Quote:
Originally posted by Kadath
Jesus, you can be a jackass sometimes. The post you so viciously assaulted contained an extremely solid point: that the bill would cement, for the first time, the rights of the unborn. If you can't see how that could be used as a stepping stone to overturn RvW, then maybe you should think about it some more. Instead you chose to get your back up because you perceived insults and sarcasm. It's a rookie, for god's sake. Maybe you cut FaderMonkey some slack, don't scare him (or her) away, hey?
|
I am a jackass, which is fair, and I do apologize if it seems as if I was going after fadermonkey.
But seriously, don't give me some slippery slope bullshit. Its fucking ridiculous that I get harped on and labeled a bigot and get told that I'm an idiot and offbase because I disagree with homosexual marriage.
Like I said Roe v. Wade will never get overturned you guys have to many precedents in your favor as it is. Besides I can guaren-damn-tee that this bill will get heavily assualted if it even gets passed, and the sadistic 13th circuit will call it unconstitutional.
Anyone else think its funny that when a woman wants an abortion its her choice because the child isn't human, but if she wishes to afford her unborn an equal slice, which one would assume would also be her choice, she is a threat to "woman's rights"?