Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2008, 02:11 PM   #41 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
It's under "pursuit of happiness". Same thing as Prohibition and criminalization of drugs.

Why should I not be allowed to do to my body whatever I want?
Pursuit of happiness is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, not the Bill of Rights; nowhere in the United States or Japan is your so-called right to the pursuit of said happiness protected.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:17 PM   #42 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Only if I'm unconscious or incoherent and cannot refuse. If I am conscious and coherent and say that I don't want treatment, then he has to honor my right to refuse treatment, and is liable if he does not.
Yes, but obesity could be explained as a food addiction and as such your judgment would be impaired. Or would you not pump the stomach of someone addicted to painkillers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
This photo is an example of the person not choosing the apropriate clothing for their body weight, rather than their body weight in and of itself. There's a difference.
She's not technically breaking indecency laws, but I'm pretty sure there can be a consensus that what's seen in that picture is indecent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I would see ordering a competant adult to seek treatment for obesity (in themselves) as an abuse of governmental power. I don't see government's rightful role in society as protecting an adult from himself.
Except that you're not operating under a US framework. Government healthcare is a reality in Japan, and as such it's tax dollars being spent more efficiently. Asking someone to lose weight is simply a part of having that system. You may disagree with the system, but that's what they have and they show now signs of abandoning it.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:19 PM   #43 (permalink)
President Rick
 
mrklixx's Avatar
 
Location: location location
Ooooh, pictures!

__________________
This post is content. If you don't like it then you are not content. Or perhaps just incontinent.

This is not a link - Do not click here

I hate animated avatars.
mrklixx is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:23 PM   #44 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
Pursuit of happiness is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, not the Bill of Rights; nowhere in the United States or Japan is your so-called right to the pursuit of said happiness protected.
Don't know much about the Japanese Constitution but the United States Constitution has the 9th Amendment, that says:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9thAmendment
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti.../9th+Amendment
If the Founders had intended that the Constitution only protect the rights that were explicitly mentioned therein, including the Bill of Rights, they would not have passed and ratified the 9th Amendment.

Last edited by Terrell; 06-14-2008 at 02:59 PM..
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:25 PM   #45 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Sure, but it communicates more than a thousand words.
Oh my God! It's a fat woman! Kill it!

Do you believe that the government should be able to prevent you from ingesting a substance that can impair your judgment and have negative effects on your health, as well as causing risk to society at-large?

Hope you don't drink.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:25 PM   #46 (permalink)
Upright
 
macandcheese240's Avatar
 
Location: Portland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I would see ordering a competant adult to seek treatment for obesity (in themselves) as an abuse of governmental power. I don't see government's rightful role in society as protecting an adult from himself.
But if you don't see the governments role in protecting adults from themselves then there should be no protections against suicide, and laws preventing adults from abusing drugs should be removed to since those are choices that an adult makes themselves.
I think that regulating the body weight only goes halfway and that if you really wanted to make a change you would need laws against cheap fast food that is high in fats.
macandcheese240 is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:28 PM   #47 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by macandcheese240
But if you don't see the governments role in protecting adults from themselves then there should be no protections against suicide...
There shouldn't.

Quote:
...and laws preventing adults from abusing drugs should be removed to since those are choices that an adult makes themselves.
See, you're catching on

Quote:
I think that regulating the body weight only goes halfway and that if you really wanted to make a change you would need laws against cheap fast food that is high in fats.
That's not necessarily true, because you can get fat off cheeseburgers, but also off broccoli.

And fattening foods in moderation are not a threat, anymore then alcohol in moderation.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:31 PM   #48 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Heart disease and diabetes have a direct relationship with obesity and are leading causes of death in Japan, immediately behind Cerebro-vascular disease (strokes).
These aren't necessarily linked to waist size. I could find someone with a 28" waist with lifestyle-related risks of heart disease and diabetes.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:31 PM   #49 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
Do you believe that the government should be able to prevent you from ingesting a substance that can impair your judgment and have negative effects on your health, as well as causing risk to society at-large?

