Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2006, 06:21 AM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Carno's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilda
$600 for a PS3 is a bargain, considering that you're getting a Blu Ray DVD player with it. Standalone Blu Ray players are currently retailing for about a thousand dollars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aKula
Yes but you must ask yourself, how much is a blu ray player worth for me? As for myself, I'm perfectly happy sticking around with DVD. So no thanks.
Yeah, exactly. I don't give a shit about blu ray, so that is worth nothing to me.
Carno is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 02:17 PM   #42 (permalink)
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
A Blu Ray DVD player is worth a lot whether it's useful to you or not. Just like having a $10,000 dishwasher in your 1-room apartment may not be useful to you but it's still worth a lot. Sony may have made a bad (very bad) decision by putting in a technology so new to the world that it jacks the price up that far, but you are getting your money's worth with it, especially considering the competition's main focuses.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
Old 12-01-2006, 09:32 PM   #43 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by zed wolf
I feel $600 is way over priced for the unit. I mean come on, how much dose it cost to manufacture the thing?
$840

<!message too short>
MSD is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 04:54 AM   #44 (permalink)
Tilted
 
How much does it cost to manufacture a game sold for $50 though? Yeah, thats where they make the killing, regardless of how much they sell the stupid system for.
Smooth23 is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 07:09 AM   #45 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
This is one of the many issues that very handily illustrates the inadequacies of textbook economic theory.
Nicely put. So much of what students learn in the classroom doesn't work in the real world any more. I spend a great deal of time helping new employees unlearn things and face reality with a new learning curve. Imagine teaching a journalism or an English major how to write a business letter!!
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:53 PM   #46 (permalink)
Archangel of Change
 
the only thing stopping them from selling it at $1500 in the first 3 months is the bad press it would get them.
hobo is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 12:27 PM   #47 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
yeah, i find it funny how sony LOSES $240 or so on every ps3 it sells while nintendo makes $13.

i know sony is going for the game sales, etc, but still, so LOSE about 30% of what it costs to make...

that's just funny to me. they have to sell at least 6 games per console to break even...mind you, i KNOW they will sell more than that and so do they, but it just seems like a funny business model
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 12:30 PM   #48 (permalink)
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
I don't consider it that funny, I just consider it brave. Sony loses money on the PS3 to bring next-gen hardware to consumers. Nintendo makes money on the Wii in order to rehash last-gen hardware into a new white box with a motion controller and pretend it's next-gen. Someone has to bring in the new technology, losing money or not. I do believe that it was a bad idea to include BluRay in the PS3 though, even if it is a technology that the world will have to embrace, if not much later than Sony realizes.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 12:45 PM   #49 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
well, sony banked on blu ray, microsoft banked on hd-dvd, nintendo banked on making games fun for nongamers.

i just find it an odd business model to sell things below cost, although i can totally understand why. I know they'll make a fortune on it and their costs will drop to a point where they are making money on each ps3 sold, but it just seems funny to me right now.

the other thing i find funny is the laughably low stock before the christmas season. 400K units...i think they could have sold that many in 2 states alone, not a nationwide campaign.

but the funniest thing: i can't understand their commercials...at all.
__________________
Live.

Chris
Paq is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:19 PM   #50 (permalink)
Insane
 
Tamerlain's Avatar
 
Location: Victoria
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
but the funniest thing: i can't understand their commercials...at all.
I've only seen one, but I totally get it. It's the one where the PS3 logo forms in some clouds while people are on their rooftops looking at it. The point is that you're more likely to see a PS3 logo form in some clouds while you're on your rooftop than you are to find one to purchase.

Comedy aside, I think it makes sense for Sony to make their profits through games at first. Get the systems out there first (like, 3 of them: see above) and then make your profits from games. It's not an ideal model, but it has worked for Sony in the past.

Trying to make a profit off the system itself will make it too far out of the reach of their core demographic (I believe). People can more easily afford to buy a new game every month than they can to buy a $1500 system, I would argue.

-Tamerlain
__________________
I never let school interfere with my education.
Tamerlain is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 03:42 AM   #51 (permalink)
Too Awesome for Aardvarks
 
stevie667's Avatar
 
Location: Angloland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lasereth
Someone has to bring in the new technology, losing money or not.
What do you think nintendo are doing? I'll bet you good money that either by the end of this generation, or the beginning of the next, all the consoles will have motion controllers.

IIRC its the gillette (as in razors) business model as i learnt it. make peanuts/lose money on the initial product, but make your money on the little things that people always need to buy to make it go (i.e. games and accessories).

As for making few consoles, how much time do you think they had before they finished the final specification before they sent it to be built? Not as long as the whole world seems to think, it takes time to build up stock levels.


The way i see it this generation is merely a technology test-bed for the next one. Sony and Microsoft are seeing if their new players will work, and how much power they can fit in, whilst nintendo are going for a different approach. Sony's days are coming to a close, microsoft will take the limelight next, then it'll be back to nintendo.

My view anyway.
__________________
Office hours have changed. Please call during office hours for more information.
stevie667 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 07:04 AM   #52 (permalink)
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
When I say "new technology," I mean better technology, not innovative tech. It is a great move by Nintendo to freshen up gaming with their controller, but the primary reason next-gen systems are released is hardware limitations and simply more raw computing power for better graphics. Sony brought this to the market. Nintendo didn't. That's why there's a huge price difference.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 07:15 AM   #53 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Nintendo is very conservative with it's technology and always has been.

DS isn't anything different than the dual screen Game and Watch multiscreens from 20 years ago.

http://www.gameandwatch.com/screen/m...een/index.html

What Nintendo has always been good at is creating fun simple gameplay without resorting to fancy graphics.

Same goes for the Wii. The only motion controllers aren't really that innovative, since the NES Power Glove (not made by Nintendo BTW) had the same idea 20 years ago.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 08:22 AM   #54 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilda
$600 for a PS3 is a bargain, considering that you're getting a Blu Ray DVD player with it. Standalone Blu Ray players are currently retailing for about a thousand dollars.

We got a Wii and skipped the others. Pure Nintendo fun and it's the only one I can actually use anyway.
And the consumer who wants to play Blu Ray DVDs, and owns the setup to properly appreciate them, probably doesn't want to play their DVDs via a game system.

We will likely purchase a Wii eventually.
sapiens is offline  
 

Tags
economics, ps3


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360