.
-----Added 4/12/2008 at 03 : 03 : 19-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by CinnamonGirl View Post
Would you say the same thing if they weren't pretty?
I have no idea what the girls in this case look like, I dont know if they are pretty or not. My judgment is based on their gender and age, and the gender of the alleged "victims"... nothing to do with whether they are attractive or not.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas

Last edited by Strange Famous; 12-04-2008 at 12:03 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:15 AM   #42 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Do you have any evidence for your claims? Peer reviewed, sociological evidence?

Women have every capacity to be just as violent and just as cruel as men. I will grant that there is less prevalence, or at least reported prevalence (and I can guarantee that people with your attitude are exactly why it's underreported), but that is a far cry from impossible.

Do you have any response to the fact that these girls have reported that they did it to make the elderly people in their care upset? Do you have any response to the fact that these people were suffering from dementia and therefore cannot give consent and are essentially invalids who can't use the bathroom by themselves, let alone fend someone off who wants to torment them? Or do you just have gender stereotypes?
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:22 AM   #43 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
A key piece of evidence is revealed by the article quoted

Quote:
One stated Broitzman put her bare rear end in one resident’s face and that Larson would rub vigorously on residents’ genital areas to sexually arouse them.
If the man, even if he was unwell or suffering from mental illness, was being hurt, humiliated or found this activity offensive - he surely would not have become arroused?

The fact that he did is clear evidence that he was not resisting and not being victimised in a conventional sense.

No, I am not going quote sociological studies to say that violence and cruelty are alien to the female personality - it is common sense that this is so. The experience of life which all of us have shows us these things to be true every day.

It is not reported that the people in their care were upset - only that at times they cried out. They did not complain, their families did not complain, and still they do not complain. Are we to believe that of this nursing every one of them sufferes from conditions that effect the memory?

In my view they were not tormented. In my view, whatever age the man is, being groped (which is basically what we are talking about here) by a 19 year old girl is not a "torment"
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:35 AM   #44 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
If the man, even if he was unwell or suffering from mental illness, was being hurt, humiliated or found this activity offensive - he surely would not have become arroused?

The fact that he did is clear evidence that he was not resisting and not being victimised in a conventional sense.
I don't even know what to do with that. You realize that arousal is not entirely governed by your mental state, right? There are instinctive, hardwired responses to certain stimuli that just happen. I'm sure with about 5 minutes of work you could find plenty of accounts of girls getting wet during a rape, no matter how much they were saying no or resisting. I'm sure with another 5 minutes, you could find tons of stories about guys getting erections at awkward times when they weren't the slightest bit turned on.

That aside, you still don't seem to understand that someone who has Alzheimers can never consent to sexual contact. It is a legal impossibility. Having sexual contact with someone who cannot consent is sexual assault or rape. It's that simple. These girls are getting off with slaps on the wrist because of the attitude you're expressing, when they're no better than guys who would do the same thing.

It is truly a perverse relic in this day of supposed gender equality that people still honestly believe that just because a woman does it it's somehow ok, because hey, the guy got some sexual contact from a peaceful, loving girl that he could've easily stopped at any time with his huge muscles.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:09 AM   #45 (permalink)
Banned
 
dang, that's just sick/evil...
Coolyo is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:57 AM   #46 (permalink)
More Than You Expect
 
Manic_Skafe's Avatar
 
Location: Queens
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
If the man, even if he was unwell or suffering from mental illness, was being hurt, humiliated or found this activity offensive - he surely would not have become arroused?

The fact that he did is clear evidence that he was not resisting and not being victimised in a conventional sense.
As a man, you should know well enough that an erection alone doesn't equal arousal. An involuntary mechanical reaction from the mentally handicapped doesn't come close to consent for reasons too obvious to outline.

Quote:
No, I am not going quote sociological studies to say that violence and cruelty are alien to the female personality - it is common sense that this is so. The experience of life which all of us have shows us these things to be true every day.
I'd like to meet the ladies where you live.

Quote:
It is not reported that the people in their care were upset - only that at times they cried out. They did not complain, their families did not complain, and still they do not complain. Are we to believe that of this nursing every one of them sufferes from conditions that effect the memory?
...
In my view they were not tormented. In my view, whatever age the man is, being groped (which is basically what we are talking about here) by a 19 year old girl is not a "torment"
I'm not trying to be rude here but I can't help but to wonder as to whether you've considered the logical conclusion of your argument. Do the mentally handicapped not have any rights all?

I'd like to hope that you're just trying to keep this interesting.
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian
Manic_Skafe is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:11 AM   #47 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
Perhaps you noticed I said that female sexual assault of an *adult male* was virtually unknown.
Funny, cause the most significant link I provided - you know, the one that provided you with the name of a study in The Journal of Sex Research - is all about adult males! Perhaps you were too unconcerned with actually knowing what you're talking about to use your library card to read it? I'd suggest you do so.


