OK.
It's just that your arguments are based on your interpretation of events. They rely almost not at all on facts but on your biased view. Do you see how someone could simply interpret things more straightforwardly and see none of the things you are convinced of?
I don't see the dire issues you raise and I'm looking at the same world you are.
Differences of interpretation is what we have here. Nothing more.
__________________
create evolution
|