Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   The Anonymous war on Scientology hits the streets (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/131429-anonymous-war-scientology-hits-streets.html)

MSD 02-09-2008 08:07 PM

The Anonymous war on Scientology hits the streets
 
This is here to for people who didn't see the video in Found on the Net, or want more info. If you don't already know what I'm talking about from the title, read this article for the back story. http://www.partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology

In short, "Anonymous," as users of the imageboard 4chan call themselves (because almost all users simply use the name "Anonymous" when they post rather than identifying themselves,) has declared war on the Church of Scientology. Anonymous has grown to include people from all over the Internet for this cause because large numbers of people want to spread the word that the Church of Scientology is a dangerous cult and criminal organization that extorts money from people, lies to them to draw them in, destroys families, works to destroy the lives of those who oppose them, and are responsible for a number of deaths of Church members.

It began with the leak of the video of Tom Cruise praising Scientology with the Mission Impossible music playing in the background. When the CoS claimed copyright violations and forced most sites to remove the video through legal threats, 4chan users, under the guise of ebaum's world users, launched a denial of service attack against the Church and began a campaign of harassment.

On Feb. 10, anonymous protests will be taking place across the world at CoS buildings. They have already begun in Australia
http://www.digg.com/world_news/Hundr...otest_Feb_10th
(please Digg this story to support the cause)

At least one fake news story, believed to have been posted by the CoS' Office of Special Affairs, has surfaced claiming to show protesters in Sydney being arrested for violence. The pictures are from a demonstration in Houston, Texas several years ago. This is just scratching the surface of what the CoS will do to discredit its opponents.

Opponents of Scientology used to be declared "fair game," which is pretty much what it sounds like. These days, they're labeled "Suppressive Persons" http://www.xenu.net/fairgame-e.html

If you can go to a demonstration, wear a mask, don't carry anything that can identify you or where you're from, park far away and walk or take public transportation to the protest, throw away any bus or train tickets that can help someone find out where you came from, and don't take the mask off or return to your car or anywhere that can help identify you until you are absolutely positive you have not been followed. The CoS is known to follow and harass "suppressive persons," tell lies to get them fired from their jobs, distribute flyers and letters in neighborhoods accusing them of being rapists, child molesters, etc. Don't risk it with these nutcases.

Here are a few pictures of the start of the protest. Scroll down to the post with two pics.
http://forums.somethingawful.com/sho...readid=2767497
See the guy in the first picture on the right edge next to the white sign? He's a CoS plant in the crowd radioing information back to the building about the protesters. This is why you have to be anonymous.

The timeline (includes current information):
http://www.pipian.com/stuffforchat/anon_v_scieno.html

Pictures of the Sydney protest:
http://forums.enturbulation.org/viewtopic.php?t=1588
edit: Sydney now has around 250 people demonstrating.
double edit: news coverage http://www.news.com.au/technology/st...014239,00.html
edit3: if you're willing to wade through the idiocy of 4chan memes, this page is updated faster than anything else
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com...y_-_200_Attend
edit4: more pictures, but the site has been goonrushed by SA
http://www.ruhe.com.au/scientologyprotest/

Information on Scientology:
Operation Clambake: www.xenu.net
Disturbing Scientology Facts: http://www.yayboo.com/Religion/Most_...entology_Facts

Randerolf 02-09-2008 08:53 PM

/B (Anon) is a pit of retards. Their levels of depravity are gobsmacking. We'll see what happens when an "Internet hate machine" clashes with a solid organization that has deep pockets, lawyers, and tax exempt status. Will cries of religious persecution fall on deaf ears or will the church try to take care of this situation quietly?

djtestudo 02-09-2008 09:12 PM

I think we should sic the Westboro Baptist Church after them. And I'm only half-joking.

Who else has the money, lawyers, and level of insanity needed to fight the Super Adventure Club?

MSD 02-09-2008 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randerolf
/B (Anon) is a pit of retards. Their levels of depravity are gobsmacking. We'll see what happens when an "Internet hate machine" clashes with a solid organization that has deep pockets, lawyers, and tax exempt status. Will cries of religious persecution fall on deaf ears or will the church try to take care of this situation quietly?

/b/ as you and I know it is practically gone. Once the rest of the Internet caught up with the times and realized where a lot of 'net humor like lolcats started out, it couldn't hold off the onslaught of new people. I doubt that any of this came from the old-school /b/tards, it's more likely a small group trying to spark activism and catching the right wave. So far, dozens of people on Something Awful (known for being anti-4chan) are joining in, and the only thing remaining of the old Anonymous is the name and the motto. Anonymity is the only way to fight Scientology for exactly the reasons you're giving.

If I'm wrong, at least the crimes of the CoS will be more well known. If not, maybe this will catch on and be a lasting thing. I've never been one for "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," but when you're going up against something so big and so bad, I can set aside differences. It's a bit personal for me, I was labeled a SP for a school newspaper article about the CoS and the Lisa McPherson case, so I have a personal grudge against them. I hope to be at the March 15 demonstration in NYC.

sprocket 02-09-2008 09:19 PM

One of Anon's sayings is:

"Anon never forgets"

I give them a couple months before they forget, and resume fulltime postings of lolcat pictures.

Not that scientology doesnt deserve any shit thrown their way, mind you.

snowy 02-09-2008 09:21 PM

Here's a link to a better article in Newsweek: http://www.newsweek.com/id/109410

Willravel 02-09-2008 09:28 PM

If you go to a demonstration in SF DO NOT WEAR A MASK. It is illegal here and you can get arrested (I've seen it first hand). Wear a hat and large sunglasses, hood, etc.

Do not leave anything at the protest. Wear thick clothing. Bring gas masks. DO NOT TALK TO ANYONE FACE TO FACE. If you see someone trying to look at your face, look away. Look down. You cannot let them get pictures of your face.

Most importantly: check your local laws concerning legal protest. SF is not the only place it's illegal to have a mask.

MSD 02-09-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
If you go to a demonstration in SF DO NOT WEAR A MASK. It is illegal here and you can get arrested (I've seen it first hand). Wear a hat and large sunglasses, hood, etc.

Do not leave anything at the protest. Wear thick clothing. Bring gas masks. DO NOT TALK TO ANYONE FACE TO FACE. If you see someone trying to look at your face, look away. Look down. You cannot let them get pictures of your face.

Most importantly: check your local laws concerning legal protest. SF is not the only place it's illegal to have a mask.

On the other hand, if you're in NYC, masks have been OKed by police, and the police do not have a favorable opinion of the CoS and its members.

Willravel 02-09-2008 09:41 PM

If you are in an area where it's illegal to wear a mask, wear a paper gas mask. Those aren't illegal anywhere.

Ustwo 02-09-2008 09:53 PM

http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/5370/xenumx8.jpg

Willravel 02-09-2008 09:54 PM

I wish I could wear an alien mask like that....