And here's a book about it
. You can even read a significant chunk of it through Google Books, this way you don't actually have to do anything, like go to a library, to know what you're talking about! That said, I'm sure you'll be interested in getting the whole book from your library. I can't imagine you'd want to profess to know what it's like to be a male sexual assault victim without having any idea what you're talking about. No, that wouldn't be like you.

Oh, and here's more! Again, I'm sure you'll read it...you're not the kind of person to just assume what is and isn't "common sense" with absolutely no research to back you up. You're smarter than that!

You'll notice that the research does show that 25% of men have a positive reaction to sexual assault from a woman. Don't get ahead of yourself though, because the research also shows that men have difficulty accepting that they were sexually assaulted by a female in the first place, regardless of whether or not they liked it. It is unclear whether the men who are indifferent to or even enjoyed their sexual assault feel that way because they have been socialized into the myth that men should enjoy any and all sex they can get, or if they actually enjoyed it. Remember: it used to be a widely held belief that women were at fault if they were raped, and many female victims truly believed this because it was ingrained so deeply into their psyche. In fact, we've got a long way to go regarding social attitudes toward female rape victims as well.

It's funny, I can't find a single journal article arguing that men truly enjoy sexual assault or that women are inherently non-violent. I wonder why that is. I mean, you must have read something reputable about it - you wouldn't just make shit up now, would you?!

Of course, the most important thing here is that this nursing home situation is nothing like the sexual assault of healthy, adult males! As has been stated - over and over again - these are people who in many cases can't even go to the bathroom without assistance, or who couldn't even remember what happened to them 5 minutes later! This sexual assault is very much like that of a child, with the exception of having effects on development.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling

Last edited by SecretMethod70; 12-04-2008 at 02:52 AM..
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 03:19 AM   #48 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
This is some fucked up shit right here dudes.

I <3 smeth.

Seriously strange: as a poster alluded to above, I know you've got some interesting issues associated with feminine criminal behavior and the punishment thereof - I assume this is related to the same issues? Although somewhat ridiculous, I find your positions moderately fascinating...where else does this extend? Are females inherently submissive, and if so does this play into acceptable roles in society and politics? Is every violent or aggressive (perhaps militarily speaking?) female confused in her gender associations?

And yes, to add to the choir - chicks have some issues. I'd bet this started off small, and rapidly grew as a peer pressure, push-it-to-the-limit sort of thing. Kids will do some pretty bizarre things to fit in and achieve status inside their cliques. I definitely think they should be punished, registered as SOs, and put into heavy counseling. I'm not as positive about the sex offender registry - but that's a general thing as the consequences can be so severe for the rest of someone's life.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
pig is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 06:56 AM   #49 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I have no idea what the girls in this case look like, I dont know if they are pretty or not. My judgment is based on their gender and age, and the gender of the alleged "victims"... nothing to do with whether they are attractive or not.
Well here you go, here's what the two girls over 18 look like-



Not that that make any difference in this case.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 10:30 AM   #50 (permalink)
Registered User
 
I'd just like to point out that since 1997, claims of sexual harassment by males has nearly tripled according to the EEOC. Third Party harassment such as this is justifiable and quite common these days. So anyone who claims that female assault or harassment on an adult male is unheard of or uncommon simply doesn't know the facts.

Don't make me pull out a Host style thread with tons of links. I just did a thesis for my wife on this whole subject. I'm armed to the teeth.

Anyway, the whole point here is that these girls were CARETAKERS. last I checked, taking care of the elderly did not involve rectal exams, lap dances or spitting in the face.

On the whole sex offender registry thing.. I think it's a bit much, however, anal penetration of an unwanted nature, and to a vulnerable person is pretty close to forms of rape.

but no.. no crime has been committed.

edit: just found this lovely gem of a comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by SF
It is not reported that the people in their care were upset - only that at times they cried out. They did not complain, their families did not complain, and still they do not complain. Are we to believe that of this nursing every one of them sufferes from conditions that effect the memory?

In my view they were not tormented. In my view, whatever age the man is, being groped (which is basically what we are talking about here) by a 19 year old girl is not a "torment"
Hrmm.. you know, it's funny how you want to say that they aren't upset because they didn't complain. You do realize that most rapes go unaccounted for because the person is embarrassed, or they enjoyed it for a split second right? That doesn't mean that a crime hasn't been committed. It simply means that the victim is embarrassed and afraid of ridicule by people of ideas such as yours.

you may enjoy a woman groping you for no reason and you may enjoy it on your death bed, however, it doesn't make it right for someone to take clear and abusive advantage of another person.

and just so you know, you made a comment about topless calendars vs. calendars of men in speedos.. technically you could easily file a harassment case on the matter.. it's called Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment. So no, I wouldn't think you were foolish to do so.

Last edited by Glory's Sun; 12-04-2008 at 10:35 AM..
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 11:21 AM   #51 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr View Post
I'd just like to point out that since 1997, claims of sexual harassment by males has nearly tripled according to the EEOC. Third Party harassment such as this is justifiable and quite common these days. So anyone who claims that female assault or harassment on an adult male is unheard of or uncommon simply doesn't know the facts.
It's been a while since I worked with sex offenders or in law enforcement but one of the last trainings I attended dealt, in part, with the changing gender roles in society and how females were engaging in more and more violent crimes. The male/female roles in western society have been in a constant state of change for years.

