Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2008, 09:38 AM   #81 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
I don't think .5 would complain much about being uncomfortable.

A third (3.0) sure does.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:45 AM   #82 (permalink)
Let's put a smile on that face
 
blahblah454's Avatar
 
Location: On the road...
I currently drive a minivan to haul shit around, and to take the wife her kid on a road trip to Ontario last summer. It gets a stunning 23 (or so) MPG, it is so brutal. I try to drive that POS as little as possible. But the train is my normal means of transport.

Oh yea, the van is a ford windstar, 98.
blahblah454 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:46 AM   #83 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya
Eh, 2 or 3 buses in the ENTIRE COUNTRY run on hydrogen from that very fancy hydrogen stop by Nói Sírius... it's really just for show. The rest of the country drives around in the usual gas-guzzling manner, with their Hummers and god knows what else. Tell me why this tiny nation needs a STRETCH LIMO HUMMER to cruise down Laugavegur?!
We've got hydrogen busses in San Jose, but they're fucking expensive as hell. It's something like $50 a mile. I mentioned the idea of simply using solar panels to create electricity that would extract hydrogen and oxygen from water instead of purchasing hydrogen from some really expensive vendors, but I was basically ignored. So instead of an initial cost of solar power and a tiny cost for tap water, we are paying $50 a mile on a program that will likely be cited in the future as a "failure of hydrogen in public transportation". Fucking morons.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:49 AM   #84 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
You traded in the Colorado? Never saw that one coming.
Yeah, I got a great deal on the trade, too. In the words of WillRavel, "...it was almost rape."

If there is one thing I am... it's practical. I'm a frugal fucker, Martian. I don't need a pickup truck right now in life. I probably won't need one ever again. Why pay the money on gas and insurance? The Vibe is very utilitarian albeit station wagonesque. I get the feeling a lot of people could and should do what I've done with their vehicles.

...

I believe family vehicle choices make the gas crisis what it is... it isn't the cost of a gallon of unleaded, it's the fuel economy of the vehicles we choose to drive. I made a choice and now a gallon of gas goes a lot farther for me. Others should follow suit and quit bitching about their unnecessary Suburbans and H3s.
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."

Last edited by Plan9; 04-14-2008 at 09:57 AM..
Plan9 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:19 AM   #85 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
We've got hydrogen busses in San Jose, but they're fucking expensive as hell. It's something like $50 a mile. I mentioned the idea of simply using solar panels to create electricity that would extract hydrogen and oxygen from water instead of purchasing hydrogen from some really expensive vendors, but I was basically ignored. So instead of an initial cost of solar power and a tiny cost for tap water, we are paying $50 a mile on a program that will likely be cited in the future as a "failure of hydrogen in public transportation". Fucking morons.
A modern day Cassandra.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:34 AM   #86 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
A modern day Cassandra.
Daughter of Priam, king of Troy?
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:38 AM   #87 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Daughter of Priam, king of Troy?
Thats the one.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:41 AM   #88 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaya
Eh, 2 or 3 buses in the ENTIRE COUNTRY run on hydrogen from that very fancy hydrogen stop by Nói Sírius... it's really just for show. The rest of the country drives around in the usual gas-guzzling manner, with their Hummers and god knows what else. Tell me why this tiny nation needs a STRETCH LIMO HUMMER to cruise down Laugavegur?!
mmm. there are 2 (two) marked electric car parking spots on the main street and i missed a golden photo opportunity with one parking space taken up by a supercharged range rover and the other a brand new mercedes coupe. i used to drive a vw golf but now i have the volvo 850 and i still feel dwarfed my a lot of the icelandic cars. what they do is jack up the suvs and put on 40+" tyres on them so they can handle glaciers and the like as well as very bad snowfalls. then they drive them through the tiny rvk city centre streets...
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 10:44 AM   #89 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
It looks like I'm getting an Audi when I get a new job (reflashing the ECM for high performance has the added bonus of bumping fuel economy to ~38mpg if you cruise at 70mph,) but I'm still holding on to my idea of getting an H1 and getting waste oil from any of the few hundred restaurants in town that has a deep fryer. Taking a guzzling, polluting vehicle out of the equation and turning it into one that runs on free garbage and has a low carbon footprint (and can off-road and crush small cars and children) sounds like my idea of a good time. Plus, if I ever run out of gas I would have a choice between regular diesel and stopping at the grocery store for a few bottles of veggie oil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
what they do is jack up the suvs and put on 40+" tyres on them so they can handle glaciers and the like as well as very bad snowfalls. then they drive them through the tiny rvk city centre streets...
What a waste of expensive tires
MSD is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 04:41 PM   #90 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Didn't you buy a Camry?

