|
View Poll Results: Should the helmet law be restated | |||
Yes | 29 | 48.33% | |
No | 29 | 48.33% | |
Not sure | 2 | 3.33% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
06-19-2006, 07:36 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
©
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Last year, an acorn sized rock got flung off a tire and took out the polycarbonate visor on my helmet. The visor stopped the rock; but was no longer transparent afterwards. I'm not sure what would have happened if it had hit my face, instead. I wear a full faced, Snell approved helmet, leather jacket, gloves and boots every time I ride. However, I fully support your right to be a moron if you choose. |
|
06-19-2006, 07:54 AM | #42 (permalink) |
Float on.... Alright
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, i.e. Oklahoma
|
If they don't put into effect a helmet at least make people sign a release if they don't want to wear one.
__________________
"I'm not even supposed to be here today." "I assure you we're open." |
06-19-2006, 08:04 AM | #43 (permalink) |
Falling Angel
Location: L.A. L.A. land
|
At least in California, the legislation was put into effect soely because of the state footing the healthcare bills for those who are dependant on state care for the many expensive-to-treat and preventable head injuries. Ideally, if the state takes care of your butt (or your head, or any combination of the two), then I'd say they have a right to tell you you have to wear a helmet.
Obviously though, that'd be impossible to enforce. I guess the next best thing would be for the insurance companies to do the ruthless enforcement--that's their specialty, after all. It's hard, because I do believe that helmet laws save and improve lives in general, but it's easy to see how this line of thought could be abused by the government. It's also easy to see how the general public could also take this arguement to rediculous extremes. Edited to add: I do like the idea of the mandatory organ donorship if nothing else but to make a point, but I'm sure that would inflame people who don't want the gov't to impose *that* either. For the record, I'm highly in favor of organ donorship. By force, if needed!
__________________
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come." - Matt Groening My goal? To fulfill my potential. Last edited by Sultana; 06-19-2006 at 08:06 AM.. Reason: To add a thought. |
06-19-2006, 08:55 AM | #44 (permalink) |
Too Awesome for Aardvarks
Location: Angloland
|
To be honest, if you chose to ride a bike/motorcycle without a helmet, your an idiot.
I've come off various vehicular transportation devices with a helmet, hurt like hell, but i'm still hear now to moan and bitch about it.
__________________
Office hours have changed. Please call during office hours for more information. |
06-19-2006, 08:57 AM | #45 (permalink) |
Banned
|
As long as you have insurance, so the country doesn't end up paying for your hospitalization because of your "preference", it should be your call if you wear a helmet or not.
I'd just prefer that everyone did, because I live in Florida, so I won't have to scoop up so much brain matter and console your families when i'm a Paramedic. I don't like legislating personal decisions that have no impact on me. If you want to die, I'm not gonna vote on a law to keep you from it. I already had one kid yesterday during one of my clinicals who fell off his moped, landed straight on his head at only 30 mph. 17 years old. Thankfully, he lived because he had his helmet on. |
06-19-2006, 09:16 AM | #46 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
You see how helmet laws could be abused by the government, but fail to see how organ donation could be abused by them too? Sorry, but mandatory organ donorship is a hellish practice. Just look to China where you can get a match for a pristine 20 year old's kidney in two weeks. You don't have to have that great of an imagination to figure out that scenario is impossible unless you're killing people only for their organs. |
|
06-19-2006, 09:32 AM | #47 (permalink) | ||
Falling Angel
Location: L.A. L.A. land
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come." - Matt Groening My goal? To fulfill my potential. |
||
06-19-2006, 09:49 AM | #48 (permalink) |
The Worst Influence
Location: Arizona
|
Well being that I've been riding motorcycles for a while and that I race my bikes off-road this is a big thing for me. I don't know many people that approve of me riding on the street but I'm trying to get a street bike anyways. I live in Phoenix, one of the most dangerous places for motorcycles and I've know people that have died or been injured on motorcycles.
It's true that alot of the danger comes from other people on the road but I do agree that it is a surival of the fittest issue. I don't think that it's necessarily right for the government to control helmet use but I understand that it would save lives. It's not about speed it's just how you will hit the pavement when you crash. Your skin gets damaged too but you can easily fall back and hit your head hard enough to have permanent brain damage. That said, my dad is a neurologist and he constantly rides without a helmet. I can understand people not wanting to wear helmets, especially out here where it's 117 degrees in the summer but personally, I've hit my head enough to have learned. Granted I still ride on the dirt with out protection somtimes..last time I did I flipped my bike and lost a good amount of skin. I'm all for freedom.
__________________
My life is one of those 'you had to be there' jokes. |
06-19-2006, 09:50 AM | #49 (permalink) |
I aim to misbehave!
Location: SW Oklahoma
|
I'll stay out of the whole helmet thing, I just don't enjoy arguing that much but I do have a couple of observations.
