Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-17-2006, 01:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Ethanol Fuel (E85) - Would you use it?

I'm just curious as to the opinions and thoughts of TFPers about E85 fuel.

Basically, it's a blend of fuel that is 85% ethanol (made from corn at the moment) and 15% unleaded gas. Many late-model domestic cars can run on it (and many people who own them may or may not even know this) and are also known as flex-fuel capable. Here is a link with all E85-capable cars.

Right now E85 fuel is pretty pricey because there is a huge shortage of it, although more ethanol plants are set to go online in the next 12 months, which will reduce the price. Also, as the technology advances and the production of it becomes more efficient, the price should drop.

Right now retailers are beginning to introduce the product to market. Most likely you DON'T have a station near you, although that will probably change in the next year or 2. Here is a database of current stations - http://www.e85refueling.com/

The biggest disadvantage to the consumer besides the current market price (which is expected to go down eventually, although it is competitive with regular gasoline, and some retailers are actually selling it at a temporary loss in order to make it competitive) is that it is less efficient than petroleum gas (except for on acceleration), and will require more fill-ups, most likely.

My questions are:

Would you consider using E85 fuel if it was cheaper per gallon than regular gas?

If it was about the same per gallon as regular gas? (Though, keep in mind it's less efficient.)

Even if it were more per gallon than regular gas?

And why?

I would use it even if it's just a little more than petrol gas since it's a cleaner burning fuel. I wonder what the long term ramifications for using this type of fuel will be, though it should be better than using fossil fuel, like we do now.
lindalove is offline  
Old 08-17-2006, 01:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I would use it if it were significantly cheaper, and by significantly I mean enough to more than offset the loss in fuel economy. Other than that I just don't see the benefit. The automakers that have built in the E85 capability have done so primarily with the knowledge that the capability will almost certainly never be used. They did so primarily because of loopholes in the Corporate Average Fuel Economy regulations that allow them to take a fleet that may not meet the standards and enable them to squeak by. Sorry I don't have time right now to dig up links to the sources for this. I feel that E85 could certainly be a viable option, but right now it is more about politics than actually making a difference
laconic1 is offline  
Old 08-17-2006, 01:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
I would use it if it was cheaper than regular gas. Not on a per gallon basis, but on a per-mile basis. If the per-mile cost of E85 was equal to unleaded 87 then I'd be indifferent, and as long as it costs more per mile to run my car on E85 I'm not going to buy it.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 08-17-2006, 02:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
Mulletproof
 
Psycho Dad's Avatar
 
Location: Some nucking fut house.
Were my vehicle able to use it, it was available and more economical than traditional fuels, I'd be on it depreciation on an SUV.
__________________
Don't always trust the opinions of experts.
Psycho Dad is offline  
Old 08-17-2006, 04:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
In South Dakota E85 is about $2 less per gallon than regular gas..... I'd definatly run it if I lived there.
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-17-2006, 04:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
We're having potato pancakes!
 
hotzot's Avatar
 
Location: stalag 13
sure what the hell, I'd rather have an electric or water car.
__________________
The Bully Boys are here!
hotzot is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 04:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
Insane
 
JamesB's Avatar
 
Location: Ottawa
Give it a couple of years and you will NOT have a choice but to use it .
__________________
-- apt-get install spare_time --
JamesB is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 07:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
According to the website...

Quote:
Ethanol has less energy content than gasoline. However, E85 also has a much higher octane (ranging from 100 to 105) than gasoline. FFVs are not optimized to E85, so they experience a 10-15% drop in fuel economy. This will vary based on the way one drives, the air pressure in the tires, and additional driving conditions..

For comparison purposes, aggressive driving habits can result in a 20% loss and low tire pressure can reduce mileage by 6%. Research indicates Ford FFVs experience a 5% horsepower gain on E85. The range of any particular vehicle is dependent on the size of the fuel tank and driving habits. Current Ford Taurus FFVs have an 18-gallon fuel tank and will normally travel 350 miles between refuelings.
It's all academic as far as I'm concerned since I don't own a vehicle on the list. However, if I did, E85 would have to be considerably cheaper than gasoline to get me to the pump. I'm all for alternative fuels, but if I have to pay just as much (or worse...considerably more) for E85 and suffer the 10-15% loss in fuel economy, then I don't see much point in using the stuff.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
Searching for the perfect brew!
 