I can remember my dad being upset when my mom wore pants one day... outside of the house *gasp!* And when she wanted to get a job? "Well what the hell are the neighbors going to think?" This was in the late 60's, really not that long ago. I came across a book one day in the library at Western Oregon State about being a good wife. It was written in the 50's, mid 50's I think. It gave details on how to plan your day around your husband. Everything from getting up to cook his breakfast to how to keep a clean house without disturbing "his" day. Even had a section regarding making sure you have time to both put on your make-up and have his favorite cocktail waiting for him when he gets home. That was 50 years ago, my how times have changed.

Back to the training- One of the theories put forth by the trainer in that final course I took was as these roles become closer to one another the good comes with the bad. Females are not only enjoying more freedoms, some are engaging in more aggressive behavior. Behavior that has been more typical of their male counterpoints. She (said trainer) had graphs and charts complete with arrows and highlights, mostly from the US Dept. of Justice and the FBI, showing that the rate of violent crimes being committed by females was(is?) snowballing. Everything from robbery to murder to gang violence and yes, even rape was increasing at a dramatic rate.

One of the many things that stuck in my head was child molesters and sex offenders are more often then not victims of abuse themselves. And who gets victimized most often? Females, by far.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 11:22 AM   #52 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars View Post
I can remember my dad being upset when my mom wore pants one day... outside of the house *gasp!* And when she wanted to get a job? "Well what the hell are the neighbors going to think?" This was in the late 60's, really not that long ago. I came across a book one day in the library at Western Oregon State about being a good wife. it was written in the 50's, mid 50's I think. It gave details on how to plan your day around your husband. Everything from getting up to cook his breakfast to how to keep a clean house without disturbing "his" day. Even had a section regarding making sure you have time to both put on your make-up and have his favorite cocktail waiting for him when he gets home. That was 50 years ago, my how times have changed.
skogafoss has a copy of that book. it is weird to read.
-----Added 4/12/2008 at 02 : 45 : 16-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
Perhaps you noticed I said that female sexual assault of an *adult male* was virtually unknown. There are a small number of sexual assaults committed by women against children. These women are in my judgment suffering from gender confusion - ie they are biologically women but emtionally are male. (the opposite case would become a cross dresser or even have a sex change)

Simply violence and cruelty are not part of the female character. There are very few violent crimes committed by women, and sexual assault is one of the most violent crimes of all.
-----Added 4/12/2008 at 03 : 03 : 19-----


I have no idea what the girls in this case look like, I dont know if they are pretty or not. My judgment is based on their gender and age, and the gender of the alleged "victims"... nothing to do with whether they are attractive or not.
well, your own UK papers are making a case for an increase in female youth crimes

Quote:
View: The Big Question: Why are girls committing more crime, and should we be alarmed?
Source: Independent
posted with the TFP thread generator


The Big Question: Why are girls committing more crime, and should we be alarmed?
The Big Question: Why are girls committing more crime, and should we be alarmed?

By Nigel Morris, Home Affairs Correspondent
Friday, 16 May 2008

Why are we asking this question now?

Anxiety about growing lawlessness among young women was fuelled by figures yesterday from the Youth Justice Board (YJB). It disclosed that the number of offences committed by girls leapt by 25 per cent in just three years, compared with a two per cent fall among boys.

The notion of female delinquents has recently passed into the national consciousness with the comic creations of Little Britain's Vicky Pollard and Lauren Cooper, the surly teenager portrayed by Catherine Tate. But there is a sinister side to the phenomenon of girls aping boys' yobbish behaviour, with a series of reports in recent months of vicious attacks by girls and women. Evidence is mounting that violent crime is spreading to female offenders.

What do the youth crime figures show?

The vast majority of offences are committed by boys, but just over one-fifth of crimes reported to Youth Offending Teams, which deal with children aged between 10 and 17, are committed by girls. The trend is sharply upwards, representing a 25 per cent increase on the 47,358 offences committed by girls in 2003-04. Last year, girls carried out 15,672 violent attacks (a rise of more than 50 per cent over the past three years) and more than one-quarter of all assaults by youngsters. They were also responsible for 19,722 thefts, 5,964 public order offences and 5,748 incidents of criminal damage.

One-hundred-and-eighty girls were convicted of arson, while 954 were found guilty of drugs crimes and 1,463 of drugs crimes.

What happens to them?

A total of 15,835 girls appeared in court last year, of whom 15,375 received bail or community sentences and 460 were sent into custody. Fewer than 10 per cent of the children in custody are girls, although they commit about 20 per cent of offences, suggesting courts are less willing to lock them up or – more likely – they have been convicted of less serious offences.