In this state, and probably most of the country, you can just walk in and buy a zero to 60 in 3 seconds, 160 MPH or faster machine, weighing anywhere from 300 to 1800 pounds, (yes, really), and you don't even need to prove that you can operate the thing. You might need a license to ride it on public roads, but not to buy it. To get a license in this state, unless you were grandfathered in like me, you need to take a basic class at slow speed to learn to operate said machine. Bingo, you have a motorcycle license and you can now ride it where ever you want. Interesting observation about helmets. So, you have the best helmet money can buy, guaranteed to save your noggin. So, where are your boots, leathers, armor, gloves, etc? I see people every day with helmets, and T-shirts, shorts, flip flop shoes and women with almost nothing on but the helmet. (Not that I don't enjoy that part). I have wrecked a few times and have seen several. I pretty much have slid to a stop on my leather jacket, jeans, gloves, and boots each time. I have also seen a few folks slide to a stop on their arms and bare legs. I once saw a guy slide to a stop with his bike on top of his left leg. He was wearing tennis shoes and had sanded the outside of his ankle off. From the screaming I assumed it probably stung a little. My only point in all of this is that it is not just a helmet issue. Idiots with helmets die also. If you are going to discuss safety equipement then I think you should discuss all of it. By the way, I don't ALWAYS wear a helmet but I have two and they are both full face, high dollar items. I wear em as I see fit. As you were.
__________________
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom |
06-19-2006, 09:52 AM | #50 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
|
|
06-19-2006, 10:21 AM | #51 (permalink) | |
I aim to misbehave!
Location: SW Oklahoma
|
Quote:
Exactly why I can't survive in the Politics forum.
__________________
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom Last edited by rockogre; 06-19-2006 at 10:23 AM.. Reason: SPELLING, FREAKING DAMN SPELLING!!! Arrrrgggg, we hates it! |
|
06-19-2006, 10:30 AM | #52 (permalink) | ||
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
I don't think the government should mandate helmets or seatbelts. Recommend yes, Require no.
I wonder which would save more lives and injury, requiring motorcycle riders to wear helmets or requiring car passengers to wear helmets. By shear numbers alone I bet many more lives would be saved in the car crashes even with seatbelts on. How far do we want our government to go in protecting us? I do not like the logic of "if it saves one person's life, it is worth it". Freedom from excessive intrusion from our government is worth something. My insurance agent tells me that motorcycle insurance is reasonably priced because 9 out of 10 times an accident is the car driver's fault and they collect from them. However since they also insure the cars they probably wish that motorcycles would just go away. I don't want to get into a lot of statistics debate because one can usually twist the numbers around to show what you want but a few comments on the OP's Florida numbers: Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-19-2006, 10:38 AM | #53 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. Last edited by Bill O'Rights; 06-19-2006 at 10:40 AM.. |
|
06-19-2006, 10:49 AM | #54 (permalink) | |
32 flavors and then some
Location: Out on a wire.
|
Quote:
I'm fully in favor of a presumption of consent to donate. It would work exactly as it does now. In case of an accidental death, the family would be contacted and asked what their wishes were regarding donation, and if the next of kin objected, no donation would occur; if they consented, the organs would be donated. The big difference would be for the apathetic middle. Those like my family would still donate, and those, like the Orthodox Jewish family that lives next door, who have religious or other reasons not to donate, would still have their wishes honored. But that apathetic middle would be donating rather than not, and the organs lost because a person with a donor card or donor marked license has no family to consent would be used. Heck, short of that, a very simple, easy to implement change would make a huge difference: Ask people when renewing licenses if they want to donate their organs. Many who make no effort on their own will say yes when asked. Make this a standard section of the license and then use that as consent without requiring additional family consent. Grace has told me that they routinely get potential donors with a donor card or a marked license whose organs are lost because a family member can't be located quickly enough or the family member refuses donation against the expressed wishes of the patient. The beauty of this system is that it's a small change, no government intrusion, and it follows the wishes of the individual rather than relying on others to speak for her. Grace also is a bit ambivalent regarding helmets. Young, healthy accident victims with severe head injuries and intact internal organs are the perfect organ donors. Gilda |
|
06-19-2006, 10:54 AM | #55 (permalink) | ||
big damn hero
|
Quote:
Can we build them to seat eight and get real crappy gas mileage? Quote:
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously. Last edited by guthmund; 06-19-2006 at 10:57 AM.. |
||
06-19-2006, 11:00 AM | #56 (permalink) | |
©
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Every time I consider them, I get Village People flashbacks. |
|
06-19-2006, 11:10 AM | #57 (permalink) | ||
I aim to misbehave!
Location: SW Oklahoma
|
Quote:
Quote:
And I agree StanT, but then I live in cowboy country and can get away with it a little better. And I didn't even plan to have a horse in this race! Sucked in again.
