Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2008, 06:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Hate Crime or not? Obama Effigy on noose racist - Palin Effigy on not even sexist.

Quote:
View:
Source: Latimes
posted with the TFP thread generator


Effigy of Sarah Palin hanging by a noose creates uproar in West Hollywood
Los Angeles sheriff's officials say the Halloween display isn't a hate crime. Authorities are keeping an eye on the house to make sure the situation doesn't get out of hand.
By Victoria Kim



6:58 PM PDT, October 27, 2008

A West Hollywood Halloween display showing a likeness of Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin hanging by a noose has caused a furor among some residents who reported it as a hate crime, authorities said Monday.

But Los Angeles sheriff's officials said the mannequin sporting a beehive hairdo, glasses and a red coat does not rise to the level of a hate crime because it was part of a Halloween display.

"I'm not defending this; I'm not criticizing it. It doesn't rise to the level of hate crime," said Steve Whitmore, spokesman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, who said he went out to the house himself to look at the display this morning. "Now, if there was a crime against bad taste . . . "

Sgt. Kristin Aloma of the sheriff's department's West Hollywood station said that since Sunday she had received five to 10 calls from residents offended by the display. Officials are monitoring the house to make sure the situation doesn't get out of hand, she said.

West Hollywood Mayor Jeffrey Prang said although he recognizes residents' right to free speech, he found the display problematic and felt it should be removed.

"While these residents have the legal right to display Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin in effigy, I strongly oppose political speech that references violence -- real or perceived," Prang said in a statement. "I urge these residents to take down their display and find more constructive ways to express their opinion."

Whitmore said that potential hate crimes are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. If the same display had been made of a Barack Obama-like doll, for example, authorities would have to evaluate it independently, Whitmore said.

"That adds a whole other social, historical hate aspect to the display, and that is embedded in the consciousness of the country," he said, adding he's not sure whether it would be a hate crime. "It would be ill-advised of anybody to speculate on that."

Chad-Michael Morisette, who lives in the house, told a local TV news crew that cars and buses have been stopping near his home and that people have been snapping photos of the Halloween display.

The home's decorations also feature a doll of John McCain surrounded by "flames" in the chimney, and other more typical Halloween items, such as skeletons and spider webs.
You may not like her, but why is even perceived violence against a woman okay and versus a black man not? Women have been oppressed, not to the degree of blacks, but still oppression and equal rights have been fought by women.

This is one of the reasons why I don't agree with any sort of hate or bias crime legislation. First, the officer is the one who is determining if it is a hate crime. He's not supposed to determine any thing, that's the judge's job.

Why is one an acceptable hate crime and the other gets a pass?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
Sarah Palin was not effigied because she's a woman, she was effigied because of her stance on homosexual marriage.

The two most public instances of Obama being effigied, the persons doing it admitted it was because he's black.

Also, up to the early '70's thousands of black men were hung because they were black. It was a hobby for many white southerners.

Not shot.

Not stabbed.

Hung.

They did it so as to leave a message that the noose was the best way out of this world for blacks in America. It was genocide.

Palin's effigy was similar to my high school hanging a hornet because of our belief that the Forst Hill Hornets suck at football.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Crazy
 
mcgeedo's Avatar
 
deleted

Last edited by mcgeedo; 10-28-2008 at 06:48 AM..
mcgeedo is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i don't think we're dealing with rocket scientists in any of these situations.
given the speed and intensity of the streams of bullshit pseudo-information that characterizes the sorry state of affairs that is this campaign at this point, anyone deciding to undertake such an action has to be a fucking idiot.
so now we have a great little fake issue, the pseudo-equivalence of effigies hanging from a rope in the days immediate prior to halloween.
obviously, if you're conservative and have been alarmed by the nature and intensity of the populist rage being manipulated and stoked by the increasingly desperate mc-cain campaign machinery as it feels itself sliding into the ant-heap and you want to make this bothersome turn of events seem less bothersome without going so far as to deny anything is happening outright, the best move is to generate a false equivalence.
and since anyone who is awake at this point would know that something like this is possible--again--you'd have to be a fucking idiot to make a palin effigy.

do they mean the same thing? no.
are they the same thing? in a way. but if you want to play this game, you'd also have to find outrageous the hanging man in a deck of tarot cards.
i think the superficiality of the equivalence is obvious: you have two body-shaped objects hanging from rope. therefore these situations are the same.
but in the united states, the symbolic resonances are not at all the same, now are they? lynching is a very particular tradition in petit bourgeois resentment land, now isn't it?
is there really any need to go through this?
the op is shallow, the equivalence is shallow, it's all a function of the noxious character of the presidential election charade 2008 style.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 07:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
It doesn't matter what the "reason" you're posting is. If someone is offended, they are offended.

