Now this logic I don't agree with. Yes there are bigger crimes but just spending more money doesn't make them go away or get caught. If dudes jerking it in the park were a real issue, and I'll just assume they were or argument sake, then the police should respond to it.

In this case what they did to catch someone was over the top and shouldn't have happened but the concept of a sting like this, properly carried out doesn't upset me.

Will & DK. do either of you know Robin Garrison's penis size? If not, then you are both ignorant.......about the same fact.......so there. :P

As far as the case goes, I feel that I would not be able to make an informed decision without high definition video of the topless woman, in order to study the intimate details and nuances of her........conduct, over and over again, to determine if it was indeed entrapment.

"Her boobs went up, and to the left.... up, and to the left"

Its an interesting one. I don't know the fireman personally but approaching a half naked lady he doesn't know in the park suggests he was after a bit of action. A woman should be free to sunbathe topless without being hassled. In terms of the debate over whether this is entrapment, I'd say he approached her with the intend of pursuing a sexual act, the grey area is whether he intended on pursuing the sexual act in public or not.

Personally I don't think I would have approached her, I probably wouldn't have the balls to do it. I would have dandered on by, chuckled to myself and told my friends about this, 'absolutely hot chick with the biggest boobies I've ever seen, naked in the park!!!'. Mature, I know but it is the truth.

It's a public park, the guy is 40 odd, he should have more sense. If he is the type of guy to approach a girl randomly just cause she doesn't have a top on he is probably not a perv (he probably gets more action than me), but he is most definately a sex pest. A real bummer if hes finally plucked up the courage to speak to a female and this is what happens but me thinks he does it all the time and most probably wouldn't really care about age, how receptive they were about him coming on to them or much else apart from whether he could get some...

I more or less agree with will and Ustwo. The idea of the sting is both technically legal and personally acceptable (to me). The execution was botched badly, and for that reason the case deserves to be overturned in appeal on entrapment. As many have pointed out, prior intent is the key factor.

This is so unfair. I could hardly blame any guy who is lured by a half-dressed woman to expose himself. Either he gets out of it or ends up being labeled a sexual predator of some sort for the rest of his life. I can only imagine the humiliation of going through this and having a moment of poor judgment (and raging hormones I imagine) being exposed to your friends, your family, your coworkers... I feel badly for this man and any others that have fallen victim to this entrapment.

If they put a topless woman out there and looked for dudes hiding in the bushes and jerking off, that would be a proper sting. I wouldn't care about that.

Yea thats pretty much entrapment. She asked to see his wang. If he had offered first that would be different.

The more l think about it, the only way the guy should been arrested is if he didn't whip it out. Topless, leg on his shoulder and she whispers “unleash the monster”, you'd have to be a pervert not to.

I think you would have to be asexual to not follow through.

There's topless women at parks an hour away from me? Why wasn't I told of this before?