Its not just me. In comparing this democratic primary to Clinton vs. Bush senior it makes sense. You have the well known non-charismatic established politician, he is from the northeast. Going against him you have the lesser known charasmatic southerner. I realize the primaries are a different thing. But going into the actual Presidental election I'm sure many democratic strategists are concerned about the fact that Kerry is an old school old money northeasterner going against a would be "charsimatic southerner" in Dubya. Who do you honestly would have an easier time carrying the southern vote Sparhawk, Kerry or Bush? Granted as pointed out, you don't need the south to win the election, but as a trend no elected president in the last 50 odd years has won the office without the southern vote.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|