Um, the reporter said he wouldn't run the story EVEN if they had
PHOTOGRAPHS. He never said he would deny the story with proof.
Photographs are no longer proof. They can be easily manipulated in an almost undetectable way (unless your career is digital photography and manipulation) And just getting photos doesn't mean a thing because photos do not prove that when you were with the woman or doing whatever, that it was at a story-worthy time.
To just run with any old pictures that someone SAYS is from an extramarital affair, fully knowing that Kerry was a playboy as he was between marriages, is irresponsible. No reputable paper would do so. Which surprises me, since it is from the ultra conservative rag of Sun Myung Moon. I guess a reporter with ethics slipped through the cracks.
You saying this...
Quote:
|
And finally, the issue isn't if Kerry had an affair or not. The issue is the Washington Post reporter saying they wouldn't run the story EVEN if they had proof of the affair.
|
Is twisting the words of someone else that shows you truly are a student of the Limbaugh Institute of Conservative Studies.
Quote:
a reference to those words:
Even if someone came to us with photographs we still wouldn’t run it.
|