If someone was to put up Obama in the same position and say it's not because he's black, but because of his stance or position on a topic people would still say, "No, it's because of institutional memory of blacks being suppressed."
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 07:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i don't buy that argument, cyn.
you based the op on it and now you're restating it.
the whole of my post above was directed against that argument, so it hardly makes sense to simply repeat it as if that's a response.

so let me put it this way---the comparison that the op is based on is, i think, false, except at the most superficial possible level.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 07:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Catdaddy33's Avatar
 
Location: TN
The photoshopped picture of her in a bikini holding a gun is sexist, but if they photoshopped Obama in a speedo would that be considered sexist?
Catdaddy33 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 07:49 AM   #8 (permalink)
President Rick
 
mrklixx's Avatar
 
Location: location location
They should've had Palin being shot by a moose or eaten by a bear.
__________________
This post is content. If you don't like it then you are not content. Or perhaps just incontinent.

This is not a link - Do not click here

I hate animated avatars.
mrklixx is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:02 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
i don't buy that argument, cyn.
you based the op on it and now you're restating it.
the whole of my post above was directed against that argument, so it hardly makes sense to simply repeat it as if that's a response.

so let me put it this way---the comparison that the op is based on is, i think, false, except at the most superficial possible level.
my response was directed at poppinjay not your response.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:04 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
ah. mea culpa then.
{doffing my hat, bowing out stage center}
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:06 AM   #11 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
RB's response still stands, though. You're trying to re-state your op and add a theory that is based on a hypothetical situation.

What has happened, one effigy of Palin, and two of Obama. The one of Palin was done because of her stance on homosexual marriage. The two of Obama, because he's black.

Either find us the non-racist effigy of Obama, or don't assume what people will think.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:11 AM   #12 (permalink)
President Rick
 
mrklixx's Avatar
 
Location: location location
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catdaddy33 View Post
The photoshopped picture of her in a bikini holding a gun is sexist
Really? How? Because she actually has done swimsuit modeling and she likes to hunt.
__________________
This post is content. If you don't like it then you are not content. Or perhaps just incontinent.

This is not a link - Do not click here

I hate animated avatars.
mrklixx is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:21 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
abaya's Avatar
 
Location: Iceland
I think that whoever put up those effigies is lacking intelligence and also probably an asshole. Sexist, I don't know--he included McCain, too--does that make him ageist??? But I find the whole thing reprehensible, and the excuse that it's "just part of a Halloween display" to be weak sauce and not funny or condonable in any form, given the tenor of this election so far.

That doesn't change the fact that if it were Obama being hanged and Biden in the chimney, then it would be even MORE offensive, and would certainly classify as being a hate crime--hands down.
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.

--Khalil Gibran
abaya is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppinjay View Post
RB's response still stands, though. You're trying to re-state your op and add a theory that is based on a hypothetical situation.

What has happened, one effigy of Palin, and two of Obama. The one of Palin was done because of her stance on homosexual marriage. The two of Obama, because he's black.

Either find us the non-racist effigy of Obama, or don't assume what people will think.
And that's what the problem is. You CANNOT nor WOULD NOT find a non racist effigy of Obama, because ANY hanging effigy of Obama will be instantly classified as racist, all because he's black and the baggage that entails.
-----Added 28/10/2008 at 12 : 23 : 36-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya View Post
I think that whoever put up those effigies is lacking intelligence and also probably an asshole. Sexist, I don't know--he included McCain, too--does that make him ageist??? But I find the whole thing reprehensible, and the excuse that it's "just part of a Halloween display" to be weak sauce and not funny or condonable in any form, given the tenor of this election so far.