__________________
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom Last edited by rockogre; 06-19-2006 at 11:12 AM.. Reason: Slooooowwwwww thinking! |
||
06-19-2006, 11:14 AM | #58 (permalink) | |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, the insurance industry can't solve this problem, no matter how much they may want to (and trust me, anything that will lower claims costs they are all for). Since insurance policies are written to protect the people you hurt (liability section), your physical property (physical damage section) and you if you're hit by someone with no or not enough insurance (uninsured/underinsured motorist section), there's no way to craft any language anywhere except the UM/UIM portion (which is an optional coverage only purchased by about 35% of drivers) to remove coverage if you don't wear your helmet. Most auto claims end up going to the health insurance carrier and since most Americans buy their health insurance through work to get better rates, it's unlikely that a blanket helmet requirement would be legal since it's a coverage provided by the employer who pays for at least a portion of it. If I'm driving and hit someone, my insurance can't have an exclusion of coverage for a third party that I injure because of my actions/negligence because that third party wasn't wearing a helmet. I'm still liable for my actions, and that denial of coverage could theoretically bankrupt me. That all said, I'm fine with the state telling you to wear your damn helmet just as I'm ok with them telling you that have to have the proper departments have to sign off on the plans for your new house - it's too dangerous to have a lack of oversight.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
|
06-19-2006, 11:33 AM | #59 (permalink) | ||
Free Mars!
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
|
Just to clarify...
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war |
||
06-19-2006, 11:37 AM | #60 (permalink) | |
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
Quote:
Last edited by flstf; 06-19-2006 at 11:45 AM.. |
|
06-19-2006, 04:28 PM | #63 (permalink) | |||
Mine is an evil laugh
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
who hid my keyboard's PANIC button? Last edited by spindles; 06-19-2006 at 04:46 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|||
06-19-2006, 05:04 PM | #64 (permalink) |
Tilted
|
I see, and agree, with both sides of the argument.
I agree that helmets save lives, and that every motorcyclist should wear one. I also agree that it isn't the government's place to enforce it, it should be common sense. And yeah... survival of the fittest is great to bring up in this argument. My problem with the whole thing is that there are some pretty shady traffic laws in this country. Enough that if the motorcyclist who wasn't wearing a helmet caused an accident with me, and his brains end up on my vehicle... if his family got a snazzy lawyer, -I- could be liable for his death. That's fucked up. There are laws that try to simplify traffic accidents to the point that in many states, you are automatically at fault if you were the car in the rear or the accident. So if Joe Headstrong decides to dump his bike right in front of my car, and I crush his head under my wheels, suddenly I am at fault for his death. My feelings are, if you want to ride without a helmet on public roads, you should feel free to do so, but if you do, then you are held responsible for all injuries to your head, regardless of who's fault an accident is. Cars have to meet a minimum crash rating to be allowed on public US roads for a reason. There is no reason they shouldn't have that same crash rating for your head. |
06-19-2006, 05:12 PM | #65 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
|
|
06-20-2006, 07:47 AM | #66 (permalink) | ||
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
Riding a motorcycle in traffic is like diving in shark infested waters without a cage. Riding the bike in traffic in the first place is the big danger and helmets offer little protection.
I still believe that the reason the stats show fewer deaths/injuries when helmet laws are enacted is largely because of the reduced number of riders and miles ridden. Forbes: http://www2.owen.vanderbilt.edu/mike...9/Helmets.html Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-22-2006, 03:02 PM | #67 (permalink) |
Float on.... Alright
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, i.e. Oklahoma
|
I was almost run over 3 times within 7 minutes today made me glad I was wearing my helmet, gloves, jacket, jeans, and boots. Would have given me a fighting chance if they had gone ahead and run over me.
__________________
"I'm not even supposed to be here today." "I assure you we're open." |
06-22-2006, 09:35 PM | #69 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
What, do you think the #1 cause of motorcycle deaths is road rash or something? No. What's the part of the body most likely to kill you if you sustain trauma there? That's right, it's your head. |
|
06-23-2006, 04:25 AM | #70 (permalink) | |
pinche vato
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
|
Quote:
When I was 13, I asked my father for a motorcycle. He said he'd rather give me a pistol instead, because if I really wanted to kill myself he'd rather I do it properly. On that same note, my big sister is a high-ranking official in state government yet she rides her Harley everywhere (including Daytona every March). ANd she does wear a bucket.
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed. |
|
06-23-2006, 04:46 AM | #71 (permalink) | |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Quote:
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
|
06-23-2006, 06:35 AM | #72 (permalink) | |
pinche vato
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
|
Quote:
Of course, if you whipped that spidercrawl manuever on him, I think you could take him.
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed. |
|
Tags |
debated, helmet, law |
|
|