Hope you don't drink.
You can drink, but don't get drunk in public.
You can eat bacon or fried mayonnaise balls, but don't get too fat.

Where's the difference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
These aren't necessarily linked to waist size. I could find someone with a 28" waist with lifestyle-related risks of heart disease and diabetes.
There are plenty of causes for heart disease and diabetes. Obesity is a biggy. No pun intended. Obesity is the simplest way to determine if someone is more likely than average to be the victim of heart disease and diabetes.

Last edited by Willravel; 06-14-2008 at 02:33 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:44 PM   #50 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
That's not necessarily true, because you can get fat off cheeseburgers, but also off broccoli. And fattening foods in moderation are not a threat, anymore then alcohol in moderation.
You can't become fat off of broccoli--it has only trace amounts of fat and the amount of calories per serving is incredibly low. You literally could not consume enough broccoli to equal the caloric intake of eating a Triple Whopper. A Triple Whopper is 1250 calories and 84 grams of fat, while broccoli has 30 calories per 3.5oz--meaning you would have to eat 9.18445781 pounds of broccoli to equal a Triple Whopper in caloric intake. That many pounds of broccoli still only has 15.42 grams of fat, considerably less than a Triple Whopper.

Let's say we choose a smaller cheeseburger--the McDonalds cheeseburger. A McDonalds cheeseburger has 300 calories and 19 grams of fat. You would have to eat 2.19 pounds of broccoli to equal that cheeseburger, and it would have 12.95 grams of fat.

It's not at all a valid assumption--it's considerably easier to eat a McDonalds cheeseburger over 2.19 pounds of broccoli. No one's going to do it, so trying to suggest that someone could get fat off of broccoli is a really awful argument.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:46 PM   #51 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Snowy takes the high road. I would have challenged him to get fat off broccoli so he could experience it.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:47 PM   #52 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Yes, but obesity could be explained as a food addiction and as such your judgment would be impaired. Or would you not pump the stomach of someone addicted to painkillers?
Obesity may not be an addiction to food, it can be caused by many factors, and it's probably not as simple as an addiction to food, and the reasons/specifics probably vary from person to person.

Unless that person who is addicted to pain killers has is in the ER with an overdose pumping his stomach is probably going to do him more harm than good, so I don't really see any point in doing so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
She's not technically breaking indecency laws, but I'm pretty sure there can be a consensus that what's seen in that picture is indecent.
Except that the very same woman at the very same weight would not be indecent if she wore a different outfit. One more apropriate for a woman of her weight. The attire that she has chosen to wear is what makes her photo indecent. It would be like Roseanne if she decided to walk down the beach in a g-string thong.

Being overweight isn't what's indecent. But if you're a 200lb woman and you're trying to wear something that's apropriate for a 120lb woman that's what's inapropriate, the same thing is true for men, just add about 50-75lbs to those numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Except that you're not operating under a US framework. Government healthcare is a reality in Japan, and as such it's tax dollars being spent more efficiently. Asking someone to lose weight is simply a part of having that system. You may disagree with the system, but that's what they have and they show now signs of abandoning it.
I'm aware of that, though I do tend to think in US terms. I could support education about obesity, but this program is enforcement which also costs money, and I cannot support this, even in a govt heathcare system.
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:47 PM   #53 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
I'm all about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If being fat makes me happy, then damnit, I'm bulking up.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:48 PM   #54 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by macandcheese240
But if you don't see the governments role in protecting adults from themselves then there should be no protections against suicide, and laws preventing adults from abusing drugs should be removed to since those are choices that an adult makes themselves.
I think that regulating the body weight only goes halfway and that if you really wanted to make a change you would need laws against cheap fast food that is high in fats.
The underlined are basically my positions on those issues.
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:52 PM   #55 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
Such a legislation is really vanity driven. The sight of a fat person is just so offensively abhorrent that it must be legislated off the face of the planet!

