Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Found On The Net (https://thetfp.com/tfp/found-net/)
-   -   Against The Death Penalty? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/found-net/142092-against-death-penalty.html)

Sun Tzu 10-31-2008 04:55 AM

Against The Death Penalty?
 

I guess it depends on what you consider life.

Baraka_Guru 10-31-2008 05:41 AM

It's propagandically delicious!

Sun Tzu 10-31-2008 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru (Post 2553359)
It's propagandically delicious!

Is it? If that is all it is I'll ask a moderator to take it down. What part of this is untrue?

Baraka_Guru 10-31-2008 08:02 AM

First, there will be no need to take it down, regardless. It's listed under "Found on the Net." It's fair game.

Second, I'm not going to parse it bit by bit, but its propagandic status was obvious to me.

A few examples:
  • They used what appeared to be full-term baby "actors" to stand in for these aborted babies (well, fetuses rather).
  • They used appeal to emotion, and rather cheaply, especially at the end.
  • Obama didn't vote "against," he voted "present," and he did so because he didn't want to criminalize doctors and women who use the procedure for acute cases where health is endangered. He was concerned with the wording of the bill, which used such words as "kill."
  • It assumes that Obama's voting is directly responsible for the ostensible abuses that health-care providers conduct against the fetuses.
  • A 13-week fetus is in the second trimester. It isn't until the third trimester where you get into issues of pain, suffering, and consciousness of the fetus. Moreover, a vast majority of abortions happen early in the first trimester.
  • It appeared to me that the purpose of the video was to paint Obama as a "baby-eater."

Sun Tzu 10-31-2008 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru (Post 2553453)
First, there will be no need to take it down, regardless. It's listed under "Found on the Net." It's fair game.

Second, I'm not going to parse it bit by bit, but its propagandic status was obvious to me.

A few examples:
  • They used what appeared to be full-term baby "actors" to stand in for these aborted babies (well, fetuses rather).
  • They used appeal to emotion, and rather cheaply, especially at the end.
  • Obama didn't vote "against," he voted "present," and he did so because he didn't want to criminalize doctors and women who use the procedure for acute cases where health is endangered. He was concerned with the wording of the bill, which used such words as "kill."
  • It assumes that Obama's voting is directly responsible for the ostensible abuses that health-care providers conduct against the fetuses.
  • A 13-week fetus is in the second trimester. It isn't until the third trimester where you get into issues of pain, suffering, and consciousness of the fetus. Moreover, a vast majority of abortions happen early in the first trimester.
  • It appeared to me that the purpose of the video was to paint Obama as a "baby-eater."


I guess to believe everything one sees on the internet isnt very smart.

So in your opinion its probably safer to assume the nurse presented on the video is lying. Especially the story she had about holding the infant (not fetus) in her arms as it died. That does play to emotion.

Baraka_Guru 10-31-2008 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sun Tzu (Post 2553472)
So in your opinion its probably safer to assume the nurse presented on the video is lying. Especially the story she had about holding the infant (not fetus) in her arms as it died. That does play to emotion.

I don't know. I would sooner say she is being misleading and perhaps is misinformed (regarding Obama). I don't know what 13-week fetuses are like to see directly, but my guess is that it wouldn't be a pleasant thing to view. They are rather shaped by that stage, but what's missing is consciousness, etc., as I mentioned, so she probably felt sympathetic to the fetuses for that reason. It would be a tough thing to see--living tissue shaped like a tiny baby.

telekinetic 10-31-2008 10:33 AM

Here is a picture of a 12 week old fetus--it looks like a vaguely human shaped jellyfish the size of a mouse.

http://www.donorth.net/winterwonderl...20Hand%201.jpg

**Warning: This is an actual photograph of a (non-bloody) fetus in someone's hand (for scale...it's smaller than their palm) and as such could be considered graphic depending on your beliefs.***

snowy 10-31-2008 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru (Post 2553478)
I don't know. I would sooner say she is being misleading and perhaps is misinformed (regarding Obama). I don't know what 13-week fetuses are like to see directly, but my guess is that it wouldn't be a pleasant thing to view. They are rather shaped by that stage, but what's missing is consciousness, etc., as I mentioned, so she probably felt sympathetic to the fetuses for that reason. It would be a tough thing to see--living tissue shaped like a tiny baby.

This is a fetus that is 13 weeks old:
http://www.pregnancy.org/images/preg...cs/13wk125.jpg

At 13 weeks, a fetus is approximately 2.91 inches long (7.4cm) and weighs around .81oz. The eyes and ears have yet to develop but continue to do so during the 13th week. The heartbeat is undetectable unless using specialized instruments. So while it looks a bit like a baby, it's still nothing like a full-term infant.

shakran 10-31-2008 10:57 AM

The propaganda is clearly bullshit, but it does bring to light an interesting question.

Why is it that neo cons are so violently against abortion, but pro death penalty?

I suppose it could be explained by noticing that the family values party has so many prominent officials cheating on their wives.

Hypocrisy. The great, unacknowledged, central plank in the neocon platform.

Sun Tzu 10-31-2008 12:03 PM

I didnt think far enough ahead before posting this. Occasionally whenever I came across something I found interesting I posted in this area (a couple of times they were moved here). It wasnt my intention to post it to be pro anything. Perhaps I could have labeled it "check out this propoganda" I asked them to take it down. It was a mistake, it needs to be aborted.

telekinetic 10-31-2008 12:15 PM

Do not mistake discussion of what you posted for criticism of you.

Crack 10-31-2008 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twistedmosaic (Post 2553571)
Do not mistake discussion of what you posted for criticism of you.

Oh man, if I ever did that, I could never post anything ever again!

Edit:
I heard Obama eats babies? If that were true, why does he also want them aborted? I love to eat steak, so it would be strange of me to want all the baby cows killed... then how would I get steak?

Someone explain in terms I can understand using words with only one vowel and more than 2 syllabales.

And... Go.

Sun Tzu 10-31-2008 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twistedmosaic (Post 2553571)
Do not mistake discussion of what you posted for criticism of you.

I dont, but the commentary just made me think a bit, and overall I agree that it could be seen as propoganda. If I can help it I want try and steer clear of approaching the creation of threads like that. I have a friend that bombards me with shit that I have to respond with why its a hoax. Its really annoying. Unless Im labeling it check out this propoganda. I should have researched more before posting something like this with a title like that. Im still researcing it now.

There are times I dont agree with people here, but Im not too big to be wrong and learn something.

Tully Mars 10-31-2008 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crack (Post 2553577)
Someone explain in terms I can understand using words with only one vowel and more than 2 syllabales.

And... Go.

Thanks. I needed that. It's ben a tough go lately and a good laugh cures all.

hawtdog 10-31-2008 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakran (Post 2553541)
Why is it that neo cons are so violently against abortion, but pro death penalty?

One reason many are pro-death penalty but anti-abortion is that they see a murderer being put to death for murder as a form of bringing justice. The murderer isn't killed to
'just' punish him but to punish him and to serve justice. On the other hand, aborting a baby has nothing to do with justice. They baby did nothing to deserve death whereas the murderer did.

There's nothing hypocritical about that, the two cases just aren't the same.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360