That doesn't change the fact that if it were Obama being hanged and Biden in the chimney, then it would be even MORE offensive, and would certainly classify as being a hate crime--hands down.

and that's where there is disconnect for me. WHY? why is it MORE offensive?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 10-28-2008 at 08:23 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
When you think of lynching in American history, do you think of a black man or a white woman?
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:26 AM   #16 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Catdaddy33's Avatar
 
Location: TN
If it was an actual photo of her from a swimsuit contest then it wouldn't be "it is what it is". I got that photo in an e-mail under the title "VPILF", so yeah I thought it was funny but also it was sexist. Am I all torn up about it? No I have a sense of humor...

I was just making an example.
Catdaddy33 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:34 AM   #17 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
Quote:
and that's where there is disconnect for me. WHY? why is it MORE offensive?
It may be as offensive, it's just not sexist-offensive. It's kind of odd, one is effigied because she opposes certain civil rights, another because he represents the success of certain civil rights.

Which kind of person has America had a history of rebelling against? Both. But always against oppressors.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:02 AM   #18 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Let me reframe the OP a bit better clarified.

I am not a support of hate/bias crime legislation. A crime is a crime.

Why is a hate crime worse than another crime?

If a person is murdered versus a person murdered because he's black?
If a person is assualted versus a person who is assualted because of sexual orientation, race, creed?

Why is a HATE/BIAS crime worse than a regular crime? What makes it worse? Why?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:04 AM   #19 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
I just watched the South Park episode dealing with that precise issue, and it said it far better than I could. Now I just need to find the youtube of it.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:07 AM   #20 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
you can't escape history: you can't escape that glorious tradition of lynching---one of the ironies is that many lynchings were carried out to "protect the honor" of white women...because you can't escape history, you cannot control the resonances that it generates.
that's one problem.

the other is that you are presupposing that the palin effigy is in fact a "hate crime"---on that, i am not sure at all.
i think it's stupid, like i said above, and i think the folk who put it up were and probably still are stupid for having done it.

is any effigy hung by the neck from a rope a hate crime?
why would that be true?
isn't what's at issue here really a question of resonances, and so a question of differential echoes with the past?
because unless i am mistaken, hanging a dummy is not in itself a crime--i mean, dummies aren't alive, right?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:09 AM   #21 (permalink)
More Than You Expect
 
Manic_Skafe's Avatar
 
Location: Queens
I wonder how this would play out if these were gallery pieces in an art show rather than public Halloween adornments. Freedom of speech is of course respected in either setting but I can't help but to wonder what exactly pushes people beyond causing controversy and being offended to the pressing charges.

I find all of these effigies, despite their connotations to be rather ineffectual.
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian
Manic_Skafe is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:16 AM   #22 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic_Skafe View Post
I wonder how this would play out if these were gallery pieces in an art show rather than public Halloween adornments. Freedom of speech is of course respected in either setting but I can't help but to wonder what exactly pushes people beyond causing controversy and being offended to the pressing charges.

I find all of these effigies, despite their connotations to be rather ineffectual.

Growing up and the whole Maplethorpe NEA controversy is something that I have a hard time digesting as well, for the same reasons.

and yes, rb, I agree with your first statement.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:33 AM   #23 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
A hate crime is a systematic crime based on a belief that others who are different should not exist. That leads to genocide, should the right person get into power.

I think it's good legislation. Certainly a lot smarter than 3 strikes you're out, or harsh drug penalties.

Just shooting somebody for fun or to take their stuff only oppresses the victim.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:42 AM   #24 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
So you're saying that if someone assaults you it's not as bad as if someone assaults you because you're a dumb zebra (example from your avatar), and should carry a stiffer penalty than if it was just a simple assault. Am I understanding that correctly?

Three strikes is addressing a different thing completely.

I'm sorry the genocide is a stretch in that vein of what someone else is thinking as you put it earlier.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
Registered User
 
I'm also of the mindset that a crime is a crime.. as far as hate crime vs regular crime.

I think the reason the Palin effigy isn't so offensive is because of the historical nature of the noose. It's really become a symbol much like the swastika. It was once a peaceful symbol then the Nazi's turned it into a hate mongering symbol.. the same could, in a way, be said for the noose.

take a noose to a predominately black area and see what happens. it won't be pretty.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:54 AM   #26 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Wait, so the thread is about why hate crimes exist as a different classification? That's simple.

