Quote:
Originally posted by Superbelt
You have shown that NSF keeps their funding levels, but not that there will be the proper type of funding for climate change. I don't have anything to back it up other than Bush's predilection to cutting similar programs in every other department. But I think that can strongly lead me towards that direction. The wording he uses could study climate change like El Nino or North Atlantic Oscillation rather than global climate change. And again. What NSF does is a drop in the bucket compared to the programs we lose this year.
|
"Proper type of funding for climate change"? What would you consider proper? What other programs will you cut to make up the difference (let's keep defense spending off the table, for now please)?