|
I don't buy it. The letter seems to imply that it is just the nra that is excluded. I guess i have a hard time believing that the scotus would decide that to prohibit just the nra from speaking. And since they refrain from even hinting at the court's rationale it seems like they're hiding something.
The letter is way to emotional and lacking in substance for me to take it seriously. Not that i really expect them to portray any side but their own.
|