Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-03-2006, 07:57 AM   #41 (permalink)
Unencapsulated
 
JustJess's Avatar
 
Location: Kittyville
It's pretty simple. Drunk driving = wrong, and he should be arrested etc. Of course people are more interested because of who he is. It was just a mistake, but one that he should have to pay consequences to just like anyone else.

Sure, have a drunken tirade. I do it all the time m'self! But seriously... drunk or not, if you start going off about how 'everything is the Jews' fault'... yeah. You're an anti-Semite, and for that kind of irrational racism, you should be bitchslapped. I believe in free speech, but I also believe in bitchslapping.
__________________
My heart knows me better than I know myself, so I'm gonna let it do all the talkin'.
JustJess is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 09:07 AM   #42 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Free speech means you have the right to say something. It does not mean you have the right to say something free of any and all consequences. He'd already fought off questions about being anti-Semitic before; now he's just confirmed that they were true. Being an anti-Semite, unfortunately for Gibson, has consequences-like ABC won't want you to produce a miniseries about the Holocaust, for example. People who think biggotry is stupid and wrong won't want to work for him or with him, despite his star power.

This isn't about "He's free to say whatever he wants." Of course he is. That doesn't mean the rest of the world either has to like it or has to ignore it. It is not illegal for him to hate Jews. He cannot and should not be jailed for it. However, he has no Constitutional protection against people deciding that being one makes him a stupid asshat and not be interested in seeing his movies or being in them or associating with him. People are not entitled to the rest of the world conforming to their ideas or accepting them simply because they have them.

As tophat said, in vino veritas. I have no interest in supporting someone who thinks that Jews killed his lord and savior and ruined the world, and neither the Constitution nor anything else guaranatee him the ability to be like that without other people choosing not to have anything to do with him.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 10:05 AM   #43 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
Free speech means you have the right to say something. It does not mean you have the right to say something free of any and all consequences. He'd already fought off questions about being anti-Semitic before; now he's just confirmed that they were true. Being an anti-Semite, unfortunately for Gibson, has consequences-like ABC won't want you to produce a miniseries about the Holocaust, for example. People who think biggotry is stupid and wrong won't want to work for him or with him, despite his star power.

This isn't about "He's free to say whatever he wants." Of course he is. That doesn't mean the rest of the world either has to like it or has to ignore it. It is not illegal for him to hate Jews. He cannot and should not be jailed for it. However, he has no Constitutional protection against people deciding that being one makes him a stupid asshat and not be interested in seeing his movies or being in them or associating with him. People are not entitled to the rest of the world conforming to their ideas or accepting them simply because they have them.

As tophat said, in vino veritas. I have no interest in supporting someone who thinks that Jews killed his lord and savior and ruined the world, and neither the Constitution nor anything else guaranatee him the ability to be like that without other people choosing not to have anything to do with him.

There's a huge difference between supporting the person and punishing the person.

If you do not like what the man says you do not buy his product. The studio heads decide that they don't want him to be in their movies, have his distributed by their studio and so on.

But to have people say he needs to be bitchslapped and by whom(?) that's just wrong.

If you personally have issues with what he said turn away and look elsewhere and for people you can believe in what they say.

To me, Mel Gibson is a decent actor, one of the best these days, he adds humor and has a style of acting I like. His personal life is none of my business, his beliefs are none of my business and what he says and does outside of that entertainment realm is none of my business.

If he comes down my street and preaches hatred or if his movies are filled with hatred then I will lose interest and decide I won't buy his product. If he restarts a NAZI party and declares all jews must die..... then he needs help, deep psychological help.

As for The Passion of The Christ, it was a very good movie, very realistic as to how the Bible itself wrote it. It was also damn entertaining and well acted. I didn't find it anti-semitic in anyway. What, was Mel Gibson supposed to change the Bible and history and make the Jews love and want to save Christ?

For Christians, Christ died to save us all...... therefore he had to die and had to suffer because it was his sacrifice to do so. That is all I got out of what the movie and Gibson said. I saw nothing damning the jews.