MSD 02-09-2008 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Looks like someone in Auckland had the same idea
http://img14.imagevenue.com/view.php..._122_947lo.jpg

Martian 02-09-2008 10:05 PM

On a slightly tangential note, I remember hearing once that Scientology arose out of a bet between L Ron Hubbard and Robert A Heinlein. The deal was that they'd both found a church and the individual who was able to attract the most followers would win. As a result Hubbard wrote Dianetics and Heinlein wrote Stranger in a Strange Land, but when the time came to found a church based on his work, Heinlein refused to go through with it (being the moral paragon of our tale). Hubbard, with visions of Scrooge McDuck-esque piles of cash dancing through his head, had no such compunctions.

I have a feeling that it's one of those stories that isn't true but should be. Especially since I'll probably be labeled SP for relating it.

(expecting the burly scientologist men to knock on my door any minute now...)

MSD 02-09-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martian
On a slightly tangential note, I remember hearing once that Scientology arose out of a bet between L Ron Hubbard and Robert A Heinlein. The deal was that they'd both found a church and the individual who was able to attract the most followers would win. As a result Hubbard wrote Dianetics and Heinlein wrote Stranger in a Strange Land, but when the time came to found a church based on his work, Heinlein refused to go through with it (being the moral paragon of our tale). Hubbard, with visions of Scrooge McDuck-esque piles of cash dancing through his head, had no such compunctions.

I have a feeling that it's one of those stories that isn't true but should be. Especially since I'll probably be labeled SP for relating it.

(expecting the burly scientologist men to knock on my door any minute now...)

I've heard the same, but I think it's based on the comment that "Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." I've also heard a similar story that he made a bet about starting a religion with Aleister Crowley. I don't think it's true.

Willravel 02-09-2008 10:36 PM

Reminder: this is a PEACEFUL PROTEST. When in doubt, ask "What Would Gandhi Do?" Stop agitators, as they may be CoS plants.

RenaissanceII 02-09-2008 11:17 PM

The CoS does many things that I find distasteful (the auditing, suing or threatening to sue naysayers, Lisa MacPherson, the cult of celebrity), and yet...

I have a sister and brother-in-law who are CoS members...

Ustwo 02-09-2008 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martian
On a slightly tangential note, I remember hearing once that Scientology arose out of a bet between L Ron Hubbard and Robert A Heinlein. The deal was that they'd both found a church and the individual who was able to attract the most followers would win. As a result Hubbard wrote Dianetics and Heinlein wrote Stranger in a Strange Land, but when the time came to found a church based on his work, Heinlein refused to go through with it (being the moral paragon of our tale). Hubbard, with visions of Scrooge McDuck-esque piles of cash dancing through his head, had no such compunctions.

I have a feeling that it's one of those stories that isn't true but should be. Especially since I'll probably be labeled SP for relating it.

(expecting the burly scientologist men to knock on my door any minute now...)

After reading stranger in a strange land I thought just how well his fake religion would have worked. I think it would be bigger than Scientology if someone worked on it.

Martian 02-10-2008 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
After reading stranger in a strange land I thought just how well his fake religion would have worked. I think it would be bigger than Scientology if someone worked on it.

Of course it would. It combined the reality-altering powers scientology supposedly grants with free love and massive orgies. The Church of All Worlds is the Church of Scientology with sex appeal.

Willravel 02-10-2008 12:16 AM

Orgies? Damn... atheism needs more of that.

Martian 02-10-2008 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Orgies? Damn... atheism needs more of that.

I don't think there's any religion or belief system out there that couldn't be improved by more sex.

Ace_O_Spades 02-10-2008 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martian
I don't think there's any religion or belief system out there that couldn't be improved by more sex.

Quoted for massive truth.

Anyway, that story seems entirely plausible. Heinlein wrote some strange stuff (Time Enough For Love), but he wasn't nearly as cracked as Hubbard.

MSD 02-10-2008 06:52 AM

Video from London plus pictures. There were over 300 people at the peak. Unfortunately, they're not following Australia's example and have been shouting 4chan memes and chanting "Xenu" all day instead of doing something productive.
http://www.qik.com/anonlondon

TotalMILF 02-10-2008 08:03 AM

Ah yes, I remember seeing a flier posted outside of my statistics class on Friday, trying to recruit people to attend their demonstration against a local CoS.

Esoteric 02-10-2008 08:26 AM

I wonder if there will be any protests in Downtown Clearwater. It's pretty much been overrun by Scientologists. Used to be such a nice area, now all you see is robots walking around.

snowy 02-10-2008 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esoteric
I wonder if there will be any protests in Downtown Clearwater. It's pretty much been overrun by Scientologists. Used to be such a nice area, now all you see is robots walking around.

http://forums.enturbulation.org/viewtopic.php?t=685

Esoteric 02-10-2008 09:33 AM

Haha awesome. I won't be participating but I wish them the best of luck. These Scientology fucks have ruined Clearwater.

MSD 02-10-2008 07:04 PM

Today was a huge success with the exception of Chicago and Vienna, which were canceled because of permit issues. Two Scientologists were arrested at separate protests for attempting to unmask demonstrators, and the only injuries were two people in Cleveland, Ohio who were hurt when a city bus driving next to the sidewalk had an engine cover latch fail. When the cover sprung up, the bus was driving at about 20 mph, and when it hits them one suffered cuts to the stomach and the other had a broken wrist.

Passersby seemed receptive to protesters messages and most were glad to take flyers and learn more. It's a very encouraging success, and I look forward to participating the March 15 event.

Infinite_Loser 02-10-2008 07:09 PM

Anon = Morons

Their 'War on Scientology' has gotten to the point of absurd.

Willravel 02-10-2008 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Anon = Morons

Their 'War on Scientology' has gotten to the point of absurd.

Because...? You want to back this up with anything?

Martian 02-10-2008 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MSD
Today was a huge success with the exception of Chicago and Vienna, which were canceled because of permit issues. Two Scientologists were arrested at separate protests for attempting to unmask demonstrators, and the only injuries were two people in Cleveland, Ohio who were hurt when a city bus driving next to the sidewalk had an engine cover latch fail. When the cover sprung up, the bus was driving at about 20 mph, and when it hits them one suffered cuts to the stomach and the other had a broken wrist.

Man, you go to a protest that has a distinct possibility of getting violent, and then get clipped in a freak accident with a bus. That's random.

Menoman 02-10-2008 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Anon = Morons

Their 'War on Scientology' has gotten to the point of absurd.


I was gone for awhile, glad to see you still love throwing around info without backing though.

If you have a better way please feel free to let us know.

Anon is winning, and has been for awhile now. The one thing scifags hate the most is attention toward their cult attributes, which they are getting plenty of at this point.

Next protest will be the ides of march, future steps include mass email/snailmail/calls/letters to state representatives about the shady ass lawsuits and ways they got their tax exemption.

