Quote:
Originally posted by synic213
I agree we need a new term to distinguish gay unions (and all unions for that matter), such as "official partner", that the government uses to distinguish between singles and couples for legal reasons. This seems simple enough and it forces the government to get over the issue and move on with their lives. But leave the definition of marriage alone.
|
I don't see why they need a different name for it...that could kind of be viewed as discrimination, labeling their unions differently.
And yeah, I don't see why Bush want's to all of a sudden change the legal definition of marriage. It's been defined by the government as a union between two people for a long time. Where does HIS definition come from. Kind of sad that the president doesn't have to explain his reasoning.