If people worried more about the log in their own eye and not the splinter in anothers, when it comes to what 1 man says the world may just be a better place.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

Last edited by pan6467; 08-03-2006 at 10:07 AM..
pan6467 is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:18 PM   #44 (permalink)
Fledgling Dead Head
 
krwlz's Avatar
 
Location: Clarkson U.
Agreed on all points Pan. I don't remember, anywhere in our Constitution of the United States where it states that "You have the right to not be offended"
krwlz is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:28 PM   #45 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Who is talking about a right to not be offended?

He made offensive comments, so now people don't want to be involved with him because they feel offended. If a guy at work tells you he raped your mom every day you walked by his desk, wouldn't you try to avoid that guy at work?

Actions have consequences. He has a right to hate Jews and he has a right to express that hate if he chooses. He does not have a right to express that hate free and expect that nothing will change. He offended a lot of people and they have every right to choose to not go to his movies or be in his movies or anything else regarding him. Alternately, people who don't want to be tarnished by his newfound reputation as a bigot will avoid him or distance themselves from him.

Freedom of expression does not guarantee tolerance or acceptance of that expression.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:48 PM   #46 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
Alcohol does two things: It enhances the asshole effect and it allows the truth to come up. That's all I'm sayin....
I've always said "A drunken mind speaks a sober heart."
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:49 PM   #47 (permalink)
Fledgling Dead Head
 
krwlz's Avatar
 
Location: Clarkson U.
I didn't say anyone had to ignore it... But its a personal choice, and as far as the mass media coverage, and bullshit that goes along with it... Thats too much.

On an individual basis, if you want to boycott him, thats fine, and I won't berate you for it. But legal-esq punishment? Please....
krwlz is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 02:07 PM   #48 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
having been drunk quite a few times in my younger days and not remembering what i've said or done on a few of those, i'm inclined to forgive, forget, and move on with whatever he may have said. Personally, I think that there is a bit of hypocrisy floating around. How many of you would be criticizing him if Mel had gone off on a tirade calling the cop a german nazi and a hitler puppet and then slamming the whole nazi movement? My guess is less than two or three of you.

Anyway, people and companies can do whatever they feel they need to do with Gibsons movies...I, however, still enjoy his work and will continue to see and buy his movies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krwlz
Agreed on all points Pan. I don't remember, anywhere in our Constitution of the United States where it states that "You have the right to not be offended"
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."

Last edited by dksuddeth; 08-03-2006 at 02:10 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 03:05 PM   #49 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Sarasota
As soon as I heard they found a bottle of Tequila in the car, I discounted just about everything he said. Te-kill-ya is not normal booze. It makes you say and do stuff you can't even believe you said or did. BTDT.

Also, I realize that LA/Malibu cops are used to dealing with all manner of star/wanna-be/washed-up actor types, but who writes up an 8 page report on the babblings of drunk asshole during a DUI arrest? Only someone who wants to share the limelight when the shit hits the fan. You can be sure if it was you or I every drunken slur and insult would not have been written down in a report.

Also, what is the big deal with insulting Jews? What if he goes off on 'lazy, cross-breeding Mexicanos' , 'foul smelling cheap-ass frenchies' , or 'sneaky slant-eyed Japs'. Is there a French Anti-Defamation League who gets their panties in a wad? A Mexican Civil Liberties Union running to crucify Gibson? A Japanese Defense Society who sentences him to eternal damnation? Didn't think so.

Sticks and stones and all that.....
__________________
I am just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe...

"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined." - Thoreau

"Nothing great was ever accomplished without enthusiasm" - Emerson
DDDDave is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 06:13 AM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
I can't believe this crap.

There are people here crucifying the man for a drunken (free speech) tirade, and yet they argue and say they will fight for censorship.

Hypocrites!