At this point, it's a matter of sticking to the guns, Anon can't lose, How do you beat a regenerative invisible monster?

"Internet Hate Machine" You can call it that if you want. That shit is so old. Most people I hope have enough sense to see it as "young people standing up for what they believe in"

Charlatan 02-11-2008 01:23 AM

Here is an account of the Toronto protests from a Toronto blog:

http://torontoist.com/2008/02/scientology_pro.php

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_4.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torontoist
If you passed the Church of Scientology’s Toronto chapter at Yonge & St. Mary on Sunday, you may have momentarily entertained a dark fantasy that Tom Cruise would emerge from the masked masses amid gales of manic laughter, igniting the dissenting throng with bolts of righteous lightning.

Sadly, no such fun. Rumour has it that Mr. Cruise was under lockdown during Anonymous’ global day of action against L. Ron Hubbard’s brainchild. As the Toronto campaign got underway, Sunday commuters voiced solidarity with the placard-waving Vs and Vaders through their horns. “Honk for Xenu” read one such sign; “Honk if you think Scientology is silly” read another. On the other side of the street, police wedged themselves between Scientology’s Toronto headquarters and a crowd that was only getting louder.

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_7.jpg

The war Anonymous wants is over ten years old, fought on a digital battleground. Many of the demonstrators gathered on Yonge Street were rallied through Facebook or YouTube, new recruits in a struggle that, in this city, can be traced at least as far back as a guy named Gregg Hagglund (pictured above) and “The Great Internet Wars” of the late nineties.

“I started picketing because Scientology attacked me for criticizing them on the Internet,” he said. Referring to a Usenet newsgroup on the subject, he says, “Some of it was wild, but a lot of the posters were very, very educated in their information about Scientology. So I made the comment that if what they were saying was true, Scientology should be investigated.” As exchanges and e-mail bombings escalated, things got ugly. Before long, Hagglund and his compatriots were embroiled in a struggle which, at its heart, was about freedom of speech, information, and challenging a “culture of surveillance.”

That was something like ten years ago. And while Anonymous is a new movement, it is fighting the same war.

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_6.jpg

Watching the swelling crowd across the street, Hagglund reminisced. “We never had this many. The most we ever had was fifty people from all over North America,” he said. “This is incredible.”

Surrounded by watchful shutters, Rev. Yvette Shank, president of Scientology’s Toronto chapter, dismissed Hagglund’s and Anonymous’ allegations of harassment, suppression of dissent, and even stalking. “Bushwash,” she responded. “That is such bushwash. I have never, ever had that happen. If we did, we would be very busy. We wouldn’t be doing anything else.” "Anything else" probably refers to Scientology’s outreach campaigns, many of which are youth-targeted. “We have a drug-education campaign where we get kids from the age of 6 on up to pledge to be drug-free.”

"Anything else" also refers to Scientology’s infamous stress tests. “All that does is help us locate where the person is having the most difficulty,” Shank said, “and then you can start working on improving that.” When asked to elaborate further on the methods involved, Shank declined. (An invitation to “show us how it works” through participation, but that’s about it, and no mention of Thetans.)

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_9.jpg

Such details of the Scientology mythos have remained tightly-guarded for years, available only to the Church’s ladder-climbing members. With the advent of the Internet, the conflict between Anonymous and Scientology has become an information war, one that’s rapidly approaching critical mass.

“We’ve always said that the Internet is Scientology’s Vietnam,” Hagglund continued. “Now, years later, so many people between the ages of 18 and 25 are on YouTube or Facebook. When I stopped picketing, YouTube was just starting. Facebook didn’t exist. And they want to attack that?” Hagglund chuckled a little, remarking, “It’ll be like throwing a hand grenade into an African Bees’ nest.”

Since Anonymous’ first video appeared on YouTube, Scientology has been vigilant in defending itself and its interests, profiling Anonymous as an “Internet hate machine.” In its reporting, FOX News echoed the accusation. “I think FOX News did a good job at exposing the intent of these guys, honestly,” Shank asserted. “The hate crimes of Anonymous should be condemned. This is a country that is free, and I don’t want people that believe and follow Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto as their Bible.” Pressed for her source, she said, “It comes from Anonymous. That’s the source. You have to look at...” as an aide whispered in her ear: “It’s on YouTube.”

“Yes,” she confirmed. “On YouTube.”
http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...protest_10.jpg

Outside, a masked demonstrator offered his answer. “Anonymous likes to think of itself as a school of all literature,” he said. “So, likewise, we also educate ourselves through 1984 and Brave New World, which I’m sure they’d love their followers to read. Or not.”

If this is an information war, Anonymous’ outrage concerns a lack of transparency on the Scientology side. “We just like to raise attention on certain matters. If the church wanted to debunk some of [Anonymous’] claims, then they could make more of their information available and not be so secretive. If people knew all that they were getting into, they might have a different opinion.”

When asked for his name, the masked demonstrator simply answered, “My name is Legion.”

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_5.jpg

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_1.jpg

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_8.jpg

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_2.jpg

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...protest_11.jpg

http://torontoist.com/attachments/to...yprotest_3.jpg

All photos by Miles Storey


MSD 02-11-2008 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Anon = Morons

Their 'War on Scientology' has gotten to the point of absurd.

What is absurd about protesting a cult that is responsible for at least 23 deaths worldwide, the destruction of thousands of families, and the bankruptcy and abuse of its members? An FBI investigation found the church responsible for "criminal campaigns of villification, burglaries and thefts ... against private and public individuals and organizations," the most notable of which was "Operation Freakout," a church program to have critic Paulette Cooper committed to a mental institution and ended up destroying her life through fraud, threats, and accusations of terrorism.

Church members engaged in a campaign (Operation Snow White) to steal and destroy records about the church from government agencies, and enough evidence of this was gathered to convict church members of that criminal activity.

What is so absurd about fighting against this organization?

Infinite_Loser 02-11-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Menoman
I was gone for awhile, glad to see you still love throwing around info without backing though.

You'll be hard-pressed to find any post which I don't provide evidence for but, really, that's neither here nor there.

Anywho, no one outside of Anon and their supporters care about these "raids" (aka, the majority of people). If Anon wants to 'change the world', they can start by protesting something meaningful-- Like run away government. But anything to protest the idea of a religion, right?

Ustwo 02-11-2008 01:07 PM

I love those masks from Toronto.

Well not the transformers one...

Ace_O_Spades 02-11-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
I love those masks from Toronto.

Well not the transformers one...

They were using Guy Fawkes masks everywhere. Apparently there was such a huge run on them in some cities that they were literally sold out everywhere you went to look.

I think they look neat as well... Although I doubt a single Anon has the vigor, verve, and voracity of V

Willravel 02-11-2008 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
You'll be hard-pressed to find any post which I don't provide evidence for but, really, that's neither here nor there.