If they were about healthy lifestyles, they'd ban smoking. There's tons of more smokers than there are fat folks in Japan.

But smokers aren't ugly like fat people are, so we must eliminate the fat folks.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:57 PM   #56 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
There are plenty of causes for heart disease and diabetes. Obesity is a biggy. No pun intended. Obesity is the simplest way to determine if someone is more likely than average to be the victim of heart disease and diabetes.
I already know this. We should include smokers, drinkers, breeders, the malnourished, the sedentary, amongst others, into such legislation.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:01 PM   #57 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
You forgot the homeless. Those bastards are always getting sick.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:02 PM   #58 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Obesity may not be an addiction to food, it can be caused by many factors, and it's probably not as simple as an addiction to food, and the reasons/specifics probably vary from person to person.
I could find a psychologist in 20 minutes to diagnose someone with a food addiction. How? MOST Americans are addicted to food. As a matter of fact, obesity is one of the main symptoms. And most overweight people have some form of depression, be it clinical or not. Combine those two and you've got a solid case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Unless that person who is addicted to pain killers has is in the ER with an overdose pumping his stomach is probably going to do him more harm than good, so I don't really see any point in doing so.
That was the picture I was painting, as it relates to spending public money for an individual's physical problem with a substance that's not illegal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Except that the very same woman at the very same weight would not be indecent if she wore a different outfit.

Tell that to the hydrant. How many airplane tickets do you suppose he'd have to buy before he could honestly say that he wasn't invading someone else's personal space. 3? There is an issue of how one presents one's self in public and how decent that is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I'm aware of that, though I do tend to think in US terms. I could support education about obesity, but this program is enforcement which also costs money, and I cannot support this, even in a govt heathcare system.
Actually, the enforcement MAKES money. Remember?
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:05 PM   #59 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
I admit, I'm addicted to food. It's a horrible addiction, like heroin. Whenever I go through food withdrawals, I feel like I'm dying.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:08 PM   #60 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Funny, but food addiction is a serious problem for a lot of people. I myself am still recovering and it's been years.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:33 PM   #61 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
I could find a psychologist in 20 minutes to diagnose someone with a food addiction. How? MOST Americans are addicted to food. As a matter of fact, obesity is one of the main symptoms. And most overweight people have some form of depression, be it clinical or not. Combine those two and you've got a solid case.
I find food addiction a little hard to swallow, considering all members of the animal kingdom require food consumption simply to survive. I don't necessarily think that everyone who is overweight has any form of depression either, not without some stats to back that up, and since there are likely many people who could use to get more exercise that don't see a doctor about their psychological state, I think it's going to be rather difficult to get accurate statistics to do so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
That was the picture I was painting, as it relates to spending public money for an individual's physical problem with a substance that's not illegal.
You said that the person had an addiction to pain killers. A person with an addiction may not necessarily have ODed on said painkillers. Weaning them off said painkillers would be more apropriate than pumping their stomach, that was my point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel

Tell that to the hydrant.
Hydrants don't have feelings, to consider they're inanimate objects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
How many airplane tickets do you suppose he'd have to buy before he could honestly say that he wasn't invading someone else's personal space. 3? There is an issue of how one presents one's self in public and how decent that is.
How big are the seats in First Class? Coach airplane seats aren't exactly comfortable even for a person that's not overweight, when I was 21 a window or aisle seat was rather uncomfortable on the side where another person sat (I mentioned my size at that age earlier in this thread) so I'm not going to blame fat people so quickly on this one as it seems that anyone other than a child or a petite woman is going to invade the space of the adult next to them in coach to some degree.