Motive, whether you want to admit it or not, absolutely plays a part in the measure of wrongdoing. It's the difference between involuntary manslaughter and murder 1. Hate crimes, or crimes motivated by bigotry, do more damage to society because of their intent.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:04 AM   #27 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
Quote:
So you're saying that if someone assaults you it's not as bad as if someone assaults you because you're a dumb zebra (example from your avatar), and should carry a stiffer penalty than if it was just a simple assault. Am I understanding that correctly?
No, I'm saying it's worse if someone assaults you due to your skin color or other qualities about your life that were not chosen. Not exactly worse for you, but for people like you who feel they can't enjoy the same rights and freedoms because there are people in the area who would kill you because of your ethnicity.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:05 AM   #28 (permalink)
Registered User
 
will..

if I kill someone.. no matter the motive.. greed, jealousy, hatred, just because they were brown, just because they looked better than me, just because it was a hooker.. the person is still dead.. a murder still occured..

why would a hate crime make the murder worse? Bigotry?? Is bigotry in a racial sense any worse than a murder committed for fun? Is it any worse than a murder committed for some sexist reason?

you compare involuntary manslaughter to murder 1. dude..they aren't even close. Involuntary is an act out of negligence or blindness. Me walking up to you and shooting you because I just don't like you is not negligence or blindness.. it's murder.. so is murder for skin color.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:16 AM   #29 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr View Post
will..

if I kill someone.. no matter the motive.. greed, jealousy, hatred, just because they were brown, just because they looked better than me, just because it was a hooker.. the person is still dead.. a murder still occured..
By this train of logic, there should be no difference between involuntary manslaughter and murder 1. Should I get the death penalty because I left my store floor wet and someone slipped and died? Is that the same as me repeatedly stabbing someone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr View Post
you compare involuntary manslaughter to murder 1. dude..they aren't even close. Involuntary is an act out of negligence or blindness.
...in which the perpitrator had no intent. So, again, it boils down to intent.

Edit: I'll get even more specific. Let's say that I want to hurt someone and accidentally kill them. Should that be treated the same as intent to kill?

Last edited by Willravel; 10-28-2008 at 10:20 AM..
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:21 AM   #30 (permalink)
Registered User
 
will you're a smart guy think about it.

if you accidentally kill someone it was not your intent to do so, which is why the manslaughter charge exists. However, if you kill someone because they have blonde hair or they are black or just because you are a sick fucker.. then the intent was there to commit harm in the form of murder. That is a huge difference between the 2 laws. To associate a hate crime as a worse form of murder simply because of skin only leaves racism on the table.

So you can put out the slipping on floor/stabbing argument but that's obvious don't you think?? A murder can only be a murder if the intent was to murder. If the intent was to murder than no matter how the murder occurred or who the victim was, it was still an intent to murder and in fact a so called hate crime. If you kill a white man.. isn't there a case to say it is a hate crime even if you are white under this law? Does that make sense. Of course it doesn't. You murder someone and you are using some form of hatred.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:32 AM   #31 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Essentially I think the problem boils down to how much do you believe society benefits by making examples of racially/sexually/religiously-based crime versus how much you believe that highlighting differences only serves to reinforce them and encourages people to capitalize on them.

At this point, I share gucci's opinions on the matter. Murder (or rape or theft or whatever) shouldn't be based on the victim, but on the perpetrator's actions. I don't think it's a major deterrent to have an additional layer of punishment or liability for something that is a "hate crime" and, instead, only serves to make the issue racial rather than simply criminal.

I think, too, that the distinction between intent to commit a crime versus no intent and hate crimes is pretty meaningless in this case. We separate those because we feel as a society that the perpetrator can have varying levels of fault and, rightly, believe that someone who does not intend to harm should not be punished for his actions in the same way as someone who intended to harm.

Finally, if you intend to hurt someone, and kill them instead, it is murder, though it is not 1st degree murder. At common law, murder is a killing with malice aforethought which includes: intent to kill, intent to cause severe bodily injury, reckless disregard for the value of human life and a death which occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:57 AM   #32 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr View Post
will you're a smart guy think about it.

if you accidentally kill someone it was not your intent to do so, which is why the manslaughter charge exists. However, if you kill someone because they have blonde hair or they are black or just because you are a sick fucker.. then the intent was there to commit harm in the form of murder. That is a huge difference between the 2 laws. To associate a hate crime as a worse form of murder simply because of skin only leaves racism on the table.