Careful, I'm stubborn and have a free afternoon to search your posts.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Anywho, no one outside of Anon and their supporters care about these "raids" (aka, the majority of people). If Anon wants to 'change the world', they can start by protesting something meaningful-- Like run away government. But anything to protest the idea of a religion, right?

You're using the same strawman as the CoS. The protesting is against actions of the church, not their faith. Anon is trying to prevent more people from being victimized. It's democracy in action.

Esoteric 02-11-2008 01:21 PM

Apparently the Clearwater protest went pretty well. Around 250+ people showed up, though I wasn't one of them.

Willravel 02-11-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
I think they look neat as well... Although I doubt a single Anon has the vigor, verve, and voracity of V

But on this most auspicious of ante meridiem, permit me then, in lieu of the more commonplace soubriquet, to suggest the character of this dramatis persona. Announcement! In appearance a humble actor, cast additionally as both ass and antagonist by the attainment of fate. This aspect, no mere appearance of airs, is an adumbration of the “anonymous” now abandoned, alone. However, this adventuresome appearance of a bygone abuse stands animated, and has affirmed to annihilate these amoral and acrimonious assholes.

The only adjudication is avengement; a vendetta, for the account for the atrocities administered on the abandoned and abused.

You may call us Anonymous.

Ace_O_Spades 02-11-2008 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
But on this most auspicious of ante meridiem, permit me then, in lieu of the more commonplace soubriquet, to suggest the character of this dramatis persona. Announcement! In appearance a humble actor, cast additionally as both ass and antagonist by the attainment of fate. This aspect, no mere appearance of airs, is an adumbration of the “anonymous” now abandoned, alone. However, this adventuresome appearance of a bygone abuse stands animated, and has affirmed to annihilate these amoral and acrimonious assholes.

The only adjudication is avengement; a vendetta, for the account for the atrocities administered on the abandoned and abused.

You may call us Anonymous.

you win the prize :)

Derwood 02-11-2008 01:35 PM

i think CoS is a bunch of douchebags, but i'm not going to risk my or my family's well being in order to participate in a protest.

sorry, i'm selfish that way

Martian 02-11-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derwood
i think CoS is a bunch of douchebags, but i'm not going to risk my or my family's well being in order to participate in a protest.

sorry, i'm selfish that way

Dude, that's what the masks are for. You do know that Operating Thetans aren't really psychic, right?

I'm not particularly afraid of the Church of Scientology. Maybe I should be, but it seems to me that that's sort of what they're going for. The whole intimidation campaign deal is about making people too afraid to speak out against them, so that they can basically do whatever they want. Unfortunately for them, there's always going to be people like me who are too stupid to be scared.

I didn't participate in the protests, but that was because by the time I'd heard about them it was too late. I hate to use the cliche, but dude, if you let these guys tell you what you can or can't do then the terrorists win.

Oh yeah, I totally just called CoS terrorists.

(Still waiting on the scientologist muscle to come break my kneecaps)

Esoteric 02-11-2008 01:47 PM

Their HQ is in Downtown Clearwater where they're constructing their 70 million dollar building. Seriously, all you see walking around are robots wearing khakis and dress shirts. You have to see them every time you want to go to the beach.

Infinite_Loser 02-11-2008 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Careful, I'm stubborn and have a free afternoon to search your posts.

Go for it ;)

Quote:

You're using the same straw man as the CoS. The protesting is against actions of the church, not their faith. Anon is trying to prevent more people from being victimized. It's democracy in action.
There is no straw man here. You can argue that the Anon is attacking the CoS for it's practices, but this is clearly false.

As I said earlier (Which you quoted but somehow ignored) there are MUCH bigger 'fish to fry' that Anon absolutely refuses to go after with the same fervor that they attack the CoS with (It's like ignoring the guy who's engaging in grand theft auto to harass the guy who engages in petty theft). In fact, you don't even hear so much of a peep from Anon regarding any non-CoS issues. These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology.

*Shrugs*

But, you know, I suppose it's okay for people to harass another group of people just so long as the group dong the harassing isn't the WBC, right?

Ace_O_Spades 02-11-2008 02:02 PM

*the point*






*Infinite_Loser's Head*

/whoooooosh

Hain 02-11-2008 02:03 PM

WARNING: I bring nothing to this conversation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
Although I doubt a single Anon has the vigor, verve, and voracity of V

You forgot that plain word "vocabulary."

Infinite_Loser 02-11-2008 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
*the point*






*Infinite_Loser's Head*

/whoooooosh

Uh-huh...

Ace_O_Spades 02-11-2008 02:09 PM

the point = you cannot determine when or where people will be motivated. the point = can not denegrate the efforts of people who are trying to promote positive change, regardless of how many other things need changing

If you want to change those things, go start your own mass internet movement.

If you cannot see the difference between WBC & Co$ then you clearly do not understand the reason Anon is doing what they're doing. Free religion. Scientology is not free. They support the free and equal dissemination of "Church" doctrine so that people do not need to sink vast sums of money and be brainwashed in the process to get to what the "Church" is all about.

Infinite_Loser 02-11-2008 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
If you cannot see the difference between WBC & Co$ then you clearly do not understand the reason Anon is doing what they're doing. Free religion. Scientology is not free. They support the free and equal dissemination of "Church" doctrine so that people do not need to sink vast sums of money and be brainwashed in the process to get to what the "Church" is all about.

I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently). The fact is that you don't define what a religion is or what it constitutes. Because it's practices do not conform to whatever definition you want to place doesn't mean it needs to change. Still, it amazes me just how many atheists suddenly care about the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion. It perplexes me.

(Oh, and TFP really needs sarcasm tags as that doesn't go over well on the internet.)

Hain 02-11-2008 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently).

(Oh, and TFP really needs sarcasm tags as that doesn't go over well on the internet.)

So let me get this straight? You think people that say "We have the answers to..." truth, purpose, the soul, etc, should charge money for people to get in? Isn't that kinda like spiritual extortion?

And yes, yes, TFP does need Sarcasm tags... for sure. ---Not joking, I would greatly benefit from them.

Infinite_Loser 02-11-2008 02:41 PM

Doesn't bother me. If that's the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion, then more power to them.

Hain 02-11-2008 02:45 PM

You mean"Props to them," that they sucker people in while still holding out the hefty collection plate?

Willravel 02-11-2008 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
There is no straw man here. You can argue that the Anon is attacking the CoS for it's practices, but this is clearly false.

As I said earlier (Which you quoted but somehow ignored) there are MUCH bigger 'fish to fry' that Anon absolutely refuses to go after with the same fervor that they attack the CoS with (It's like ignoring the guy who's engaging in grand theft auto to harass the guy who engages in petty theft). In fact, you don't even hear so much of a peep from Anon regarding any non-CoS issues. These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology.

*Shrugs*

But, you know, I suppose it's okay for people to harass another group of people just so long as the group dong the harassing isn't the WBC, right?