Either Gibson had the right to say what he said and should face no retribution and thus free speech OR he should be condemned for the rantings of a drunken man and thus we all need watch what we say and Heaven forbid we ever get drunk and say something we regret.
I don't see how that is hypocritical. I can disagree with what he supposedly said, I can say that I think it was stupid and wrong to say it, AND I can support free speech at the same time. Free speech does not guarantee "no retribution" for your speech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krwlz
On an individual basis, if you want to boycott him, thats fine, and I won't berate you for it. But legal-esq punishment? Please....
Did anyone suggest "legal-esq" punishment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Personally, I think that there is a bit of hypocrisy floating around. How many of you would be criticizing him if Mel had gone off on a tirade calling the cop a german nazi and a hitler puppet and then slamming the whole nazi movement? My guess is less than two or three of you.
So fewer people would object to him calling an officer a nazi? Again, how is that hypocritical?

I don't really care one way or the other about what Gibson said. (EDIT: Though I did find it offensive). He was drunk-driving way, way over the speed limit. That's the main issue for me. However, I understand that there will likely be consequences when someone in a highly public career goes on a drunken anti-semetic rant.

I know that I probably won't be going to any of his films, but not because of his comments. I just don't think he's much of an actor. He has a few good movies, most are average/bad.

Last edited by sapiens; 08-04-2006 at 06:34 AM..
sapiens is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 06:32 AM   #51 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Personally, I think that there is a bit of hypocrisy floating around. How many of you would be criticizing him if Mel had gone off on a tirade calling the cop a german nazi and a hitler puppet and then slamming the whole nazi movement? My guess is less than two or three of you.
pointing out worse behavior to excuse bad behavior is childish at best, since that's exactly what children do.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 06:55 AM   #52 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Again I still wonder.

Why do more people care about what an actor says then about a president of a nation working twords nuclear weapons?

Quote:
Attending a summit of Muslim nations in Malaysia, Iran's president said: "The real cure for the conflict is the elimination of the Zionist regime, but there should be an immediate ceasefire first."
The latest.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 07:01 AM   #53 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Again I still wonder.

Why do more people care about what an actor says then about a president of a nation working twords nuclear weapons?
for the same reason people don't care that hezbollah hides among civillians and palestinians fake violence to make israel look bad.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:11 AM   #54 (permalink)
Fledgling Dead Head
 
krwlz's Avatar
 
Location: Clarkson U.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
Did anyone suggest "legal-esq" punishment?
Well, Since you or I aren't going to "Bitchslap them" I just assumed that meant a favoring of some type of formal punishment for the comments.
krwlz is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:18 AM   #55 (permalink)
Unencapsulated
 
JustJess's Avatar
 
Location: Kittyville
To clarify: bitchslapping a person is certainly not a legal punishment, just a societal one as detailed by others.
I was speaking casually, but my point was that he can say whatever he wants - but he shouldn't expect people to not have strong opinions about his opinions. He's too public a figure.

And for myself, when I hear racist mumbo-jumbo, I want to slap that person. But usually, I just practice that one mentally and hand out verbal ass-kicking instead.

Legally, it's agreed that the only thing they should be penalizing him for is the DUI, the stupid schmuck.

And yep, have to agree with Ustwo - it's just Mel Gibson. He doesn't have command of an army. Unlike the Iranians... /shudders
__________________
My heart knows me better than I know myself, so I'm gonna let it do all the talkin'.
JustJess is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:23 AM   #56 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
I don't see how that is hypocritical. I can disagree with what he supposedly said, I can say that I think it was stupid and wrong to say it, AND I can support free speech at the same time. Free speech does not guarantee "no retribution" for your speech.

The "legal-esque" question is very much a factor.

Quote:
A sheriff's spokesman's initial account of the arrest described it as occurring "without incident" and made no mention of Gibson's remarks, fueling claims of a cover-up after they came to light
Why if it is "freedom of speech" were they so worried about his remarks as he was arrested? Why did they press for some type of "extra" charges if he was just being a belligerant ass who had too many and was speaking things that may be offensive.