So you can put out the slipping on floor/stabbing argument but that's obvious don't you think?? A murder can only be a murder if the intent was to murder. If the intent was to murder than no matter how the murder occurred or who the victim was, it was still an intent to murder and in fact a so called hate crime. If you kill a white man.. isn't there a case to say it is a hate crime even if you are white under this law? Does that make sense. Of course it doesn't. You murder someone and you are using some form of hatred.
This is what I'm talking about, though. You're willing to allow intent to determine degrees of punishment in one case but not another. Manslaughter and first degree murder both end up with the exact same result: someone is dead. Killing someone because he slept with your wife or because he has sexual relations with another man both end up with the exact same result, too.

In order to address the main issue, let me apply my logic to the manslaughter/murder comparison. Why do we have lesser charges for instances where there wasn't intent and the death was an accident? We want people to know that making a mistake isn't as bad as doing it intentionally. We make it clear that, despite the same outcome, we value intent and are willing to take it into account as a part of the justice system. Moreover, if you accidentally kill someone, you're probably not a risk to do it again. You're not a danger to yourself or those around you. If you actively seek to murder someone, then you may very well do it again.

Now let's transfer that over to the difference between a crime of passion and a hate crime against a homosexual (just as examples). A man walks in on his wife having sex with another man, goes into a rage and murders the man. Elsewhere, a man sees two men walking down the street holding hands and locking lips, follows them home, and beats their heads in with a tire iron. Which is more likely to happen again, and how does motive and intent factor into that? It seems simple. The man who was cheated on could possibly get a temporary insanity verdict because of the extenuating circumstances and extreme emotional distress. In addition, he's not likely to be in that situation again. The man who hates gay people may very well be exposed to more gay people because they theoretically take up something like 8% of the US population (though not evenly distributed). Moreover, the fact that his motive was "I hate them" means that he could also hate women, black people, etc. If hatred is a motive, then he's more likely to strike again.

I hope this has clarified my point.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:35 AM   #33 (permalink)
More Than You Expect
 
Manic_Skafe's Avatar
 
Location: Queens
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte View Post
Essentially I think the problem boils down to how much do you believe society benefits by making examples of racially/sexually/religiously-based crime versus how much you believe that highlighting differences only serves to reinforce them and encourages people to capitalize on them.
The law doesn't function with the purpose of eliminating the perceived differences between people. In fact, in these cases, action by the law would be entirely unnecessary if those same perceived differences weren't already well established.

Quote:
At this point, I share gucci's opinions on the matter. Murder (or rape or theft or whatever) shouldn't be based on the victim, but on the perpetrator's actions. I don't think it's a major deterrent to have an additional layer of punishment or liability for something that is a "hate crime" and, instead, only serves to make the issue racial rather than simply criminal.
If a crime is committed on the basis of race then the matter is already racial. Having laws in place to address these issues ensures that the law itself remains directly applicable to the real world.

Should we not have laws in place that protect children especially? How do the laws that protect the handicapped, the elderly, or women serve to exacerbate the issues between the aforementioned groups and those that would exploit them?
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian
Manic_Skafe is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 12:26 PM   #34 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Your point about recidivism (if you want to call it that) isn't a bad one, will. I'd buy that, but to me that speaks more to the failure of our justice system to address the causes of crime and rehabilitating criminals than it does to the need to have specifically designated hate crimes. And/or the problem that we have with letting violent criminals walk to make room for people who were hanging on to too much weed on their way to a party.

As to your point, manic, we have laws in place which specifically protect children, women, the elderly and the disabled because of the perception that they need more protection because they cannot protect themselves. With the possible exception of women (because that might step on some gender equality toes), I don't think anyone would argue much about the importance of the law in protecting those groups of people. Personally, I don't feel that race or sexual orientation or creed is in quite the same category as people who physically are less able to protect themselves from crimes, so that it is not a necessary classification.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 01:51 PM   #35 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte View Post
Your point about recidivism (if you want to call it that) isn't a bad one, will. I'd buy that, but to me that speaks more to the failure of our justice system to address the causes of crime and rehabilitating criminals than it does to the need to have specifically designated hate crimes.
I'd argue that's one of the biggest failures as a whole society, really. Rehabilitation isn't a part of our prison system.