You're still not explaining why. You say "it's false", make a claim as to knowing what the issues are that the protesters are addressing, and then repeat your still unsupported statement that it's about religion.

The reality is that you have no idea what you're talking about. And that bear picture in your avatar gives me the creeps.

Ace_O_Spades 02-11-2008 02:58 PM

Okay, let's see

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

No, if any religion had the same practices as scientology, I would say that all things being equal they would attack it for the same reasons. It's not because it's scientology and people hate it, it's the practices that are leading to the deaths and bankruptcys of otherwise right thinking individuals who have been brainwashed.

Quote:

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently). The fact is that you don't define what a religion is or what it constitutes.
Scientology isn't a religion, it's a cult.

See: this and this and particularly THIS

Quote:

Because it's practices do not conform to whatever definition you want to place doesn't mean it needs to change.
If it kills people, yes it does. Google Lisa McPherson.

Quote:

Still, it amazes me just how many atheists suddenly care about the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion. It perplexes me.
Once again, scientology isn't a religion, it's a dangerous cult.

Quote:

(Oh, and TFP really needs sarcasm tags as that doesn't go over well on the internet.)
Agreed.

Martian 02-11-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently). The fact is that you don't define what a religion is or what it constitutes. Because it's practices do not conform to whatever definition you want to place doesn't mean it needs to change. Still, it amazes me just how many atheists suddenly care about the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion. It perplexes me.

(Oh, and TFP really needs sarcasm tags as that doesn't go over well on the internet.)

I think you're missing the distinction between Scientology itself and the Church of Scientology. Read up on Free Zone Scientology and this may become slightly more clear.

Nobody takes issue with the beliefs of Scientology as a religion. The Free Zone guys are free to believe in it if they want; I think it's silly to say the least, but if that's your bag then by all means. The Church, on the other hand, routinely engages in practices that are, eh.. somewhat shady, we'll say. The highly touted examples are Operation Snow White and Operation Freak Out, but it goes way beyond that. People who get labeled SP are regarded by the Church and it's members as sub-human. Homes get picketed, employers get called and fed false information. Lies are spread. CoS attempts to strong-arm anyone who calls their practices into question.

Frankly, I wouldn't have a problem with the Church taking people's money if that's all they did. You think the path to enlightenment costs $400 000 and can be given to you by a guy who wrote crappy science fiction, then go ahead and spend your cash. I'll keep mine, thanks. What bothers me is how much the Church works against people who say anything negative about them, how they engage in shady or outright illegal practices in an attempt to intimidate people who don't agree with them and how they get away with it so often. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with an organization that bullies, slanders and extorts anyone who they deem to be against them. If Microsoft handed out libelous leaflets condemning Linus Torvalds, everyone would be up in arms; but because the Church of Scientology hides behind the religious excuse they can get a free pass and often avoid close scrutiny. Or at least they could in the past. With the internet being so widespread now information like that becomes exceedingly difficult to suppress and now people are learning exactly what CoS is up to. And a lot of people are very, very angry.

The concept of paying for enlightenment isn't new. Tithing still exists in some Christian sects today, although I don't think any of them enforce as strictly as they used to. A collection plate (a feature of every Christian sect, from what I've seen) is a form of paying for enlightenment. This is not the issue.

All joking aside, even doing this, speaking out against CoS on a public forum, carries a risk with it (albeit a small one). The people holding these protests aren't wearing masks because they look cool. It's because attending one of these rallies carries a very real risk of being identified, labeled SP and subsequently harassed by the Church of Scientology. Those Free Zone Scientologists I mentioned above? They get the same treatment, because the Church of Scientology wants the general population to see them as synonymous with belief in Scientology. That's important for them, so that they can continue to make claims of religious suppression.

To use your example above, should we ignore the guy who engages in petty theft just because some people commit grand theft auto? Anon goes after the target they have the ability to affect.

Ustwo 02-11-2008 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martian
Nobody takes issue with the beliefs of Scientology as a religion.

I do, I think their beliefs are beyond stupid. :thumbsup:

Willravel 02-11-2008 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
I do, I think their beliefs are beyond stupid. :thumbsup:

Well all are, but you're not going to put on a Guy Fawks mask and protest.

Martian 02-11-2008 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
I do, I think their beliefs are beyond stupid. :thumbsup:

Maybe I should rephrase that. Personally, I find the idea that L Ron Hubbard is the saviour of mankind a bit hard to swallow myself. What I don't take issue with is people's right to believe it. If you really honestly believe in Scientology, go for it. It doesn't change the fact that the Church of Scientology is dangererous and, frankly, evil.

sapiens 02-11-2008 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
The reality is that you have no idea what you're talking about. And that bear picture in your avatar gives me the creeps.

ad ursus attacks like the one quoted above are really not necessary. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by msd
An FBI investigation found the church responsible for "criminal campaigns of villification, burglaries and thefts ... against private and public individuals and organizations," the most notable of which was "Operation Freakout,..."

Did the courts find them responsible?

Willravel 02-11-2008 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sapiens
ad ursus attacks like the one quoted above are really not necessary. :)

HA~! Ribbing me in latin is just another example of why TFP is a classy place.

Ad multos annos...cheers

Shauk 02-11-2008 07:57 PM

anon should have harrassed bush, I would have been more entertained.

Martian 02-11-2008 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sapiens
Did the courts find them responsible?

In one case, yes. Operation Snow White I think would qualify as a 'criminal campaign of burglary and theft against a public organization.' It gets no more public than the United States government. Several high ranking church members were prosecuted and received jail sentences, including L Ron Hubbard's wife.

Menoman 02-11-2008 10:31 PM

Claiming this war is on the religion itself is pretty weak.


Sometimes though, when I see people who sit back and claim "it doesnt hurt ME, so why bother?" or just stepping aside all together and somehow justifying injustices to themselves, a teeny little part of me hopes it DOES happen to them, and they will understand why cowardice and apathy are never the best course of action against a wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Augi
You mean"Props to them," that they sucker people in while still holding out the hefty collection plate?


It's more like "Props to them" that they financially destroy most of its members, up to the point of suicide in far too many cases, been the direct cause of far too many of its members deaths, and actually SUPPORTS the destruction of anyone who speaks against them.... up to the point of killing them.


I would venture to guess.



Furthermore, even using the term "Collection plate" is not appropriate, that implies you donate, donating would mean you aren't forced to pay more than 300,000 dollars to learn about the religion.

Last I heard, I can pick up a bible and learn exactly as much or more than even the highest ranking catholic priest in the world knows.

(Where = bible replace = Koran = Torah = ANY religious scriptures)

Hain 02-12-2008 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Menoman
It's more like "Props to them" that they financially destroy most of its members, up to the point of suicide in far too many cases, been the direct cause of far too many of its members deaths, and actually SUPPORTS the destruction of anyone who speaks against them.... up to the point of killing them.