Brewmaniac's Avatar
 
If I could I would use it if pump prices were equal, i'd eat the difference in fuel economy to help the save the planet!

Until we are willing to make sacrifices future generations are doomed!
__________________
"That's a joke... I say, that's a joke, son"
Brewmaniac is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:24 AM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Dane Bramage's Avatar
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
if it was readily available and comperably priced, sure... why not.
__________________
Every passing hour brings the Solar System forty-three thousand miles closer to Globular Cluster M13 in Hercules — and still there are some misfits who insist that there is no such thing as progress.
Kurt Vonnegut - Sirens of Titan
Dane Bramage is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 03:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Eat your vegetables
 
genuinegirly's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Arabidopsis-ville
Most cars aren't designed to work on the stuff. It's going to be harder on the system and your vehicle's "health" will suffer.

If I were capable of re-working my vehicle myself so that it could handle ethanol, yes, I will go for it when it is readily available. Even if it is more expensive than gasolene.
__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq

"violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy
genuinegirly is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 04:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
I'll look for the link in a bit, but I was under the impression that the manufacture and waste disposal of E85 made it no more environmentally friendly than standard petro (which still contains ethanol, just not as much). Since this is the drawing factor, that is "burns cleaner", are we really helping if the production is grossly less efficient? Even if it's cheaper?

Hmm, check out this link:

http://digg.com/environment/Why_Wal_...o_sell_ethanol

It has some info that I was trying to portray above...

Last edited by xepherys; 08-18-2006 at 04:24 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
xepherys is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 04:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
The other drawing factor is that it requires less oil thus reducing our dependance on foreign oil. Also since the ethonal is produced within the US the money goes back to the US thus providing a big boost to the economy.
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 04:32 PM   #14 (permalink)
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Many stations here have signs that say 'contains 10% ethanol'. Lately I've noticed my car pinging and hesitating using regular gas, so this week I had to get plus, which is 20c more a gallon.
I don't know if this 10% mix is the problem; I have noticed that my car is running better on the plus, but the cost isn't worth it. Proverbial rock and hard place, I guess.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em.
ngdawg is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 06:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
who ever said streaking was a bad thing?
 
streak_56's Avatar
 
Location: Calgary
I would make the change easily if I could afford such a vehicle.
streak_56 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 07:44 AM   #16 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
I would only use it if I had a newer car designed for ethanol use. Ethanol is a slightly corrosive substance. Any natural materials used in an engine such as seals and plugs can be corroded. Ethanol has a higher oxygen content than gasoline so it can cause other problems. Ethanol in it's pure form - not mixed with fuel - can kill a standard gasoline engine.

If I did have a car that was designed for ethanol use I would use it. Why not. There are a number of usable byproducts made in the production of Ethanol. My only questions are, Is gasoline used to run the machinery that produces ethanol? How much is used versus how much ethanol is made? and are we using just as much gasoline just to make this expensive fuel?
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 09:44 PM   #17 (permalink)
Tilted
 
I would use E85 even if it were more expensive than gas. It is the only short term alternate energy source that Is viable for use right now. I only need two things: a vehicle that can run on E85, and a station within 200 miles that can sell me E85.
__________________
Jack1.0
----------------------------------------------
I've learned to embrace my inner Geek.
I haven't found anything else I'm good at.
Jack1.0 is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 01:20 AM   #18 (permalink)
Quadrature Amplitude Modulator
 
oberon's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
If you had to buy another car, I think it'd be better to get a more fuel efficient car than to get one that can do E85. You'll reduce America's dependency on foreign petrol AND have lower fuel bills, most likely. Are there any E85 compatible vehicles that get better than, say, 40 miles a gallon? These days, it makes no sense to buy a passenger car that gets less.

As for the merits of E85 itself... the studies I've seen show that ethanol produced from corn is rather inefficient, and even if we use all the arable land in the US to produce corn for ethanol, it would not be enough to meet the demand. Ethanol from sugar is more promising, but politically infeasible. I think improving vehicle efficiency will have more of an effect on petrol use in the US than switching to E85.

