11-29-2006, 06:21 AM | #41 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/ |
||
11-29-2006, 02:17 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Knight of the Old Republic
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
|
A Blu Ray DVD player is worth a lot whether it's useful to you or not. Just like having a $10,000 dishwasher in your 1-room apartment may not be useful to you but it's still worth a lot. Sony may have made a bad (very bad) decision by putting in a technology so new to the world that it jacks the price up that far, but you are getting your money's worth with it, especially considering the competition's main focuses.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert |
12-02-2006, 07:09 AM | #45 (permalink) | |
A Storm Is Coming
Location: The Great White North
|
Quote:
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves. Stangers have the best candy. |
|
12-10-2006, 12:27 PM | #47 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: South Carolina
|
yeah, i find it funny how sony LOSES $240 or so on every ps3 it sells while nintendo makes $13.
i know sony is going for the game sales, etc, but still, so LOSE about 30% of what it costs to make... that's just funny to me. they have to sell at least 6 games per console to break even...mind you, i KNOW they will sell more than that and so do they, but it just seems like a funny business model
__________________
Live. Chris |
12-10-2006, 12:30 PM | #48 (permalink) |
Knight of the Old Republic
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
|
I don't consider it that funny, I just consider it brave. Sony loses money on the PS3 to bring next-gen hardware to consumers. Nintendo makes money on the Wii in order to rehash last-gen hardware into a new white box with a motion controller and pretend it's next-gen. Someone has to bring in the new technology, losing money or not. I do believe that it was a bad idea to include BluRay in the PS3 though, even if it is a technology that the world will have to embrace, if not much later than Sony realizes.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert |
12-10-2006, 12:45 PM | #49 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: South Carolina
|
well, sony banked on blu ray, microsoft banked on hd-dvd, nintendo banked on making games fun for nongamers.
i just find it an odd business model to sell things below cost, although i can totally understand why. I know they'll make a fortune on it and their costs will drop to a point where they are making money on each ps3 sold, but it just seems funny to me right now. the other thing i find funny is the laughably low stock before the christmas season. 400K units...i think they could have sold that many in 2 states alone, not a nationwide campaign. but the funniest thing: i can't understand their commercials...at all.
__________________
Live. Chris |
12-10-2006, 04:19 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Comedy aside, I think it makes sense for Sony to make their profits through games at first. Get the systems out there first (like, 3 of them: see above) and then make your profits from games. It's not an ideal model, but it has worked for Sony in the past. Trying to make a profit off the system itself will make it too far out of the reach of their core demographic (I believe). People can more easily afford to buy a new game every month than they can to buy a $1500 system, I would argue. -Tamerlain
__________________
I never let school interfere with my education. |
|
12-11-2006, 03:42 AM | #51 (permalink) | |
Too Awesome for Aardvarks
Location: Angloland
|
Quote:
IIRC its the gillette (as in razors) business model as i learnt it. make peanuts/lose money on the initial product, but make your money on the little things that people always need to buy to make it go (i.e. games and accessories). As for making few consoles, how much time do you think they had before they finished the final specification before they sent it to be built? Not as long as the whole world seems to think, it takes time to build up stock levels. The way i see it this generation is merely a technology test-bed for the next one. Sony and Microsoft are seeing if their new players will work, and how much power they can fit in, whilst nintendo are going for a different approach. Sony's days are coming to a close, microsoft will take the limelight next, then it'll be back to nintendo. My view anyway.
__________________
Office hours have changed. Please call during office hours for more information. |
|
12-11-2006, 07:04 AM | #52 (permalink) |
Knight of the Old Republic
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
|
When I say "new technology," I mean better technology, not innovative tech. It is a great move by Nintendo to freshen up gaming with their controller, but the primary reason next-gen systems are released is hardware limitations and simply more raw computing power for better graphics. Sony brought this to the market. Nintendo didn't. That's why there's a huge price difference.
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert |
12-11-2006, 07:15 AM | #53 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Nintendo is very conservative with it's technology and always has been.
DS isn't anything different than the dual screen Game and Watch multiscreens from 20 years ago. http://www.gameandwatch.com/screen/m...een/index.html What Nintendo has always been good at is creating fun simple gameplay without resorting to fancy graphics. Same goes for the Wii. The only motion controllers aren't really that innovative, since the NES Power Glove (not made by Nintendo BTW) had the same idea 20 years ago.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
12-11-2006, 08:22 AM | #54 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Some place windy
|
Quote:
We will likely purchase a Wii eventually. |
|
Tags |
economics, ps3 |
|
|