I don't think having nuclear rods in my car would be safe. Either you're talking about electric cars (which I support) or you're not taking transportation into consideration.

Oh comon, you knew i was kidding. The point I was making is that you could get way better than 43 mpg (what the average Camry Hybrid gets) and not have to spend much at all.
You really know how to hurt a guy. You think a Camry is cheap? It's a less expensicv version of the Lexus ES350 which I would have purchased had it been a hybrid. A GEO is cheap, a Camry is a good, solid vehicle and loaded is very nice. What do you drive? Oh, and you'd better check your facts because the average Camry hybrid won't come close to 43 mpg in ordinary driving. It's rated for 34, 35. You must be confused with a Prius that actually get's more than 43 mpg.

As far as nuclear rods in a car, come on - now you're being silly and insulting if you think that's what I thought I meant. Please don't put words in my mouth. My wife does that enough for me.

And the way you talked about Porche struts - how could I tell you were kidding? You basically jumped all over me. By the way, my wife drives a Boxter and the ride isn't that great but it corners like a dream.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 04:54 PM   #91 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo
You really know how to hurt a guy. You think a Camry is cheap? It's a less expensicv version of the Lexus ES350 which I would have purchased had it been a hybrid. A GEO is cheap, a Camry is a good, solid vehicle and loaded is very nice. What do you drive? Oh, and you'd better check your facts because the average Camry hybrid won't come close to 43 mpg in ordinary driving. It's rated for 34, 35. You must be confused with a Prius that actually get's more than 43 mpg.
The 43 thing was keyboard dyslexia. I get it from time to tmie. And I was just razzing you about the Camry. It's a respectable vehicle, of course. Toyota makes very dependable vehicles, some of the most dependable on the road. Still, 34 mpg for a hybrid doesn't seem like much of a deal. The non-hybrid Civic gets that. And the Civic hybrid is rated at 45 mpg highway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo
As far as nuclear rods in a car, come on - now you're being silly and insulting if you think that's what I thought I meant. Please don't put words in my mouth. My wife does that enough for me.
Of course I was also kidding, but the point I was trying to make is that you weren't offering an alternative. You mentioned Europe using nuclear energy, but that only translates to transportation if it's stored electricity, like an electric car.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 04:23 AM   #92 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
The 43 thing was keyboard dyslexia. I get it from time to tmie. And I was just razzing you about the Camry. It's a respectable vehicle, of course. Toyota makes very dependable vehicles, some of the most dependable on the road. Still, 34 mpg for a hybrid doesn't seem like much of a deal. The non-hybrid Civic gets that. And the Civic hybrid is rated at 45 mpg highway.

Of course I was also kidding, but the point I was trying to make is that you weren't offering an alternative. You mentioned Europe using nuclear energy, but that only translates to transportation if it's stored electricity, like an electric car.
I feel much better about you.

I've driven a Civic and a Civic is no Camry. Small car vs. much larger car. We need to compare apples to apples. That's why the Geo comparison hit me wrong. And 34 mpg is pretty darn good when the non-hybrid 3.3 L engine of the ES 330 only gets 23 mpg. I've basically cut the relative value of a gallon of gas by 50%. That will save me $800 a year if I drive 15K miles and the price of gas is $3.50/gallon.

This is a relational thing as I'm not going for the absolute best milage but am going for a balance of comfort, style and economy. With leather, auto climate control, electric seats, basically all the major comforts of a Lexus, adds up to a lot. Also, all these non-hybrids produce tons of carbon. Yes, I do have a little tree-hugger in me to say the least. It has been said that the air from a hybrid Camry or Prius tailpipe is cleaner that that of the air you breathe in most downtown city areas.

In terms of electricity, I thought you could easily see I was talking about electric cars. Geez! We're talking about powering cars and you're a pretty smart guy so I didn't think hand holding was needed.