The guy in that picture isn't violating public decency either, now if he were walking around wearing only a thong you would have a point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Actually, the enforcement MAKES money. Remember?
Whenever law enforcement is in the business of making money, it's rife with the potential for abuse, if the law enforcement agency gains from the money made in any way shape or form, that is even worse.
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:40 PM   #62 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I find food addiction a little hard to swallow, considering all members of the animal kingdom require food consumption simply to survive. I don't necessarily think that everyone who is overweight has any form of depression either, not without some stats to back that up, and since there are likely many people who could use to get more exercise that don't see a doctor about their psychological state, I think it's going to be rather difficult to get accurate statistics to do so.
You may want to google "food addiction".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
You said that the person had an addiction to pain killers. A person with an addiction may not necessarily have ODed on said painkillers. Weaning them off said painkillers would be more apropriate than pumping their stomach, that was my point.
The hypothetical situation I put fourth included the necessity of pumping a stomach, which suggests ODing. It all fits if you look at it. Public funding (ambulance) going to help someone addicted to something that's not illegal and that one might call a personal problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Hydrants don't have feelings, to consider they're inanimate objects.
Hardy har har.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
How big are the seats in First Class? Coach airplane seats aren't exactly comfortable even for a person that's not overweight, when I was 21 a window or aisle seat was rather uncomfortable on the side where another person sat (I mentioned my size at that age earlier in this thread) so I'm not going to blame fat people so quickly on this one as it seems that anyone other than a child or a petite woman is going to invade the space of the adult next to them in coach to some degree.
The gentleman on the hydrant would likely stretch from the window seat to the aisle seat. That's 3 seats. Would you ned 3 seats?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
The guy in that picture isn't violating public decency either, now if he were walking around wearing only a thong you would have a point.
As I already said, it's not about public decency laws, it's about decency.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Whenever law enforcement is in the business of making money, it's rife with the potential for abuse, if the law enforcement agency gains from the money made in any way shape or form, that is even worse.
It's better because they have a more efficient system, but again, that's for another thread.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:49 PM   #63 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauk
While I am for people having assistance controlling their weight, I can see the slippery slope argument.

however, the grey becomes black and white rather quickly if you start asking fat people if they WANT to be fat.

not going to find a lot of support there.

however, if you try to compare it to something like smoking? yeah, people want to smoke, despite it driving up health costs, so theres no way you could convince people that businesses jumping in and throwing nico-gum/patches and whatever else is required to stop people from smoking would gain even remotely the same support as this.


so Yeah, I'm totally for this.

I think ths slippery slope argument is invalid in this particular case
I wouldn't want Shauk to think this was ignored, so I'll go back and actually reply with what I was thinking when I read it.

The problem with this argument is that the very existence of obesity refutes it. Sure, nobody wants to be fat, but I would posit that someone who is fat isn't bothered enough by their condition to change it, or else they wouldn't be that way to begin with. Losing weight takes effort, but it's really quite simple, conceptually. Therefore anyone who is overweight is someone who is almost certainly someone who for whatever reason isn't willing to put in the effort; it seems absurd to me to think that it could be an issue of education.

