04-24-2006, 11:28 PM | #41 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Sweden - Land of the sodomite damned
|
Quote:
__________________
If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. |
|
04-24-2006, 11:53 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Crazy
|
Somebody who supports the decision, please explain to me how this is not censorship. If you agree that it is censorship, please explain to me why it is okay to censor certain things (and/or people) and not others. Please explain this for me, please, because I simply cannot understand your position.
__________________
I'm swimming in the digital residue of a media-drenched world. It's too cold. |
04-25-2006, 12:00 AM | #43 (permalink) | |
Crazy
|
Quote:
That's one thing to say, and that might be how they're using it now... but this law, that allows convictions for cartoons and nothing but cartoons, is on the books, and any over-zealous DA with certain moral convictions can use it and interpret it however he/she sees fit. That scares me. This is a law that legalizes the censorship of things that ought be protected under free-speech. Censorship, no matter what is being censored, is wrong. There is no grey area. We cannot be anti-censorship and for prosecuting people who have and say things we don't agree with. Japan, a nation with state-controlled censorship, allows the things this man was sent to prison for owning. That's all we need to know, in my opinion. Our so-called sacred tradition of free-speech is fast becoming merely a legacy of the long-gone American dream.
__________________
I'm swimming in the digital residue of a media-drenched world. It's too cold. |
|
04-25-2006, 05:17 AM | #44 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
Take the good fight elsewhere, this is a dead end and only a concern for NAMBLA.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
04-25-2006, 07:20 AM | #45 (permalink) |
Comedian
Location: Use the search button
|
I don't mind my civil liberties being stepped on to prevent animals like this from finding a legal loophole.
Then again, I am not allowed to type out what I would do to this guy if given a room with no windows, a pair of pliers and a blowtorch. I do not (I say again, Do NOT) agree with the slippery-slope argument in this case. I think society is smart enough to make the distinction. In Jest: Then again, I am a Liberal, and would quickly deal away all of your rights and freedoms for one moment of safety and security.
__________________
3.141592654 Hey, if you are impressed with my memorizing pi to 10 digits, you should see the size of my penis. |
04-25-2006, 07:51 AM | #46 (permalink) | ||||
Crazy
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Furthermore, who in that society should be empowered to make these decisions? I mean, when the Muslim world got fired up about the Danish cartoons, most of them didn't even know what the cartoons looked like, because they were against their religion. If society demanded to see these pictures, to see if they are what in fact what Ustwo says they are (in which case, fair dues) would we be allowed to see them? Or would we be thrown in jail for asking? For merely suggesting that the people making these decisions may not know what's best, would we be labeled pedophiles and left to rot alone? Honestly, I'm a bit bothered about playing the devil's advocate on this one. I don't like the fact that Ustwo is trying to descredit my opinion and arguments by labelling me as a NAMBLA supporter, which I'm not. I'm not trying to say that our age of consent is wrong. I think 18 is just fine and dandy, and before this post, I wasn't aware that the US federal age was 16. I'm not trying to defend a convicted sex offender from prison... he's in jail where he belongs. I'm not trying to defend sexual perversion, when that is indeed what it is. All I hope to accomplish with the statements I've made here is to complicate this issue. This is a cultural issue as much as it is an issue of domestic law. Art and mass media are frequently the best arenas to play out matters of cultural difference, and strangeness, and as long as we are censoring things from other cultures that are considered "normal" or at the very least "acceptable" we are preventing ourselves from understanding our neighbors in the global village. Furthermore, I do also see this as a slippery slope, and I don't think that's as far-fetched as others have tried to make it out to be. Any time there is censorship, period, we have started down the "slippery slope." If it is a crime to make a media-object, because crimes were committed in its creation, then it should be handled accordingly... but it should never be a crime to engage a media-object, no matter what.
__________________
I'm swimming in the digital residue of a media-drenched world. It's too cold. |
||||
04-29-2006, 06:04 PM | #49 (permalink) | |
Darth Mojo
Location: Right behind you...
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
illegal, pedophilia |
|
|