Currently 207 girls are locked up in young offender institutions, secure training centres or local authority homes, compared with 2,735 boys. The numbers of children of both sexes who are behind bars is increasing, despite appeals to courts by the YJB to use more community sentences.

What recent evidence is there of girls becoming violent?

A girl who received horrific injuries in a bomb blast in Harrow, north-west London, was said to have been living in fear of a girl gang that had already beaten her up and was trying to drive her out of the city. Last night, the explosion was blamed by police on a gas leak, but the episode inadvertently shone a spotlight on violence between young women.

Last month, a massive brawl erupted between rival girl gangs wielding snooker balls in socks in the unlikely setting of Shoreham railway station in West Sussex.

In Northwich, Cheshire, a former policewoman was punched in the face by a teenage girl as she was mobbed by a gang of youngsters. A 15-year-old girl was jailed in March for filming two male friends beating a man to death in Keighley, West Yorkshire, on her mobile phone. The same month, a court heard that a gang of six teenage girls threw stones at a pensioner in Selby, North Yorkshire, forcing her into a busy road and leaving her with a broken nose and black eyes.

Are girls really committing more crime?

It is hard to deny the trend uncovered by the YJB's figures, but the increase might not be as dramatic as it first appears.

First, the number of teenage girls in the population has risen, so the offending rate could be expected to go up – although not, admittedly, by 25 per cent. More significantly, more girls are becoming embroiled in the youth justice system after petty incidents, such as school fights. There is also evidence that many of the theft/handling crimes committed by girls are minor shoplifting offences. Where they might have previously received informal warnings, they are now appearing in youth courts. Paul Cavadino, chief executive of Nacro, the crime reduction charity, said: "Much of the recorded 25 per cent rise is a statistical illusion, reflecting a greater readiness to report minor offences to the police."

Nacro also suspects that more children of both sexes are being given on-the-record reprimands by police because of pressure to hit targets for crime detection.

Elaine Arnull, of London's South Bank University, who has investigated female offending for the YJB, said: "We think the response to girls by agencies – schools, police, other people – has changed, so girls are possibly being prosecuted for offences they weren't being prosecuted for before."

She added: "Most offending by girls, especially violent offending, is of a very low level. It doesn't mean it's insignificant, but it is hair-pulling fights between girls."

The rise could also be seen as evidence that society is becoming less tolerant of behaviour that might once have been seen as high spirits.

Surely drink plays a part?

There is ample evidence in town and city centres at weekends of the phenomenon of "ladettes", groups of teenage girls and young women who become as drunk and unruly as their male contemporaries. Recent police figures suggested that 50 per cent more women were arrested in 2007-08 for being drunk and disorderly than five years ago. In the West Midlands, the number went up from just 59 to 731.

Meanwhile, as many as 29 per cent of schoolgirls admit to binge-drinking, a higher figure than schoolboys. Given the link between extreme alcohol consumption and violence, it is inevitable that more girls are finding themselves with a criminal record. David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, said the levels of offending were a "shocking indictment" of the Government's failure to get a grip on crime. He said new licensing laws, and policies which have "driven family breakdown", had contributed to the problem.

Are more girls joining gangs?

Last year, the Metropolitan Police estimated that there were at least 170 youth gangs in London, but only three known to be all-female. There is also anecdotal evidence of the rise of "mixed-sex" gangs in some parts of the country.

However, very little research has been done into the subject and the true extent of gang membership among girls nationally is unknown. But its impact is already being felt in several communities.

Is there a crimewave among girls?

Yes...

* A 25 per cent rise in offences is objective proof of more lawlessness among girls.

* Female binge-drinking is growing, resulting in more violent crime offences.

* There has been a succession of reports about girl violence in all parts of the country.

No...

* Girls commit far fewer crimes than boys – only 20 per cent of the offences committed by children.

* They are being prosecuted for offences that would have previously received an informal warning.

* Drink-fuelled high spirits are hardly a pointer to criminal behaviour in later life.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 12-04-2008 at 11:45 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 11:50 AM   #53 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
strange famous, you're assuming as well that all the victims were male. some were poked in the breast. I would assume that breast is used here instead of chest because the victim was female.

Regardless of gender, all of these victims were entrusted to care. There should not have been a question of consent implied or required. Just because you rub a guy's dick and it gets hard, doesn't mean that he is liking it. It means that you are rubbing it.

And yes, gowns, pajamas, robes etc are often the only clothing worn in these facilities.

I find that if you are truly playing the devil's advocate here, then you are taking on Sean Avery proportions...
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey
And I never saw someone say that before
You held my hand and we walked home the long way
You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr


http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I
Leto is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:01 PM   #54 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
Simply violence and cruelty are not part of the female character.
What, is this taken directly from the 19th century or is it earlier?

I'm not sure who you're making out to be second-class citizens, males, females, or the infirm. They can't all be second-class. I'm not easily confused, but you've accomplished as much in me.

I'm glad others have spoken from my perspective in my stead.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:19 PM   #55 (permalink)
Registered User
 
While I haven't seen any sexual harassment charges filed, the patients could easily bring about a sexual harassment suit towards the hospital.

