Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   "I need a copy of that Minority Report this Summer." Yes sir, "No problem" (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/10394-i-need-copy-minority-report-summer-yes-sir-no-problem.html)

ARTelevision 06-06-2003 02:30 AM

"I need a copy of that Minority Report this Summer." Yes sir, "No problem"
 
Are you noticing how the future is getting here faster lately?
..............
New technology may predict crimes in advance
times of india

WASHINGTON: With the introduction of a new technology, which analyses crime data over a ten-year period, the police would now be able to predict the number and type of crimes that will occur in a given neighbourhood one month in advance, media reports claimed.

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, who have developed the software, claim that the technology can forecast the number and types of crimes that will occur within a ten-block area with a 20 per cent error rate.

"This is the next generation of crime mapping", Wipen Gorr, a Carnegie Mellon professor of public policy and management information systems said.

A small team of researchers is running final tests on the project, which is funded by the National Institute of Justice, the research wing of the Department of Justice.

The scientists plan to release the novel system later this summer.
..............

There are some effects of Moore's Law that are inevitable.
The main one is speeding up the rate at which the present becomes the future.

SecretMethod70 06-06-2003 02:50 AM

Pretty cool. I have no problem with this. It's one thing to predict what crimes will probably happen and where they will happen - it's a totally different thing to predict that someone will commit the crime and charge them with it before-hand. Let's hope that the error percentage either decreases or increases dramatically. Decreases because they get it to be more accurate, or increases because criminals become more aware they're watching and commit less crimes. (While the former is the more likely one, the latter would be nice)

Daval 06-06-2003 04:11 AM

Neat article, thanks art.

Cynthetiq 06-06-2003 05:02 AM

Interesting... a 20% margin of error is huge, and of course, people will say that the software is biased to minorities due to the fact most of the crimes happen in the poorer neighborhoods.

I wonder what the margin of error is for weather since they have been collecting that data as well, and IMHO weather is just as unpredictable as people.

ARTelevision 06-06-2003 05:39 AM

c'mon Cyn, you know it's just a matter of time (shorter and shorter) until this type of app will predict when we will have an anti-social thought...

I'd say human behavior is more predictable by the hour. This would be because our range of behaviors is rapidly being edited and programmed by culture. But you knew I'd say that
:)

Cynthetiq 06-06-2003 05:50 AM

True.... the weather isn't influenced and coaxed by big business.... I will it is affected by it obviously by the manufacturing by product and chemical runoff.

I agree with you but what makes the human machine the most exciting to study is that predictable as they can be, at some point there is someone that doesn't fit that prediction. I guess that's why we like non-fiction stories and myths.

sbscout 06-06-2003 06:33 AM

can you say neighborhood profiling?

I knew you could!

phredgreen 06-06-2003 06:39 AM

so what good will this do for society beyond bringing statisticians endless hours of glee? so woo, we know that 5 people will get raped, 20 people will get mugged, 14 people will ahve their llama stolen and one person is going to file a complaint because their neighbor plays their sitar too fucking loud... sure, we know we can deploy more cops in the area, but beyond saturating an area with uniforms, what good is this going to make? that's like taco bell taking a survey of how many tacos i've eaten over the last year and having them cooked and ready for the times they thik i'm gonna be coming in... i'm not always gonna be there when they have one piping hot and ready to go for me.

i think this is quite the novelty, but it really serves no practical purpose, but that is my own opinon, of course.

Peetster 06-06-2003 06:55 AM

Can't see how this would affect the really evil people. Petty crime, sure.

06-06-2003 07:15 AM

I think it will self-fulfill. Put more cops in a area, and they will find more, to justify being there.
Not saying the individual cop will become more agressive, but I imagine that there will be pressure from higher up the chain of command to produce the desired results.

Ticket quotas anyone? That kinda thing.

As Peetster alludes, the hard-core criminal will just go elsewhere.

gibber71 06-06-2003 07:31 AM

Thanks,..That's interesting.I have a friend who does something similar but rather than predicting crime,predicts the potential outcome to football and hockey games.He is pretty good at it too and when he gambles,he usually wins.

gov135 06-06-2003 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Big Julie
I think it will self-fulfill. Put more cops in a area, and they will find more, to justify being there.
Not saying the individual cop will become more agressive, but I imagine that there will be pressure from higher up the chain of command to produce the desired results.

This is a nice thought. I simply don't see it that way.

Phred is right, knowing crime will occur does nothing to stop it. Putting squad cars on the streets doesn't help anything other than response time.

They should take the information and use it in targeted stings; this may help. For example, if Highland is seeing a pattern of rampant gang activity, use undercover officers and paid informants to take out gangs. I don't, however, see this happening. Instead, people living in Highland are more likely to see increased traffic citations.

Everyone that works with data in any capacity knows a twenty percent error rate is through the roof. And that data is only good when it can be translated to meaningful information. I just don't see this data translating to a lower crime rate.

seretogis 06-06-2003 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sbscout
can you say neighborhood profiling?

I knew you could!

People who live in a city (such as Minneapolis) know where the "bad parts of town" are already and know to avoid them. I don't think this will do anything but reinforce that.

BBtB 06-06-2003 11:29 AM

The first thing I will say is what has been pointed out before. 20% margin of error? Hell I could probably just guess the crime of any given neighborhood and do better then that. I mean I could just look at their past crime and maybe any new crime stopping programs and give out a number. This is still a far cry from (usefull) minority report though. I do think at one point we will be aresting people for what they could have done.

THE MAC GOD 06-06-2003 11:43 AM

I think it's a great step forward and possibly a good deterrent...

Frowning Budah 06-06-2003 01:12 PM

Don't you think shifting the police to an area where the computer predicts crime will happen will just increase crime in other areas?

madsenj37 06-06-2003 08:00 PM

I do not really have a problem with this because it does not pick out individuals. I think its good for a police dept to have a good heads up. But I also agree that this can lead to other things such as ARTelevision suggested. Any new technology always has the possiblity of being used wrongly, so this having a potential to be used wrong is not a surprise to me.

guthmund 06-06-2003 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Frowning Budah
Don't you think shifting the police to an area where the computer predicts crime will happen will just increase crime in other areas?
My thoughts exactly. Crime is going to happen. You'd think by pushing on the balloon in the bad neighborhoods crime would compensate by stretching into other neighborhoods.

They could've saved millions of dollars on this project, just by going to the neighborhoods and asking the locals. We all no what streets we avoid and what neighborhoods you don't want to be in after sundown.

krwlz 06-07-2003 09:57 AM

Since I know 1984 was a popular book....Anyone else predicting the creation of the thought police? Or at least be charged with thoughtcrime?

Kinda scary, kinda cool...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360