That said, if it was cheaper I'd use it.
__________________
"There are finer fish in the sea than have ever been caught." -- Irish proverb
oberon is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 12:17 PM   #19 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
My only gripe about E85 is that I hear it takes 4 gallons of water to produce one gallon of E85. Don't know if that is true though.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 08-21-2006, 04:20 PM   #20 (permalink)
Insane
 
i would defiantely use it. the majority of brazil is already using it as they have an easy means to make ethanol from sugar cane. its also a lot cheaper.

the distribution of ethanol shouldn't be terribly expensive to implement either, as it can be pumped using the same type of pumps used for gasoline and diesel.
KungFuGuy is offline  
Old 08-21-2006, 04:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon
As for the merits of E85 itself... the studies I've seen show that ethanol produced from corn is rather inefficient, and even if we use all the arable land in the US to produce corn for ethanol, it would not be enough to meet the demand. Ethanol from sugar is more promising, but politically infeasible. I think improving vehicle efficiency will have more of an effect on petrol use in the US than switching to E85.

That said, if it was cheaper I'd use it.
One upside I see to using more ethanol is that the corn lobby will set its sights (and has set its sights) on government subsidies of the ethanol industry. More corn for ethanol=less corn for high fructose corn syrup, to my thinking. I know that idea is flawed, because the corn lobby wants to have their cake and eat it too.

Personally, I'd rather see more biodiesel. It's easier to produce and environmentally-friendly, especially since you can make it from used cooking oil.

But I'd rather use anything over foreign oil.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 08-21-2006, 04:54 PM   #22 (permalink)
Unbelievable
 
cj2112's Avatar
 
Location: Grants Pass OR
E85 is nothing but hype, it's not good for the environment, nor is it cost effective. Check out this article http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-promises.html
cj2112 is offline  
Old 08-21-2006, 05:36 PM   #23 (permalink)
A Storm Is Coming
 
thingstodo's Avatar
 
Location: The Great White North
Sounds like the CO2 benefits aren't really there. If they were, I might pay a penny or two/gallon more ona mile/gallon basis.
__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.
thingstodo is offline  
Old 08-22-2006, 07:41 AM   #24 (permalink)
Tilted
 
ozahs's Avatar
 
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
I'm all for anything that reduces our dependance on fossil fuels, but it seems most people are very sensitive about price. If they can make it cost similar to regular gas on an mpg basis, then I can see it really start to take off. From the standpoint of our economy, it seems like a win/win.
ozahs is offline  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
We're having potato pancakes!
 
hotzot's Avatar
 
Location: stalag 13
I buy the cheepest gas, I wouldn't care if it were rat butts. If it makes my car go and the milage is the same I don't care. I remember back in the 60's and 70's they promiced that we'd all have automated cars and driving using nuclear fuel. What the hell happened?
__________________
The Bully Boys are here!
hotzot is offline  
Old 08-28-2006, 11:02 AM   #26 (permalink)
Adequate
 
cyrnel's Avatar
 
Location: In my angry-dome.
Three things are needed before I'll take it seriously:

-My car has to like it.
-Cost/gal doesn't mean anything without correction for efficiency loss.
-Freeze or kill the corn grower subsidies. I won't pay more on that side to make E85 look cheap at the pumps.
__________________
There are a vast number of people who are uninformed and heavily propagandized, but fundamentally decent. The propaganda that inundates them is effective when unchallenged, but much of it goes only skin deep. If they can be brought to raise questions and apply their decent instincts and basic intelligence, many people quickly escape the confines of the doctrinal system and are willing to do something to help others who are really suffering and oppressed." -Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, p. 195
cyrnel is offline  
Old 08-31-2006, 06:24 PM   #27 (permalink)
Myrmidon
 
ziadel's Avatar
 
Location: In the twilight and mist.
the engine in my truck was made in 1975, ethanol would destroy every seal it came into contact with.
__________________
Ron Paul '08
Vote for Freedom
Go ahead and google Dr. Ron Paul. You'll like what you read.
ziadel is offline  
Old 08-31-2006, 07:48 PM   #28 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Demeter's Avatar
 
I would use it as long as it wasn't much more expensive than regular fuel. We all need to do our part, right?
__________________

I am not bound to please thee with my answers.