We can power everything we need with clean electricity powered from nuclear plants. I've learned a great deal about that over the past few years since I have a nephew that graduated from GA Tech a few years ago with a degree in nuclear engineering. In fact, Europe (France with some other participating countries - and the USA backed out but now wants in) has a new nuclear technology using fission. You'll see that hitting its stride by 2020 or sooner.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:01 AM   #93 (permalink)
Banned
 
<h3>Tough "Love":</h3>

Quote:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/282adfd4-0...0779fd2ac.html

Russian oil production has peaked and may never return to current levels, one of the country’s top energy executives has warned, fuelling concerns that the world’s biggest oil producers cannot keep up with rampant Asian demand.

The warning comes as crude oil prices are trading near their record high of $112 a barrel, stoking inflation in many countries.

US crude oil West Texas Intermediate surged in London trading to $113.06 a barrel, above last week’s record of $112.21 a barrel. It later traded 125 cents higher at $113.01 a barrel.


Leonid Fedun, the 52-year-old vice-president of Lukoil, Russia’s largest independent oil company, told the Financial Times he believed last year’s Russian oil production of about 10m barrels a day was the highest he would see “in his lifetime”. Russia is the world’s second biggest oil producer.

Mr Fedun compared Russia with the North Sea and Mexico, where oil production is declining dramatically, saying that in the oil-rich region of western Siberia, the mainstay of Russian output, “the period of intense oil production [growth] is over”.....
The least I ever paid for a gallon of gasoline was 19.9 cents, in Galveston, TX, in 1972.....and the most was yesterday, $3.359.....

Time is growing short for the US to either order it's military to "pay back" the investment made in it by a sudden furious attempt to confiscate every other country's nuclear weapons as a prelude to controlling commodities, or.... drastic cuts in US military spending are needed to free up funding for a mass transit buildout and alternative energy technology. We in the US use four times the energy per person than an equal share by population would allocate us, so we're going to feel what is coming, four times as intensely as a lot of the rest of the world.

Last edited by host; 04-15-2008 at 11:07 AM..
host is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:16 AM   #94 (permalink)
Pickles
 
ObieX's Avatar
 
Location: Shirt and Pants (NJ)
I've gone from putting $5 in my tank to $10 every two weeks. I'm just glad i work only a couple minutes from my house.
__________________
We Must Dissent.
ObieX is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:07 PM   #95 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo
We can power everything we need with clean electricity powered from nuclear plants. I've learned a great deal about that over the past few years since I have a nephew that graduated from GA Tech a few years ago with a degree in nuclear engineering. In fact, Europe (France with some other participating countries - and the USA backed out but now wants in) has a new nuclear technology using fission. You'll see that hitting its stride by 2020 or sooner.
In order to replace oil with nuclear, we'd need to build something like 10,000 nuclear reactors (Breeder reactors). At a cost of $3-5 billion per reactor, that would cost at least $30,000,000,000,000 or $30 trillion. And that doesn't even compensate for rising energy requirements that will continue to rise as 10,000 nuclear reactors were built, which would take about 25 years.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:38 PM   #96 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
In order to replace oil with nuclear, we'd need to build something like 10,000 nuclear reactors (Breeder reactors). At a cost of $3-5 billion per reactor, that would cost at least $30,000,000,000,000 or $30 trillion. And that doesn't even compensate for rising energy requirements that will continue to rise as 10,000 nuclear reactors were built, which would take about 25 years.
Interesting, and yet people think we can replace our energy needs with solar and wind power?

BTW that link is dead, perhaps you can site the source you got it from since it wasn't your original source?

Edit: Hehe googling it did find it sited in some 'interesting' hits. I liked this ones solutions....

