Quote:
Originally posted by FaderMonkey
No, this bill itself does not alter current abortion rights, but it will lead us down that road. As Rep. Nita Lowey points out, it would be the first time in federal law that a fetus would be recognized as having the same rights as the born. To me, that obviously sets the stage for future challenges to abortion rights. Yeah, we could wait until those challenges and complain then, but at that point what would be left to say? If we have one bill that gives the same right to a fetus as the born, then why should there be abortion?? I guess my point is that I don't believe that a fetus should have those rights...I don't look at a fetus as a human being. Of course that's just me, and that's coming from a non-religious person.
|
**Sarcasm containing totally inappropriate wording**
**Rude comment directed at other posters** You already have SOOOO many precedents in your favor. How can you be threatened by a bill that in no way shape or form attacks your beloved Roe v. Wade?
**Long rant in which the main purpose was to (I have to assume) prove a point through the use of hyperbole and sarcasm. Unfortuntely, it fell short of both and was thoroughly offensive regardless.**
Seriously weak Analog.