You must realize the sarcastic nature of my comment with Infinite Loser, and was making the situation lighter than it was, as I do have a problem with the CoS and their practices, while Loser isn't bothered by it.

Yet another reason this forum needs sarcastic tags.

Menoman 02-12-2008 02:19 AM

No I understood, I wasn't trying to argue with you or anything. Just adding a little bit myself.

SVT01Cobra 02-12-2008 04:02 AM

I gotta say, after watching some of those protest videos, I was simply amazed. After all the slack Generation Y has gotten, it's about time they did something worthwhile.

And Infinite_Loser, if you truly believe their attack is against religion, you're brainwashed. This is a cult that is responsible for the single largest infiltration of the US Government in history. Their plan no doubt is world domination, and as absolutely asinine as that sounds, they've already succeeded in taking over a city and its police force. Do some homework before you criticize something. This isn't an attack on religion, because Scientology ISN'T a religion. It's a dangerous cult, read some of L. Ron's quotes and use some common sense and you'll be able to realize it's complete bullshit. This isn't an attack on anyone's beliefs, but the practices of this "church", such as their "fair game" policy, the fact that they charge $370,000 for enlightenment, their suppression of free speech by suing anyone who speaks out against them, and the fact that they separate people from their families through their "disconnect". (Clever on their part, as people are easier to turn into robots and will be less willing to leave without their family there to talk some sense into them) No, this is a war to help those who have been indoctrinated into Scientology, to help them see the truth, and to prevent Scientology from ruining even more lives. Google "Operation Freakout", and you'll see how sick Scientology is.

Hell, after the 2/10 protests, their official response was that Anonymous is being lead by the German secret service and psychiatrists that are conspiring against them. I shit you not. Why are they picking on Germany? Because Germany refused to acknowledge Scientology as an official religion, and instead, labeled it as a cult.

Derwood 02-12-2008 09:45 AM

i'm not exactly sure what these protests accomplished. i'm pretty sure most of us know what the deal is with Scientology; there have been tons of specials and reports on the news, etc. are a bunch of guys in masks going to suddenly make CoS dissolve? is it going to start investigations? i'm sure a lot of CoS money is lining the pockets of law enforcement and government officials.

seems like a piss in the wind effort

Willravel 02-12-2008 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derwood
i'm not exactly sure what these protests accomplished. i'm pretty sure most of us know what the deal is with Scientology; there have been tons of specials and reports on the news, etc. are a bunch of guys in masks going to suddenly make CoS dissolve? is it going to start investigations? i'm sure a lot of CoS money is lining the pockets of law enforcement and government officials.

seems like a piss in the wind effort

It's part of something A LOT bigger. This is basically phase 2 out of dozens.

BTW, they're expecting the March 15 protest to be at least 50% bigger than the Sunday protest.

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
No, if any religion had the same practices as scientology, I would say that all things being equal they would attack it for the same reasons. It's not because it's scientology and people hate it, it's the practices that are leading to the deaths and bankruptcys of otherwise right thinking individuals who have been brainwashed.

Yeah... I'm going to have to say people hate Scientology because it's, well, Scientology. For everyone one death caused (Or, I should say, claimed to have been caused) in the name of Scientology, I can name you at the very least ten or more deaths caused in the name of Democracy, Christianity, Islam etc. etc. etc. Not to marginalize any wrongful death, but the fact that some people willfully overlook the glaring sins of another group of people in order to, for lack of a better word, dog pile on one group of people who they don't like is rather... Hypocritical. You see, Anon and it's supporters aren't attacking Scientology because they seeks social justice; They're attacking Scientology because the church rained on their parade and they didn't like that and/or they have some person grudge against the church.

*Shrugs*

Oh, and since we're on the topic, you must REALLY hate the gospel of prosperity?

Quote:

Scientology isn't a religion, it's a cult.

See: this and this and particularly THIS
Not this argument again...

The difference between a cult and a religion is, well... There is no difference, aside from one word having a distinctly negative connotation to it. Belief systems are only labeled as cults when the society at large deems them dangerous to the status quo. It's nothing new, as nearly every religion has had to deal with the 'cult' status at one point in it's history.

*Shrugs*

Of course, this entire argument is moot. You happen to think Scientology is a cult while many world governments happen to disagree with you and define Scientology as a religion. I think it's safe to say that your personal beliefs are outweighed by the beliefs of the government under which you reside.

Quote:

If it kills people, yes it does. Google Lisa McPherson.
I suppose this has become the rallying cry for Anon and it's supporters. I'm curious, though. Was the church of Scientology ever charged with any criminal conduct?

Quote:

Once again, scientology isn't a religion, it's a dangerous cult.
*See above*

You're wrong. End of story.

Willravel 02-12-2008 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
The difference between a cult and a religion is, well... There is no difference, aside from one word having a distinctly negative connotation to it.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cult
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion

Now you know the difference.

Ace_O_Spades 02-12-2008 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
You're wrong. End of story.

You're wrong. End of story.

I can do it too!

WHEEEE! :thumbsup:

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel

Come now, Will. You know better than to play semantics.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace_O_Spades
You're wrong. End of story.

I can do it too!

WHEEEE!

Yeah, except I provided irrefutable evidence as to why your classification of Scientology as a cult is wrong whereas you're just trying to patronize me.

silent_jay 02-12-2008 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Come now, Will. You know better than to play semantics.



Yeah, except I provided irrefutable evidence as to why your classification of Scientology as a cult is wrong whereas you're just trying to patronize me.

No semantics played there, one is a definition of cult, the other for religion, you didn't seem to know the difference.

What irrefutable evidence would that be? It certainly isn't your opinion in your last post, that isn't really evidence, it's an opinion not fact.

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silent_jay
No semantics played there, one is a definition of cult, the other for religion, you didn't seem to know the difference.

When one resorts to debating the meaning of words in order to detract from the real issue, that's called playing semantics. But since we're on the topic, would you care to tell me the difference between Christianity as a cult and Christianity as a religion? I know it's off-topic, but since you seemingly believe there's some innate difference between the two aside from how it's perceived by society, then I'd really like to know what that difference is, exactly.

Quote:

What irrefutable evidence would that be? It certainly isn't your opinion in your last post, that isn't really evidence, it's an opinion not fact.
This (As I said earlier) ---> Of course, this entire argument is moot. You happen to think Scientology is a cult while many world governments happen to disagree with you and define Scientology as a religion. I think it's safe to say that your personal beliefs are outweighed by the beliefs of the government under which you reside.

It's not an opinion. It's a fact.

Willravel 02-12-2008 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Come now, Will. You know better than to play semantics.

You're making a semantic argument. You said there's no difference between two words other than negative and positive connotation. You are incorrect and I provided evidence to show that you're incorrect. You have provided no evidence. This is why I am and right and you are not.