Here's just a few notes to help clairfy why the girls were charged legally

* The victim as well as the harasser may be a woman or a man. The victim does not have to be of the opposite sex.
* The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, an agent of the employer, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or a non-employee.
* The victim does not have to be the person harassed but could be anyone affected by the offensive conduct.
* Unlawful sexual harassment may occur without economic injury to or discharge of the victim.
* The harasser's conduct must be unwelcome.


Sexual Harassment types

One-of-the-Gang Often motivated by bravado or competition, or because the harasser(s) think it is funny (AAUW 2006), One-of-the-gang harassment occurs when groups of men or women embarrass others with lewd comments, physical evaluations, or other unwanted sexual attention. Harassers may act individually in order to belong or impress the others, or groups may gang up on a particular target

Bully In this case, sexual harassment is used to punish the victim for some transgression, such as rejection of the harasser's interest or advances, or making the harasser feel insecure about himself or herself or his or her abilities. The bully uses sexual harassment to put the victim in his or her "proper place.


just by these facts alone it's easy to see why these girls were charged.

There is no reason to take the stance you are taking SF, unless you just see it from your view point only and that you wouldn't mind it happening to you. Just because females are stereotypically the "gentler" species does not exempt them from bad behavior.

If the roles were reversed and a male had done these things to women, the uproar would have been tremendous.. why should we cater to some notion of a double standard? Women deserve better than that, even if it means they get in trouble.. because equal means equal on all levels.. not just the non-criminal levels.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:20 PM   #56 (permalink)
Insane
 
FlatLand Flyer's Avatar
 
Location: Eastern, WA
Personally, I am on the fence on this one. I can see what they did can and should be considered wrong and very punishable.

However, when I put myself in the "victim's" shoes, I think differently. If I consider myself an old man that can no longer take care of myself and placed in a home full of people just like me, I would be depressed. To add to that, I am essentially waiting for death and don't completely have my wits with me. Even more depressing.

Then a group of attractive to very attractive teenage girls want to rub my penis and put there butts in my face. I have to admit that I would not be complaining at all. Hell, I would thank them and ask them to continue. I would not care if they put a finger in my butt or spit in my mouth. When compared with the reality surrounding me in that home, I would think the "care" given by the girls was a gift from god.

Again, this is just what I think of when I put myself in the place of one of these victims.
FlatLand Flyer is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:37 PM   #57 (permalink)
Registered User
 
I don't think anyone can actually say what they will really think or how they would act when they are old or in a situation like these patients, until it actually happens.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:39 PM   #58 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
What FF is an important point, and should not be under-estimated. Empathy is an important factor in all of our moral judgments. I have to say that if I place myself in the place of the men in this home, I feel the same as FF does - I would not be complaining. That may sound flippant, but its genuinely my empathetic interpretation. Everyone might not agree, but I believe that many people, and in fact the majority of people, would.

I dont know how anyone can accuse me of sexism. I am an ardent feminist and supporter of women's rights.

I have never said that men cannot be the victim or rape or sexual assault. I understand that homosexual sexual assaults can take place, and I certainly understand that many men may feel a stigma in reporting these crimes - which society must address, and make clear that being a victim is not a thing to be ashamed of.

I am only stating that there are hardly any real cases of a female sexually assaulting an adult male - not that men cannot be victims of sexual assault at all.

__

I think people throw around moral judgments in a very black and white way. Is it really what we want for these young girls to have their lives ruined because of these juvenile and childish actions? If you want to take a legalistic view - yes, some of the actions could be seen as assault. But I call upon everyone to place themselves in this situation and think honestly. As an old man, gravely ill, with declining powers - would you REALLY feel you were a victim if an attractive 19 year old vigoursly rubbed your crotch or stuck her ass in your face?

You can say "the law written down forbids this action which can be interprated in this way" - but if we speak of real common sense justice - can you put your hand on your heart and say in the situation of one of these men you would consider yourself a victim?
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:40 PM   #59 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
It appears their aim was to demean them, not perform sex acts on them. Honestly? I'd take proper care over sexual assault, please.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 12-04-2008 at 01:43 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:44 PM   #60 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
I completely disagree Baraka - I cannot see any malice in any of these actions. They were thoughtless, childish, over the top certainly - but I see no intention to harm or demean, only peer pressure and a group of over excited young girls
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:49 PM   #61 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I completely disagree Baraka - I cannot see any malice in any of these actions. They were thoughtless, childish, over the top certainly - but I see no intention to harm or demean, only peer pressure and a group of over excited young girls
so someone can actually walk up to you and probe your rectum and you'd agree that there is no malice?

I mean you're basis this on a article, you read on the internet.

You can somehow tell the individuals intentions via someone else's writing, while logging on via webserver all the way from the UK?????

that's fricken' amazing!!! You could supplant Uri Geller!
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:51 PM   #62 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I completely disagree Baraka - I cannot see any malice in any of these actions. They were thoughtless, childish, over the top certainly - but I see no intention to harm or demean, only peer pressure and a group of over excited young girls
What branch of feminism did you say you subscribe to?