Quote:
LOS ANGELES - Mel Gibson now faces a legal battle in addition to the one to restore his public image.

Prosecutors on Wednesday charged Gibson with driving under the influence of alcohol, having an elevated blood-alcohol level and an open container of liquor in his car when he was pulled over in Malibu last week.

If convicted, Gibson faces up to six months in jail, though first-time misdemeanor drunken driving offenders usually face minimal, if any, time behind bars. It's up to the judge to determine if Gibson would serve any time.

Prosecutors made no mention of Gibson's self-described "belligerent behavior" and "despicable" remarks in the complaint — reportedly the unleashing of an anti-Semitic tirade.

"After evaluating all the evidence presented by the Sheriff's Department — and they presented every scrap of evidence they had — we evaluated carefully and felt the charges we filed were the appropriate charges in this case," said district attorney spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons.

Gibson's lawyer, Blair Berk, declined to comment, saying, "It is inappropriate to discuss the ongoing case." An attorney may appear in the actor's place during his Sept. 28 arraignment.
So if this weren't about what he said and just the DUI...... then what other charges are they looking for????????

I know ....... it's that whole public disturbance thing. He was loud and acting a fool (as drunks do) and they want to charge him for that also. And while we're at it let's pressure the judge to max old Mad Max out on the sentencing, that'll teach him to speak his mind.

From this I have learned..... if and when I drink I can no not never speak badly of sprites and pixies..... even though I love them when sober when I drink I find them very much a nuisance. So Heaven forbid I start walking home from a drunk get arrested for public intox and instead of wanting to feel guilty for my stupid actions I go into a tirade against pixies and sprites...... I don't believe what I am saying, I'm just having a drunk rationalization that if I can blame others for why I am drinking maybe someone will understand that I have a true reason to drink.

I know that's psycho babble from an bleeding heart liberal addictions counselor that many of you probably just see as an excuse, even though it happens.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:38 AM   #57 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
The "legal-esque" question is very much a factor.

Why if it is "freedom of speech" were they so worried about his remarks as he was arrested? Why did they press for some type of "extra" charges if he was just being a belligerant ass who had too many and was speaking things that may be offensive.
I think that they were worried about preferential treatment of celebrities and possible falsification of records by the police. Again, I don't see any charges relating to what he said while drunk.
sapiens is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 09:02 AM   #58 (permalink)
32 flavors and then some
 
Gilda's Avatar
 
Location: Out on a wire.
I refuse to accept being drunk as an excuse for anything he said. He chose to drink, he chose to get in a car. The subesequent behavior is his, not the alcohol's.

Gilda
Gilda is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 09:11 AM   #59 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
keep in mind his bac was only .12 - that and he's an admitted alcoholic. most alcoholics I know wake up with a .12 not go on anti-semetic tirades. .12 what is that like 4 beers? damn mel is a lightweight pussy.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 08-04-2006, 10:42 PM   #60 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
Alcohol does two things: It enhances the asshole effect and it allows the truth to come up. That's all I'm sayin....
So when a drunk in a bar comes up to you and tells you he's rich and single, you're sure he's telling you the truth?
SteelyLoins is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 06:57 AM   #61 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
keep in mind his bac was only .12 - that and he's an admitted alcoholic. most alcoholics I know wake up with a .12 not go on anti-semetic tirades. .12 what is that like 4 beers? damn mel is a lightweight pussy.
From a professional in the field :

As stated above a long term alcoholic who has liver issues will get drunk on less, it's called a tolernece break. (Hopefully, this isn't Mel's case.)

Also, when a recovering alcoholic who has a significant amount of time in recovery (everyone is different and thus the results) when they first "slip" it may take very little to "get them drunk". They will return very fast to the tolerence level they stopped at, but the first 2-3 times out they'll get "drunk" on very little.

Also, who's to say alcohol was the only drug in his system, it's the only one they tested for.

Before stating the above, keep those facts in mind.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
 

Tags
abuse, antisemitic, apologises, gibson, mel


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360