Unless you have evidence?

silent_jay 02-12-2008 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
When one resorts to debating the meaning of words in order to detract from the real issue, that's called playing semantics. But since we're on the topic, would you care to tell me the difference between Christianity as a cult and Christianity as a religion?

There was no debate on the meaning of the words, you said there was no difference between a religion and a cult, will posted definitions to show you the two are obviously different.

Cult of Christianity: A cult of Christianity is a group of people, which claiming to be Christian, embraces a particular doctrinal system taught by an individual leader, group of leaders, or organization, which (system) denies (either explicitly or implicitly) one or more of the central doctrines of the Christian faith as taught in the sixty-six books of the Bible.

Religion of Christianity: Christianity is a monotheistic religion centered on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as recounted in the New Testament. Its followers, known as Christians, believe Jesus to be the Son of God and the Messiah (or Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament - which they share as part of its scriptures with Judaism and they see the New Testament as relating the "Gospel", the message revealed by Jesus.

Clear enough? Or shall I draw you a picture?

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Unless you have evidence?

Doubtful we'll see evidence, other than 'your personal beliefs are outweighed by the beliefs of the government under which you reside'. Yeah that's real proof right there:rolleyes:

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
You're making a semantic argument. You said there's no difference between two words other than negative and positive connotation. You are incorrect and I provided evidence to show that you're incorrect. You have provided no evidence. This is why I am and right and you are not.

Unless you have evidence?

This is getting further and further off-topic but...

No, Will, you're not right. You need proof? I extend the question I asked to Silent Jay to yourself. Good luck with that, as you're going to need it.

silent_jay 02-12-2008 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
This is getting further and further off-topic but...

No, Will, you're not right. You need proof? I extend the question I asked to Silent Jay to yourself. Good luck with that, as you're going to need it.

Already answered, wasn't hard at all, just have to know how to read, and understand what the difference between a religion and a cult is.

Ustwo 02-12-2008 11:12 AM

All religions are stupid and dangerous to me to some degree.

Scientology is just extra stupid and extra dangerous (to its own members) and is predatory.

The cosmic Jewish zombie is hard for me to swallow but at least there is some 5000 years of tradition behind it, and they no longer persecute me for giving up the religion.

The whole Xenu thing isn't just science fiction its BAD science fiction, and has no good going for it beyond those who think just joining a group makes their miserable lives seem a bit better, and those profiting from them.

There is a fine line between freedom of religion, and exploitation, these people cross it.

Willravel 02-12-2008 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
No, Will, you're not right. You need proof? I extend the question I asked to Silent Jay to yourself. Good luck with that, as you're going to need it.

He already answered it, but I'll take it a step further. It turns out that there actually are Christian cults. Ever heard of Moonies? No? Yeah, I'm not surprised.

Why is it that atheists consistently know more about religion than theists?

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silent_jay
There was no debate on the meaning of the words, you said there was no difference between a religion and a cult, will posted definitions to show you the two are obviously different.

Cult of Christianity: A cult of Christianity is a group of people, which claiming to be Christian, embraces a particular doctrinal system taught by an individual leader, group of leaders, or organization, which (system) denies (either explicitly or implicitly) one or more of the central doctrines of the Christian faith as taught in the sixty-six books of the Bible.

Religion of Christianity: Christianity is a monotheistic religion centered on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as recounted in the New Testament. Its followers, known as Christians, believe Jesus to be the Son of God and the Messiah (or Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament - which they share as part of its scriptures with Judaism and they see the New Testament as relating the "Gospel", the message revealed by Jesus.

Clear enough? Or shall I draw you a picture?

*Draws further off-topic*

I'm hoping you're not serious (Though I believe you are).

You *do* realize why Christianity was labeled a "cult" by the Roman government, right? You *do* realize that Christianity wasn't able to throw off the "cult" moniker until 313 AD, right? You *do* realize that the First Council of Nicaea, whose purpose was to to create the first Christian Doctrine, wasn't held until 325 AD, right (Twelve years after the Roman ban on Christianity was lifted)? You *do* realize that the New Testament, as it is today, wasn't created until the Council of Trent in 1546, right?

As we black folk say, "Nigga' please". Your distinction falls flat on it's face. The difference between a cult and a religion-- Societal views. That's it :)

*Taken from one of the links Will provided*

Quote:

6. a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
Quote:

Doubtful we'll see evidence, other than 'your personal beliefs are outweighed by the beliefs of the government under which you reside'. Yeah that's real proof right there :rolleyes:
*Laughs to himself*

Some of ya'll TFP'ers can be real hypocrites sometimes. I guess the government's rules/laws/classifications are only valid when they benefit you, huh (Or, I should say, when it's busy restricting religious practices)? :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Why is it that atheists consistently know more about religion than theists?

You don't. Simple :)

Willravel 02-12-2008 11:33 AM

Moonies are a Christian cult. Catholics are a Christian religion.

Infinite_Loser 02-12-2008 11:35 AM

I'm just going to continue using the definition you so graciously provided.

That's because it's a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.

:)

SVT01Cobra 02-12-2008 11:37 AM

And yet, I love how you've completely ignored my post, because deep down you know it's right. Their goal is to "clean the world". To remove bad people from it; in other words, world domination by "cleaning the world" of those who oppose them. It's fucking sick.

Quote:

This is a cult that is responsible for the single largest infiltration of the US Government in history. Their plan no doubt is world domination, and as absolutely asinine as that sounds, they've already succeeded in taking over a city and its police force. Do some homework before you criticize something. This isn't an attack on religion, because Scientology ISN'T a religion. It's a dangerous cult, read some of L. Ron's quotes and use some common sense and you'll be able to realize it's complete bullshit. This isn't an attack on anyone's beliefs, but the practices of this "church", such as their "fair game" policy, the fact that they charge $370,000 for enlightenment, their suppression of free speech by suing anyone who speaks out against them, and the fact that they separate people from their families through their "disconnect". (Clever on their part, as people are easier to turn into robots and will be less willing to leave without their family there to talk some sense into them) No, this is a war to help those who have been indoctrinated into Scientology, to help them see the truth, and to prevent Scientology from ruining even more lives. Google "Operation Freakout", and you'll see how sick Scientology is.

sapiens 02-12-2008 11:41 AM

Cult or religion? Why does it matter?

SVT01Cobra 02-12-2008 11:43 AM

Cults don't get tax breaks, religions do. :p

Frosstbyte 02-12-2008 11:53 AM

Alright, to move this little event right along, for the sake of argument, IL, let's say we were to concede your point that Scientology is a religion like any other. What then?

Is your whole problem with this that people have decided to take on them instead of militant Islam or something? Or that they've declared their opposition to one religion instead of all religion? Are people required to accept the existence of anything that exists simply because it exists and that creates some sort of first in time first in right quality that can't be challenged?

