11-02-2007, 07:54 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Sperm bank mixup
I frequent many places on the internet, and a friend of mine from one of these places had a sperm bank mixup, heres the jist of it:
I'm a father by the most ****ed up circumstances possible. As some of you know, I went through chemotherapy for non-hodgkins b-cell lymphoma a couple of years ago. One of the side effects of chemo is the possibility of making the patient sterile. To combat this, before my treatment started I had to go to a sperm donation clinic and have them save two samples of my seed for possible later use, if I wanted kids. The samples only stay good for ten years, so if I had become sterile, and wanted children of my own genetic material, I would have had to have them by the time I am 25. Which would have been odd. And I could only have two, which is a little sad. Thankfully, though, I am not sterile. After my chemo I went back for tests and they said the sample I gave them was full of swimmers. Hooray! So the following week I went to get a document notarized stating that I approved the destruction of my tissue. Pretty simple. Except for the call I got this morning. It was the clinic. They told me that a woman had come in and wanted to the identity of the donor she had used to create her now 18-month-old child. That was fine with the clinic, because whatever donor she had used had not opted to remain anonymous. They keep the DNA record of every man who donates there, just for filing purposes and records. They had my DNA record even though they didn't have my tissue, just because it had never been deleted. So the clinic told the woman who her donor was, and for assurances, they matched the baby's DNA to that of the donor. It didn't match. So they ran a search, and it matched mine. Apparently there was a clerical or filing error, and my samples were put in the wrong place, or something. I don't really know, because I don't know exactly how that place works, and I only talked to the woman on the phone for about ten minutes. Long enough for her to explain to me most of what I've said here. She told me that I could contact the woman if I like, but that the choice is totally up to me, and that I have absolutely zero responsibility for the baby in the eyes of the law. I have no idea what to do. What are his options here? Can he sue the sperm bank for this? I dont even know what to begin to tell him. Then I wonder is suing even worth it. I mean that bank could probably use the money more than he can, and how do you place value on a mistake like this? He has a child by someone whom he's never even met or anything without his consent...its crazy Last edited by BlackIce; 11-02-2007 at 08:03 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
11-02-2007, 08:22 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Can he sue? Sure he can. Can he win? Ony if he shows that he was somehow injured by this.
He's not responsible for the child so he's not going to have to support it. If he choses to, that's his own undertaking. I suppose he could claim some sort of emotional distress and win, but it would be a paltry sum, and in my opinion as simple money grab. By the way, the clinic/sperm bank won't be paying anything. Their insurance company will.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
11-02-2007, 07:05 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Like John Goodman, but not.
Location: SFBA, California
|
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mspermdonor.htm
Quote:
Aside from that, I don't see the problem, but I'd rather enjoy such a situation. All my genetic responsibility splattered into a cup and grown into a human, I'm then free to do whatever dangerous crap I want. Skydiving, bungee jumping, alligator wrestling, etc. |
|
11-02-2007, 08:21 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Eat your vegetables
Super Moderator
Location: Arabidopsis-ville
|
Odd mixup. Sounds like it'd be a good idea for the guy to contact the mother of the child with any medical history that seems applicable. She might want to know that her child's genes were taken from someone who had cancer at a young age. It seems like it'd make more sense for HER to sue the sperm bank.
__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq "violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy |
11-02-2007, 08:22 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Rawr!
Location: Edmontania
|
If i were you, i'd think i lucked out.
In evolutionary terms, you reproduced at no cost to your resources. There's no harm to you, and it's an interesting story to tell. If you want to invest yourself in your child's upbringing, it sounds like it's up to you.
__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim |
11-03-2007, 06:38 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Currently sour but formerly Dlishs
Super Moderator
Location: Australia/UAE
|
i agree that u could sue, and the sperm banks insurance company would pay and not the sperm bank themselves.
to think that you inseminated someone without having sex with them.. an immaculate conception, since your free from religious sin! especially if your a church goer. i find it quite ironic.
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay? - Filthy |
11-03-2007, 07:55 AM | #7 (permalink) |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
The only basis to sue, as I see it, is if he was rendered sterile by chemo, giving him no future options to become a father other than his spouse also going through the services of a sperm bank.
The woman, married or not, assumed all responsibilities attached to her usage of the sperm bank's services, so she can't sue for child support. And her spouse, if there is one, assumed and signed for, all responsibilities as the recognized father under law. Now, if she distinctly noted that there could be no history of cancer (and that usually is a process of donation-that certain genetic anamolies render a potential donor unsuited), she might have a case against the sperm bank, but that would not be his problem. I used these services, btw, so I have an inkling of what happens. |
11-03-2007, 08:09 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
As a father of two I'd be royally pissed.
Prior to being a father and really understanding it, I'd have been less pissed.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
11-03-2007, 10:24 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
Quote:
It should be the sperm bank's place to contact the woman who used their services and explain to her that her anonymous choice was not used. Women use these services because either their spouse could not produce kids or she's single and wanted kids; either way he should NOT do his own contacting. If there's a dad in the picture, he would do much more harm than good. |
|
Tags |
bank, mixup, sperm |
|
|