Key changes needed
· Urgent need to reduce consumption of fossil fuels, especially
oil, through:
o lifestyle change - eg greater use of public transport,
using smaller cars, car-sharing, holidaying closer to home
o energy efficiency technologies - eg more fuel-efficient
vehicles, better home insulation
o renewable energy technologies - wind, solar, biomass,
water (hydro, wave, tidal), geothermal
o government policies and measures to support these
changes, eg eco-taxes, carbon trading, regulation, R&D
support
o strengthening of the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change, especially binding targets on the biggest
emitters (the largest being the USA) based on
"Contraction and Convergence" principles
(Ustwo note, its now China, expect the left to ignore)
· Urgent need to stem the global flow of weapons, especially
small arms in poorer countries whose environmental resources
are under stress and conflict may occur
o need strengthening of UN programme of action on
eradicating illegal small arms
o need countries to agree a UN arms trade treaty
o USA, which has highest levels of small arms in private
hands and is world's largest arms exporter, is resisting
these efforts

· Urgent need to support post-conflict reconstruction and
conflict prevention activities
o Only receives a small amount of funding
· In 2005, the world spent over $1.1 trillion
($1,100,000,000,000) on its military forces - continuing a
rising trend. Diverting at least some of this spending could
help achieve the aims above, reducing the likelihood of
conflict.
· Reducing dependence on military forces as a way of dealing
with international problems will also help reduce their carbon
emissions!

· The power of corporations, especially military corporations,
with their ability to lobby for favourable policies needs to be
curbed.


http://www.frosinone.org/scuola/diri...%20Warming.pdf
Ah hippies...
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 04-15-2008 at 12:47 PM..
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:01 PM   #97 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Ah hippies...
Stupid hippies, what with the wanting to reduce the amount of weapons the US exports, international dependence on military force, and air pollution. Good thing the neoconservative agenda has been so successful, otherwise it might become glaringly obvious that the "hippies" just might have a point.
filtherton is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:40 PM   #98 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
Stupid hippies, what with the wanting to reduce the amount of weapons the US exports, international dependence on military force, and air pollution. Good thing the neoconservative agenda has been so successful, otherwise it might become glaringly obvious that the "hippies" just might have a point.
Being naive is quite funny.

Let me translate into hippese..

Man the UN man can like stop all this by like stopping the corporate nazis in the US man, and like they will stop this man but like with peace instead of guns man.

The us man has too many rednecks with guns man and they are trying to keep their murder man and then they export their murder, its all the USA's fault man, there would be no violence without uncle Sam.

Man like, man we need to use bombs less man, and like do things peaceful like man and man it will save lots of trees man, and like stop global warming, oh god I think I'm going to throw up.

Such thing are kinda cute in young adults, but it grows tiresome.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:48 PM   #99 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Interesting, and yet people think we can replace our energy needs with solar and wind power?
No. Reduction is key. Finding more efficient ways to burn what fuel we have left and find ways to not spend the fuel seems a better strategy than a continued trend of using MORE energy.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 02:25 PM   #100 (permalink)
Une petite chou
 
noodle's Avatar
 
Location: With All Your Base
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin
I traded my Chevrolet Colorado (21 MPG) for a Pontiac Vibe (34 MPG).

Due to my daily commute to college, gas prices were a huge slice of my monthly budget pie. Not anymore. I like my dorky little station wagon plenty.
I love mine, too. And I think it's Red or Fresnelly that has one, too. My apologies to the one that doesn't.

I drive a ton for work. Last week it was over 450 miles. I get reimbursed 50.5 cents per mile. Minus the 16 miles each way to the office, regardless of if I even go there during the day... stupid IRS... but it's not enough to really offset the damage done on my car. I need oil changes every six weeks.

So to answer the question and quit threadjacking...

Gas prices are killing me.
__________________
Here's how life works: you either get to ask for an apology or you get to shoot people. Not both. House

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plan9
Just realize that you're armed with smart but heavily outnumbered.
The question isn’t who is going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me. Ayn Rand
noodle is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:12 PM   #101 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
For solar/alternative/etc., what we need to do is find a way that individuals can produce the power that they require. I know it would cost me about $35,000 to become energy independent at today's prices. That means, no power plants, no gas companies, just some unknown companies to supply me with geo-thermal heat, solar panels, and electric car parts (for Chevy S-10). 98% of my trips could be done with an electric car (under 10 miles). And I live close to the stores and other things I do. I know I could survive with no gas for my car if they rationed it or something.

Gas prices won't effect me, but they will effect the prices businesses charge, and the salary minimum wage earners will demand.

