Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Disney lets gays and lesbians have fairy tale weddings (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/115724-disney-lets-gays-lesbians-have-fairy-tale-weddings.html)

Miss Mango 04-06-2007 01:40 PM

Disney lets gays and lesbians have fairy tale weddings
 
Source

Quote:

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Same-sex couples who want to exchange vows in front of Cinderella's Castle now have the chance.

The Walt Disney Co. had limited its Fairy Tale Wedding program to couples with valid marriage licenses, but it is now making ceremonies at its parks available to gay couples as well.

"We believe this change is consistent with Disney's long-standing policy of welcoming every guest in an inclusive environment," Disney Parks and Resorts spokesman Donn Walker said Friday. "We want everyone who comes to celebrate a special occasion at Disney to feel welcome and respected."

The company said it made the change after being contacted by a gay couple who wanted to use the wedding service, which offers ceremonies at Disneyland in California, Walt Disney World Resort in Florida and Disney's cruise ships.

The service offers flowers, dining, music and many optional Disney touches, from ceremonies in front of the parks' iconic attractions to having Mickey and Minnie Mouse in formal wear as guests. The packages start at $8,000 and can cost more than $45,000.

Groups not affiliated with Disney have held annual "gay days" celebrations at Disney parks for years. Company officials have taken a tolerant attitude to the weekend, allowing party promoters to rent out parks after hours and rebuffing religious groups that condemned Disney.

In 2005, Southern Baptists ended an eight-year boycott of the Walt Disney Co. for violating "moral righteousness and traditional family values."

ABOUT DAMN TIME!!!

It really pissed me off when they didn't allow for a Gay & Lesbian day at Disneyland, and I can understand why they didn't, but GET USED TO IT, you're not getting rid of the homosexual community.

I'm glad they are finally pulling their heads out of their butts, even if it is just to expand their client base / money.

Everyone should be entitled, regardless of things such as sexual preference, to participate in whatever they choose.

Lady Sage 04-06-2007 02:11 PM

Now if we could get them to have Mickey and Donald in formal dress or Minnie and Daisy instead of Mickey and Minnie we would be alright! :thumbsup:

World's King 04-06-2007 02:28 PM

"On the tour... right when Jaws pops out of the water... "

Ourcrazymodern? 04-06-2007 02:33 PM

This strikes me as an odd news item. Disney? Heh.

KellyC 04-06-2007 02:48 PM

I wonder what would happen if Disney decide to take it a step further and create a cartoon where the main character is gay/lesbian?

Now THAT should be interesting.

World's King 04-06-2007 03:09 PM

Chip and Dale...

The chipmunks... ?

Taltos 04-06-2007 07:44 PM

Weren't they both into Gidget?

Willravel 04-06-2007 08:00 PM

That's that gayest thing I've ever heard, and I couldn't be happier to hear it. It's great to hear that Disney won't discriminate like so many others will. I wish all of those couples well, and I hope this is altruistically motivated.

Charlatan 04-06-2007 08:07 PM

Very smart business move on their part.

Fire 04-06-2007 08:45 PM

This is encourageing, in america, money rules, and now that money has seen the buying power of the gay and lesbian community, can equality be far behind?

Bill O'Rights 04-06-2007 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
I hope this is altruistically motivated.

:no:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
Very smart business move on their part.

:thumbsup:

Val_1 04-07-2007 04:55 PM

I'm glad to hear that Disney is taking such a bold social move! I applaud them. Disney is big enough and strong enough that they don't need to fear pressure from picketing and boycotts.

If I remember right, a group (AFA?) did attempt to boycott Disney when they started having the "gay days" at their parks. But Disney held firm and they eventually called off their boycott (though they did somehow try to claim a victory in the battle).

Now, if other large companies (cough, Wal-Mart) would stop caving in to the stupid demands of small fringe hate groups that attempt to set America back 50 years.

Cavi Mike 04-08-2007 04:42 AM

I see this as nothing more than a
Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
Very smart business move on their part.

and nothing more. Just like the Frog Princess, Disney must have noticed their stocks weren't meeting projected numbers and decided to make some money off the minors instead of only turning their nose up at them.
:thumbsdown:

Charlatan 04-08-2007 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cavi Mike
I see this as nothing more than aand nothing more. Just like the Frog Princess, Disney must have noticed their stocks weren't meeting projected numbers and decided to make some money off the minors instead of only turning their nose up at them.
:thumbsdown:

I see no reason why this should be a thumbs down. What? You were expecting a large corporation to be doing something for altruistic reasons?

The fact that Disney, or any business, normalizes relations with a minority group is a good thing. It sends a message to the majority that is loud and clear. Money is money, regardless of your race, colour, creed, gender or sexual preference.

analog 04-08-2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Sage
Now if we could get them to have Mickey and Donald in formal dress or Minnie and Daisy instead of Mickey and Minnie we would be alright! :thumbsup:

Opening up to couples of all kinds is great, but parading straight characters out in same-sex pairs would be completely inappropriate. Lots of straight folk go to the weddings of same-sex couples. There's absolutely no reason for them to be pairing off characters any way than they normally would.

fightnight 04-08-2007 12:20 PM

Bravo Disney. /agree with Analog.

Elphaba 04-08-2007 02:54 PM

Psst...Analog, she was joking.

Disney has been under an evangelical boycott ever since they dedicated a day at the park for gays. I doubt they have much to worry about economically, if my evangelical friend is representative of the whole. She badmouths Disney every chance she gets, and takes her family of seven to the park every year. I remind her that as boycotters go, she falls short of the mark. :D

Good on Disney.

lurkette 04-08-2007 06:12 PM

Actually the Southern Baptist Convention (that was the group boycotting Disney) called off the boycott with little fanfare some time in the last year or two. It really didn't make a bit of difference, and they retreated with their tail between their legs, as it were.

relenawolf 04-09-2007 08:13 AM

I'm glad to see that Disney is doing this. They put their necks on the line with the Southern Baptist's pocket of their GLBT park days and continuing sponsorship of Ellen Degeneres, and I'm glad they've now moved another logical step forward. From the castmembers that I've talked to in Orlando, they say the GLBT days are some of the times they like to work best. (I have a family member who has worked at WDW for several years.)

This at least minimally offsets my anger at them for starting the "Disney Princess Brides" line of bridal gowns.

Elphaba 04-09-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lurkette
Actually the Southern Baptist Convention (that was the group boycotting Disney) called off the boycott with little fanfare some time in the last year or two. It really didn't make a bit of difference, and they retreated with their tail between their legs, as it were.

Thanks for the update. I love the result. :)

Dilbert1234567 04-09-2007 12:21 PM

another first for Disney, a black lead role
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17524865/

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Sage
Now if we could get them to have Mickey and Donald in formal dress or Minnie and Daisy instead of Mickey and Minnie we would be alright! :thumbsup:

I'd pay to see Donald in a formal dress, covered in sequins, glistening black sequins.:thumbsup:

Lady Sage 04-09-2007 12:25 PM

Dont forget the Ruby red lipstick and bright blue eyeshadow. I think it would be a gas! If for no other reason than to have fun!

percy 04-11-2007 07:37 PM

Poor Keith Richards. Probably wishes now he rolled naked in his fathers ashes rather than allegedly snorting them.

But that would make him a metrosexual pirate then, wouldn't it?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360