So you're saying it's okay for me to stick my ass into an old man's face for a little fun...if I were only joking?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 12-04-2008 at 01:56 PM.. Reason: typo
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:58 PM   #63 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Strange Famous: If you don't see any malice, you must not be reading any of the articles...which talk about how they did these things in order to upset the patients.

As for calling yourself a feminist...well, I don't know a single self-identified feminist female who would agree with you. Perhaps you don't realize this, but a large part of past discrimination against women had to do with a warped, idealized view of them which denied them their individuality. Much of the reason behind women's sexual repression comes from the belief that they are more "pure" than men, not out of some intent to deny them pleasure. The "feminists" I know - real women who are active and, dare I say, rather feisty about women's rights - would slap you silly for many of the things you've said about women here.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:59 PM   #64 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
What branch of feminism did you say you subscribe to?

So you're saying it's okay for my to stick my ass into an old man's face for a little fun...if I were only joking?
No, Im not saying that it would be ok for you to do that, as - to the best of my knowledge - you are not female.

Feminism doesnt mean that men and women should be treated exactly equally - by any interpretation.

I have already said that if the people in the nursing home were female and the nurses male - these would be outrageous crimes, which should be punished heavily.

This is why I am talking about legalistic moralism against common sense.

If a women grabs a man's butt or a man grabs a woman's butt - common sense and basic human understanding tell us that these are different things and one is an offensive and one isnt. We all know this in our hearts to be true. The moral legalistic approach will say it is the same thing - and I feel it is this approach which is being used in this case.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:59 PM   #65 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
What FF is an important point, and should not be under-estimated. Empathy is an important factor in all of our moral judgments. I have to say that if I place myself in the place of the men in this home, I feel the same as FF does - I would not be complaining. That may sound flippant, but its genuinely my empathetic interpretation. Everyone might not agree, but I believe that many people, and in fact the majority of people, would.

I dont know how anyone can accuse me of sexism. I am an ardent feminist and supporter of women's rights.

I have never said that men cannot be the victim or rape or sexual assault. I understand that homosexual sexual assaults can take place, and I certainly understand that many men may feel a stigma in reporting these crimes - which society must address, and make clear that being a victim is not a thing to be ashamed of.

I am only stating that there are hardly any real cases of a female sexually assaulting an adult male - not that men cannot be victims of sexual assault at all.

__

I think people throw around moral judgments in a very black and white way. Is it really what we want for these young girls to have their lives ruined because of these juvenile and childish actions? If you want to take a legalistic view - yes, some of the actions could be seen as assault. But I call upon everyone to place themselves in this situation and think honestly. As an old man, gravely ill, with declining powers - would you REALLY feel you were a victim if an attractive 19 year old vigoursly rubbed your crotch or stuck her ass in your face?

You can say "the law written down forbids this action which can be interprated in this way" - but if we speak of real common sense justice - can you put your hand on your heart and say in the situation of one of these men you would consider yourself a victim?
I would feel like a victim if I were a married old man who had stayed faithful to my wife for 70 years and some tramp decided to grab my dick and stick her finger in my ass without me being able to say or do anything about it. From a purely physical level, I'm sure my nerves would receive signals of pleasure, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't feel ashamed and violated. I would say I was a victim of someone else's desire to use my body in the way they wanted to, regardless of how I felt about it.

The whole problem with that way of thinking is that it ignores the most important aspect of our entire way of life: agency. Your conclusion and that of FF completely ignores the fact that we fundamentally think as a society (at least in nearly all cases) that people have the unalienable right to decide what happens to them and to their body. The fact that they enjoyed it AFTER makes no difference if they did not consent to it BEFORE.

Furthermore, the girls have admitted to doing this to antagonize the patients. They weren't lovers or even stripper or hookers.

And finally, all of your nonsense about the lack of female on male sexual harassment has been torn to tiny, weeping pieces by SM's sources in post 47. Read them and stop embarrassing yourself.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:00 PM   #66 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I completely disagree Baraka - I cannot see any malice in any of these actions. They were thoughtless, childish, over the top certainly - but I see no intention to harm or demean, only peer pressure and a group of over excited young girls
Actually, you are missing the entire import from the article then. These girls were demeaning their victims as they would pose and take pictures, congregate later to retell their stories and have a great laugh about it.

I agree, thoughtless, childish, and over the top. But also demeaning and without regard for the dignity of those who were placed in the care of these people.

The red herring that you raise about the statistical improbability of women abusing men doesn't hold any merit in this case and does not stand up to scrutiny.
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey
And I never saw someone say that before
You held my hand and we walked home the long way
You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr


http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I
Leto is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:01 PM   #67 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
No, Im not saying that it would be ok for you to do that, as - to the best of my knowledge - you are not female.

Feminism doesnt mean that men and women should be treated exactly equally - by any interpretation.

