Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2008, 11:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Myspace hoax/suicide trial: what are your thoughts?

Many of you are probably already aware of the Lori Drew trial. She's the mother who created a fake identity on Myspace which became the catalyst for 13 year-old Megan Meier's suicide. If you're not familiar, or want to read an update on the case, here is a CNN article:

MySpace hoax case about big issues, petty feud - CNN.com

MySpace hoax case about big issues, petty feud   click to show 

I'm kind of torn when it comes to this case. I think it sets a terrible precedent to prosecute someone for creating a false identity on the internet. That said, I do think someone should be held criminally liable in the suicide of Megan Meier. I originally thought that person should be Lori Drew, but in the article I quoted above it states that her assistant, Ashley Grills, is the person who actually sent the message that apparently led to her suicide. Unlike Lori Drew, Ashley Grills was not made aware of Megan's fragile mental condition. That said, considering Lori was told by Megan's mother about concerns for Megan's mental health, she should have known that Megan may not be able to handle such a misleading relationship on MySpace in the first place.

I don't know if there are any civil suits pending, though I do hope a wrongful death suit is in the works for all involved parties. I'm more interested in the criminal side of this, seeing as how the only way they've found to try and bring justice is by unreasonably manipulating a law intended to be used against hackers.

What are your thoughts on this? Is it reasonable to charge Lori Drew with conspiracy and accessing computers without authorization (for breaking MySpace's Terms of Service)? What are your suggestions to find balance between reasonable digital rights and justice regarding the real life consequences?
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 04:25 AM   #2 (permalink)
Shade
 
Nisses's Avatar
 
Location: Belgium
My opinion is fairly simple:

Why should somebody be held criminally liable for the *suicide* of Megan Meier?

"Instead, he said he would instruct the jurors that the case is about whether Drew violated the terms of service of the MySpace social networking site, not about whether she caused the suicide of Megan Meier."

The defense lawyer says, and I agree, that this case will never be understood as break of user agreement, but about the ensueing suicide...

This can only go wrong as far as I can see.



You give her a standard penalty somewhere around perjury/signing leases/signing bad cheques ---> The public's reaction will be outraged because a "murderer" got off so lightly.

You give her a severe punishment, and you're creating a weird precedent for further "Internet Law" trials.



Maybe invent a modern version of the pillory for these adults. Adults that really should have known better?

(hurray, I learned a new word today - pillory )
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated.

Last edited by Nisses; 11-18-2008 at 04:42 AM..
Nisses is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 04:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Too Awesome for Aardvarks
 
stevie667's Avatar
 
Location: Angloland
Unfortunatly this is a perfect example of how our current laws are not up to date at all with dealing with these new types of debacles.

I agree completly she should be punished with a hefty jail sentance, there is no excuse for causing this type of suffering on a person with explicit understanding of what the consiquences may be.

Hopefully they nail her to a wall, then draft some new legislation on the other side. Like you said, interesting legal hoohah that could emerge here.
__________________
Office hours have changed. Please call during office hours for more information.
stevie667 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 05:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
SabrinaFair's Avatar
 
Location: Louisville, KY
I'm torn--while I think what this woman did is heinous, I'm not sure how I feel about the precedent this sets. The law is ill-equipped to handle "cyber crimes", and I'm not really comfortable with bending the laws to make them fit the crime. If we as a society feel the need to punish this sort of behavior, we need laws designed to prosecute it, ones that set out a clear actus reas and mens rea. Not everything that is "wrong" is a crime. (just as I don't believe everything that is a crime is wrong) So I feel until we have laws, we cannot hold people accountable for breaking them.
__________________
"With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful. Strive to be happy."
-Desiderata
SabrinaFair is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 06:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Iliftrocks's Avatar
 
Location: Near Raleigh, NC
Suicide is terrible and regrettable, but she killed herself. The woman who harassed her is an ass, and probably should be ostracised for what she did do, but she is not responsible for the girl's predisposition to commit suicide. She probably would have been upset by something else, and done the same thing at a later date. There may have been nothing that could have been done to stop this.........

Her parents, knowing how fragile she was, probably should have been monitoring the situation more closely, but then again, maybe they were also clueless.

We can have more and more laws created to stop all bad behaviour, and we'll just get more and more sensitive to anything slightly negative, and we'll all be suicidal before too long. Quit molly-coddling kids, let them get cut and scraped, both physically and emotionally and they will grow up stronger.
__________________
bill hicks - "I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out."
Iliftrocks is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 01:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Nisses: For the most part, I don't disagree. Using this law to prosecute Lori Drew sets an awful precedent on many levels.

It's true that Megan committed suicide, but there are a number of factors involved here:[*]Lori Drew was aware of Megan's fragile mental state (not to mention that young teenagers already have a fragile mental state due to the hormones raging in their bodies)[*]As an adult, it is reasonable to expect that Lori Drew should understand the possible consequences of her actions[*]It is clear that the suicide flowed directly from the MySpace charade.

To be honest, I'm still not quite sure why Lori Drew doesn't qualify for involuntary manslaughter charges. I suspect it's because Ashley Grills is the person who sent the final message.

Iliftrocks: Again, generally speaking I don't disagree. The point of diversion is where you say she's not responsible for Megan's predisposition to commit suicide. If she weren't already made aware of her fragile mental state, then that would be true, but Lori Drew was explicitly made aware of concerns for Megan's mental health, and as an adult it is reasonable to expect her to understand the potential consequences of her actions. Maybe Megan would have committed suicide at some other point anyway, but we don't know. All we know is that her suicide was directly encouraged by the actions of Lori Drew and Ashley Grills.

SabrinaFair: Yeah, I'm generally against the way this particular situation is shaping up, because using the law this way sets a very bad precedent. I do think involuntary manslaughter is an accurate charge, but the fact Ashley Grills sent the final message complicates the matter. I'm not sure if she was 18 at the time she sent it.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Cornwall, UK
I'd say it's fairly well known that there are cases where a student has committed suicide in response to bullying, in the schoolground, yet their detractors were never attempted prosecution in such a fashion.

Last edited by Sensei Crap; 11-18-2008 at 03:23 PM..
Sensei Crap is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
In most cases, the bully is a minor who cannot be reasonably expected to understand the consequences of their actions. Moreover, in most cases, the bully has not been previously made aware that the victim is of a particularly fragile mental state.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Cornwall, UK
That is true in some respects, having said that, bullies pick on the weaker whether physically or mentally inferior, to absolve them on that point is stupid. I will agree that Lori Drew et al, should have known better. That is not to say that "minors" necessarily don't, either they don't know of the implications and consequences, or just don't care.
Sensei Crap is offline  
 

Tags
hoax or suicide, myspace, thoughts, trial


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360