But, I did ride my bike to work everyday last week (5 days, 3 miles each way). My car gets about 24 mpg in the city, so I only saved about $5. I haven't refilled my gas tank since March 14th though.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:56 PM   #102 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
You bring up some good points, but this is an overstatement. You haven't convinced me to give up on what is an emerging technology.

You leave out some important details. Switchgrass has low fertilization and herbicide requirements, for starters, and it's a hardy perennial with a complex and well-established root system, to boot. Also, some have found ways of getting 4 units of energy output for every 1 unit of input.
The link you put up there is just a chap saying that ethanol can be produced from switchgrass on a +ve return, high yield basis, the Cornell and Berkeley study I linked to via PhysOrg reports:

Quote:
switch grass requires 45 percent more fossil energy than the fuel produced
If you've got some more info on switch grass that puts some flesh on the bones of the statement through npr, then I'll be out setting up switch grass cooperatives immediately.

Ahh: I went and nosed around for some more info... it seems switchgrass has the potential in some people's eyes, but is a red herring in others'...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
For years, it was ridiculously expensive to extract oil from the tar sands in Alberta. Almost not worth it. But they've developed the technology to make it more viable and rewarding (though the environmental factors are questionable). Canada is now poised to be the next Saudi Arabia. Hoser Canadia?

I believe the same could be done with biofuels. I wouldn't give up so easily.
The thing that has changed is the oil price, not the cost of the technology.

Above $35 dollars per barrel shale and sand oils start to become economical to extract, above $50 per barrel and they become commercially attractive to extract. The only problem is oil > $50 per barrel. I think, from memory, that economists reckon that world growth will slow by 1% for every $25 in the oil price over $20? something like that.

One good thing for Canada though, it becomes the nation with the second largest oil reserves while oil is over $50 per barrel (tar sands and oil shales are counted towards viable reserves then) - Venezuela is number 1.

Gracias Gringos! Viva Chavez!
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 04:43 PM   #103 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by tisonlyi
If you've got some more info on switch grass that puts some flesh on the bones of the statement through npr, then I'll be out setting up switch grass cooperatives immediately.

Ahh: I went and nosed around for some more info... it seems switchgrass has the potential in some people's eyes, but is a red herring in others'...
My intent was to point out that this is still in development. I hope we don't give up on this due to initial barriers. We've not come this far without overcoming such barriers. There's a reason why we don't rely so much on whale oil anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tisonlyi
The thing that has changed is the oil price, not the cost of the technology.
I'm not referring to the cost of the technology; I'm referring to the application of it. If it weren't for the enhanced oil recovery method known as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), the amount of oil extractable from the oil sands would be greatly limited. Surface bitumen as it is has a recovery rate of 20%, whereas those applying the SAGD method get as high as 60%. That's a huge difference. For decades in the tar sands, they've been experimenting with various methods to extract deeper oil. I'm guessing there are still developments to be made. Oil price is the biggest factor for development, but the impact of the technology should not be underestimated.

We should be working toward a way to make switchgrass and other materials (e.g. waste vegetable oil, and other inedible plant materials) a viable source of biofuel. It's entirely possible. I say don't give up.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:14 PM   #104 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Being naive is quite funny.

Let me translate into hippese..

Man the UN man can like stop all this by like stopping the corporate nazis in the US man, and like they will stop this man but like with peace instead of guns man.

The us man has too many rednecks with guns man and they are trying to keep their murder man and then they export their murder, its all the USA's fault man, there would be no violence without uncle Sam.

Man like, man we need to use bombs less man, and like do things peaceful like man and man it will save lots of trees man, and like stop global warming, oh god I think I'm going to throw up.

Such thing are kinda cute in young adults, but it grows tiresome.
I think you've been fighting the hippies for too long, you're starting to see them when they aren't there.

One doesn't need to be a hippie to think that the U.S. is currently blocking efforts to limit CO2 emissions internationally. One doesn't need to be a hippie to resent the amount of weapons that U.S. companies sell to other countries. One doesn't need to be a hippie to believe that the world would be better off if certain entities were less inclined to use military force.
filtherton is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:28 PM   #105 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
I think you've been fighting the hippies for too long, you're starting to see them when they aren't there.