I have already said that if the people in the nursing home were female and the nurses male - these would be outrageous crimes, which should be punished heavily.
You, sir, do not understand "feminism." But don't worry--it's one of the most misconstrued and misunderstood concepts coming out of the 20th century.

Feminists (especially the academics amongst them) would strongly argue against your double-standardism.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 12-04-2008 at 02:04 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:04 PM   #68 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
If a women grabs a man's butt or a man grabs a woman's butt - common sense and basic human understanding tell us that these are different things and one is an offensive and one isnt. We all know this in our hearts to be true. The moral legalistic approach will say it is the same thing - and I feel it is this approach which is being used in this case.
If any of the three women in my office grabbed my butt, I would be offended. Period. Without question. I don't desire any physical contact with them other than that required to carry out our jobs and incidental, unavoidable contact from working in close vicinity. That is in no way different than if I grabbed their butt, because I'm pretty sure they feel the same way.

Sexism is making blanket judgments about either sex without looking at the way specific individuals are acting. You are making outrageous assumptions about these girls based solely on things "you know in your heart to be true" and you are making outrageous assumptions about the reactions of the males because "that's how we'd feel if we really stepped into their shoes." You have said that women are gentle by nature and incapable of violence and that if they are violent, they are only violent because they have gender identity disorder. All of that is the very definition of sexism, whatever you want to label yourself.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:04 PM   #69 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I am only stating that there are hardly any real cases of a female sexually assaulting an adult male - not that men cannot be victims of sexual assault at all.
So in post #18 when you said-

Quote:
Realistically, do any of us believe that an adult male can be sexually assaulted by a woman?
What exactly were you saying or asking? I mean I'm confused which is it- men can't be sexually assaulted by women or they can be but it's rare?

Sir, your positions not only have no basis in fact they seemingly change at will.

Again, you are seriously ill informed on this subject. You've made one false assertion after another and when confronted with actual facts you've simply dug your heels in harder. It's as if you've dug a hole for yourself and in an attempt to get out you asked for a larger shovel.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:05 PM   #70 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70 View Post
Strange Famous: If you don't see any malice, you must not be reading any of the articles...which talk about how they did these things in order to upset the patients.

As for calling yourself a feminist...well, I don't know a single self-identified feminist female who would agree with you. Perhaps you don't realize this, but a large part of past discrimination against women had to do with a warped, idealized view of them which denied them their individuality. Much of the reason behind women's sexual repression comes from the belief that they are more "pure" than men, not out of some intent to deny them pleasure. The "feminists" I know - real women who are active and, dare I say, rather feisty about women's rights - would slap you silly for many of the things you've said about women here.
I do not deny women individuality anymore than I deny men indivisuality... I merely state what most people here also believe, that men and women are different, and have different characters. There are some biological women who are masculine and some biological men who are feminine, certainly... but the basic characteristics of masculine and feminine have some differences.

I no way to I state that women are in any way inferior, nor do I believe that all women are "pure" of sexless. Certainly it is the case that women prefer one partner and men tend to prefer many parters, ie - that women are more faithful than men... this is known to everyone - but it doesnt mean that women enjoy or appreciate sex less.

I put it to you that you in fact are using negative stereotypes of women - claiming that any feminist will be aggressive and "slap silly" people who disagree with them (ie - you are stating that a feminist in fact has the masculine characteristic of physical aggression)

In fact, feminists and women who defend their rights and call for an end of sexism are perflectly feminine, and the myth of the "butch feminist" I feel you are trying to put across is utterly false.

I have been alive 30 years, and I have seen plenty of people get into fights over all sorts of silly things - and Ive never seen a women "slap someone silly" over a political argument yet.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:08 PM   #71 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
He meant slap silly in the figurative sense of disagreeing vehemently, being offended and bringing up many counter-arguments to your points. He didn't meant they'd come and slap you in the face. And that's not even close to the mark any of us are making in this thread. Care to respond to any of the real issues?
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:09 PM   #72 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
No, Im not saying that it would be ok for you to do that, as - to the best of my knowledge - you are not female.

Feminism doesnt mean that men and women should be treated exactly equally - by any interpretation.

I have already said that if the people in the nursing home were female and the nurses male - these would be outrageous crimes, which should be punished heavily.

This is why I am talking about legalistic moralism against common sense.

If a women grabs a man's butt or a man grabs a woman's butt - common sense and basic human understanding tell us that these are different things and one is an offensive and one isnt. We all know this in our hearts to be true. The moral legalistic approach will say it is the same thing - and I feel it is this approach which is being used in this case.


damn dude.. you must get some sweet ganja.

wtf? How is a sexual assault any different based on the perps gender??

fuck me .. you get closer and closer to the edge with every post on this subject.

You are the one who in a different thread talked about how it is cowardly to hit a man while he is knocked down. Yet here, these patients are incapable of many common functions.. yet it is ok for these girls to assault and humiliate them.. because.. they are girls, and girls doing things aren't offensive? If a girl farts.. it's going to stink, just like a mans.


nonsense. complete and utter nonsense to the nth degree.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:09 PM   #73 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
No, I said someone would slap you silly - and you're smart enough to know I was speaking figuratively - because what you're saying is so absurdly asinine, not just because she's a feminist and would disagree with you.