I'm really not sure what food addiction has to do with anything. If someone has a serious psychological problem, then they need to be treated or seek treatment for that. On the other hand, if we take as granted that food addiction is a real issue for some people, then I should say that it's not particularly harmful from a societal standpoint. A food addict (or cigarette addict, for that matter) isn't someone who's likely to turn to crime or prostitution to feed their addiction, and it's possible for those who suffer from the addiction to be useful contributing members of society. It's a drain on the healthcare system, but then so is skin cancer and I don't see anyone suggesting government mandated sunblock.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:55 PM   #64 (permalink)
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Fucking excellent. I was 280 pounds a year ago and now I'm down to 205 and I simply forgot how excruciating life is when you're considerably overweight. I agree with Japan's decision 100%.
Lasereth is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 03:56 PM   #65 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
The hypothetical situation I put fourth included the necessity of pumping a stomach, which suggests ODing. It all fits if you look at it. Public funding (ambulance) going to help someone addicted to something that's not illegal and that one might call a personal problem.
If that person requests it. If that person refuses said help however my point would stand, their right to refuse said help would still stand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
The gentleman on the hydrant would likely stretch from the window seat to the aisle seat. That's 3 seats. Would you ned 3 seats?
No I would not, I only need one, but I would still find another person that close to me in a coach seat, uncomfortably close given how tightly people are packed in airplanes, that was my point. Even when I was 21.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
As I already said, it's not about public decency laws, it's about decency.
And I say he doesn't violate decency, simply by being in public. He could wear clothing with a looser fit, that's the only criticism I could potentially level at him on appearence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
It's better because they have a more efficient system, but again, that's for another thread.
Then quit bringing it up.
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:06 PM   #66 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
If that person requests it. If that person refuses said help however my point would stand, their right to refuse said help would still stand.
You'd refuse to do a possibly life saving procedure on someone who was clearly effected by addiction? Most doctors would disagree with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
No I would not, I only need one, but I would still find another person that close to me in a coach seat, uncomfortably close given how tightly people are packed in airplanes, that was my point. Even when I was 21.
I'm about 6' to 6'1" and about 175 pounds. Who would you rather have in the seat next to you, me or captain hydrant?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
And I say he doesn't violate decency, simply by being in public. He could wear clothing with a looser fit, that's the only criticism I could potentially level at him on [appearance].
I'm concerned this will devolve into aesthetic relativism, which is a very theoretical discussion. Maybe there will be an "Agree to disagree" on this one.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:16 PM   #67 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
You'd refuse to do a possibly life saving procedure on someone who was clearly effected by addiction? Most doctors would disagree with you. .
If that person says, "Keep your hands off of me" I would respect his wishes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
I'm about 6' to 6'1" and about 175 pounds. Who would you rather have in the seat next to you, me or captain hydrant?
I'd rather not have either of you in the seat next to me on the airplane. I'd rather have a pretty and intellegent woman there whose about 5'4" and 110lbs with blonde hair and green eyes. However, my personal peference doesn't make his (fire hydrant guy) existence indecent, nor give me the right to regulate his body weight, or his wasitline.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
I'm concerned this will devolve into aesthetic relativism, which is a very theoretical discussion. Maybe there will be an "Agree to disagree" on this one.
Probably, 'cause I can go all night.

Last edited by Terrell; 06-14-2008 at 04:18 PM..
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:21 PM   #68 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
If that person says, "Keep your hands off of me" I would respect his wishes.
Then we're talking about a right to suicide. Which I believe is a different conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I'd rather not have either of you in the seat next to me on the airplane. I'd rather have a pretty and intellegent woman there whose about 5'4" and 110lbs with blonde hair and green eyes. However, my personal peference doesn't make his (fire hydrant guy) existence indecent, nor give me the right to regulate his body weight, or his wasitline.
What if your taxes were paying for his obesity?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
Probably, 'cause I can go all night.
It's going to devolve into what you find indecent and what I find indecent, which is simply differing opinions. As it's a matter of opinion, I'm backing off.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:27 PM   #69 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Reason: Soon 45% of the population of Japan will be over 65 years of age.
There is no narcissism behind this law, only health concern.

Even if that wasn't the case, I wouldn't mind the law wherever I was. ..
Not to say I wouldn't object to it philanthropically; I don't know what I think in that regard.
UKking is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:27 PM   #70 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Then we're talking about a right to suicide. Which I believe is a different conversation.
I think that if an adult wishes to commit suicide then he should have the right to do so. I'm okay with assisted suicide too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
What if your taxes were paying for his obesity?
I don't much like the idea of my taxes paying for it, but I dislike the idea of regulating someone's waistline much, much, more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
It's going to devolve into what you find indecent and what I find indecent, which is simply differing opinions. As it's a matter of opinion, I'm backing off.
Acknowledged.
Terrell is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:33 PM   #71 (permalink)
I have eaten the slaw
 