Regardless of how we characterize it (cult, religion, whackos, masters of the universe and psychology), Scientology has a demonstrated history of dangerous, subversive activity. That doesn't mean that there aren't other groups who are equally or more dangerous and subversive, simply that this one is the one that this group of people has decided to take on and try to break down before it can do any more harm. I don't see why that's such a bad thing.

QuasiMondo 02-12-2008 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derwood
i'm not exactly sure what these protests accomplished. i'm pretty sure most of us know what the deal is with Scientology; there have been tons of specials and reports on the news, etc. are a bunch of guys in masks going to suddenly make CoS dissolve? is it going to start investigations? i'm sure a lot of CoS money is lining the pockets of law enforcement and government officials.

seems like a piss in the wind effort

I'm with you on this one.

Apparently lost in the debate of why we should paricipate in Anonymous protests is what exactly is the endgame here? Is the goal to get current members to up and leave? To force them to lose their tax-exempt status? Issue a press release that says, "Okay, Anon, you got us, we're shutting our doors and closing up shop." I just don't see what specific goal Anonymous has in mind when they hold nationwide protests and leak embarrassing videos.

World's King 02-12-2008 11:58 AM

I'm happy to see that people in my home town had better things to do with their time then stand out in the cold with a mask on...

Willravel 02-12-2008 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
Apparently lost in the debate of why we should paricipate in Anonymous protests is what exactly is the endgame here

Are you asking the desired outcome or the final part of the plan? I can't answer the latter, but the former is simply a severely weakened CoS that no longer has the ability to threaten or hurt people. This is about declawing the monster, and showing the world that it is, in fact, a monster.

QuasiMondo 02-12-2008 12:48 PM

And severely weakened how? Loss of tax exemption status? Membership attrition so they don't have as much money? Bring a lawsuit that results in a loss of an extraordinary amount of money? I'm not seeing that. From where I'm typing this, I see an open-ended war. Is that really a good thing?

Willravel 02-12-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
And severely weakened how? Loss of tax exemption status? Membership attrition so they don't have as much money? Bring a lawsuit that results in a loss of an extraordinary amount of money? I'm not seeing that. From where I'm typing this, I see an open-ended war. Is that really a good thing?

Let's say that we only succeed in severely slowing recruitment. Wouldn't that be a smashing success? Let's say we only succeed in bringing to light illegal activities, for which some church officials are charged. Wouldn't that be a smashing success?

Ustwo 02-12-2008 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Let's say that we only succeed in severely slowing recruitment. Wouldn't that be a smashing success? Let's say we only succeed in bringing to light illegal activities, for which some church officials are charged. Wouldn't that be a smashing success?

I really need to see a picture of will in a Guy Fawkes mask.

Willravel 02-12-2008 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
I really need to see a picture of will in a Guy Fawkes mask.

How would you know it was me?

QuasiMondo 02-12-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Let's say that we only succeed in severely slowing recruitment. Wouldn't that be a smashing success? Let's say we only succeed in bringing to light illegal activities, for which some church officials are charged. Wouldn't that be a smashing success?

The former, yes. The latter, no. Slowing recruitment will eventually weaken their organization. Bringing a few officials down only means some great job opportunties have just opened up for whoever was under them.

Of course, I don't think the CoS releases new membership numbers, so we'll never really know if recruitment will ever be affected by this 'war' will we?

Ustwo 02-12-2008 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
How would you know it was me?

I'd look for the clothing labels...duh.

mrklixx 02-12-2008 10:39 PM

There is a difference between cult and religion. Religion gives you 9 points in scrabble, but cult only gives you 6. But since a 6 is merely an upside down 9, this is irrefutable evidence that the 2 are closely related. And that, my friends, is numerology, which is a belief in a mystical or esoteric relationship between numbers and physical objects or living things, therefore making it a religion........or a cult.....I forget witch.

Hain 02-13-2008 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrklixx
therefore making it a religion........or a cult.....I forget, witch.

You forgot that comma. ;-P

xepherys 02-13-2008 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently). The fact is that you don't define what a religion is or what it constitutes. Because it's practices do not conform to whatever definition you want to place doesn't mean it needs to change. Still, it amazes me just how many atheists suddenly care about the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion. It perplexes me.

Well, first of all, I don't really see where one's spiritual beliefs, up to and including atheism, counteract their freedom to protest that which they believe is wrong. Should someone who chooses not to vote not be allowed to protest the war? Should someone who does not teach their children advanced math outside of school not be allowed to protest a mad mathematics curriculum? Why does the ability to protest that which you disagree with dissipate with a set (or lack thereof) of beliefs?

It's democracy, baby!

skier 02-13-2008 09:20 AM

Is infinite_loser a scientologist? He hasn't even budged from his point A ever since he came into this thread.

I protested on February 10th. I didn't do it because Scilons believe that 75 million years ago the evil lord Xenu, emperor of a galactic quadrant, dumped aliens into earth volcanos to solve galactic overpopulation and then sealed them over with giant H-bombs where their spirits congregated into clusters and settled themselves into human bodies, where they stay now, waiting for the proper training to achieve superhuman powers.

I did it because of stories like this, and this, and this.

I did it for Lisa McPherson, and others who tragically lost their lives due to this Dangerous Cult's inhumane practices.

I did it to help raise awareness of this Cult; so that the movement gains strength and actually causes change.

I did it so that in the future more will not have to suffer, and those weak enough to be tricked into this bait and switch will have a chance to escape.

I did it because I believe in free speech. It pisses me off to think that this cult is destroying people's lives because they spoke out against them. They are using my country's own laws, designed to protect an individuals rights, to instead frame, slander, and outright shatter someone's life- hiding behind a bloody wall of money culled from their victims.


I did it because it is delicious schadenfreude. Because they must eat it, for they are stuck between a rock and a hard place- if they attack Anonymous, it will be reported; if they leave Anonymous alone, their followers will increase their doubts. Because there is no leader, they have no reference in which to stop this movement.


Anonymous isn't a small internet website group anymore. Not even content to be contained on the internet anymore, on February 10th it crossed over to "the real world". This worldwide protest, containing over 9000 excited people, was organized spontaneously in less than a month. It's not an organization; it's a collective unconscious, a groupthink. A "Stand Alone Complex".

Those Nine Thousand individuals are all aware it's not a one time deal. The movement is gaining momentum, not losing it. And the biggest difference between this and every other resistance campaign is this:

Anonymous is having fun.

It's not so much a protest as a meetup. People go hang out for a while, make fun of a few people, laugh, have a good time. It's a social event, you even get to dress up. And as a bonus there is a tiny mix of excitment and danger of a ninja scientologist following you around with a camera for a while. People had a blast this Feb 10th. They will come back again, and bring some friends too. They will post party invites around town and school. It's not a flash in the pan and Anonymous will shake the Scifag tree until something falls out.


edit- wrote an essay on the last reply to the page :grumpy: ah well :P


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360