One doesn't need to be a hippie to think that the U.S. is currently blocking efforts to limit CO2 emissions internationally. One doesn't need to be a hippie to resent the amount of weapons that U.S. companies sell to other countries. One doesn't need to be a hippie to believe that the world would be better off if certain entities were less inclined to use military force.
didn't we go over what hippies were and where to find them?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:35 PM   #106 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Maybe you should mention this to ustwo, he keeps having flashbacks from his anti-anti-war protesting days.
filtherton is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:48 PM   #107 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
My intent was to point out that this is still in development. I hope we don't give up on this due to initial barriers. We've not come this far without overcoming such barriers. There's a reason why we don't rely so much on whale oil anymore.
The con I'm referring to is in the solving of the problems we have with regard to cheap oil, cheap fuel and cheap energy for the _now_. The recent investments in corn, sugar cane, etc, etc on both sides of the pond... for the most part are gov. sponsored con jobs imo. There is probably some valid research going on, but my cynical mind sees Mr Bush delivering (well, regurgitating) a speech mentioning switch grass that has "Go Back To Bed" written all over it...

Solutions to cheap oil problems for the now do not currently include biofuels, because they currently need cheap oil to produce... :s

(Oh, and don't mention whale oil... the last thing we need is the Japanese using more of that kind of biofuel... )

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I'm not referring to the cost of the technology; I'm referring to the application of it. If it weren't for the enhanced oil recovery method known as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), the amount of oil extractable from the oil sands would be greatly limited. Surface bitumen as it is has a recovery rate of 20%, whereas those applying the SAGD method get as high as 60%. That's a huge difference. For decades in the tar sands, they've been experimenting with various methods to extract deeper oil. I'm guessing there are still developments to be made. Oil price is the biggest factor for development, but the impact of the technology should not be underestimated.
AFAIK, that method is the only reason those heavy oil shales, sands and tars are economically viable at ~$35 rather ~$100... IIRC, even lovely light crudes become commercially unattractive to produce at oil prices of around $15 to the barrel (if i remember the harrowing cries from opec in the mid-late 90's correctly) and uneconomical sub $10 per barrel... Barring miracles, i don't think there's an awful lot further to go after the improvements that were made in the 80's for those very heavy oil shales and sands...

Also, the oil companies will surely remember the burn they 'suffered' from very heavy crudes when oil dropped from ~$70 per barrel in the early 80's to $20 pre barrel and less in the 90's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
We should be working toward a way to make switchgrass and other materials (e.g. waste vegetable oil, and other inedible plant materials) a viable source of biofuel. It's entirely possible. I say don't give up.
And animal materials... that turkey/chicken gut blender seemed like a 'nice' option from what i read about a while back... but there'd be a knock on effect in animal feeds... :s

No giving up in research for biofuels, but we should be applying technologies NOW to reduce demands on cheap oil asap...

Things like this:
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q9vkkFNkE44&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q9vkkFNkE44&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Together with emergency roll-outs for electric vehicles, liquification of coal for trucks, etc, etc...

The fallout from permanently higher, post-peak cheap oil prices could be pretty scary... we need to delay that as far into the future as possible, and the clock is running down fast.

From wikipedia's peak oil entry:

Quote:
Peak oil production has not been reached in the following nations (these numbers are estimates and subject to revision):[137]

* Iraq: 2018
* Kuwait: 2013
* Saudi Arabia: 2014
That's pretty much the West's cheap oil supplies. Prices will be heading towards Jupiter from then on.

We won't be heading back to the stone age like some wacky predictions, err, predict, but oil prices are going to keep on climbing for quite some time. We need serious, nigh on draconian mitigation measures in favour of electricity and some sort of great leap sidewards away from the internal combustion engine - and fast... or else we won't be able to afford synthetic rubber tyres for our electric cars.

Anyway, this getting a touch off-topic i think... sorry!
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 05:56 PM   #108 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, we've got coal for centuries.
filtherton is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:06 PM   #109 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
Well, yeah... but it isn't a cheap oil alternative... in the same mold as shales, tars and sands @~$35+ to be economical and ~$50+ to be profitable. Also, i'm not sure if you can get the same variety of chemicals out of coal as you can from oil. Diesel and a jetfuel additive, yes. all the other goodies we use up in our fertilizers, plastics, paints, oils, lubricants, waxes, dyes, etc, etc, etc... I'm not so sure.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:07 PM   #110 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by tisonlyi
We won't be heading back to the stone age like some wacky predictions, err, predict, but oil prices are going to keep on climbing for quite some time. We need serious, nigh on draconian mitigation measures in favour of electricity and some sort of great leap sidewards away from the internal combustion engine - and fast... or else we won't be able to afford synthetic rubber tyres for our electric car.
Nice post.