inBOIL's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrell
I would see ordering a competant adult to seek treatment for obesity (in themselves) as an abuse of governmental power. I don't see government's rightful role in society as protecting an adult from himself.
+1.
Also, why punish the employer for their employee being fat? The government can protect society by forcing the fat person to pay more into the healthcare system, and possibly reducing their access to health care. There is no compelling cause for restricting someone's right to make lifestyle choices when the public can be adeuately protected by other means.
__________________
And you believe Bush and the liberals and divorced parents and gays and blacks and the Christian right and fossil fuels and Xbox are all to blame, meanwhile you yourselves create an ad where your kid hits you in the head with a baseball and you don't understand the message that the problem is you.
inBOIL is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:59 PM   #72 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
Yes! Yes! We shall make them conform!!
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 06:06 PM   #73 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Not only is this a good idea, I strongly support additional legislation to outlaw the flu, pneumonia, and cancer. If those go through, bad knees, bad backs, and arthritis will be the next to go.
MSD is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 06:28 PM   #74 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Funny, but food addiction is a serious problem for a lot of people. I myself am still recovering and it's been years.
I'm an obese person. I am also not a food addict. I have a sedentary lifestyle that is my choice.

By posting those pictures, you are bringing in a completely different argument: that people should not be allowed to get fat because it is unpleasant for you to see. In which case I think we should ban all tattoos, piercings, tank- and halter-tops on women who have less-than a B-cup and makeup in colors that are not natural skin-tones.

As for taxes, if right-to-suicide is a different argument, then the subsidized/universal health-care aspect is as well. I don't want my taxes paying for "that guy" in the picture, but I also don't want them paying for anyone's health care.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 06:56 PM   #75 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
What if your taxes were paying for his obesity?
My healthcare costs already are, as is medicare and medicaid recipients. I pay for unisured, smokers, cancer patients, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and hosts of other debilitating diseases and disabilities. There are even social programs that I pay for like ACCESS-A-RIDE, Food Stamps, WIC, Welfare....

so I pay for obesity in there too... over lapped with those things.

So one day it's because you are fat... next it's because you're type 2 diabetic because you ate too much sugars and are fat, but not obese....

Please give me a fucking break.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 07:34 PM   #76 (permalink)
I read your emails.
 
canuckguy's Avatar
 
Location: earth
sorry just in from the patio checking the scoreboards and I refreshed this thread....couple wobbly pops in me...

anyway, i remember watching a TLC show about the worlds fattest man who lost all the weight, then gained it back only to lose it all again. He said a drug addict does not have to do drugs three times a day, an alcoholic does not have to take a drink 3 times a day but he still has to put a fork in his mouth 3 times a day. not that it is an excuse.

I never thought of it before in those terms and i can understand how hard it is for someone who is addicted to food. not to trivialize other addictions, there all hard to overcome.
canuckguy is offline  
Old 06-16-2008, 12:59 PM   #77 (permalink)
Shade
 
Nisses's Avatar
 
Location: Belgium
I've been waiting for something like this to happen.

One step closer to conformity for everybody.

The scary part is, I see that there are already several people won over for this point of view. All because they consider it good&healthy&easy on the eyes for everybody.
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated.
Nisses is offline  
Old 06-16-2008, 01:40 PM   #78 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Health is not subjective, Nisses.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-16-2008, 01:45 PM   #79 (permalink)
Shade
 
Nisses's Avatar
 
Location: Belgium
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, Will.

Conformity and growing direct interference by state & law does not make for a mental & social well-being, quite the opposite.
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated.
Nisses is offline  
Old 06-16-2008, 01:55 PM   #80 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisses
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, Will.
Being that this thread is about fat, that would be physical health.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisses
Conformity and growing direct interference by state & law does not make for a mental & social well-being, quite the opposite.
Being fat is not being a nonconformist.

Losing fat means better physical health, thus it does make for "well-being".
Willravel is offline  
 

Tags
fat, japan, legislates


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360