Recidivism is at the core of intent in the legal system, by my layman's understanding. Accidents happen but are unlikely to be repeated. If an intent to murder is ongoing, the individual poses a potential long-term danger to society.
Willravel is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 03:26 PM   #36 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte View Post
Essentially I think the problem boils down to how much do you believe society benefits by making examples of racially/sexually/religiously-based crime versus how much you believe that highlighting differences only serves to reinforce them and encourages people to capitalize on them.
I think everyone is missing the point except you. It seems to me the whole hate crime debate should revolve around this question.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 03:37 PM   #37 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
This isn't downtown Tehran. Any effigy burned or hung shouldn't be allowed. It doesn't matter what side you are on or what your political views are. I would classify it the same as making a threat against their life. After a few hours of 'interrogation' by the secret service, they probably will take it down and not do anything like that again.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 03:41 PM   #38 (permalink)
Eat your vegetables
 
genuinegirly's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Arabidopsis-ville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
...that's where there is disconnect for me. WHY? why is it MORE offensive?
If Palin saw a picture of a manequin dressed as her being hung from someone's roof, she would probably laugh about it. You're talking about a woman with a sense of humor - someone who laughed when Saturday Night Live did a skit making fun of her. She would take it all in stride and would not consider the move sexist. Most of her supporters would likely do the same.

If Obama saw a manequin dressed as him hanging by the neck from someone's roof, he would not laugh. His supporters would not laugh. No one would laugh. Lynching is serious business.

If we had a period in America's history where women were frequently and publically lynched, for trivial crimes, we might not laugh any longer.
__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq

"violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy
genuinegirly is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:16 PM   #39 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
This is not hypocrisy, and this is not an issue.

Women have not been lynched for decades at a time as a form of political suppression.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:30 PM   #40 (permalink)
Banned
 
"Now let's transfer that over to the difference between a crime of passion and a hate crime against a homosexual (just as examples). A man walks in on his wife having sex with another man, goes into a rage and murders the man. Elsewhere, a man sees two men walking down the street holding hands and locking lips, follows them home, and beats their heads in with a tire iron. Which is more likely to happen again, and how does motive and intent factor into that? It seems simple. The man who was cheated on could possibly get a temporary insanity verdict because of the extenuating circumstances and extreme emotional distress. In addition, he's not likely to be in that situation again. The man who hates gay people may very well be exposed to more gay people because they theoretically take up something like 8% of the US population (though not evenly distributed). Moreover, the fact that his motive was "I hate them" means that he could also hate women, black people, etc. If hatred is a motive, then he's more likely to strike again.

I don't think the comparison is valid. You're comparing two different crimes which laws without a "hate" clause distinguished between anyway. Do you think the punishment would be different if your example of a hate crime were instead two heterosexuals walking down the street and someone follows them home and bashes their head in with a hammer? I don't see how labeling it a hate crime accomplishes anything legally. Matthew Shepard as a real world example, if he was straight and someone did that same thing to him how is one worse than the other, and why should one of those criminals be seen as any different than the other. There's a markedly different mentality between both of those examples and someone killing in a crime of passion.

Not to mention that in my opinion if you have proven you have it in you to kill another human being in a given circumstance, you have it in you to do it again in another not necessarily identical circumstance, and no innocent person should be subject to that possibility ever again.

Genuingirly, no way Palin is laughing about this. At the very least, those who are so sensitive to an effigy of Obama hanging outside someone's house, should at the very least it acknowledge that hanging an effigy of anyone, encourages those who would be inclined to do so. Fuck the rest of the worlds reaction if Obama was hung like this, what would these hollywood homeowners reaction be if their next door neighbor hung an effigy of Obama outside their own in reaction. Couldn't they see that it would have never happened if they hadn't done it in the first place. They'd have no business being offended, becuase they encouraged it.
matthew330 is offline  
 

Tags
crime, effigy, hate, noose, obama, palin, racist, sexist


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360