William Shakespeare
Demeter is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 04:33 AM   #29 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
I may be wrong here, but it seems that everyone is not looking at the broad scheme of things here. REmember our history? There was a time where everyone FREAKED that we would be driving in cars with UNLEADED GAS? OMG my car wont run good at ALL if I have unleaded gas! (Leaded gas was used in older cars with solid steel valves and heads to protect the valve and valve seats btw) Now I bet you wouldn't find many people who even knew we had leaded gas several years back. Our world is changing and evolving, and we need to evolve with it. Maybe E85 isn't the answer to EVERY energy problem, but who knows, in several years when you have more enigineers working on designing cars/trucks for ethanol, they might stumble on something that DOES make it more efficient. Remember the days when people thought that there was no way automobiles would EVER relace the horse because they were inefficient and unreliable? The only way to find solutions for problems is to TRY something. Maybe It wont work, but maybe it will. I work at a dealership, and have been learning about ethanol based fuels, and we are working on ways to make the vehicles more efficient, but it takes TIME and WORK. This country is too full of people who expect INSTANT gratification. Sit back and relax, go with the flow people...Buy one tank of E85, then on the next fill up go back to regular, until things get more efficient. Production costs may be slightly higher, but when are they NOT for a new product? For those that are old enough, remember that unleaded gasoline cost more than leaded gas, because of the increase in production costs? But we still converted, because EVENTUALLY the automakers were able to integrate the vehicles. It wasn't an INSTANT solution, it takes time.

I personally support it (E85), because history in economics shows that competition drives prices down. Think about it, if only 20% of the US converted to ethanol, the big oil companies will se a substantial loss in the pocket for them. In order to try to keep atleast SOME of their customers, they will need to lower their prices to compensate....Basic economy, supply goes up, prices go down, and competition breeds lower prices. It's not a guess, its economic historic fact.

Also, if you look at some of the news, to help support Ethanol, the US government has allowed people to actually manufacture and use the old fashioned STILL! What do you think they do at the ethanol plants? It's pure grain alcohol! MOONSHINE! (of course in order to operate a still you have to sign an agreement with the government promising to put in an additive that poisons the mixture so you can't drink it, but who says you cant pull out a quart or two BEFORE for um...Medicinal purposes!) As far as the cost? I have researched this recently when I heard about it. The average still can be made for about $250, and production costs to manufacture? Is in the neighborhood of a 60 to 90 cents per gallon, depending on where you purchase your corn/grain from, and use propane for the processing. Now if you were to calculate out things, say 85 gallons of Ethanol to 15 gallons of gasoline to make your own mixture (Yes it can be done safely) then you will have 100 gallons of E85 Ethanol. If you paid $3.00 for the gasoline, and max cost of $.90 for the Ethanol, then 100 gallons cost you $121.50, for an average cost of $1.22 per gallon. Thats enough to make me switch!

Now the above paragraph isn't perfect, but it gives you an idea of how it CAN be done by an enterprising person. Imagine if you had your own farm, what you could make? Personally I think that if you had your own farm in Montana and a large still, you could have your own gas station and make some good money!

Again this isn't perfect, and I am not saying it is for EVERYONE, but remember how things work in the world, hell half of the discoveries in the WORLD were made by accident when trying to create something else. Perfect example? WD-40, everyone knows what it is, but did you know that it was a mistake? WD-40 stands for "water displacement sample 40". It was originally designed to help remove water from places where you didn't want it. But look at what it is used for now? And the guy who made it is RICH!...lol
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 09-02-2006, 07:47 AM   #30 (permalink)
Crazy
 
I have driven an E85 vehicle for a while and it was great. couldn't tell the difference between it and a similiar car on gas. However, it was specifically tuned for E85. If it were available and within the same price range, I would definitely use it.
samiam is offline  
 

Tags
e85, ethanol, fuel

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360