You know we put a man on the moon. We had an X-project and a private organization put a man craft into space. How come we can't have a E-project where the winner gets a billion dollars to develop a viable option to the I.C.E.? Second thought- make that a billion euros, really who's going to take you serious if you're offering dollars?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:16 PM   #111 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
I think you've been fighting the hippies for too long, you're starting to see them when they aren't there.

One doesn't need to be a hippie to think that the U.S. is currently blocking efforts to limit CO2 emissions internationally. One doesn't need to be a hippie to resent the amount of weapons that U.S. companies sell to other countries. One doesn't need to be a hippie to believe that the world would be better off if certain entities were less inclined to use military force.
I think you are too sensitive, now take a bath and get a hair cut.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:27 PM   #112 (permalink)
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I think you are too sensitive, now take a bath and get a hair cut.
Like, woah man, where's he supposed to find hot water, a bath AND a barber at this time of night on the commune?

Heavy trip, man.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:36 PM   #113 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I think you are too sensitive, now take a bath and get a hair cut.
I think your powdered wig is on too tight.


* * * * *

Thanks for post #107, tisonlyi. I think with some exceptions, we are generally on the same page.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:37 PM   #114 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Filtherton, hippie is a compliment. A big one.
Willravel is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:48 PM   #115 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Filtherton, hippie is a compliment. A big one.


It was funny when you said it in the other thread too.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:49 PM   #116 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tisonlyi
Well, yeah... but it isn't a cheap oil alternative... in the same mold as shales, tars and sands @~$35+ to be economical and ~$50+ to be profitable. Also, i'm not sure if you can get the same variety of chemicals out of coal as you can from oil. Diesel and a jetfuel additive, yes. all the other goodies we use up in our fertilizers, plastics, paints, oils, lubricants, waxes, dyes, etc, etc, etc... I'm not so sure.
Well yes, but as far as making electricity, which can be used to power transportation systems, we'll be covered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I think you are too sensitive, now take a bath and get a hair cut.
I only cut my hair and bathe for potential employers, so hook me up with a salary and free dental work and I'm yours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Filtherton, hippie is a compliment. A big one.
Well, any insult from ustwo should generally be considered a compliment. I mean, the guy's so busy, it's an honor for me that he'd take time out of his busy day ironing his white dress shirts, polishing his "I'm a professional white man from the 60's" glasses and shaking his fists menacingly at children to notice li'l old me.

Last edited by filtherton; 04-15-2008 at 07:58 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
filtherton is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:58 PM   #117 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Filtherton, hippie is a compliment. A big one.
Please, both hippies and Babbitts are guilty of burning way too much fossil fuel.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:00 PM   #118 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
cmon guys, let's keep it from devolving...
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 09:39 AM   #119 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
In order to replace oil with nuclear, we'd need to build something like 10,000 nuclear reactors (Breeder reactors). At a cost of $3-5 billion per reactor, that would cost at least $30,000,000,000,000 or $30 trillion. And that doesn't even compensate for rising energy requirements that will continue to rise as 10,000 nuclear reactors were built, which would take about 25 years.
I don't know if I buy those numbers. Not based on the numbers my nuclear engineer nephew was sharing with me. And I think he knows his stuff. The alternative is to keep building coal-fired plants. And you have to begin sometime, someplace. Plus, the fission thing he's talking about procides substantially more power from one plant.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 09:57 AM   #120 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
The alternative is to reduce use considerably, something that will be necessary one way or another eventually. What we should be doing is getting jobs closer to home and biking there. What we should be doing is putting refrigerators and water heaters underground and powering them, along with the rest of the house, with 100% solar energy. The government should be giving massive tax breaks to solar companies, so that they can pass on the savings to consumers.
Willravel is offline  
 

Tags
affecting, gas, prices


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360