Don't kid yourself, when you say things like "violence and cruelty are not part of the female character," you are painting with extremely broad strokes that do deny the individuality of women.

EDIT: But Frosstbyte has the right idea. Let's get back to the real issues that you've yet to address.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:18 PM   #74 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr View Post
I just did a thesis for my wife on this whole subject. I'm armed to the teeth.
Isn't your wife supposed to do her own goddamned thesis?

__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 03:39 PM   #75 (permalink)
pig
pigglet pigglet
 
pig's Avatar
 
Location: Locash
This is like reading Thomas Mallory. I can't even wrap my head around your position strange. The things you are claiming are universal truths, and which I know in my heart to be true, I resounding reject in a universal sense. I don't think I can continue this line of conversation.

In a passing sense, I am interested in seeing how this thing plays out. I think if nothing else, this is just a severe case of a serious problem in nursing homes in general. I've heard horror stories from friends who's family members are in facilities for advanced/terminal care. Stealing food being a major issue...I thought it was pretty despicable when someone stole a friend of mine's grandfather's home-cooked cake. Like I said, I wonder how much of this will fall back on the facility in which this occurred? I would be seriously pissed if my parent/grandparent were treated in this fashion. I would wonder if the civil suits are far behind?
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
pig is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 03:58 PM   #76 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Men are perpetually willing sexual objects that all women have rights to at will.

That's the one claim I'm having the most trouble swallowing. (Please correct me if I have it wrong.) It basically means men are second-class citizens and perhaps don't even have autonomy.

For example, if the women with whom I interact consistently touch me in sexual ways, there is nothing I can do about it. If my SO found out about this and wanted to divorce me, I would be at fault because I was a willing participant, automatically, partly (or wholly) due to the fact that I prefer multiple partners by default based on my sex.

Do I have it right?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:15 PM   #77 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief View Post
Isn't your wife supposed to do her own goddamned thesis?

what can I say I'm good at papers and such..and I want her to hurry up and finish..

plus the promise of head every day for 2 weeks doesn't hurt

but anyway..

Quote:
Originally Posted by pig
In a passing sense, I am interested in seeing how this thing plays out. I think if nothing else, this is just a severe case of a serious problem in nursing homes in general. I've heard horror stories from friends who's family members are in facilities for advanced/terminal care. Stealing food being a major issue...I thought it was pretty despicable when someone stole a friend of mine's grandfather's home-cooked cake. Like I said, I wonder how much of this will fall back on the facility in which this occurred? I would be seriously pissed if my parent/grandparent were treated in this fashion. I would wonder if the civil suits are far behind?
I'd say the civil suits are not far behind. The facility can be held liable on a slew of charges including the sexual harassment that I posted earlier.

Here in Raleigh there is a case similar to this except the caretakers left a man alone for something like 22 hours and didn't monitor him and he died shortly after someone actually did move him. It's all on tape.. civil suits will be forthcoming in that case as well.




-+-{Important TFP Staff Message}-+-
This thread has evolved into more of an male vs female equality issue. I'd like to see those hashed in a different thread. Reserve this thread for the talk of the actual case.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:24 PM   #78 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Borla's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
I completely disagree Baraka - I cannot see any malice in any of these actions. They were thoughtless, childish, over the top certainly - but I see no intention to harm or demean, only peer pressure and a group of over excited young girls
You obviously didn't read the police report that was linked earlier then. The girls flat out said that many of the things they did (hands over the mouth, poking in the breasts, poking in the genitals, spitting in their mouths) were simply to make the patients angry, and then they would laugh at them because they were powerless to defend themselves.

If purposefully making someone who cannot defend themselves angry by touching their genitals or spitting in their mouths isn't malicious or demeaning, I don't know what is.
__________________
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde!!!!
Borla is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:34 PM   #79 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
All right, ardent feminist popping her head in.

Sexual assault is sexual assault, period--regardless of the gender/sex of the perpetrator, regardless of the gender/sex of the victim. Assault is assault, and it's pretty clear that assault was perpetrated here.

As a feminist, I believe we should all be equally treated and have equal opportunities. Therefore, I believe that these girls should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We would do the same to teenage boys who did these things, and we should insist on consistency despite sex/gender here. Despite what you may believe, StrangeFamous, women ARE capable of committing violent crimes and doing horrible things, and the law should treat them just as it would a male who committed the same crime.

I feel horrible for those poor, helpless people who were treated that way. My oma died of Alzheimers. I've been in a care facility like the one described. There was no way my oma could have given consent to anything by the time she was there. She had the mentality of an infant.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:40 PM   #80 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Well said snowy.

Alas I fear we're beating a dead horse. Either that or SF is having a bit of fun with us. I'm starting to think the latter.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
 

Tags
charged, girls, home, molesting, nursing, patients, teen


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:11 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360